20.10.2014 Views

Toolkits for Urban Transport Development - UNEP

Toolkits for Urban Transport Development - UNEP

Toolkits for Urban Transport Development - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page i


Toolkit <strong>for</strong> Comprehensive Mobility Plans (CMP) Revised (2013)<br />

Page ii


Director General<br />

Institute <strong>for</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Anand Vihar Metro Station Building<br />

Delhi<br />

Phone: 011-66578710 / 66578720<br />

The current revision of CMP has been based on experiences from review of existing CMP<br />

implementations done by IUT and the experience gained from preparation of Low-carbon<br />

Comprehensive Mobility Plans under the <strong>UNEP</strong> project "Promoting Low Carbon <strong>Transport</strong> in India" in<br />

the cities of Rajkot, Vishakhapatnam and Udaipur<br />

Page<br />

iii


Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

Comprehensive Mobility Plans (CMP): Preparation Toolkit<br />

Page<br />

iv


Page v


Foreword<br />

I have great pleasure in presenting the revised toolkit <strong>for</strong> Comprehensive Mobility Planning (CMP).<br />

The toolkit has been prepared jointly by Institute of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> (IUT) which was mandated by<br />

the Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong> (MoUD) to revise the existing CMP toolkit and, a team of<br />

researchers and consultants from premier institutions in India, the United Nations Environment<br />

Programme (<strong>UNEP</strong>) and <strong>UNEP</strong> Risoe Centre working on the project "Promoting Low Carbon<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> in India". The process <strong>for</strong> preparation has been carried under the advice of MoUD and<br />

Secretary General, IUT and was coordinated by the IUT.<br />

The current revision has been based on experiences from the review of existing CMP implementations<br />

done by IUT and the experience gained from preparation of Low-carbon Comprehensive Mobility<br />

Plans under the <strong>UNEP</strong> project "Promoting Low Carbon <strong>Transport</strong> in India" in the cities of Rajkot,<br />

Vishakhapatnam and Udaipur. The preparation process has also involved consultation with experts on<br />

an early draft on 17 October 2013 and with the representatives from states on 25 November 2013.<br />

Their inputs have made a valuable contribution to the revision.<br />

The revised toolkit has a clear focus on climate change and sustainable development and takes<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward the process of integrating the actions necessary <strong>for</strong> transport sector as per the "National<br />

Mission on Sustainable Habitats" <strong>for</strong> which MoUD is the nodal ministry. The toolkit also comes up<br />

with a clear guidance <strong>for</strong> integrating the inclusiveness agenda within the transport planning processes.<br />

The toolkit has also a strong focus on land use planning bringing the CMP closer to the development<br />

/master plans and there<strong>for</strong>e a closer integration of the two is proposed.<br />

I congratulate all those who have contributed directly and indirectly in this task.<br />

Secretary<br />

Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

Page<br />

vi


Page<br />

vii


Preface<br />

The toolkit <strong>for</strong> Comprehensive Mobility Plans (CMP), prepared in 2008 by Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong><br />

<strong>Development</strong> (MoUD) with the assistance of the Asian <strong>Development</strong> Bank (ADB) to provide a broad<br />

framework <strong>for</strong> working out detailed projects within a long term planning framework and bring focus<br />

on mobility instead of vehicular movements alone, came in quite handy in first phase of the<br />

Jawaharlal Nehru National <strong>Urban</strong> Renewal Mission (JnNURM).<br />

Since 2008 policy landscape in India has undergone changes with a heightened focus on climate<br />

change. Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong> is the nodal ministry <strong>for</strong> the National Mission on Sustainable<br />

Habitats, one of the eight missions <strong>for</strong>med to achieve climate change goals in India. This mission is<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> articulating actions <strong>for</strong> climate change under National Action Plan on Climate Change<br />

(NAPCC). At the same time, another cross cutting theme has emerged within the policy focus, which<br />

is the need <strong>for</strong> inclusive development, given the growth during the last two decades has increased the<br />

chasm between the rich and poor. These two policy changes are the underlying theme <strong>for</strong> this revised<br />

CMP.<br />

The authors have taken the methodology of the original CMP, also referred as the ADB toolkit, as the<br />

starting point <strong>for</strong> the preparation of revised Comprehensive Mobility Plan, which has both low-carbon<br />

and inclusive agenda interwoven. The contents of the ADB toolkit have been left unchanged at places<br />

where change was not necessary. The changes that have been undertaken <strong>for</strong> the revised toolkit<br />

include changes in approach and comprehensiveness of the toolkit.<br />

In terms of approach the toolkit has moved from a deterministic <strong>for</strong>ecasting approach to a more<br />

flexible scenario-based approach relying on projections. The scenario based approach takes two broad<br />

views <strong>for</strong> future: i) which mimics the current development patterns and where the land use <strong>for</strong> future<br />

is closely tied to the master plan (or development plans) document and ii) where specific interventions<br />

