THESE de DOCTORAT - cerfacs
THESE de DOCTORAT - cerfacs
THESE de DOCTORAT - cerfacs
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
162 Chapter B: Publications<br />
The temporal <strong>de</strong>rivative of the <strong>de</strong>nsity in Eq. 10 is combined with Eq. 14. After some algebra, the<br />
divergence of the velocity can therefore be expressed as:<br />
∂u j<br />
= 1 ˙q (15)<br />
∂x j c p K 0<br />
This velocity field is supposed to be composed only by hydrodynamics, due to the fact that in the low<br />
Mach number mo<strong>de</strong>l the acoustic wave length is infinitely long. One can state that the divergence of the<br />
fluctuating velocity is<br />
B. Finding the Acoustic Pressure<br />
Injecting Eq. 16 into Eq. 9 leads to<br />
− ∂ ( 1 ∂p ′ )<br />
ac<br />
= ∂ ( ∂u<br />
′ )<br />
i,LES<br />
− ˙q′<br />
∂x i ρ 0 ∂x i ∂t ∂x i c p K 0<br />
or in the frequency domain<br />
Finally, multiplying everywhere by γP 0<br />
∂u ′ j,hyd<br />
∂x j<br />
= 1<br />
c p K 0<br />
˙q ′ (16)<br />
(17)<br />
( )<br />
∂ 1 ∂ ˆp ac<br />
= iω ∂û i,LES<br />
− iω ˆ˙q<br />
(18)<br />
∂x i ρ 0 ∂x i ∂x i c p K 0<br />
(<br />
∂<br />
c 2 ∂ ˆp )<br />
ac<br />
∂x i ∂x i<br />
= iωγP 0<br />
∂û i,LES<br />
∂x i<br />
} {{ }<br />
T 1<br />
− iω γP 0ˆ˙q<br />
c p K 0<br />
} {{ }<br />
T 2<br />
It has been found by the author that the contribution of T 2 can be neglected. As a consequence, one can<br />
state that for a reactive flow the divergence of the hydrodynamic velocity field ( ∂u hyd<br />
∂x i<br />
) can be consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />
zero as typically done for non-reactive flows. Equation 19 simplifies<br />
F(ˆp ac ) =<br />
∂ (<br />
c 2 ∂ ˆp )<br />
ac<br />
∂û i,LES<br />
= iωγP 0 (20)<br />
∂x i ∂x i ∂x i<br />
(19)<br />
VI.<br />
LES Vs Hybrid Results<br />
Figures 7 and 8 shows the Sound Pressure Level (SPL) given by the solution of Eq. 20 (LES ‘Filtered’)<br />
and the hybrid computation for microphones 5, 6 and 7.<br />
SPL (dB) − micro 5<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
Hybrid Computation<br />
Direct Computation: LES (Filtered)<br />
SPL (dB) − micro 6<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
Hybrid Computation<br />
Direct Computation: LES (Filtered)<br />
60<br />
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />
Frequency (Hz)<br />
60<br />
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />
Frequency (Hz)<br />
Figure 7.<br />
Sound Pressure Levels from the direct and hybrid approaches<br />
After extracting the acoustic field from the complete pressure fluctuation field, it is seen that results match<br />
pretty well with the values predicted by the hybrid method, especially for microphones 6 and 7. There is a<br />
high contain of hydrodynamic fluctuations at low frequencies (before 400 Hz) that has been removed. Also<br />
7 of 9<br />
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics