Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Drug abuse in Pakistan - United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

23.10.2014 Views

DRUG ABUSE IN PAKISTAN This suggests that whilst considerable difficulties may exist ong>inong> respect to the provision of care for this group, should appropriate services be available many would seek to access them. ong>Drugong> ong>abuseong> history All respondents were asked about their history of usong>inong>g different types of illicit drugs and alcohol. These data can be found ong>inong> table 16. Agaong>inong> the differences observed between the three samples were not great and drug consumption repertoires appeared remarkably constant across the three groups. In terms of lifetime prevalence, heroong>inong> was the drug most commonly used by respondents, followed by hashish/charas, alcohol, opium, tranquillizers and synthetic opiates. The use of cough syrups (for the purposes of ong>inong>toxication) ong>inong>halants, and morphong>inong>e, was relatively low (9%, 5% and 3% respectively) and no significant use of barbiturate or amphetamong>inong>e use was detected. Current drug use When recent drug use was considered the consumption patterns closely reflected patterns of lifetime use. The reader should note that this ong>inong>formation applies to the month before enterong>inong>g prison or treatment for the samples contacted ong>inong> those settong>inong>gs. Agaong>inong> heroong>inong> was most commonly used, with virtually all respondents reportong>inong>g usong>inong>g the drug ong>inong> the last 30 days (96%). This was followed by hashish/charas and then alcohol. Other significant current drug use ong>inong>cluded opium and tranquillizers, which were currently beong>inong>g used by a quarter of all respondents. The data on use of drugs reveal a picture, which is fairly commonly found ong>inong>ternationally, of multiple drug consumption amongst hard-core drug ong>abuseong>rs. Whilst the maong>inong> focus of this study was on the use of heroong>inong>, and this was the prong>inong>cipal sample ong>inong>clusion criterion, it can be observed that many heroong>inong> ong>abuseong>rs are also regularly consumong>inong>g a range of other psychoactive substances. This fact can complicate the development of effective ong>inong>terventions from both the supply and demand reduction perspective. Although many respondents were consumong>inong>g multiple drugs, the patterns of frequency of consumption varied for specific substances. A simple measure of specific drug consumption among ong>inong>dividuals who had used the drug ong>inong> the last month is the mean number of days on which they were consumong>inong>g ong>inong> the 30 days prior to ong>inong>terview (note: the terms “last month/30 days” refer to the month before enterong>inong>g prison or treatment for the sample groups contacted ong>inong> those settong>inong>gs). Dependent drug use is typically characterized by daily or near daily consumption patterns. Table 16. History of drug use (all respondents) Used ong>inong> past Ever used 12 months Mean number of days ong>Drugong> (percentage) Age first used (percentage) used ong>inong> last 30 days Hashish/charas 86 18 77 19 Heroong>inong> 97 22 96 27 Opium 38 23 25 18 Synthetic opiates 14 27 11 20 Morphong>inong>e 3 26 2 23 Cough syrups 9 22 3 14 Barbiturates 1 26 1 11 Tranquillizers 30 24 25 15 Amphetamong>inong>es 1 24 >1 17 Alcohol 52 19 32 8.5 Inhalants 5 23 3 20 28

INTERVIEWS WITH DRUG ABUSERS Figure V. Usual route of heroong>inong> admong>inong>istration Inject drug on a daily basis. It appears that overall the users of these drugs are comprised of both a group of ong>inong>tensive users and a significant, but slightly smaller proportion, of occasional users. Smoke Sniff The mean number of days on which heroong>inong> was consumed (27) ong>inong>dicates that heroong>inong> use was beong>inong>g more ong>inong>tensively used by respondents than the other psychoactive substances listed. Most (77%) of those who were usong>inong>g heroong>inong> reported usong>inong>g the drug on a daily basis ong>inong> the month prior to ong>inong>terview. This figure was highest for the street users where 86% reported daily use as compared to 75% of treatment attendees and 69% of the prison sample. Just over 6% of subjects where usong>inong>g heroong>inong> on a once per week basis or less. Overall these data suggest that a highly dependent, chronic heroong>inong> abusong>inong>g population has been accessed by this study. Far fewer ong>inong>dividuals were usong>inong>g synthetic opiates but of these just over half (57%) were doong>inong>g so on an ong>inong>tensive basis (four times a week or more). Intensive users of synthetic opiates were more common amongst the sample of street addicts. Although morphong>inong>e was only consumed by a very small number of subjects, two-thirds of these were usong>inong>g the Daily use of hashish was also common with 41% of those usong>inong>g this drug reportong>inong>g daily use ong>inong> the month prior to ong>inong>terview, a further 34% were usong>inong>g more occasionally and reported 10 days of use or less ong>inong> this period. Of those consumong>inong>g opium most (32%) were usong>inong>g the drug regularly on five days a week or more. The consumption of alcohol was more varied but nearly all respondents (76%) who drank were drong>inong>kong>inong>g on two or three days a week or less with only 10% five or more days a week. In addition to ong>inong>tensity of use, the route of admong>inong>istration (the way the drug is taken by the consumer) can be an important factor ong>inong> ong>inong>fluencong>inong>g the amount of morbidity and mortality that results from a given level of prevalence. Data on the usual route of admong>inong>istration for drugs data is presented ong>inong> table 17. It should be noted that these data reflect the most common rather than an exclusive practice. For many drug types, ong>inong>cludong>inong>g heroong>inong>, drug ong>inong>jection is the route of admong>inong>istration typically thought of as resultong>inong>g ong>inong> the greatest levels of morbidity and mortality. In particular, this method of use is associated with the transition of HIV and other blood borne diseases and has also been associated with the elevated risk of opioid overdose. The ong>inong>jection of drugs is therefore considered agaong>inong> ong>inong> detail later ong>inong> this section. Table 17. Route of admong>inong>istration (selected drugs only—percentage of whole sample) ong>Drugong> Swallow Snort/sniff Smoke Inject Hashish/charas 4 96 Heroong>inong>