<strong>for</strong> land use, infrastructures, public transport / non-motorised transport and changed regulations <strong>for</strong><br />

personal motorised transport are envisaged. The revised approach there<strong>for</strong>e allows the policy makers<br />

and stakeholders at city level to make a comparison of the benefits they can gain from implementation<br />

of the CMP approach ii) versus the additional costs on account of the approach ii).<br />

In terms of comprehensiveness, the CMP toolkit has been modified to include new data collection<br />

<strong>for</strong>mats so that in<strong>for</strong>mation on different socio economic groups and gender is explicitly collected and<br />

also used <strong>for</strong> transport planning projections. The second change is with regards to environment and<br />

CO 2 emissions and this has involved collection of data on vehicles (related to energy and emissions<br />

Page<br />

viii


characteristics). The third aspect is related to safety and once again a more comprehensive approach is<br />

suggested. The more important aspect is that all these data are used to create in<strong>for</strong>mation on future<br />

sustainable and low carbon transport scenarios which are quantified in terms of indicators <strong>for</strong> mobility<br />

and accessibility, infrastructure and land use; safety and security; environmental impacts (including<br />

CO 2 emissions) and economic. The indicators allow easy comparison to service level benchmarks<br />

and can there<strong>for</strong>e aid policy makers and consultant at city level.<br />

The authors <strong>for</strong> the revision feel the toolkit is a working document and after 5 years there could be a<br />

new context to which the toolkit may have to be adapted. One such emerging theme is increased focus<br />

on increasing vulnerabilities of cities from a changing climate.<br />

Page<br />

ix


Acknowledgement<br />

The revised guideline and toolkit <strong>for</strong> Comprehensive Mobility Planning has been prepared <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong> (MoUD), Government of India, jointly by IUT which was mandated<br />

by MoUD to undertake a revision of the toolkit, and a team of researchers and consultants working on<br />

the <strong>UNEP</strong> project on "Promoting Low Carbon <strong>Transport</strong> in India". The team worked under advise<br />

from Mr. S.K. Lohia and Mr. B.I Singal.<br />

The team from IUT involved Mr. M.L. Chotani, Ms. Kanika Kalra and Ms. Vijaya Rohini Kodati<br />

whereas <strong>UNEP</strong> project team in alphabetical order comprised of Dr Anvita Arora, Dr. Subash Dhar,<br />

Mr. Ranjan Jyoti Dutta, Mr. Ravi Gadepalli, Ms. Deepty Jain, Prof. Darshini Mahadevia, Dr. Talat<br />

Munshi, Prof P.R. Shukla and Prof Geetam Tiwari.<br />

The team would like to thank external experts in alphabetical order Ms Chhavi Dhingra, Ms. Akshima<br />

T Ghate, Prof Sanjay Gupta, Ms Nupur Gupta and Prof Sewa Ram who provided inputs <strong>for</strong> the toolkit<br />

at an expert workshop held at IUT on Oct 17, 2013. The team would also like to thank Ms. Kamala<br />

Ernest <strong>for</strong> her comments on the draft CMP and her constant support to the team.<br />

The team would also like to thank the participants from cities who provided inputs on the CMP toolkit<br />

at the workshop in Goa on November 25, 2013.<br />

The team would also like to acknowledge the consultants team which wrote the original CMP toolkit<br />

comprising of Dr. Chiaki Kuranami, Mr. Christopher Rose and Mr. Satoshi Ogita under a technical<br />

assistance from Asian <strong>Development</strong> Bank.<br />

Page x


Comprehensive Mobility Plans (CMPs): Preparation Toolkit<br />

Abbreviation ____________________________________________________________________ xv<br />

SECTION I: INTRODUCTION ___________________________________________________ 1<br />

Background ___________________________________________________________________ 1<br />

Existing CMP _______________________________________________________________________ 1<br />

Need <strong>for</strong> Revision ____________________________________________________________________ 1<br />

Differences between CMP and Revised CMP ______________________________________________ 2<br />

Role of CMPs in the JnNURM Process ___________________________________________________ 2<br />

What is a CMP? _______________________________________________________________ 3<br />

Objectives of CMP ___________________________________________________________________ 3<br />

Main Features of CMP ________________________________________________________________ 3<br />

Key Outcomes of CMPs _______________________________________________________________ 4<br />

Relationships between a CMP and Other Existing Plans ______________________________ 4<br />

Relationship with CDP ________________________________________________________________ 5<br />

Relationship with the Master Plan _______________________________________________________ 5<br />

Relationship with the CTTS ____________________________________________________________ 5<br />

FAQs on Comprehensive Mobility Plan ____________________________________________ 5<br />

SECTION II: PREPARATION PROCESS _________________________________________ 8<br />

Understanding Key CMP Tasks __________________________________________________ 8<br />

