23.10.2014 Views

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

Drainage Design Manual, Hydrology - Flood Control District of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> for Maricopa County<br />

<strong>Hydrology</strong>: Multiple Frequency Modeling<br />

6<br />

6 MULTIPLE FREQUENCY<br />

MODELING<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

6 MULTIPLE FREQUENCY MODELING<br />

6.1 BACKGROUND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1<br />

6.2 APPROACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1<br />

6.3 IMPLEMENTATION IN HEC-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2<br />

6.1 BACKGROUND<br />

Originally, the <strong>Hydrology</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> was intended to be used for the development <strong>of</strong> flood discharges<br />

and run<strong>of</strong>f volumes resulting from infrequent storms, such as the 100-year rainfall. Data<br />

that were collected and used in the selection and development <strong>of</strong> the methods, techniques and<br />

parameters are representative <strong>of</strong> infrequent storms. While it was recognized that the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> the methods, techniques and procedures may not be appropriate for more frequent storms,<br />

this limitation was not perceived as a significant issue at that time.<br />

Recently, there has been an increasing need for run<strong>of</strong>f magnitudes from more frequent storms,<br />

particularly in regard to the design <strong>of</strong> storm drains, but also for regulatory and planning purposes.<br />

However, use <strong>of</strong> the methods, techniques and parameters presented in the preceding chapters<br />

may result in the overestimation <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f magnitudes for those types <strong>of</strong> events. The threshold at<br />

which this occurs <strong>of</strong>ten is the 10-year recurrence interval. Several different alternative<br />

approaches were considered that could be used in place <strong>of</strong> or to supplement the methods, techniques<br />

and parameters presented in the preceding chapters. Each alternative method was evaluated<br />

in regard to the three benchmarks (accuracy, practicality and reproducibility) that were<br />

used to evaluate the original methods, techniques and parameters. The alternative approach to<br />

be used in Maricopa County for the estimation <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f for more frequent storms is a ratio that is<br />

applied to the 100-year run<strong>of</strong>f hydrographs.<br />

6.2 APPROACH<br />

Ratios for the 2-, 5- and 10-year recurrence intervals are based on analysis <strong>of</strong> USGS gage data<br />

for watersheds throughout the State <strong>of</strong> Arizona. That data reflects the wide range <strong>of</strong> hydrologic<br />

and physiographic characteristics that exist in Arizona. This variability was considered in the<br />

analysis in regard to the conditions that are specific to Maricopa County.<br />

August 15, 2013 6-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!