Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN National treatment registry update 2000 As part of the current research exercise, the National Treatment Registry was updated. Dur
DRUG TREATMENT IN PAKISTAN No major changes are evident from earlier studies on the pattern of service provision
- Page 11 and 12: Executive summary The Pakis
- Page 13 and 14: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY About half of tho
- Page 15: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY on these groups c
- Page 18 and 19: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN data are to
- Page 20 and 21: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN at the time
- Page 22 and 23: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Act also all
- Page 25: 2 Rationale, methods and sampl<stro
- Page 28 and 29: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN (19 urban an
- Page 30 and 31: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Table 3. Res
- Page 32 and 33: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN associated w
- Page 34 and 35: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Table 7. Per
- Page 36 and 37: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Perceptions
- Page 38 and 39: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN decl
- Page 40 and 41: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN in</
- Page 42 and 43: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Table 14. Me
- Page 44 and 45: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN This suggest
- Page 46 and 47: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Respondents
- Page 49 and 50: 5 Drug in<
- Page 51 and 52: DRUG INJECTING in
- Page 53 and 54: DRUG INJECTING Lahore profile In La
- Page 55: DRUG INJECTING unemployed, compared
- Page 58 and 59: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN In P
- Page 60 and 61: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN procedures f
- Page 65 and 66: 8 National drug contour mapp<strong
- Page 67 and 68: NATIONAL DRUG CONTOUR MAPPING Table
- Page 69 and 70: NATIONAL DRUG CONTOUR MAPPING Figur
- Page 71 and 72: NATIONAL DRUG CONTOUR MAPPING Table
- Page 73 and 74: NATIONAL DRUG CONTOUR MAPPING Table
- Page 75 and 76: 9 Drug abu
- Page 77 and 78: IMPLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESS
- Page 79: IMPLICATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESS
- Page 82 and 83: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN different as
- Page 84 and 85: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN offences for
- Page 86 and 87: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN This approac
- Page 88 and 89: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Table A.II.1
- Page 90 and 91: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Table A.II.4
- Page 92 and 93: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Table A.II.6
- Page 94 and 95: DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN Table A.II.8
- Page 97 and 98: Annex III. Tables supplemental to p
- Page 99 and 100: ANNEX III. TABLES SUPPLEMENTAL TO P
- Page 101 and 102: ANNEX III. TABLES SUPPLEMENTAL TO P
DRUG TREATMENT IN PAKISTAN<br />
No major changes are evident from earlier studies<br />
<strong>on</strong> the pattern of service provisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> respect to<br />
Government <strong>and</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-government facilities. NGO’s<br />
appeared to be prov<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the broadest range of care<br />
<strong>and</strong> where Government treatment centres were provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
services this tended to be <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> a detoxificati<strong>on</strong><br />
basis.<br />
Some diversificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> improvement is suggested<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> respect to the range of services offered by some<br />
private <strong>and</strong> NGO managed facilities. They have<br />
developed programmes that provide a range of treatment<br />
<strong>and</strong> rehabilitati<strong>on</strong> services, <strong>and</strong> have made<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>novati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> their <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terventi<strong>on</strong>s to meet the chang<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
requirements of their clients. A few organizati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
have experimented with c<strong>on</strong>cepts of therapeutic<br />
communities as well as of community based rehabilitati<strong>on</strong><br />
of clients. This area is not addressed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
detail by this current study but the results do suggest<br />
the need for a more <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-depth assessment of the<br />
k<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ds of treatment provisi<strong>on</strong> available for those with<br />
drug problems <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pakistan</str<strong>on</strong>g>, the development of good<br />
practice st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> the identificati<strong>on</strong> of tra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
<strong>and</strong> other developmental needs.<br />
All but <strong>on</strong>e of the treatment facilities <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicated that<br />
they kept records of age, gender, educati<strong>on</strong>, occupati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
primary drug, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jecti<strong>on</strong> status, marital status<br />
<strong>and</strong> treatment history of their clients for m<strong>on</strong>itor<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
purposes. However, most of these records are not<br />
summarized <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a form that would allow easy analysis<br />
<strong>and</strong> storage facilities often mean that data<br />
retrieval would be problematic. Currently some periodic<br />
reviews do take place with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> agencies but periodically,<br />
no actual analysis of trends over time is<br />
attempted. N<strong>on</strong>etheless, the fact that agencies collect<br />
this <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong> means that develop<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a treatment<br />
report<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g system is a realistic aspirati<strong>on</strong>. As<br />
the <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong> currently collected is poorly utilized<br />
at present, such a system could supply the treatment<br />
services themselves with a useful review of<br />
their own clients. This data could also provide a<br />
valuable nati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicator of patterns <strong>and</strong> trends <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
illicit drug <str<strong>on</strong>g>abuse</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pakistan</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />
Table 22. Comparis<strong>on</strong> of drug treatment services available <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1994/1995 <strong>and</strong> 2000<br />
1994/1995 2000<br />
Total provisi<strong>on</strong> identified<br />
Number of treatment centres identified was 203 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
89 cities <strong>and</strong> towns<br />
Centres provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g:<br />
Outpatient services <strong>on</strong>ly = 35 (17%)<br />
Inpatient services <strong>on</strong>ly = 61 (30%)<br />
Inpatient <strong>and</strong> outpatient services = 97 (48%)<br />
Organizati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
Government hospitals = 67 (33%)*<br />
Private (for profit), = 93 (46%)<br />
NGO = 43 (21%)<br />
Almost all provide detoxificati<strong>on</strong> services, nearly all<br />
claimed to be provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g counsell<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
Over 66% reported to be provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g relapse preventi<strong>on</strong><br />
therapy services<br />
Total provisi<strong>on</strong> identified<br />
Number of treatment centres identified was 73 from<br />
18 major urban centres of the country. Thirty-eight<br />
of these facilities were also listed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the 1994/1995<br />
survey whereas 35 facilities were newly established<br />
or not identified <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the previous exercise.<br />
Centres provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g:<br />
Outpatient services <strong>on</strong>ly = 3 (4%)<br />
Inpatient services <strong>on</strong>ly = 43 (59%)<br />
Inpatient <strong>and</strong> outpatient services = 27 (37%)<br />
Organizati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
Government hospitals = 28 (38%),<br />
Private (for profit), = 20 (27%)<br />
NGO = 25 (34%)<br />
All provide detoxificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> over 90% counsell<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
services<br />
Relapse preventi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> aftercare services provided<br />
by over 80% of services<br />
*Government hospitals <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g teach<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g hospital, district headquarter hospitals or Tehsil headquarter hospitals.<br />
47