20.10.2014 Views

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

However, a grid configuration extended across <strong>the</strong> whole territory could, from <strong>the</strong><br />

American point of view, guarantee <strong>building</strong>‐town‐country integration. It was on <strong>the</strong><br />

basis of this premise that Wright’s idea of a project to perfectly integrate Broadacre<br />

City into <strong>the</strong> logical system of <strong>the</strong> majority of American territory [Figure 48‐50].<br />

To understand it, it is worth retracing some historical and political transitions which<br />

determined <strong>the</strong> transformation of <strong>the</strong> colonial checkerboards of <strong>the</strong> towns into a<br />

system, with which even wider territories could be planned.<br />

The problem of governing <strong>the</strong> developing Western lands arose for <strong>the</strong> first time<br />

following <strong>the</strong> Land Ordinance of 1784, written by Thomas Jefferson (at <strong>the</strong> time a<br />

delegate from Virginia), which made provision for <strong>the</strong> creation of a series of states<br />

in <strong>the</strong> lands west of <strong>the</strong> Appalachian Mountains, North of <strong>the</strong> Ohio River and East of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Mississippi River. It had in fact become necessary to determine <strong>the</strong> criterion by<br />

which newly acquired lands should be subdivided and managed following <strong>the</strong> Treaty<br />

of Paris (1783), which had officially ended <strong>the</strong> War of Independence.<br />

In 1785, <strong>the</strong>refore, a new Land Ordinance 85 was issued which not only provided a<br />

useful model for land colonisation [Figure 47], but also enabled <strong>the</strong> land to be sold,<br />

thus ensuring an income for <strong>the</strong> treasury chest of Congress. The idea of selling <strong>the</strong><br />

land also centralized <strong>the</strong> power and gave importance to <strong>the</strong> central bodies of <strong>the</strong><br />

newly born Republic, which had thus found a way to finance <strong>the</strong>mselves. In fact,<br />

Congress was unable to raise taxes from <strong>the</strong> settlers, because this right belonged to<br />

<strong>the</strong> individual states. The Land Ordinance involved <strong>the</strong> work of geographers and<br />

explorers, which was to establish <strong>the</strong> basis for <strong>the</strong> current Public Land Survey<br />

System of <strong>the</strong> United States.<br />

This system soon collided head‐on with <strong>the</strong> rights of <strong>the</strong> American Indians, who<br />

were forcibly moved several times from <strong>the</strong>ir lands, even though <strong>the</strong> Northwest<br />

Ordinance of 1787 had recognized <strong>the</strong> right of Native Americans to occupy <strong>the</strong><br />

territories, and excluded any unilateral interference by <strong>the</strong> United States.<br />

85 For <strong>the</strong> data on this page see WHITE, Albert C., A History of <strong>the</strong> Rectangular Survey System,<br />

Washington D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991 (first ed. 1983), p. 776; KNEPPER, George<br />

W., The Official Ohio Lands Book, Columbus, Ohio Auditor of State, 2002, p. 86<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!