Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

23.10.2014 Views

DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN National treatment registry update 2000 As part of the current research exercise, the National Treatment Registry was updated. Durong>inong>g this exercise the field workers visited 18 selected major urban centres ong>inong> the country and identified 73 centres that were providong>inong>g drug treatment and rehabilitation services on a regular basis. Out of the 73 centres, 38 facilities had been enlisted ong>inong> the 1994/95 survey of drug treatment services, whereas 35 centres and facilities enlisted ong>inong> the current exercise are either newly established facilities or that had not been enlisted ong>inong> the previous exercise. Twenty-eight of these 73 facilities (38%) are government funded and admong>inong>istered hospitals, 25 (34%) are NGO run facilities and 20 (27%) are private (for profit) run drug treatment centres. Forty-three (59%) of the 70 three facilities provide both ong>inong> and outpatient services, whereas 27 (37%) provide only ong>inong>patient services and three (4%) provide only outpatient services. The mean capacity, i.e., number of clients treated at any given time, for ong>inong>patient clients ong>inong> the centres is around 37 whereas for outpatients it is 59. The range for clients treated as ong>inong>patient was 1-1,000 (one facility only) and for outpatient 1-450 (one facility only) clients. All services reported providong>inong>g detoxification services. It should be noted that even withong>inong> this narrow category of response considerable differences may exist ong>inong> terms of therapeutic practices. Nong>inong>ety per cent (66) of agencies reported providong>inong>g counsellong>inong>g, and over half of all agencies (50/68%) also offered religious counsellong>inong>g. Forty-one (56%) reported that they had an outreach service. This kong>inong>d of provision is regarded as an important component of an overall treatment approach as it can provide a conduit to more formal treatment or deliver services to drug ong>abuseong>s who are unable or unwillong>inong>g to access other treatment options. Just over half (59 of the 73-80%) ong>inong>cluded a relapse prevention element ong>inong> their after care facilities. A range of other treatment options were mentioned by 26 (35%) of facilities. The mean number of admissions (at each centre) for drug treatment, ong>inong> the 12 months prior to ong>inong>terview, was 264. This ranged from between 7 and 3,000 clients beong>inong>g admitted durong>inong>g the relevant period and ong>inong>dicates that some services had considerably higher client contacts than others. The total number of admissions ong>inong> the 73 centres was calculated as 17,425 ong>inong> the 12 months prior to ong>inong>terview. This can be regarded as a proxy yearly total for client admissions. It should be noted that this figure excludes alcohol users, and ong>inong>cludes repeat attendees. It should also be noted that this data does not allow one to comment on the level of double-countong>inong>g between treatment facilities. If repeat attendees (those with more than one episode of treatment at the agency ong>inong> the last 12 months) are excluded, the total estimate falls to 11,454 with the mean of 176 different patients per agency admitted ong>inong> the previous 12 months. Young people and women were less commonly seen ong>inong> treatment. Only 30% of clients less were reported as beong>inong>g under 25 years of age and only 3% of clients were women. How far this reflects a disproportionate higher proportion of male drug use and how far it reflects reluctance or difficulties women have ong>inong> accessong>inong>g services is unclear. However, the social stigma on drug use among women ong>inong> ong>Pakistanong> is considerable. It would therefore appear highly likely that women with drug problems would be reluctant to enter mixed-sex services. Assessong>inong>g the prevalence and nature of drug problems among women ong>inong> ong>Pakistanong>, and developong>inong>g culturally appropriate treatment responses, remaong>inong>s an important challenge. As treatment services have ongoong>inong>g contact with drug ong>abuseong>rs, they can be considered a useful source of ong>inong>formation on trends over time. Around 40% of treatment centre staff ong>inong>terviewed thought that the proportion of well-off clients comong>inong>g for treatment has lowered over the last five or six years although 20% considered that this proportion had ong>inong>creased. Some staff (26%) were also of the opong>inong>ion that “sniffong>inong>g drugs” (the use of ong>inong>halants) had ong>inong>creased especially among adolescents, that the use of other opiates and cough syrups had ong>inong>creased due to a declong>inong>e ong>inong> quality of illicit heroong>inong> (25% of the respondents) and that ong>inong>jectong>inong>g drug use was ong>inong>creasong>inong>g among treatment attendees. 46

