23.10.2014 Views

A Raisin in the Sun

A Raisin in the Sun

A Raisin in the Sun

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RUTH YOUNGER: THE POWERLESS HOUSEWIFE?<br />

MacK<strong>in</strong>non has called female power “a contradiction <strong>in</strong> terms, socially speak<strong>in</strong>g” (1987: 53). If<br />

her assertion is true, no woman has power of any form. However, her idea comes <strong>in</strong>to question when one<br />

analyzes <strong>the</strong> power relations of Ruth with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r women <strong>in</strong> A <strong>Rais<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sun</strong>. At a first glance, Ruth<br />

appears to be <strong>the</strong> woman with <strong>the</strong> least power –or <strong>the</strong> woman who utterly lacks power <strong>in</strong> any form– if<br />

compared to Beneatha and Lena. While Beneatha is a liberated woman and Lena is <strong>the</strong> head of <strong>the</strong><br />

Younger family, Ruth has totally assimilated <strong>the</strong> discourse of patriarchy. For Ruth, a woman's happ<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

comes from marry<strong>in</strong>g a rich man. This is evident when Beneatha's hesitation about a possible marriage<br />

with George Murchison surprises her: “You mean you wouldn't marry George Murchison if <strong>the</strong> asked you<br />

someday? That pretty, rich th<strong>in</strong>g? Honey, I knew you was odd–” (Hansberry, 1988: 49). Ruth's level of<br />

literacy is basic, which can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed as a product of patriarchal discourse on her: she does not th<strong>in</strong>k it<br />

necessary for a woman to pursue educational goals if all she needs to do is f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a man who will take care<br />

of her. Ruth appears, thus, a totally helpless victim of patriarchal oppression, especially tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account<br />

Patricia Hill's idea of “<strong>in</strong>terlock<strong>in</strong>g systems of oppression”. She expla<strong>in</strong>s this idea as follows:<br />

The notion of <strong>in</strong>terlock<strong>in</strong>g oppressions refers to <strong>the</strong> macro-level connections l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g systems of oppression such as<br />

race, class, and gender. This is <strong>the</strong> model describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> social structures that create social positions. [...] Second, <strong>the</strong><br />

notion of <strong>in</strong>tersectionality describes micro-level processes –namely, how each <strong>in</strong>dividual and group occupies a social<br />

position with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlock<strong>in</strong>g structures of oppression described by <strong>the</strong> metaphor of <strong>in</strong>tersectionality. Toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y shape<br />

oppression (Hill, 2002: 82).<br />

Due to <strong>the</strong> apparently unprivileged position Ruth has as a result of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>terlock<strong>in</strong>g systems of<br />

oppression and <strong>the</strong>ir strong <strong>in</strong>fluence on her, Ruth even lacks <strong>the</strong> vision to realize her victimization. In this<br />

light, one could expect Ruth to feel <strong>in</strong>ferior to Beneatha or to admire her because of <strong>the</strong> latter's high<br />

literacy level. Also, one could expect Ruth to accept Beneatha's authority over her s<strong>in</strong>ce Beneatha is <strong>in</strong><br />

college and is more knowledgeable. Similarly, Ruth might be expected to follow Lena's every word<br />

without question<strong>in</strong>g it, due to Lena's experience <strong>in</strong> life. However, this does not happen because Ruth<br />

actually feels entitled to criticize Beneatha, sees her as <strong>in</strong>ferior, and is even powerful enough to confront<br />

Lena directly.<br />

Although Ruth may be expected to somehow acknowledge Beneatha's power over her, <strong>in</strong> reality she<br />

feels superior to her sister <strong>in</strong> law. Ruth demonstrates her power over Beneatha by us<strong>in</strong>g language as a<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ation tool: Ruth freely criticizes Beneatha and uses belittl<strong>in</strong>g words when referr<strong>in</strong>g to her sister <strong>in</strong><br />

law. Ruth criticizes Beneatha <strong>in</strong> front of Lena: “You ask me, this child a<strong>in</strong>'t sweet on nobody but herself –<br />

Saravia Vargas, José Roberto. "From Power-over to Power-to: Power Relations of Women <strong>in</strong> Hansberry's A <strong>Rais<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sun</strong>"<br />

Impossibilia Nº4, Págs. 34-51 (Octubre 2012) Artículo: Recibido 08/02/2012 - Aceptado 20/03/2012 - Publicado 30/10/2012<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!