Stakeholder Consultation ________________________________________________________ 8<br />

Identifying Stakeholders _______________________________________________________________ 9<br />

Classifying stakeholders on the basis of their role in transport __________________________________ 9<br />

Managing Stakeholders _______________________________________________________________ 10<br />

Page<br />

xi


Stages of CMP where stakeholder Consultations play a role __________________________________ 11<br />

Preparing <strong>for</strong> a CMP: Where to Start? ___________________________________________ 12<br />

Consultation <strong>for</strong> Validation of CMP ______________________________________________ 13<br />

Example Work Schedule _______________________________________________________ 14<br />

SECTION II: TASK DESCRIPTIONS ___________________________________________ 15<br />

TASK 1: Defining the Scope of the CMP __________________________________________ 15<br />

Planning Area ______________________________________________________________________ 15<br />

Planning Horizon ___________________________________________________________________ 15<br />

Vision <strong>for</strong> the City ___________________________________________________________________ 15<br />

TASK 2: Data Collection and Analysis of the Existing <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Environment ____ 16<br />

Task 2-1 Review of the City Profile _____________________________________________________ 16<br />

Task 2-2 Delineation of Traffic Analysis Zones ____________________________________________ 16<br />

Task 2-3 Review of Land Use Pattern & Population Density __________________________________ 17<br />

Task 2-4 Review of the Existing <strong>Transport</strong> Systems ________________________________________ 19<br />

Task 2-5 Data Collection Approach – Methodology and Sources ______________________________ 23<br />

Task 2-6 Study of Existing Travel Behaviour ______________________________________________ 25<br />

Task 2-7 Review of Energy and Environment _____________________________________________ 27<br />

Task 2.8 Analysis and Indicators (Comparison with Benchmarks) _____________________________ 29<br />

TASK 3: <strong>Development</strong> of Business As Usual (BAU) Scenario _________________________ 31<br />

Task 3-1 Framework <strong>for</strong> Scenarios ______________________________________________________ 31<br />

Task 3-2 Socioeconomic Projections ____________________________________________________ 32<br />

Task 3-3 Land Use Transitions _________________________________________________________ 33<br />

Task 3-4 <strong>Transport</strong> Demand Analysis ____________________________________________________ 33<br />

Task 3-5 Technology Transitions _______________________________________________________ 33<br />

Task 3-6 CO 2 Emissions and Air Quality _________________________________________________ 36<br />

Page<br />

xii


Task 3-7 Analysis and Indicators (Comparison with Benchmarks) _____________________________ 38<br />

TASK 4: <strong>Development</strong> of Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Scenarios _____________________ 39<br />

Task 4-1 Framework <strong>for</strong> Scenario _______________________________________________________ 39<br />

Task 4-2 Strategies <strong>for</strong> Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Scenario _________________________________ 39<br />

Task 4-3 <strong>Transport</strong> Demand Analysis of Alternative Strategies <strong>for</strong> Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> ______ 42<br />

Task 4-4 Technology Transitions under a Low Carbon Scenario _______________________________ 44<br />

Task 4-5 CO 2 Emissions and Air Quality (Refer task 3-6) ____________________________________ 45<br />

Task 4-6 Analysis and Indicators (Comparison with Benchmarks) _____________________________ 45<br />

TASK 5: <strong>Development</strong> of <strong>Urban</strong> Mobility Plan _____________________________________ 45<br />

Task 5-1 Integrated Land Use and <strong>Urban</strong> Mobility Plan _____________________________________ 45<br />

Task 5-2 Formulation of the Public <strong>Transport</strong> Improvement Plan ______________________________ 45<br />

Task 5-3 Preparation of Road Network <strong>Development</strong> Plan ___________________________________ 46<br />

Task 5-4 Preparation of NMT Facility Improvement Plan ____________________________________ 46<br />

Task 5-5 Preparation of Mobility Management Measures ____________________________________ 47<br />

Task 5-6 Preparation of Regulatory and Institutional Measures ________________________________ 47<br />

Task 5-7 <strong>Development</strong> of Fiscal Measures ________________________________________________ 48<br />

Task 5-8 Mobility Improvement Measures and NUTP Objectives ______________________________ 48<br />

TASK 6: Preparation of the Implementation Program ______________________________ 48<br />

Task 6-1 Preparation of Implementation Programs__________________________________________ 48<br />

Task 6-2 Identification and Prioritisation of Projects ________________________________________ 49<br />

Task 6-3 Funding of Projects __________________________________________________________ 49<br />

Task 6-4 Monitoring, of CMP Implementation _____________________________________________ 54<br />

SECTION III: ANNEXES ______________________________________________________ 55<br />

Annex 1 Sample Survey Forms __________________________________________________ 55<br />

Annex 2 Sample Project Sheets _________________________________________________ 102<br />

