22.10.2014 Views

Government-funded programmes and services for vulnerable - Unicef

Government-funded programmes and services for vulnerable - Unicef

Government-funded programmes and services for vulnerable - Unicef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Government</strong>-<strong>funded</strong> <strong>programmes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>services</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>vulnerable</strong> children in SA<br />

The policy is there<strong>for</strong>e inadequate to meet the water needs of <strong>vulnerable</strong> children <strong>and</strong><br />

their families. This is aggravated by the fact that local governments are only obliged to<br />

implement the policy in accordance with their means. This has resulted in some local<br />

authorities not providing the full 6 000 litres, but less, leaving <strong>vulnerable</strong> children <strong>and</strong><br />

their families at an even greater disadvantage. For example, the South African Human<br />

Rights Commission records that a 2005 Department of Provincial <strong>and</strong> Local <strong>Government</strong><br />

survey revealed that 49 out of 256 municipalities were not implementing the policy at<br />

all. In addition, some municipalities, such as the Ilembe district municipality, were only<br />

providing 3 000 litres per family per month. Municipalities cited insufficient funds as the<br />

reason <strong>for</strong> not providing 6 000 litres per family per month, <strong>and</strong> argued that the equitable<br />

shares allocated to them <strong>for</strong> service delivery were not enough (SAHRC 2006).<br />

No free basic sanitation policy<br />

On the sanitation front, the government has set as a goal the provision of adequate<br />

sanitation to all <strong>and</strong> the elimination of the bucket system. 96 However, this goal has not yet<br />

translated into an implementable free basic sanitation policy. This is a critical policy gap<br />

that needs urgent attention, given that:<br />

good sanitation is essential <strong>for</strong> safe <strong>and</strong> healthy childhoods. Poor sanitation<br />

compromises children’s health, safety <strong>and</strong> nutritional status, <strong>and</strong> is associated<br />

with diarrhoea, cholera, malaria, bilharzias, eye infections <strong>and</strong> skin disease.<br />

The use of open l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the bucket toilets also impacts on water quality <strong>and</strong><br />

contributes to the spread of disease. (Hall & Marera 2010: 131)<br />

In 2009, 6.6 per cent of South African households had no toilet facilities at all or still used<br />

the bucket system. This national average once again hides the provincial variables: the<br />

figure is much higher in the Eastern Cape (18.9%), Limpopo (8.8%), Northern Cape (8.7%)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Free State (7.5%) (Stats SA 2010a: 31).<br />

96 White Paper on Basic Household Sanitation, 2001<br />

192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!