Children - Terre des Hommes

Children - Terre des Hommes Children - Terre des Hommes

23.10.2014 Views

182 attention on child labour issues, there are serious difficulties on the ground to trace the routes or to trace the linkages between mines that use child labour and the companies that buy the products. Similar case of state and industry irresponsibility were seen even where a precious stone like diamond is concerned. Children are working in Madhya Pradesh to find diamonds for local contractors. The Obulapuram mines and the child labour in Bellary is another clear example. The local contractors who hire child labour do not even make a pretension of hiding the facts. In Bellary they stated that they are immune from laws and regulations, which they flout openly because ‘it is taken care of ” by the Obulapuram Mines. This reflects the arrogant defiance to law as lawkeepers up to the highest levels of power can be easily purchased as stated by them. In most of the EIA documents we reviewed, social impacts and rehabilitation promises of mining companies vaguely refer to indirect benefits to local communities and children as it is assumed that the local economy grows, thereby leading to local market forces entering with private educational institutions, hospitals, employment opportunities and consumerism. In reality what we saw was that these are not opportunities accessed by affected dalit and adivasi children but more so by children of the middle class and white-collar employees of the companies. More often, the fact is that the local children end up as child labour in the tea stalls, mechanic shops, hotels and other economic ‘opportunities’ and ‘benefits’ generated by mining companies. Also, in every case study where large-scale mining projects were set up, the people stated that they were promised jobs and employment before the mining activities started, but later, hardly any persons from affected communities ever got jobs. Most of the case studies were also done in mine sites of public sector companies who are meant to be more socially responsible. It is over 30 years since the NALCO bauxite project was begun. In these 30 years the data from the case study reveals that there has been little upward mobility for the children of the affected families, either educationally or economically. This is the fate of those affected by a public sector project where social responsibility is intended to be the principal agenda. There does not appear to be a single mining project that has fulfilled the rehabilitation promises in a manner that has improved the life of the affected communities or that could set a precedent for a best practice that the government can set as a pre-condition to private mining companies. More so, there has been no assessment or stock taking of the status of rehabilitation especially with regard to the status of children. With India’s thrust for the future being privatisation of mining projects, for sustainable mining to be implemented with seriousness, best practices have to be more forthcoming from the public sector and the looming gaps that exist in the law and regulatory mechanisms have to be plugged. Yet, the new projects proposed in Kasipur and Lanjigarh by private and global mining companies like Vedanta/Sterlite, whose human rights records in earlier projects across the world, do not set a precedent for socially responsible mining, justify the suspicion and strong opposition from communities and the civil society. The corporate induced conflicts and state of terror in these regions, particularly in Orissa, Chattisgarh and Jharkhand were visible all through the study where data collection was interrupted several times due to strikes, bandhs, non cooperation of local communities due to fear of police and industry repercussions, and the inability to travel without fear of violence. It is of greater concern that the adivasi children are being thrown out of the Scheduled Areas (as seen from the migration in Damanjodi, Panna and other tribal areas after mining activities began) and these areas are being thrown open to multinationals, against the laws of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution and the verdict given in the Samatha Judgement. Hence, the adivasi children of today stand to lose their Scheduled Area ownership and protection as their lands are allowed to slip into the hands of the private mining industries. This is the most brutal state injustice to adivasi children. These case studies are not stories but the real life facts of not scattered or obscure numbers- these are a few million mining children in India. And we are no closer to our MDGs that we have set for our country to fulfil the needs of our children, than when we started. This is because our development policies work inversely to our goals, and as the state overviews presented along with the case studies demonstrates, growth indicators for the marginalised children are shockingly low, in each of the mining affected districts. This inverse-ness of the development trajectory contributed significantly by mining, is only making the situation worse for children in the mining regions and for the government to meet its targets. Therefore, a lot depends on the political will, public accountability and bureaucratic transparency. A lot also depends on a nation’s conscience. We hope that the case

studies here can help evoke a glimmer of this conscience. We also hope that the case studies can help us explore legally binding mechanisms for addressing the issues concerning children and help review the current policies that directly or indirectly affect them, and what institutional mechanisms can be lobbied for, in order to protect the children. Recommendations Children live in families and communities. It therefore becomes difficult to isolate the impacts of any particular issue on children without also dwelling on impacts on the environment in which they live and the family and communities to which they belong. And yet it is also critical to identify the specific impacts on children themselves also to gain an understanding of what specific measures may be required to address their particular needs. The recommendations arising out of the report are therefore addressed to all the concerned departments and ministries. Over-arching recommendations on children impacted by mining in a number of ways, and these impacts must be considered and addressed at all stages of the mining cycle. they do ‘belong’ to any one ministry or department. While the Ministry of Mines is the prime mover of mining projects and responsible for violation of their rights, it is not directly responsible for children whose concerns in the present governance structure are the responsibility of several other departments in the State and Ministries in the Centre like Education, Women and Child Welfare/ Development, Labour, Tribal and Social Welfare, Health and Police etc. It is essential that all ministries and departments to address their concerns and ensure convergence at the legal and policy level as well of services to ensure justice to the mining child. years, working in the most hazardous mining activities in India, and there should be official acknowledgement of this problem. The governments and society can no 183 longer live in denial regarding the existence of children in labour in mines. amend them wherever needed to address the specific needs of mining children. o o guiding principle shall be that a ‘miner shall leave the mining area in better ecological shape than he found it’. In the context of the child, the definition of ecology should include all human-ecology aspects. Further, the government should not, in the guise of an “enabler”, abdicate its fundamental responsibilities to children in mining areas. Especially in the case of Scheduled Areas, the state must take the principal responsibility for all aspects of mining projects and should not transfer this responsibility to private players. The problems of children in mining areas cannot be treated in isolation and has to be placed in the Policy, Programme and Project contexts. In mining situations many laws and policies come into force regarding land acquisition, rehabilitation, environment, pollution, forests, mining processes etc. Some already exist and others are being considered. They seldom reflect children’s concerns and needs. It is essential to mainstream child rights concerns into policies, amendments to the existing laws on mining and those that are being proposed by the respective ministries, whether with regard to the Rehabilitation Bill, the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (MMDR) Bill, the Social Security Bill, the Land Acquisition Bill, to name a few. In the context of child labour, the Mines Act,1952 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act, 2000 (Amendment 2006). However, both the Child mining. 306 Given the extreme hazardous nature of the activity, the Mines Act, 1952 and the Mines 306 The CLPRA does not prohibit the employment of children in all mines upto the age of 14 years and allows for children to work in mines beyond the age of 14 years. The Mines Act 1952 and the Mines (Amendment) Act, 1983, lay down that no person below eighteen years of age shall be allowed to work in any mine or part there of (Section 40) or in any operation connected with or incidental to any mining operation being carried on (Section 45), it simultaneously allows for children of sixteen years to be apprentices and trainees.