Page<br />

xiii


Annex 3 Stakeholder Engagement ______________________________________________ 103<br />

Annex 4 Indicators and Benchmarks ____________________________________________ 108<br />

Annex 5 Four Step Modelling __________________________________________________ 113<br />

Annex 6 Financing Options <strong>for</strong> Implementation of Projects _________________________ 118<br />

Funding from Domestic Source at Local Level (ULB) ______________________________________ 118<br />

Funding from Domestic Source at State Level ____________________________________________ 121<br />

Funding from Domestic Source at National Level _________________________________________ 122<br />

Funding from International Source _____________________________________________________ 123<br />

Funding from Private Source _________________________________________________________ 124<br />

Annex 7: Financing Options <strong>for</strong> Project <strong>Development</strong> (Preparation of DPRs/Feasibility<br />

Report) _____________________________________________________________________ 126<br />

Central Govt. Sponsored Scheme of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Planning of Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, GoI<br />

JnNURM Scheme __________________________________________________________________ 126<br />

State /ULB budget Funding __________________________________________________________ 127<br />

Multilateral Funding Agency (International Source) _______________________________________ 127<br />

India Infrastructure Project <strong>Development</strong> Fund (IIPDF) ____________________________________ 127<br />

Page<br />

xiv


Abbreviation<br />

ADB<br />

BAU<br />

BOO<br />

BOOT<br />

BOT<br />

BPL<br />

BRT<br />

BT<br />

BTO<br />

CBD<br />

CDM<br />

CDP<br />

CEA<br />

CEF<br />

CEPT<br />

CMP<br />

CNG<br />

CO<br />

CO 2<br />

CSOs<br />

CTTS<br />

DBFO / M<br />

DBM<br />

DBOM<br />

DMIC<br />

DP<br />

DPR<br />

EB<br />

EPCA<br />

FAR<br />

FSI<br />

GHG<br />

GIS<br />

HC<br />

HSD<br />

HUDCO<br />

IDFC<br />

ILFS<br />

IPCC<br />

ITS<br />

IUT<br />

Asian <strong>Development</strong> Bank<br />

Business as Usual<br />

Build - Own - Operate<br />

Build - Own - Operate - Transfer<br />

Build - Operate - Transfer<br />

Below Poverty Line<br />

Bus Rapid <strong>Transport</strong>ation<br />

Build Transfer<br />

Build - Transfer - Operate<br />

Central Business District<br />

Clean <strong>Development</strong> Mechanism<br />

City <strong>Development</strong> Plan<br />

Central Electricity Authority<br />

Composite Environment Fee<br />

Centre <strong>for</strong> Environmental Planning and Technology<br />

Comprehensive Mobility Plan<br />

Compressed Natural Gas<br />

Carbon Oxide<br />

Carbon Dioxide<br />

Civil Society Organisation<br />

Comprehensive Traffic and <strong>Transport</strong>ation Studies<br />

Design - Build - Finance - Operate - Maintain<br />

Design Build Maintain<br />

Design - Build - Operate - Maintain<br />

Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor<br />

<strong>Development</strong> Plan<br />

Detailed Project Report<br />

Enumeration Block<br />

Environ Pollution Control Authority<br />

Floor Area Ratio<br />

Floor Space index<br />

Green House Gases<br />

Geographic In<strong>for</strong>mation System<br />

Hydrocarbon<br />

High Speed Diesel<br />

Housing and <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Corporation<br />

Infrastructure <strong>Development</strong> Finance Company<br />

Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services<br />

Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change<br />

Intelligent <strong>Transport</strong> System<br />

Institute of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> (India)<br />

Page<br />

xv


JICA<br />

JnNURM<br />

LCMP<br />

LCS<br />

LPG<br />

LRT<br />

MFA<br />

MLAs<br />

MoUD<br />

MPs<br />

MRT<br />

MTW<br />

NAMA<br />

NAPCC<br />

NGOs<br />

NHAI<br />

NMT<br />

NOx<br />

NUIS<br />

NUTP<br />

PBS<br />

PM<br />

PPP<br />

PT<br />

PUC<br />

ROW<br />

RTA<br />

SC<br />

SLB<br />

SOx<br />

SUV<br />

TAZ<br />

TDM<br />

TERI<br />

TOD<br />

UIDSSMT<br />

ULBs<br />

UMTA<br />

<strong>UNEP</strong><br />

UNFCCC<br />

UTF<br />

Japan International Cooperation<br />

Jawaharlal Nehru National <strong>Urban</strong> Renewal Mission<br />

Low-Carbon Comprehensive Mobility Plan<br />

Low Carbon Scenario<br />

Liquefied Petroleum Gas<br />

Light Rail Transit<br />

Multilateral Funding Agency<br />

Member of legislative Assembly<br />

Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

Member of Parliament<br />

Mass Rapid <strong>Transport</strong>ation<br />

Motorised Three Wheeler<br />

Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions<br />

National Action Plan on Climate Change<br />

Non Governmental Organisation<br />

National Highway Authority<br />

Non-Motorised <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Nitrogen Oxide<br />

