jp3_12r
jp3_12r
jp3_12r
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Executive Summary<br />
integrate CO into plans (concept plans and operation<br />
plans [OPLANs]); and work closely with the joint force,<br />
USSTRATCOM/USCYBERCOM, Service components,<br />
and DOD agencies to create fully integrated capabilities.<br />
Legal Considerations<br />
The legal framework applicable to CO depends on the<br />
nature of the activities to be conducted, such as offensive<br />
or defensive military operations; defense support of civil<br />
authorities; service provider actions; law enforcement<br />
and counterintelligence activities; intelligence operations;<br />
and defense of the homeland. Before conducting CO,<br />
commanders, planners, and operators must understand<br />
the relevant legal framework in order to comply with<br />
laws and policies, the application of which may be<br />
challenging given the ubiquitous nature of cyberspace<br />
and the often geographic orientation of domestic and<br />
international law.<br />
Planning and Coordination<br />
Joint Operation Planning<br />
Process and CO<br />
CO Planning Considerations<br />
Command and Control of CO<br />
Commanders integrate cyberspace capabilities at all<br />
levels and in all military operations. Plans should<br />
address how to effectively integrate cyberspace<br />
capabilities, counter an adversary’s use of cyberspace,<br />
secure mission critical networks, operate in a degraded<br />
environment, efficiently use limited cyberspace assets,<br />
and consolidate operational requirements for cyberspace<br />
capabilities.<br />
CO planners are presented the same considerations and<br />
challenges that are present in planning for other joint<br />
capabilities and functions, as well as some unique<br />
considerations. Targeting, deconfliction, commander’s<br />
intent, political/military assessment, and collateral effects<br />
considerations all play into the calculations of the CO<br />
planner’s efforts. CO planning considerations include:<br />
cyberspace-related intelligence requirements, targeting,<br />
and DODIN operations.<br />
Clearly established command relationships are crucial for<br />
ensuring timely and effective employment of forces. As<br />
authorized by CDRUSSTRATCOM, Commander,<br />
United States Cyber Command (CDRUSCYBERCOM)<br />
manages day-to-day global CO. Typically, CO require<br />
coordination between theater and global operations,<br />
creating a dynamic C2 environment. CO are integrated<br />
and synchronized by the supported commander into their<br />
x JP 3-12