Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN<br />
reported occasi<strong>on</strong>al clean<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>and</strong> nearly half regularly<br />
clean<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g their <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ject<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g equipment before use.<br />
Methods used for clean<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cluded the use of<br />
spirit (25%), bleach (3%), boil<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g water (22%), <strong>and</strong><br />
cold water (49%). The actual efficacy of the procedures<br />
used is not known <strong>and</strong> is very probably<br />
questi<strong>on</strong>able. The use of cold water <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> particular is<br />
not likely to be effective.<br />
Most <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors (68%) reported that they usually used<br />
drugs with other <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors. In the 12 m<strong>on</strong>ths prior to<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terview (or, where appropriate, enter<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g pris<strong>on</strong> or<br />
treatment) over half (53%) of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors reported shar<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
a needle/syr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ge after some<strong>on</strong>e else had used it.<br />
This figure rose to 69% for those <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the street sample.<br />
For many, us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g others’ equipment was not an<br />
isolated <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cident. Nearly a quarter reported (23%)<br />
that they had d<strong>on</strong>e so 20 times or more, <strong>and</strong> this<br />
figure was aga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> higher (40%) for <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
street sample. Admitt<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g shar<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g equipment after<br />
somebody else has used it is often difficult for drug<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors. A subsequent questi<strong>on</strong> therefore asked<br />
about the risk behaviour of other <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors by ask<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />
how often they had passed <strong>on</strong> a needle or<br />
syr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ge they had used to another <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jector.<br />
Worry<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gly, <strong>on</strong> this questi<strong>on</strong> shar<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g rates were<br />
higher yet. Under a third of the sample reported<br />
never pass<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> a needle or syr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ge (28%), <strong>and</strong><br />
slightly under half (42%) report<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g do<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g so 20 times<br />
or more (the highest category <strong>on</strong> the scale used).<br />
These data can be found <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> table 19.<br />
Karachi profile<br />
Patterns of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jecti<strong>on</strong> risk behaviour differed between<br />
the cities studied. In Karachi almost two thirds of<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jected drugs <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the company of others,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 80% did not use new needles every time they<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jected. Although 60% said they “very often” cleaned<br />
their needles before use, a significant m<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ority of<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors (22%) had never cleaned equipment <strong>and</strong><br />
17% had <strong>on</strong>ly occasi<strong>on</strong>ally cleaned their needles<br />
before <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ject<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. More than half (58%) of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Karachi cleaned their needles with cold or<br />
warm water whereas 26% cleaned them by boil<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g.<br />
With regard to needle <strong>and</strong> syr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ge shar<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g it is<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terest<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to note that 45% said they never used<br />
others’ needles while almost 31% said they had<br />
used needles used by others for more than 20 times<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the past 12 m<strong>on</strong>ths. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, more than<br />
half (57%) said that others had used their needles<br />
or syr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ges more than 20 times <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly 22% said<br />
that other <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors had never used their needles.<br />
Table 19.<br />
Shar<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of needles <strong>and</strong> syr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ges <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the last year (percentage)<br />
Us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g equipment after Treatment Street Pris<strong>on</strong><br />
another <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jector sample sample sample All <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectors<br />
Never 54 31 53 47<br />
Once or twice 20 9 4 11<br />
3-5 times 3 7 10 7<br />
6-10 times 2 7 15 8<br />
11-20 times 3 6 4 4<br />
20 times + 18 40 14 23<br />
Pass<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> equipment<br />
to another <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jector<br />
Never 41 27 17 28<br />
Once or twice 22 7 4 11<br />
3-5 times 2 6 12 7<br />
6-10 times 7 2 15 8<br />
11-20 times 2 5 5 4<br />
20 times + 26 53 47 42<br />
Note: Percentages based <strong>on</strong> those report<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g “ever <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ject<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g”—lifetime prevalence measure.<br />
36