National <strong>Urban</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mation System<br />

National <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Policy<br />

Public Bicycle Sharing<br />

Particulate Matter<br />

Public Private Partnership<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Pollution Under Control<br />

Right of Way<br />

Regional <strong>Transport</strong> Authority<br />

Scheduled Caste<br />

Service Level Benchmarks<br />

Sulphur Oxide<br />

Sports Utility Vehicle<br />

Traffic Analysis Zone<br />

Travel Demand Management<br />

The Energy and Research Institute<br />

Transit Oriented <strong>Development</strong><br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Infrastructure <strong>Development</strong> Scheme <strong>for</strong> Small and Medium Towns<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Local Bodies<br />

Unified Metropolitan <strong>Transport</strong> Authority<br />

United Nations Environment Programme<br />

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Fund<br />

Page<br />

xvi


SECTION I:<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Background<br />

Existing CMP<br />

In 2008 Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong> (MoUD) with the assistance of the Asian <strong>Development</strong> Bank<br />

(ADB) prepared a toolkit <strong>for</strong> preparation of Comprehensive Mobility Plans (CMPs) 1 . The CMPs<br />

provide a broad framework to work out detailed projects within a long term planning framework and<br />

bring focus on mobility instead of vehicular movements alone. The Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

encouraged cities 2 to prepare CMPs be<strong>for</strong>e seeking funding <strong>for</strong> projects under Jawaharlal Nehru<br />

National <strong>Urban</strong> Renewal Mission (JnNURM).Phase I. Many cities as a result prepared CMPs using<br />

the CMP toolkit.<br />

Need <strong>for</strong> Revision<br />

In 2008 India came out with its National Action Plan on Climate Change 3 (NAPCC), which takes a<br />

mission based approach <strong>for</strong> achieving climate change goals through eight missions. The NAPCC has a<br />

mission on sustainable habitats with Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong> (MoUD) as the nodal ministry<br />

<strong>for</strong> this mission. The mission aims to make urban habitats sustainable through urban planning and<br />

modal shifts and also achieve reduction in the CO 2 emissions.<br />

A review of CMPs in JnNURM phase I undertaken by Institute of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> (IUT) and The<br />

Energy and Resource Institute (TERI) however revealed that CMPs have not indicated the long term<br />

GHG benefits and there<strong>for</strong>e it was recommended to include estimates <strong>for</strong> CO 2 emissions in the CMP.<br />

A review of the CMPs that have been submitted by cities 4 have also revealed that a detailed study of<br />

impact of projects on sustainability and meeting the travel demand of citizens (including poor and<br />

underprivileged) is missing in the CMPs. Sometimes, the CMPs assume that the benefits of largescale<br />

projects percolate equally to everyone in the society irrespective of gender, income or housing<br />

conditions. The CMP methodology as highlighted also does not have an approach <strong>for</strong> analysing<br />

climate change actions so desired under the NAPCC.<br />

In 2010, the United Nations Environment Programme (<strong>UNEP</strong>) started implementation of the project<br />

"Promoting Low Carbon <strong>Transport</strong> in India" which was funded by the International Climate Initiative<br />

of Germany. The project was endorsed by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India and has<br />

included a methodology <strong>for</strong> preparing Low-carbon Comprehensive Mobility Plan (LCMP). This<br />

1 Guidelines and <strong>Toolkits</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Development</strong> in Medium Sized Cities in India. Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

& Asian <strong>Development</strong> Bank in 2008.<br />

http://indiagovernance.gov.in/files/guidelines-and-toolkits-<strong>for</strong>-urban-transport-development.pdf<br />

2<br />

The first phase of JnNURM covered 60 cities with a population of more than 1 million http://jnnurm.nic.in/wpcontent/uploads/2010/12/broucher.pdf<br />

3<br />

Released by Prime Minister's Office (PMO) http://india.gov.in/allimpfrms/alldocs/15651.doc<br />

4 CMP reviewed include CMP <strong>for</strong> Pune, Kanpur, Jaipur, Chandigarh and Patna<br />

Page 1


methodology linked what cities have to do under JnNURM <strong>for</strong> CMP with what India as a nation<br />

would like to do <strong>for</strong> its climate change ef<strong>for</strong>ts. The LCMP methodology also had a strong focus on<br />

local environmental quality, social inclusiveness <strong>for</strong> all sections and gender. It will be an effective<br />

decision making tool which will develop low-carbon mobility scenarios, identify projects which will<br />

pave the way and earmark JnNURM funding <strong>for</strong> implementation.<br />

In 2013 IUT together with <strong>UNEP</strong> Risoe Centre and Indian Partners (Indian Institute of Technology,<br />

