23.10.2014 Views

A Raisin in the Sun

A Raisin in the Sun

A Raisin in the Sun

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mama: (open<strong>in</strong>g her eyes and look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to Walter's) No. Travis, you stay right here. And you make him understand<br />

what you do<strong>in</strong>g, Walter Lee. You teach him good. Like Willy Harris taught you. You show where our five generations<br />

done come to. (Walter looks from her to <strong>the</strong> boy, who gr<strong>in</strong>s at him <strong>in</strong>nocently) Go ahead, son –(she folds her hands and closes<br />

her eyes) Go ahead (Hansberry, 1988: 147).<br />

Far from just be<strong>in</strong>g subjected to patriarchy, Lena actually becomes an agent and a force liberat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

her family from racial oppression. However, Lena also becomes an oppressor herself, for she exerts her<br />

power fiercely upon Beneatha:<br />

Mama: Now –You say after me, <strong>in</strong> my mo<strong>the</strong>r's house <strong>the</strong>re is still God. (There is a long pause and Beneatha stares at <strong>the</strong><br />

floor wordlessly. Mama repeats <strong>the</strong> phrase with precision and cool emotion) In my mo<strong>the</strong>r's house <strong>the</strong>re is still God.<br />

Beneatha: In my mo<strong>the</strong>r's house <strong>the</strong>re is still God.<br />

(A long pause.)<br />

Mama: (Walk<strong>in</strong>g away from Beneatha, too disturbed for triumphant posture. Stopp<strong>in</strong>g and turn<strong>in</strong>g back to her daughter)<br />

There are some ideas we a<strong>in</strong>'t go<strong>in</strong>g to have <strong>in</strong> this house. Not long as I am <strong>the</strong> head of this family (Hansberry, 1988: 51).<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce Lena even resorts to physical violence to keep her power over her children (she slaps Beneatha<br />

and beats up Walter), she could be thought of as a hegemonic and also strongest power figure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

family, but this is not <strong>the</strong> case, for Lena <strong>in</strong>deed feels <strong>in</strong> a lower position than that of her children: “They<br />

frightens me, Ruth. My children. [. . .] And <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r [Beneatha] done commence to talk about th<strong>in</strong>gs I<br />

can't seem to understand <strong>in</strong> no form or fashion” (Hansberry, 1988: 52). Her fears and <strong>in</strong>security, far from<br />

plac<strong>in</strong>g her a strong leader <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> family, highlight her vulnerability and lack of strength. From this<br />

perspective, Lena's powerful position and unquestionable authority become destabilized, which suggests<br />

that <strong>the</strong> traditional notion of power as dom<strong>in</strong>ation of someone else is nei<strong>the</strong>r constant nor monolithic.<br />

TRANSFORMATIVE POWER: A REDEFINITION OF POWER<br />

Traditional def<strong>in</strong>itions of power based on notions of b<strong>in</strong>ary opposites fail to fully assess <strong>the</strong><br />

dynamism and complexity of power because <strong>the</strong>y reduce power relations to oversimplified constructs. An<br />

analysis of such relations among <strong>the</strong> women of Hansberry's A <strong>Rais<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sun</strong> exemplifies <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>accuracy<br />

of traditionally understood power hierarchies, for it discloses easily overlooked power shifts and overlaps,<br />

and reveals <strong>the</strong> simultaneous presence and absence of power <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> female characters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir power<br />

relations. In this light, a new def<strong>in</strong>ition of power becomes necessary, which echoes <strong>the</strong> claims of some<br />

fem<strong>in</strong>ist groups who state that current def<strong>in</strong>itions of power are to be revised. For example, Sarah Lucia<br />

Hoagland def<strong>in</strong>es power as “<strong>the</strong> power of ability, of choice and engagement. It is creative; and hence it is<br />

an affect<strong>in</strong>g and transform<strong>in</strong>g power but not a controll<strong>in</strong>g power” (1988:118). This k<strong>in</strong>d of power is<br />

Saravia Vargas, José Roberto. "From Power-over to Power-to: Power Relations of Women <strong>in</strong> Hansberry's A <strong>Rais<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sun</strong>"<br />

Impossibilia Nº4, Págs. 34-51 (Octubre 2012) Artículo: Recibido 08/02/2012 - Aceptado 20/03/2012 - Publicado 30/10/2012<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!