Government-funded programmes and services for vulnerable - Unicef
Government-funded programmes and services for vulnerable - Unicef Government-funded programmes and services for vulnerable - Unicef
Department of Health is found to be HIV positive, she is invited to join the PMTCT programme. Recent evidence indicates that a significant number of women attending antenatal facilities are not offered HIV testing and counselling. The reasons for this include inadequate counselling of patients, as well as shortages of counsellors and testing supplies (Nkonki et al. 2007). HIV interventions in the post-natal period The Every Death Counts report (DoH et al. 2008) found that, while antenatal care is accessible to and accessed by the majority of South African pregnant women, the same cannot be said for post-natal care and support. Availability of and access to key HIV interventions drop significantly from the time of childbirth and in the post-natal period, when they are the most crucial. The post-natal period is crucial for counselling and support in respect of infant feeding options and maternal nutrition, testing and the commencement of treatment of the infant. Once the mother and baby leave the clinic or hospital, there is no system for routine follow-up of mother and baby. Insufficient trained personnel to prescribe antiretrovirals Until the ART amended guidelines were introduced in March 2010, only doctors could initiate and prescribe antiretrovirals (ARVs). Nurses are now authorised to initiate and administer ART. Once again, the challenge that remains is the inadequacy of existing human resources to meet current, let alone additional, healthcare obligations. Lack of coordination between adult and paediatric treatment programmes There is a lack of coordination and linkages between adult and paediatric care and treatment programmes. As a consequence, the mother’s HIV status is often not linked to her HIV-exposed child, resulting in a lack of appropriate and adequate follow-up and treatment for both the mother and the baby. In addition, the lack of coordination across prevention and treatment programmes means that there are not quick and effective referrals between PMTCT and ARV programmes (which are often available at different physical locations/facilities). This results in delayed commencement of ART for pregnant mothers with low CD4 counts, which in turn contributes to increased rates of transmission to their infants (Kak et al. 2006, in Markovitz 2008). There is a similar lack of coordination between maternal and child health programmes. At the moment, if a baby goes through the PMTCT programme, they should be, but are not, followed up and tested. If they test positive, they need to be referred to a clinic where they can access ART. This is not happening, and as a result, clinics are seeing children when they are desperately ill. The service needs to be anticipatory and preventative. Children should be coming from maternity services much earlier. 67 Poor partner participation There has been a consistent lack of partner participation in the PMTCT programmes. HIV testing and counselling Testing of infants Not enough babies are tested. Of the 800 000 births in 2006, the HIV status of only 3 per cent of these babies was known (Barron et al. 2006; Ministry of Health 2007). Once again, the revised 2010 PMTCT guidelines aim to remedy this deficiency by ensuring the early testing of all infants. 67 Personal communication between Dr David Power and Laura Markovitz, in Markovitz (2008) 133
Government-funded programmes and services for vulnerable children in SA Infant testing is complicated, requiring specialised equipment and reliable transport. As a result, infant testing is often not available at all health facilities, especially those in more remote rural areas. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for infants, for example, is effective but complicated. Clinical capacity is a major obstacle inhibiting scaling up of PCR testing. In 2006, it was only available at six sites. In addition, the results can take up to two weeks, during which time patients are lost to follow-up. Children diagnosed too late Children are being diagnosed too late. They are only being diagnosed and treated when they are seriously ill. One of the reasons for this is the lack of early HIV screening at community health facilities providing routine baby and childcare services, such as immunisations and growth monitoring (Shung-King & Roux 2005). One of the innovations of the 2010 HIV/AIDS policies is the decentralisation of HIV/AIDS services to primary healthcare facilities, with the aim of integrating testing, prevention and treatment services into all primary healthcare programmes for women, infants and children. Facilities not youth-friendly Despite the National Adolescent-Friendly Clinic Initiative, many youth are reticent about being tested because of healthcare workers’ moralistic attitudes to sexually active youth (Shung-King 2005). Antiretroviral therapy/treatment ART started too late Treatment has been starting too late for infants and children, largely because testing and diagnosis have been happening too late. ART does not reach enough children Cotrimoxazole is not reaching enough children. Cotrimoxazole is not reaching enough children. In 2008, 9% of HIV-exposed and HIV-infected infants in Southern Africa were receiving it. (WHO, UNAIDS, UNICEF 2009: 110). In South Africa, the Cotrimoxazole coverage is not much better at 26 per cent (DoH et al. 2008). Not enough children are on ART. On average, only 36 per cent of children in need of ART are receiving it. There are, however, significant provincial variances in coverage rates. For example, coverage in 2007/08 was 97 per cent in the Western Cape, but only 22 per cent in the Free State (Scorecard 2009). The reasons for poor ART coverage have included, to date, an insufficient number of treatment sites; a lack of qualified and skilled staff to screen and identify children in need of ART, and then to prescribe and administer ARVs at accredited sites; insufficient staff to cope with the size of the demand in a community; lack of supplies and medications; and lack of administrative services in clinics, so preventing the proper patient record keeping necessary for effective case management and treatment (Shung-King 2005). Treatment sites are too far from communities needing the service, which is especially problematic in the case of children who are seriously ill. These barriers have been addressed in the revised 2010 ART guidelines, which provide for nurse-initiated ART in primary healthcare facilities. Impediments to maintaining ART Once on treatment, the distance to clinics, transport costs, and lack of accessible financial and psychosocial support means that many children do not adhere to their treatment. 134