Delhi, CEPT Ahmedabad ,Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad and consultants 5 ) associated<br />

with <strong>UNEP</strong> project has come with a revision to CMP to make it comprehensive with regard to local<br />

environmental considerations, CO2 emissions and focus on all social sections (especially poor and<br />

underprivileged). Review and update of Toolkit <strong>for</strong> CMP has also become necessary to incorporate<br />

various suggestions and recommendations of Expert Committees / Groups on <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> and<br />

Policy enunciations by Government of India.<br />

Differences between CMP and Revised CMP<br />

In the Revised Toolkit <strong>for</strong> preparation of CMP, emphasis will be on assessment of Green House Gas<br />

(GHG) emissions, low carbon intensity in <strong>Transport</strong>ation plan, due consideration to environmental<br />

and social issues, equity <strong>for</strong> various sections of the society including urban poor, accessibility <strong>for</strong> all,<br />

development of alternative scenarios <strong>for</strong> having sustainable Accessibility and Mobility Plan, use of<br />

Intelligent <strong>Transport</strong> System (ITS) in mobility solution and effective delivery of public Transit<br />

Services, solutions <strong>for</strong> Travel Demand Management, priority <strong>for</strong> Public <strong>Transport</strong> and Non-Motorised<br />

<strong>Transport</strong>, proper land use and <strong>Transport</strong> integration.<br />

Role of CMPs in the JnNURM Process<br />

The CMP is a key document providing the rationale <strong>for</strong> transport proposals. There<strong>for</strong>e, within the<br />

overall planning hierarchy, the CMP can be considered as a prerequisite <strong>for</strong> the submission of DPR<br />

(Level 1) <strong>for</strong> JNNURM funding. Although it is not mandatory, all cities considering a funding<br />

application to central government are recommended to submit the CMP and to obtain approval from<br />

MoUD 6 . CMP is also a useful document to facilitate funding from other National or International<br />

source of funding. CMP has to be an integral part of Master Planning Process <strong>for</strong> development of city.<br />

5 LCMP have been prepared in three cities of Vishakhapatnam, Rajkot and Udaipur and from the cities<br />

participating consultants have also been actively involved in revision to the toolkit<br />

6 Preparation of a CMP is also recommended <strong>for</strong> non-JNNURM cities and towns.<br />

Page 2


Figure 1.<br />

Role of a CMP in the JNNURM Process<br />

What is a CMP?<br />

A long term vision <strong>for</strong> desirable accessibility and mobility pattern <strong>for</strong> people and goods in the city to<br />

provide, safe, secure, efficient, reliable, seamless connectivity that supports and enhances economic,<br />

social and environmental sustainability.<br />

Objectives of CMP<br />

The objectives of CMP are the following:<br />

a) To understand present travel characteristics and <strong>for</strong>ecast travel demand <strong>for</strong> the planning horizon.<br />

b) To estimate emission of CO 2 from urban transport based on the travel demand and technological<br />

choices;<br />

c) To integrate transport options with land use structure and planned regional development and create<br />

alternative scenarios <strong>for</strong> achieving low carbon mobility.<br />

d) To work out the Mobility Plan which is economically, socially, environmentally and<br />

technologically sustainable and climate resilient to achieve the goal of low carbon and inclusive<br />

transport incorporating development plans / master plans<br />

e) To suggest implementation programme <strong>for</strong> successful execution of the selected interventions.<br />

Main Features of CMP<br />

The main features of CMP are the following<br />

a) Prioritize mobility <strong>for</strong> all socio economic groups and gender<br />

Page 3


) To give adequate attention to pedestrians and non-motorised transport within transport planning<br />

c) To provide a recognised and effective plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> integrating land use and transport planning.<br />

d) To integrate impacts of transport on local air quality, CO 2 emissions, climate change and safety in<br />

the decision making process <strong>for</strong> transport projects.<br />

e) To focus on the optimisation of goods transport.<br />

Key Outcomes of CMPs<br />

The CMP should lead to the following outcomes in the long term:<br />

a) Improvement in mobility <strong>for</strong> all socio-economic groups and genders<br />

b) Reduction in CO 2 emissions with reference to the BAU scenario<br />

c) Improvement in air quality with reference to the BAU scenario<br />

d) Improvement in safety and security <strong>for</strong> pedestrians and NMT.<br />

e) Achievement of desirable indicators and benchmarks<br />

Relationships between a CMP and Other Existing Plans<br />

There are a few important plans and studies that need to be referred to when a CMP is prepared <strong>for</strong><br />

example City <strong>Development</strong> Plans (CDPs) and Master Plans and Comprehensive Traffic and<br />

<strong>Transport</strong>ation Studies (CTTS). A comparison of the tasks involved in these plans and studies is<br />

summarized in Table 1 and the relationship with the CMP is explained below<br />

Table 1.<br />

Illustrative Comparison of Major Tasks of CMPs and Other Existing <strong>Transport</strong> Plans<br />

