Continuous Wavelet Transform on the Hyperboloid - Université de ...

Continuous Wavelet Transform on the Hyperboloid - Université de ... Continuous Wavelet Transform on the Hyperboloid - Université de ...

22.10.2014 Views

Then f ∗ s ∈ L 2 (SO 0 (1, 2), dg) ,wheredg stands for the Haar measure on the group and ‖f ∗ s‖ 2 ≤‖f‖ 2 ‖s‖ 1 , (52) by the Young convolution inequality. In this paper however, we will deal with a simpler definition where the convolution is a function defined on H 2 + .Let[·] :H2 + −→ SO 0(1, 2) be a section in the fiber bundle defined by the group and its homogeneous space. In the following we will make use of the Euler section, whose construction is now presented. Recall from Section 3 that any g ∈ SO 0 (1, 2) can be uniquely decomposed as a product of three elements g = k(ϕ)h(χ)k(ψ). Using this parametrization, we thus define : [·]:H 2 + −→ SO 0(1, 2) [·]:x(χ, ϕ) ↦→ g = k(ϕ)h(χ) =[x] . The hyperbolic convolution, restricted to H 2 +, thus takes the following form: ∫ (f ∗ s)(y) = H 2 + f([y] −1 x)s(x)dµ(x), y∈ H 2 + . We will mostly deal with convolution kernels that are axisymmetric (or rotation invariant) functions on H+ 2 (i.e. functions of the variable χ alone). The Fourier-Helgason transform of such an element has a simpler form as shown by the following proposition. Proposition 2 If f is a rotation invariant function, i.e. f(ϱ −1 x)=f(x), ∀ρ ∈ SO(2), its Fourier-Helgason transform ˆf(ξ,ν) is a function of ν alone, i.e. ˆf(ν). Proof : Applying the Fourier-Helgason transform on a rotation-invariant function we write: ∫ ˆf(ξ,ν)= ∫ = ∫ = H 2 + H 2 + H 2 + f(x) E ξ,ν (x)dµ(x) (53) f(ϱ −1 x)(ξ · x) − 1 2 −iν dµ(x), ξ ∈ PC + ,ρ∈ SO(2) (54) f(x ′ )(ξ · ϱx ′ ) − 1 2 −iν dµ(x ′ ) (55) = ˆf(ϱ −1 ξ,ν), (56) and so ˆf(ξ,ν) does not depend on ξ. 16

We now have all the basic ingredients for formulating a useful convolution theorem in the Fourier-Helgason domain. As we will now see the FH transform of a convolution takes a simple form, provided one of the kernels is rotation invariant. Theorem 3 (Convolution) Let f and s be two measurable functions, with f,s ∈ L 2 (H+) 2 and let s be rotation invariant. The convolution (s ∗ f)(y) is in L 1 (H+ 2 ) and its Fourier-Helgason transform satisfies ̂ (s ∗ f)(ν, ξ) = ˆf(ν, ξ)ŝ(ν). (57) Proof : The convolution of s and f is given by: ∫ (s ∗ f)(y) = s([y] −1 x)f(x)dµ(x). H 2 + Since s is SO(2)-invariant, we write its argument in this equation in the following way : ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ cosh χ − sinh χ 0 x 0 x 0 cosh χ − x 1 sinh χ ⎜ − sinh χ cosh χ 0 ⎟ ⎜ x 1 = ⎟ ⎜ −x 0 sinh χ + x 1 cosh χ , (58) ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ 0 0 1 0 0 where x =(x 0 ,x 1 ,x 2 ) and we have used polar coordinates for y = y(χ, ϕ). On the other hand we can alternatively write this equation in the form : ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ x 0 cosh χ − x 1 sinh χ x 0 −x 1 0 cosh χ ⎜ −x 0 sinh χ + x 1 cosh χ = ⎟ ⎜ −x 1 x 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ sinh χ . (59) ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ 0 0 0 1 0 Thus we have s([y] −1 x)=s([x] −1 y). (60) Therefore, the convolution with a rotation invariant function is given by ∫ (s ∗ f)(y)= ∫ = H 2 + H 2 + f(x)s([y] −1 x)dµ(x) (61) f(x)s([x] −1 y)dµ(x). (62) 17

Then f ∗ s ∈ L 2 (SO 0 (1, 2), dg) ,wheredg stands for <strong>the</strong> Haar measure <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

group and<br />

‖f ∗ s‖ 2 ≤‖f‖ 2 ‖s‖ 1 , (52)<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Young c<strong>on</strong>voluti<strong>on</strong> inequality.<br />

In this paper however, we will <strong>de</strong>al with a simpler <strong>de</strong>finiti<strong>on</strong> where <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>voluti<strong>on</strong><br />

is a functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>de</strong>fined <strong>on</strong> H 2 + .Let[·] :H2 + −→ SO 0(1, 2) be a secti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />

fiber bundle <strong>de</strong>fined by <strong>the</strong> group and its homogeneous space. In <strong>the</strong> following<br />

we will make use of <strong>the</strong> Euler secti<strong>on</strong>, whose c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> is now presented.<br />

Recall from Secti<strong>on</strong> 3 that any g ∈ SO 0 (1, 2) can be uniquely <strong>de</strong>composed as<br />

a product of three elements g = k(ϕ)h(χ)k(ψ). Using this parametrizati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

we thus <strong>de</strong>fine :<br />

[·]:H 2 + −→ SO 0(1, 2)<br />

[·]:x(χ, ϕ) ↦→ g = k(ϕ)h(χ) =[x] .<br />

The hyperbolic c<strong>on</strong>voluti<strong>on</strong>, restricted to H 2 +, thus takes <strong>the</strong> following form:<br />

∫<br />

(f ∗ s)(y) =<br />

H 2 +<br />

f([y] −1 x)s(x)dµ(x), y∈ H 2 + .<br />

We will mostly <strong>de</strong>al with c<strong>on</strong>voluti<strong>on</strong> kernels that are axisymmetric (or rotati<strong>on</strong><br />

invariant) functi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> H+ 2 (i.e. functi<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> variable χ al<strong>on</strong>e). The<br />

Fourier-Helgas<strong>on</strong> transform of such an element has a simpler form as shown<br />

by <strong>the</strong> following propositi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Propositi<strong>on</strong> 2 If f is a rotati<strong>on</strong> invariant functi<strong>on</strong>, i.e. f(ϱ −1 x)=f(x), ∀ρ ∈<br />

SO(2), its Fourier-Helgas<strong>on</strong> transform ˆf(ξ,ν) is a functi<strong>on</strong> of ν al<strong>on</strong>e, i.e.<br />

ˆf(ν).<br />

Proof : Applying <strong>the</strong> Fourier-Helgas<strong>on</strong> transform <strong>on</strong> a rotati<strong>on</strong>-invariant functi<strong>on</strong><br />

we write:<br />

∫<br />

ˆf(ξ,ν)=<br />

∫<br />

=<br />

∫<br />

=<br />

H 2 +<br />

H 2 +<br />

H 2 +<br />

f(x) E ξ,ν (x)dµ(x) (53)<br />

f(ϱ −1 x)(ξ · x) − 1 2 −iν dµ(x), ξ ∈ PC + ,ρ∈ SO(2) (54)<br />

f(x ′ )(ξ · ϱx ′ ) − 1 2 −iν dµ(x ′ ) (55)<br />

= ˆf(ϱ −1 ξ,ν), (56)<br />

and so ˆf(ξ,ν) does not <strong>de</strong>pend <strong>on</strong> ξ. <br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!