DRUG TREATMENT IN PAKISTAN No major changes are evident from earlier studies on the pattern of service provision ong>inong> respect to Government and non-government facilities. NGO’s appeared to be provong>inong>g the broadest range of care and where Government treatment centres were providong>inong>g services this tended to be only on a detoxification basis. Some diversification and improvement is suggested ong>inong> respect to the range of services offered by some private and NGO managed facilities. They have developed programmes that provide a range of treatment and rehabilitation services, and have made ong>inong>novations ong>inong> their ong>inong>terventions to meet the changong>inong>g requirements of their clients. A few organizations have experimented with concepts of therapeutic communities as well as of community based rehabilitation of clients. This area is not addressed ong>inong> detail by this current study but the results do suggest the need for a more ong>inong>-depth assessment of the kong>inong>ds of treatment provision available for those with drug problems ong>inong> ong>Pakistanong>, the development of good practice standards, and the identification of traong>inong>ong>inong>g and other developmental needs. All but one of the treatment facilities ong>inong>dicated that they kept records of age, gender, education, occupation, primary drug, ong>inong>jection status, marital status and treatment history of their clients for monitorong>inong>g purposes. However, most of these records are not summarized ong>inong> a form that would allow easy analysis and storage facilities often mean that data retrieval would be problematic. Currently some periodic reviews do take place withong>inong> agencies but periodically, no actual analysis of trends over time is attempted. Nonetheless, the fact that agencies collect this ong>inong>formation means that developong>inong>g a treatment reportong>inong>g system is a realistic aspiration. As the ong>inong>formation currently collected is poorly utilized at present, such a system could supply the treatment services themselves with a useful review of their own clients. This data could also provide a valuable national ong>inong>dicator of patterns and trends ong>inong> illicit drug ong>abuseong> ong>inong> ong>Pakistanong>. Table 22. Comparison of drug treatment services available ong>inong> 1994/1995 and 2000 1994/1995 2000 Total provision identified Number of treatment centres identified was 203 ong>inong> 89 cities and towns Centres providong>inong>g: Outpatient services only = 35 (17%) Inpatient services only = 61 (30%) Inpatient and outpatient services = 97 (48%) Organization: Government hospitals = 67 (33%)* Private (for profit), = 93 (46%) NGO = 43 (21%) Almost all provide detoxification services, nearly all claimed to be providong>inong>g counsellong>inong>g Over 66% reported to be providong>inong>g relapse prevention therapy services Total provision identified Number of treatment centres identified was 73 from 18 major urban centres of the country. Thirty-eight of these facilities were also listed ong>inong> the 1994/1995 survey whereas 35 facilities were newly established or not identified ong>inong> the previous exercise. Centres providong>inong>g: Outpatient services only = 3 (4%) Inpatient services only = 43 (59%) Inpatient and outpatient services = 27 (37%) Organization: Government hospitals = 28 (38%), Private (for profit), = 20 (27%) NGO = 25 (34%) All provide detoxification and over 90% counsellong>inong>g services Relapse prevention and aftercare services provided by over 80% of services *Government hospitals ong>inong>cludong>inong>g teachong>inong>g hospital, district headquarter hospitals or Tehsil headquarter hospitals. 47

DRUG TREATMENT IN PAKISTAN<br />

No major changes are evident from earlier studies<br />

<strong>on</strong> the pattern of service provisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> respect to<br />

Government <strong>and</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-government facilities. NGO’s<br />

appeared to be prov<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the broadest range of care<br />

<strong>and</strong> where Government treatment centres were provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

services this tended to be <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> a detoxificati<strong>on</strong><br />

basis.<br />

Some diversificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> improvement is suggested<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> respect to the range of services offered by some<br />

private <strong>and</strong> NGO managed facilities. They have<br />

developed programmes that provide a range of treatment<br />

<strong>and</strong> rehabilitati<strong>on</strong> services, <strong>and</strong> have made<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>novati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> their <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terventi<strong>on</strong>s to meet the chang<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

requirements of their clients. A few organizati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

have experimented with c<strong>on</strong>cepts of therapeutic<br />

communities as well as of community based rehabilitati<strong>on</strong><br />

of clients. This area is not addressed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

detail by this current study but the results do suggest<br />

the need for a more <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-depth assessment of the<br />

k<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ds of treatment provisi<strong>on</strong> available for those with<br />

drug problems <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pakistan</str<strong>on</strong>g>, the development of good<br />

practice st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> the identificati<strong>on</strong> of tra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> other developmental needs.<br />

All but <strong>on</strong>e of the treatment facilities <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicated that<br />

they kept records of age, gender, educati<strong>on</strong>, occupati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

primary drug, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jecti<strong>on</strong> status, marital status<br />

<strong>and</strong> treatment history of their clients for m<strong>on</strong>itor<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

purposes. However, most of these records are not<br />

summarized <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a form that would allow easy analysis<br />

<strong>and</strong> storage facilities often mean that data<br />

retrieval would be problematic. Currently some periodic<br />

reviews do take place with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> agencies but periodically,<br />

no actual analysis of trends over time is<br />

attempted. N<strong>on</strong>etheless, the fact that agencies collect<br />

this <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong> means that develop<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a treatment<br />

report<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g system is a realistic aspirati<strong>on</strong>. As<br />

the <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong> currently collected is poorly utilized<br />

at present, such a system could supply the treatment<br />

services themselves with a useful review of<br />

their own clients. This data could also provide a<br />

valuable nati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicator of patterns <strong>and</strong> trends <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

illicit drug <str<strong>on</strong>g>abuse</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pakistan</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Table 22. Comparis<strong>on</strong> of drug treatment services available <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1994/1995 <strong>and</strong> 2000<br />

1994/1995 2000<br />

Total provisi<strong>on</strong> identified<br />

Number of treatment centres identified was 203 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

89 cities <strong>and</strong> towns<br />

Centres provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g:<br />

Outpatient services <strong>on</strong>ly = 35 (17%)<br />

Inpatient services <strong>on</strong>ly = 61 (30%)<br />

Inpatient <strong>and</strong> outpatient services = 97 (48%)<br />

Organizati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

Government hospitals = 67 (33%)*<br />

Private (for profit), = 93 (46%)<br />

NGO = 43 (21%)<br />

Almost all provide detoxificati<strong>on</strong> services, nearly all<br />

claimed to be provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g counsell<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

Over 66% reported to be provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g relapse preventi<strong>on</strong><br />

therapy services<br />

Total provisi<strong>on</strong> identified<br />

Number of treatment centres identified was 73 from<br />

18 major urban centres of the country. Thirty-eight<br />

of these facilities were also listed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 1994/1995<br />

survey whereas 35 facilities were newly established<br />

or not identified <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the previous exercise.<br />

Centres provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g:<br />

Outpatient services <strong>on</strong>ly = 3 (4%)<br />

Inpatient services <strong>on</strong>ly = 43 (59%)<br />

Inpatient <strong>and</strong> outpatient services = 27 (37%)<br />

Organizati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

Government hospitals = 28 (38%),<br />

Private (for profit), = 20 (27%)<br />

NGO = 25 (34%)<br />

All provide detoxificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> over 90% counsell<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

services<br />

Relapse preventi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> aftercare services provided<br />

by over 80% of services<br />

*Government hospitals <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g teach<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g hospital, district headquarter hospitals or Tehsil headquarter hospitals.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!