CDP<br />

Master<br />

plan<br />

CTTS CMP Revised<br />

CMP<br />

Review of Existing <strong>Transport</strong> System √ √ √ √<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Demand Survey √ √ √<br />

Review of Land Use Plan √ √ √<br />

Analysis of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Situations √ √ √<br />

Preparation of Future Land Use Scenario √ √ √<br />

Future <strong>Transport</strong> Network Scenario √ √<br />

Future technological scenarios<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Demand Forecast Model √ √ √<br />

Model impacts on all sections of society and modes<br />

Network Evaluation √ √<br />

Model CO 2 emissions and air pollutants<br />

Impact analysis of scenarios on measurable indicators<br />

Preparation of Mobility Framework √ √<br />

Formulation of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Measures √ √ √ √ √<br />

Social and Environmental Impact Assessment √ √<br />

Institutional Scheme <strong>for</strong> Project Implementation √ √<br />

Preparation of Implementation Programs √ √ √ √<br />

Stakeholder Consultation √ √ √ √ √<br />

Periodical Update and Maintenance √ √ √<br />

√<br />

√<br />

√<br />

√<br />

Page 4


Relationship with CDP<br />

A City <strong>Development</strong> Plan (CDP) is prepared by each city in advance of requesting JnNURM funds<br />

from MoUD. The CDP addresses various urban development sectors, including urban transport.<br />

Usually, CDPs include project proposals <strong>for</strong> both infrastructure and regulatory measures, but the<br />

development of urban transport measures is not comprehensive. CDPs rarely adopt a transport<br />

modelling approach and do not include a clear strategy regarding long-term urban transport<br />

development and the ‘mobility’ concept. Comprehensive Mobility Plans (CMPs) will review transport<br />

sector programs and integrate them into more comprehensive transport sector programs that focus on<br />

integration of land use and transport and improvement of the mobility of people. A CDP also provides<br />

valuable in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding the existing and future development of the urban area.<br />

Relationship with the Master Plan<br />

A Master Plan (or <strong>Development</strong> Plan) is a statutory document <strong>for</strong> guiding and regulating urban<br />

development. It is prepared by urban development authorities / State Government <strong>for</strong> each<br />

metropolitan area and cities and towns. It defines the future area <strong>for</strong> urbanisation, and addresses<br />

planning issues <strong>for</strong> various sectors. The transport sector plan, however, is one of the most important<br />

sectors, and contains development measures such as road network (arterials, collectors, and<br />

distributors etc.), parking facilities and mass rapid transit systems. In preparing a CMP in target cities,<br />

where a Master Plan is available, it should serve as an input to the CMP. In this process, the CMP<br />

reviews the future land use patterns in the Master Plan from the mobility optimization point of view<br />

and selects a preferred pattern of land use / transport integration if necessary. If the recommendation<br />

by the CMP on urban growth pattern differs from the one in the Master Plan, the CMP<br />

recommendation may be reflected in a future version of the Master Plan. For cities where a Master<br />

Plan is not available, a CMP may be prepared first and used as an input <strong>for</strong> the preparation of the<br />

Master Plan. In this fashion CMP should be integrated within the master plan.<br />

Relationship with the CTTS<br />

Some cities have already conducted CTTSs by examining traffic and transport issues and<br />

recommending improvement measures. Some of these documents are concerned mainly with<br />

strengthening roads and flyovers, while others proposed MRT systems. While existing CTTS<br />

documents focus on vehicle flows, the CMP will concentrate on the mobility of people. A CMP<br />

addresses a wider range of land use/transport issues and investigates a wider spectrum of policy<br />

options to bring the city towards its desired mobility patterns. CTTS does not model alternate<br />

scenarios as the CTTS is a transport sector study, the in<strong>for</strong>mation, methodology (including demand<br />

modelling) contained and recommended projects/programs are highly relevant to the CMP tasks. All<br />

of these findings are, however, carefully reviewed in the process of CMP preparation so as to achieve<br />

vision and goals to optimize the mobility pattern of the metropolitan region.<br />

FAQs on Comprehensive Mobility Plan<br />

What is a CMP?<br />

A CMP presents a long-term vision of desirable mobility patterns (people and goods) <strong>for</strong> a city and<br />

provides strategy and policy measures to achieve this vision. It should follow the NUTP, which<br />

emphasizes the importance of pedestrian facilities, non-motorized transport measures, and public<br />

transport systems, including buses and sustainable mass rapid transit systems.<br />

