European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1352 C.D. Deakin et al. / Resuscitation 81 (2010) 1305–1352 815. Rundgren M, Karlsson T, Nielsen N, Cronberg T, Johnsson P, Friberg H. Neuron specific enolase and S-100B as predictors of outcome after cardiac arrest and induced hypothermia. Resuscitation 2009;80:784–9. 816. Fieux F, Losser MR, Bourgeois E, et al. Kidney retrieval after sudden out of hospital refractory cardiac arrest: a cohort of uncontrolled non heart beating donors. Crit Care 2009;13:R141. 817. Kootstra G. Statement on non-heart-beating donor programs. Transplant Proc 1995;27:2965. 818. Fondevila C, Hessheimer AJ, Ruiz A, et al. Liver transplant using donors after unexpected cardiac death: novel preservation protocol and acceptance criteria. Am J Transplant 2007;7:1849–55. 819. Morozumi J, Sakurai E, Matsuno N, et al. Successful kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death using a load-distributing-band chest compression device during long warm ischemic time. Resuscitation 2009;80:278–80. 820. Perkins GD, Brace S, Gates S. Mechanical chest-compression devices: current and future roles. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010;16:203–10. 821. Engdahl J, Abrahamsson P, Bang A, Lindqvist J, Karlsson T, Herlitz J. Is hospital care of major importance for outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Experience acquired from patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated by the same Emergency Medical Service and admitted to one of two hospitals over a 16-year period in the municipality of Goteborg. Resuscitation 2000;43:201–11. 822. Liu JM, Yang Q, Pirrallo RG, Klein JP, Aufderheide TP. Hospital variability of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival. Prehosp Emerg Care 2008;12:339–46. 823. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Angquist KA, Silfverstolpe J, Holmberg S. Major differences in 1-month survival between hospitals in Sweden among initial survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2006;70:404–9. 824. Callaway CW, Schmicker R, Kampmeyer M, et al. Receiving hospital characteristics associated with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2010. 825. Davis DP, Fisher R, Aguilar S, et al. The feasibility of a regional cardiac arrest receiving system. Resuscitation 2007;74:44–51. 826. Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, et al. The impact of prehospital transport interval on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: implications for regionalization of post-resuscitation care. Resuscitation 2008;79:61–6. 827. Spaite DW, Stiell IG, Bobrow BJ, et al. Effect of transport interval on out-ofhospital cardiac arrest survival in the OPALS Study: implications for triaging patients to specialized cardiac arrest centers. Ann Emerg Med 2009. 828. Vermeer F, Oude Ophuis AJ, vd Berg EJ, et al. Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study. Heart 1999;82:426–31. 829. Widimsky P, Groch L, Zelizko M, Aschermann M, Bednar F, Suryapranata H. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J 2000;21:823–31. 830. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial–PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 2003;24:94–104. 831. Le May MR, So DY, Dionne R, et al. A citywide protocol for primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008;358:231–40. 832. Abernathy 3rd JH, McGwin Jr G, Acker 3rd JE, Rue 3rd LW. Impact of a voluntary trauma system on mortality, length of stay, and cost at a level I trauma center. Am Surg 2002;68:182–92. 833. Clemmer TP, Orme Jr JF, Thomas FO, Brooks KA. Outcome of critically injured patients treated at Level I trauma centers versus full-service community hospitals. Crit Care Med 1985;13:861–3. 834. Culica D, Aday LA, Rohrer JE. Regionalized trauma care system in Texas: implications for redesigning trauma systems. Med Sci Monit 2007;13:SR9–18. 835. Hannan EL, Farrell LS, Cooper A, Henry M, Simon B, Simon R. Physiologic trauma triage criteria in adult trauma patients: are they effective in saving lives by transporting patients to trauma centers? J Am Coll Surg 2005;200:584–92. 836. Harrington DT, Connolly M, Biffl WL, Majercik SD, Cioffi WG. Transfer times to definitive care facilities are too long: a consequence of an immature trauma system. Ann Surg 2005;241:961–6 [discussion 6–8]. 837. Liberman M, Mulder DS, Lavoie A, Sampalis JS. Implementation of a trauma care system: evolution through evaluation. J Trauma 2004;56:1330–5. 838. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 2006;354:366–78. 839. Mann NC, Cahn RM, Mullins RJ, Brand DM, Jurkovich GJ. Survival among injured geriatric patients during construction of a statewide trauma system. J Trauma 2001;50:1111–6. 840. Mullins RJ, Veum-Stone J, Hedges JR, et al. Influence of a statewide trauma system on location of hospitalization and outcome of injured patients. J Trauma 1996;40:536–45 [discussion 45–6]. 841. Mullins RJ, Mann NC, Hedges JR, Worrall W, Jurkovich GJ. Preferential benefit of implementation of a statewide trauma system in one of two adjacent states. J Trauma 1998;44:609–16 [discussion 17]. 842. Mullins RJ, Veum-Stone J, Helfand M, et al. Outcome of hospitalized injured patients after institution of a trauma system in an urban area. JAMA 1994;271:1919–24. 843. Mullner R, Goldberg J. An evaluation of the Illinois trauma system. Med Care 1978;16:140–51. 844. Mullner R, Goldberg J. Toward an outcome-oriented medical geography: an evaluation of the Illinois trauma/emergency medical services system. Soc Sci Med 1978;12:103–10. 845. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Rivara FP, Maier RV. Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation. J Trauma 2000;48:25–30 [discussion 1]. 846. Nathens AB, Maier RV, Brundage SI, Jurkovich GJ, Grossman DC. The effect of interfacility transfer on outcome in an urban trauma system. J Trauma 2003;55:444–9. 847. Nicholl J, Turner J. Effectiveness of a regional trauma system in reducing mortality from major trauma: before and after study. BMJ 1997;315:1349–54. 848. Potoka DA, Schall LC, Gardner MJ, Stafford PW, Peitzman AB, Ford HR. Impact of pediatric trauma centers on mortality in a statewide system. J Trauma 2000;49:237–45. 849. Sampalis JS, Lavoie A, Boukas S, et al. Trauma center designation: initial impact on trauma-related mortality. J Trauma 1995;39:232–7 [discussion 7–9]. 850. Sampalis JS, Denis R, Frechette P, Brown R, Fleiszer D, Mulder D. Direct transport to tertiary trauma centers versus transfer from lower level facilities: impact on mortality and morbidity among patients with major trauma. J Trauma 1997;43:288-95 [discussion 95–6]. 851. Nichol G, Aufderheide TP, Eigel B, et al. Regional systems of care for outof-hospital cardiac arrest: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;121:709–29. 852. Nichol G, Soar J. Regional cardiac resuscitation systems of care. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010;16:223–30. 853. Soar J, Packham S. Cardiac arrest centres make sense. Resuscitation 2010;81:507–8.