- Page 93 and 94: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 95 and 96: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 97 and 98: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 99 and 100: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 101 and 102: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 103 and 104: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 105 and 106: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 107 and 108: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 109 and 110: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 111 and 112: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 113 and 114: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 115 and 116: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 117 and 118: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 119 and 120: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 121 and 122: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 123 and 124: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 125 and 126: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 127 and 128: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 129 and 130: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 131 and 132: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 133 and 134: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 135 and 136: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 137 and 138: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 139 and 140: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 141 and 142: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 143: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 147 and 148: CHAPTER 5 Department of Basic Educa
- Page 149 and 150: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 151 and 152: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 153 and 154: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 155 and 156: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 157 and 158: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 159 and 160: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 161 and 162: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 163 and 164: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 165 and 166: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 167 and 168: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 169 and 170: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 171 and 172: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 173 and 174: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 175 and 176: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 177 and 178: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 179 and 180: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 181 and 182: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 183 and 184: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 185 and 186: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 187 and 188: CHAPTER 6 Department of Labour Intr
- Page 189 and 190: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 191 and 192: Government-funded programmes and se
- Page 193 and 194: Government-funded programmes and se
Department of Health<br />
is found to be HIV positive, she is invited to join the PMTCT programme. Recent evidence<br />
indicates that a significant number of women attending antenatal facilities are not offered<br />
HIV testing <strong>and</strong> counselling. The reasons <strong>for</strong> this include inadequate counselling of<br />
patients, as well as shortages of counsellors <strong>and</strong> testing supplies (Nkonki et al. 2007).<br />
HIV interventions in the post-natal period<br />
The Every Death Counts report (DoH et al. 2008) found that, while antenatal care is<br />
accessible to <strong>and</strong> accessed by the majority of South African pregnant women, the same<br />
cannot be said <strong>for</strong> post-natal care <strong>and</strong> support. Availability of <strong>and</strong> access to key HIV<br />
interventions drop significantly from the time of childbirth <strong>and</strong> in the post-natal period,<br />
when they are the most crucial. The post-natal period is crucial <strong>for</strong> counselling <strong>and</strong><br />
support in respect of infant feeding options <strong>and</strong> maternal nutrition, testing <strong>and</strong> the<br />
commencement of treatment of the infant. Once the mother <strong>and</strong> baby leave the clinic or<br />
hospital, there is no system <strong>for</strong> routine follow-up of mother <strong>and</strong> baby.<br />
Insufficient trained personnel to prescribe antiretrovirals<br />
Until the ART amended guidelines were introduced in March 2010, only doctors could<br />
initiate <strong>and</strong> prescribe antiretrovirals (ARVs). Nurses are now authorised to initiate <strong>and</strong><br />
administer ART. Once again, the challenge that remains is the inadequacy of existing<br />
human resources to meet current, let alone additional, healthcare obligations.<br />
Lack of coordination between adult <strong>and</strong> paediatric treatment <strong>programmes</strong><br />
There is a lack of coordination <strong>and</strong> linkages between adult <strong>and</strong> paediatric care <strong>and</strong><br />
treatment <strong>programmes</strong>. As a consequence, the mother’s HIV status is often not linked to<br />
her HIV-exposed child, resulting in a lack of appropriate <strong>and</strong> adequate follow-up <strong>and</strong><br />
treatment <strong>for</strong> both the mother <strong>and</strong> the baby. In addition, the lack of coordination across<br />
prevention <strong>and</strong> treatment <strong>programmes</strong> means that there are not quick <strong>and</strong> effective<br />
referrals between PMTCT <strong>and</strong> ARV <strong>programmes</strong> (which are often available at different<br />
physical locations/facilities). This results in delayed commencement of ART <strong>for</strong> pregnant<br />
mothers with low CD4 counts, which in turn contributes to increased rates of transmission<br />
to their infants (Kak et al. 2006, in Markovitz 2008). There is a similar lack of coordination<br />
between maternal <strong>and</strong> child health <strong>programmes</strong>. At the moment, if a baby goes through<br />
the PMTCT programme, they should be, but are not, followed up <strong>and</strong> tested. If they<br />
test positive, they need to be referred to a clinic where they can access ART. This is not<br />
happening, <strong>and</strong> as a result, clinics are seeing children when they are desperately ill.<br />
The service needs to be anticipatory <strong>and</strong> preventative. Children should be coming from<br />
maternity <strong>services</strong> much earlier. 67<br />
Poor partner participation<br />
There has been a consistent lack of partner participation in the PMTCT <strong>programmes</strong>.<br />
HIV testing <strong>and</strong> counselling<br />
Testing of infants<br />
Not enough babies are tested. Of the 800 000 births in 2006, the HIV status of only 3 per<br />
cent of these babies was known (Barron et al. 2006; Ministry of Health 2007). Once again,<br />
the revised 2010 PMTCT guidelines aim to remedy this deficiency by ensuring the early<br />
testing of all infants.<br />
67 Personal communication between Dr David Power <strong>and</strong> Laura Markovitz, in Markovitz (2008)<br />
133