building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici
building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici
building the american landscape - Univerza v Novi Gorici
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
legal and commercial documents compared to <strong>the</strong> private correspondence of<br />
Thomas Butler (1785‐1847), one of <strong>the</strong> greatest sugar and cotton plantation owners<br />
in <strong>the</strong> territories of Mississippi and Louisiana [Figure 14].<br />
Turner describes <strong>the</strong> interest in <strong>the</strong> flower gardens of <strong>the</strong> Butler family, in particular<br />
of <strong>the</strong> women, and outlines <strong>the</strong> choices which demonstrate an awareness of and<br />
attention to <strong>the</strong> creation of The Cottage <strong>landscape</strong>. She lingers on <strong>the</strong> documents<br />
which are a witness to <strong>the</strong> owner’s research and purchase of ornamental and fruit<br />
plants. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> results obtained suggest that, although <strong>the</strong>re were certainly<br />
differences in <strong>the</strong> agricultural crops and in <strong>the</strong> specific varieties of plants in <strong>the</strong><br />
Sou<strong>the</strong>rn States, ornamental horticulture in Mississippi and in Louisiana could<br />
compare with practice in <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn and Eastern States 37 .<br />
The well‐known <strong>landscape</strong> architect, Frederick Law Olmsted (1822‐1903), left us a<br />
significant description about life in <strong>the</strong> plantations and <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>landscape</strong>s. At <strong>the</strong> end<br />
of <strong>the</strong> 1850’s, Olmsted made a series of voyages in <strong>the</strong> Cotton Kingdom of America,<br />
leaving a detailed, sophisticated report, packed with naturalistic, botanical and<br />
agricultural observations, measurements and detailed architectural comments on<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>building</strong>s. Olmsted’s experiences describe and compare <strong>the</strong> organizational<br />
features of <strong>the</strong> agricultural businesses in various States, and naturally <strong>the</strong>y also<br />
investigate <strong>the</strong> botanical and naturalistic aspects of <strong>the</strong> gardens and <strong>the</strong> sections of<br />
<strong>the</strong> land he crossed:<br />
In <strong>the</strong> afternoon, I left <strong>the</strong> main road, and, towards night, reached a<br />
much more cultivated district. The forest of pines still extended<br />
uninterruptedly on one side of <strong>the</strong> way, but on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r was a<br />
continued succession of very large fields, of rich dark soil ‐ evidently<br />
reclaimed swamp‐land ‐ which had been cultivated <strong>the</strong> previous year, in<br />
Sea Island cotton. Beyond <strong>the</strong>m, a flat surface of still lower land, with a<br />
silver thread of water curling through it, extended, Holland‐like, to <strong>the</strong><br />
horizon. Usually at as great a distance as a quarter of a mile from <strong>the</strong><br />
road, and from half a mile to a mile apart, were <strong>the</strong> residences of <strong>the</strong><br />
planters ‐ white houses, with groves of evergreen trees about <strong>the</strong>m; and<br />
between <strong>the</strong>se and <strong>the</strong> road were little villages of slave‐cabins. My<br />
directions not having been sufficiently explicit, I rode in, by a private<br />
See also TURNER, Suzanne L., The Gardens of Louisiana: Places of Work and Wonder. Co‐author with<br />
A. J. Meek, photographer. Baton Rouge and London: LSU Press, 1997.<br />
37 This statement contrasts, as <strong>the</strong> author says, with <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis of HENDRICK, Ulysses Prentiss, A<br />
History of Horticulture in America to 1860, Oxford University Press, 1950<br />
25