23.10.2014 Views

English - UNOPS

English - UNOPS

English - UNOPS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E/2004/35<br />

pledges. She appreciated donor support for the Fund’s work in promoting a rightsbased<br />

and culturally sensitive approach to programming. She assured delegations<br />

that the MYFF would not introduce conditionalities. She highlighted the Fund’s<br />

partnerships with WHO, the World Bank and UNAIDS, among others. She updated<br />

the Executive Board on the regional reviews under way on the occasion of the tenth<br />

anniversary of ICPD. Regarding LDCs, she stated that priority to LDCs was<br />

mainstreamed in the work of UNFPA and in its resource allocation system. She<br />

noted that 67 per cent of the Fund’s resources went to “category A” countries, which<br />

included all the LDCs. She appreciated the offer regarding South-South cooperation.<br />

She underscored the centrality of reproductive health commodity security to<br />

UNFPA-supported programming.<br />

113. Concerning the comment on the term “reproductive health services”, the<br />

Executive Director stated that the Fund’s mandate and reproductive health<br />

terminology were derived from the ICPD Programme of Action. She cited paragraph<br />

8.25 of the Programme of Action which, inter alia, states that “in no case should<br />

abortion be promoted as a method of family planning”. Regarding the “A, B, C”<br />

approach to HIV/AIDS prevention, she confirmed that in keeping with the<br />

international consensus UNFPA promoted all three components.<br />

114. The Chief of the Strategic Planning Office appreciated the comments made by<br />

delegations and thanked them for the guidance they had provided throughout the<br />

MYFF development process. She agreed that there was a need to improve data at all<br />

levels, as well as to strengthen monitoring and evaluation and to have adequate<br />

baselines for qualitative and quantitative indicators to measure progress in attaining<br />

results. She assured the Executive Board that UNFPA would continue to invest in<br />

capacity-building and results-based management. She stated that the MYFF was<br />

strong on gender issues and noted that the Fund maintained close coordination with<br />

UNIFEM. She took note of the request to report in more detail on the Fund’s<br />

partnership strategy. She underscored that the Fund believed in strong families,<br />

including attention to gender equity, healthy adolescent development, and women’s<br />

and girls’ empowerment.<br />

115. The Executive Board adopted decision 2004/7 on the UNFPA multi-year<br />

funding framework, 2004-2007.<br />

116. Following the Executive Board’s adoption of the decision on the MYFF, the<br />

delegation of the United States of America noted its concerns about certain aspects<br />

of the ICPD Programme of Action and ICPD+5. While joining the consensus on the<br />

decision, the delegation stated that its concerns remained relevant to the decision.<br />

XII.<br />

Other matters<br />

Review of the WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA Coordinating Committee on Health<br />

117. The Chief of the Reproductive Health Branch, UNFPA, introduced the report<br />

entitled Review of the WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA Coordinating Committee on Health<br />

(DP/FPA/2004/CRP.1).<br />

118. The Executive Board endorsed the recommendation contained in the report to<br />

discontinue the WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA Coordinating Committee on Health. The<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!