studies here can help evoke a glimmer of this conscience. We<br />

also hope that the case studies can help us explore legally<br />

binding mechanisms for addressing the issues concerning<br />

children and help review the current policies that directly or<br />

indirectly affect them, and what institutional mechanisms<br />

can be lobbied for, in order to protect the children.<br />

Recommendations<br />

<strong>Children</strong> live in families and communities. It therefore<br />

becomes difficult to isolate the impacts of any particular<br />

issue on children without also dwelling on impacts on<br />

the environment in which they live and the family and<br />

communities to which they belong. And yet it is also critical<br />

to identify the specific impacts on children themselves<br />

also to gain an understanding of what specific measures<br />

may be required to address their particular needs. The<br />

recommendations arising out of the report are therefore<br />

addressed to all the concerned departments and ministries.<br />

Over-arching recommendations on<br />

children<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

impacted by mining in a number of ways, and these<br />

impacts must be considered and addressed at all stages<br />

of the mining cycle.<br />

<br />

they do ‘belong’ to any one ministry or department.<br />

While the Ministry of Mines is the prime mover of<br />

mining projects and responsible for violation of their<br />

rights, it is not directly responsible for children whose<br />

concerns in the present governance structure are the<br />

responsibility of several other departments in the State<br />

and Ministries in the Centre like Education, Women<br />

and Child Welfare/ Development, Labour, Tribal and<br />

Social Welfare, Health and Police etc. It is essential that<br />

all ministries and departments to address their concerns<br />

and ensure convergence at the legal and policy level as<br />

well of services to ensure justice to the mining child.<br />

<br />

years, working in the most hazardous mining activities<br />

in India, and there should be official acknowledgement<br />

of this problem. The governments and society can no<br />

<br />

183<br />

longer live in denial regarding the existence of children<br />

in labour in mines.<br />

<br />

amend them wherever needed to address the specific<br />

needs of mining children.<br />

<br />

o<br />

o<br />

<br />

guiding principle shall be that a ‘miner shall leave<br />

the mining area in better ecological shape than he<br />

found it’. In the context of the child, the definition of<br />

ecology should include all human-ecology aspects.<br />

Further, the government should not, in the guise of<br />

an “enabler”, abdicate its fundamental responsibilities<br />

to children in mining areas. Especially in the case of<br />

Scheduled Areas, the state must take the principal<br />

responsibility for all aspects of mining projects and<br />

should not transfer this responsibility to private<br />

players. The problems of children in mining areas<br />

cannot be treated in isolation and has to be placed<br />

in the Policy, Programme and Project contexts.<br />

In mining situations many laws and policies come<br />

into force regarding land acquisition, rehabilitation,<br />

environment, pollution, forests, mining processes<br />

etc. Some already exist and others are being<br />

considered. They seldom reflect children’s concerns<br />

and needs. It is essential to mainstream child rights<br />

concerns into policies, amendments to the existing<br />

laws on mining and those that are being proposed<br />

by the respective ministries, whether with regard<br />

to the Rehabilitation Bill, the Mines and Minerals<br />

(Development and Regulation) (MMDR) Bill, the<br />

Social Security Bill, the Land Acquisition Bill, to<br />

name a few.<br />

In the context of child labour, the Mines Act,1952<br />

<br />

<br />

UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and<br />

the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act, 2000<br />

(Amendment 2006). However, both the Child<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

mining. 306 Given the extreme hazardous nature of<br />

the activity, the Mines Act, 1952 and the Mines<br />

<br />

<br />

306 The CLPRA does not prohibit the employment of children in all mines upto the age of 14 years and allows for children to work in mines beyond the age of<br />

14 years. The Mines Act 1952 and the Mines (Amendment) Act, 1983, lay down that no person below eighteen years of age shall be allowed to work in any<br />

mine or part there of (Section 40) or in any operation connected with or incidental to any mining operation being carried on (Section 45), it simultaneously<br />

allows for children of sixteen years to be apprentices and trainees.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!