INTERVIEWS WITH DRUG ABUSERS<br />

Figure V.<br />

Usual route of hero<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

adm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>istrati<strong>on</strong><br />

Inject<br />

drug <strong>on</strong> a daily basis. It appears that overall the<br />

users of these drugs are comprised of both a group<br />

of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tensive users <strong>and</strong> a significant, but slightly<br />

smaller proporti<strong>on</strong>, of occasi<strong>on</strong>al users.<br />

Smoke<br />

Sniff<br />

The mean number of days <strong>on</strong> which hero<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> was c<strong>on</strong>sumed<br />

(27) <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicates that hero<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> use was be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g more<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tensively used by resp<strong>on</strong>dents than the other psychoactive<br />

substances listed. Most (77%) of those<br />

who were us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g hero<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> reported us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the drug <strong>on</strong><br />

a daily basis <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the m<strong>on</strong>th prior to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terview. This<br />

figure was highest for the street users where 86%<br />

reported daily use as compared to 75% of treatment<br />

attendees <strong>and</strong> 69% of the pris<strong>on</strong> sample. Just over<br />

6% of subjects where us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g hero<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> a <strong>on</strong>ce per<br />

week basis or less. Overall these data suggest that<br />

a highly dependent, chr<strong>on</strong>ic hero<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> abus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g populati<strong>on</strong><br />

has been accessed by this study.<br />

Far fewer <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals were us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g synthetic opiates<br />

but of these just over half (57%) were do<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g so <strong>on</strong><br />

an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tensive basis (four times a week or more).<br />

Intensive users of synthetic opiates were more comm<strong>on</strong><br />

am<strong>on</strong>gst the sample of street addicts. Although<br />

morph<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e was <strong>on</strong>ly c<strong>on</strong>sumed by a very small number<br />

of subjects, two-thirds of these were us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the<br />

Daily use of hashish was also comm<strong>on</strong> with 41% of<br />

those us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g this drug report<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g daily use <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

m<strong>on</strong>th prior to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terview, a further 34% were us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

more occasi<strong>on</strong>ally <strong>and</strong> reported 10 days of use or<br />

less <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> this period. Of those c<strong>on</strong>sum<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g opium most<br />

(32%) were us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the drug regularly <strong>on</strong> five days a<br />

week or more. The c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> of alcohol was more<br />

varied but nearly all resp<strong>on</strong>dents (76%) who drank<br />

were dr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>k<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> two or three days a week or less<br />

with <strong>on</strong>ly 10% five or more days a week.<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tensity of use, the route of adm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>istrati<strong>on</strong><br />

(the way the drug is taken by the c<strong>on</strong>sumer)<br />

can be an important factor <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>fluenc<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the amount<br />

of morbidity <strong>and</strong> mortality that results from a given<br />

level of prevalence. Data <strong>on</strong> the usual route of<br />

adm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>istrati<strong>on</strong> for drugs data is presented <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

table 17. It should be noted that these data reflect<br />

the most comm<strong>on</strong> rather than an exclusive practice.<br />

For many drug types, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g hero<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>, drug <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jecti<strong>on</strong><br />

is the route of adm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>istrati<strong>on</strong> typically thought<br />

of as result<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the greatest levels of morbidity <strong>and</strong><br />

mortality. In particular, this method of use is associated<br />

with the transiti<strong>on</strong> of HIV <strong>and</strong> other blood<br />

borne diseases <strong>and</strong> has also been associated with<br />

the elevated risk of opioid overdose. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jecti<strong>on</strong><br />

of drugs is therefore c<strong>on</strong>sidered aga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> detail later<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> this secti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Table 17.<br />

Route of adm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>istrati<strong>on</strong> (selected drugs <strong>on</strong>ly—percentage of whole sample)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Drug</str<strong>on</strong>g> Swallow Snort/sniff Smoke Inject<br />

Hashish/charas 4 96<br />

Hero<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!