22.10.2014 Views

Child Drowning

Child Drowning

Child Drowning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 19: Resuscitation received by drowning children (aged 0-17 years)<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

Trained resuscitation Traditional resuscitation No resuscitation Unknown<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Bangladesh Jiangxi, China Cambodia<br />

Source: Survey data from the countries included: Bangladesh Health and Injury Survey 2003, Cambodia Accident and Injury<br />

Survey 2006 and Jiangxi (China) Injury Survey 2005.<br />

On average, less than 10 per cent of drowning victims received resuscitation from a trained responder.<br />

This reflects both the lack of widespread resuscitation skills in the population and the fact that most<br />

drowning occurred in settings where resuscitation was not possible. The majority of drowning occurred<br />

among very young children who escaped supervision and drowned. Their caretakers were unaware of<br />

the drowning for lengthy periods of time and resuscitation was not an option. The majority of the<br />

drowning incidents among older children occurred when they were alone, or with a peer that lacked<br />

swimming, rescue or resuscitation skills.<br />

For every country studied, when traditional resuscitation was given, the methods used were ineffective<br />

and harmful, and may have contributed to the drowning fatality. These methods generally fell into three<br />

categories:<br />

1. Attempts to expel water from the drowned child’s body by physical force (e.g. whirling the child<br />

overhead, pressing or jumping on the child’s chest and stomach).<br />

2. Attempts to expel water from the drowning child by inciting vomiting or coughing (e.g. forcing<br />

rotten food or other noxious substances into the child’s mouth to induce vomiting, or inserting<br />

sticks or other objects into the child’s trachea to induce coughing), and:<br />

3. Attempts to expel water from the drowned child’s body through physical means that involved<br />

drying (e.g. covering the child in ashes or in mud, heating the child’s body over a warm fire).<br />

These practices were found across the different cultures in the surveys. They were widely cited by<br />

respondents, regardless of level of educational attainment or rural or urban location. As such, they<br />

represent broad social norms in response practices to drowning in children. To be effective, drowning<br />

interventions will need to take into account the deeply embedded nature of these behaviours and to<br />

design appropriate strategies to counteract them.<br />

The lessons learned from combating diarrhoeal diseases may be useful in this regard. Many of the early<br />

interventions focused on stopping deeply ingrained harmful behaviours, such as ceasing breastfeeding<br />

when the child had diarrhoea, or feeding the child solids in an attempt to decrease the diarrhoea.<br />

Changing these pervasive behaviours required extensive and long-term behavioural change<br />

interventions. Given the rural concentration and generally low educational attainment of mothers,<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!