Resuscitation 81 (2010) 1353–1363 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Resuscitation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/resuscitation European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 5. Initial management of acute coronary syndromes Hans-Richard Arntz a,1 , Leo L. Bossaert b,∗,1 , Nicolas Danchin c , Nikolaos I. Nikolaou d a Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charite, Berlin, Germany b Department of Critical Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium c Department of Coronary Artery Disease and Intensive Cardiac Care, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France d Constantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece Summary of main changes since 2005 Guidelines Changes in the management of acute coronary syndrome since the 2005 guidelines include: Definitions The term non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction-acute coronary syndrome (non-STEMI-ACS) has been introduced for both NSTEMI and unstable angina pectoris because the differential diagnosis is dependent on biomarkers that may be detectable only after hours, whereas decisions on treatment are dependent on the clinical signs at presentation. Chest pain units and decision rules for early discharge • History, clinical examinations, biomarkers, ECG criteria and risk scores are unreliable for the identification of patients who may be safely discharged early. • The role of chest pain observation units (CPUs) is to identify, by using repeated clinical examinations, ECG and biomarker testing, those patients who require admission for invasive procedures. This may include provocative testing and, in selected patients, imaging procedures as cardiac computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, etc. Symptomatic treatment • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be avoided. • Nitrates should not be used for diagnostic purposes. • Supplementary oxygen to be given only to those patients with hypoxaemia, breathlessness or pulmonary congestion. Hyperoxaemia may be harmful in uncomplicated infarction. Causal treatment • Guidelines for treatment with acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) have been made more liberal and it may now be given by bystanders with or without dispatchers assistance. • Revised guidance for new antiplatelet and antithrombin treatment for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI-ACS based on therapeutic strategy. • Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors before angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are discouraged. Reperfusion strategy in STEMI • Primary PCI (PPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy provided it is performed in a timely manner by an experienced team. • A nearby hospital may be bypassed by emergency medical services (EMS) provided PPCI can be achieved without too much delay. • The acceptable delay between start of fibrinolysis and first balloon inflation varies widely between about 45 and 180 min depending on infarct localisation, age of the patient, and duration of symptoms. • ‘Rescue PCI’ should be undertaken if fibrinolysis fails. • The strategy of routine PCI immediately after fibrinolysis (‘facilitated PCI’) is discouraged. • Patients with successful fibrinolysis but not in a PCI-capable hospital should be transferred for angiography and eventual PCI, performed optimally 6–24 h after fibrinolysis (the ‘pharmacoinvasive’ approach). • Angiography and, if necessary, PCI may be reasonable in patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest and may be part of a standardised post-cardiac arrest protocol. • To achieve these goals, the creation of networks including EMS, non-PCI capable hospitals and PCI hospitals is useful. Primary and secondary prevention ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail address: leo.bossaert@ua.ac.be (L.L. Bossaert). 1 These individuals contributed equally to this manuscript and are equal first coauthors. • Recommendations for the use of beta-blockers are more restricted: there is no evidence for routine intravenous betablockers except in specific circumstances such as for the 0300-9572/$ – see front matter © 2010 European Resuscitation Council. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.016
Page 1 and 2:
Resuscitation 81 (2010) 1219-1276 C
Page 3 and 4:
J.P. Nolan et al. / Resuscitation 8
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
R.W. Koster et al. / Resuscitation
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
C.D. Deakin et al. / Resuscitation
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84: C.D. Deakin et al. / Resuscitation
Page 87 and 88: Resuscitation 81 (2010) 1305-1352 C
Page 133: C.D. Deakin et al. / Resuscitation
Page 137 and 138: H.-R. Arntz et al. / Resuscitation
Page 147 and 148: D. Biarent et al. / Resuscitation 8
Page 171 and 172: Resuscitation 81 (2010) 1389-1399 C
Page 173 and 174: S. Richmond, J. Wyllie / Resuscitat
Page 183 and 184: J. Soar et al. / Resuscitation 81 (
Page 185 and 186:
J. Soar et al. / Resuscitation 81 (
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
F.K. Lippert et al. / Resuscitation
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233:
show all

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?