21.10.2014 Views

Physical Chemistry 3: — Chemical Kinetics — - Christian-Albrechts ...

Physical Chemistry 3: — Chemical Kinetics — - Christian-Albrechts ...

Physical Chemistry 3: — Chemical Kinetics — - Christian-Albrechts ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.4 Generalized first-order kinetics* 55<br />

I Solution of differential equations using Laplace transforms: Consider the<br />

Laplace transform of the derivative () of a function (): 27<br />

L [() ] =<br />

Z ∞<br />

We can solve this equation for () via<br />

0<br />

()<br />

<br />

= () −¯¯∞<br />

− (3.121)<br />

Z<br />

0 − ∞<br />

= − ( =0)+<br />

0<br />

Z ∞<br />

0<br />

() ¡ −¢ (3.122)<br />

() − (3.123)<br />

= − 0 + () (3.124)<br />

() = L [() ]+ 0<br />

<br />

and recover the solution () by inverse Laplace transformation,<br />

() =L −1 ∙ L [() ]+0<br />

<br />

¸<br />

(3.125)<br />

(3.126)<br />

I Example: Application to two consecutive first-order reactions. As an example,<br />

we consider the DE’s for two consecutive first-order reactions<br />

A 1<br />

→ B 2<br />

→ C (3.127)<br />

We already solved this problem previously (in Section 2.6.1) using conventional methods,<br />

and repeat the solution now using the Laplace transform method.<br />

Towards these ends, in this example, we shall denote the concentrations [A ()] and<br />

[B ()] as () and () and their Laplace transforms as () and (). Therespective<br />

initial concentrations shall be [A] 0<br />

= 0 and [B] 0<br />

= 0 =0. Thus we have:<br />

• DE for the concentration ():<br />

= 1 0 − 1 − 2 (3.128)<br />

• Laplace transform: () can be found using Eq. 3.124:<br />

L [] =− 0 + () (3.129)<br />

Taking the Laplace transform of the r.h.s. of Eq. 3.128: 28<br />

L [] =L £ 1 0 − 1 ¤ − L [ 2 ()] (3.130)<br />

= 1 0 L £ − 1 ¤ − 2 L [ ()] = 1 0<br />

+ 1<br />

− 2 () (3.131)<br />

= − 0 + () (Eq. 3.129) (3.132)<br />

27 We used in line 2: integration by parts; in line 3: the differivative ( − ) = − − ;inline4:<br />

the definition () =L [ ()] and the abbreviation ( =0)= 0 .<br />

28 We used L [ ]= 1 from Table E.1 and L [ ()] = ().<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!