Page 5


Who should use this toolkit?<br />

Targeted users of this CMP toolkit include policy makers, city authorities and consultants. The toolkit<br />

provides: (i) guidance in setting CMP visions/objectives <strong>for</strong> policy makers; (ii) the structure and<br />

process of CMP development <strong>for</strong> city authorities, and (iii) detailed tasks to be per<strong>for</strong>med by<br />

consultants.<br />

Why is it called a Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP)?<br />

Existing CTTS documents typically focus on mobility needs of car users, while CMPs are to address<br />

the mobility needs of all people and the infrastructure requirement <strong>for</strong> all modes, as well as to<br />

integrate both the land use (i.e., the spatial distribution of activities) and transport systems. The<br />

“comprehensive” in CMP conveys this all-encompassing scope. Existing CTTS documents allocate<br />

the majority of resources to “solving” vehicle congestion, while CMPs will focus on providing<br />

“mobility” <strong>for</strong> all people, the most important issue to be addressed <strong>for</strong> effective and sustainable urban<br />

development.<br />

Who should be responsible <strong>for</strong> the preparation of CMP?<br />

City authorities should be responsible <strong>for</strong> the preparation CMPs. During the process of the CMP<br />

preparation, it is recommended to establish an advisory committee consisting of key stakeholders and<br />

to organize seminars and workshops to obtain feedback from a wider audience.<br />

Is a CMP different from a CTTS?<br />

Yes, a CMP differs from a CTTS. While the focus of a CTTS is on the mobility of vehicles, a CMP<br />

concentrates on the mobility of all people. CMPs address a wider range of land use/transport issues<br />

and investigate a wider spectrum of policy options to bring the city towards desired mobility patterns.<br />

Do we need a CMP when a CTTS has already been prepared and approved?<br />

Yes. Cities with an approved CTTS should also prepare a CMP in order to re-examine the<br />

effectiveness and sustainability of policy measures. However, if the existing CTTS follows closely the<br />

tasks required <strong>for</strong> a CMP, the Ministry may ask only <strong>for</strong> an improved CTTS and may not require the<br />

city to prepare a wholly new CMP.<br />

What should a city do when the preparation of a CTTS has already started?<br />

If the city has made significant progress, it should continue preparing the CTTS and later prepare a<br />

CMP reflecting the findings of the CTTS. If CTTS preparation is still at an early stage, the city may<br />

modify the terms of reference and commence preparation of a CMP instead.<br />

Who should be involved in the preparation of a CMP?<br />

Preparation of a CMP should involve not only the engineering division, which is responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

building roads, but also the municipal/state passenger transport authority, as well as the city<br />

development authority. In addition, other relevant agencies and stakeholders should be consulted<br />

throughout the planning process.<br />

Why do CMPs need to be prepared BEFORE feasibility studies of specific projects?<br />

The Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong> has been receiving a number of DPRs <strong>for</strong> specific projects from<br />

many cities that fail to examine the wide range of policy options available. The projects often<br />

represent preconceived “solutions” and the documents try only to justify such “solutions”. The<br />

Page 6


Ministry considers that the submission of a CMP is a prerequisite <strong>for</strong> the submission of DPRs,<br />

because any projects or policy measures recommended should effectively contribute to the attainment<br />

of “comprehensive mobility” visions that are effective and sustainable from the long-term perspective<br />

of future city development.<br />

How much detail is required in recommended policy measures included in a CMP?<br />

Although a CMP serves as a visionary document, it should provide a clear and logical methodology.<br />

As such, any project recommended in a CMP should be broadly defined in its characteristics, such as<br />

basic concepts, <strong>for</strong>m, area covered, components, preliminary estimation of costs, financing options,<br />

implementation organization and social/environmental implications. A further level of detail required<br />

<strong>for</strong> feasibility assessment and detailed design should be per<strong>for</strong>med after the CMP is approved.<br />

Is the application of demand modelling always necessary to prepare a CMP?<br />

It is recommended that the strategy <strong>for</strong> land use and transport development be based on a scientific<br />

approach. For cities where demand models have already been developed, <strong>for</strong> example within the<br />

existing CTTS, the models should be utilized to in preparing the CMP. For cities with limited time<br />

and resources, a simplified approach to transport demand modeling may be applied. A simplified<br />

modeling technique adopts techniques, such as a reduced sampling rate <strong>for</strong> the OD survey, use of<br />

larger traffic zones, use of strategic transport network, which help resource and time required <strong>for</strong><br />

transport demand modeling.<br />

What are the planning horizons of a CMP?<br />

The typical CMP planning horizon will be 20 years, but CMPs should also cover actions to be taken<br />

within 5 and 10 years.<br />

Do CMPs need to be updated regularly?<br />

Yes. Since cities are constantly changing, it is recommended that every city update its CMP at least<br />

once every five years.<br />

Page 7


SECTION II:<br />

PREPARATION PROCESS<br />

Understanding Key CMP Tasks<br />

The major tasks to develop a CMP are set out below. Detailed task descriptions are given in Section<br />

III<br />

Task 1:<br />

Task 2:<br />

Task 3:<br />

Task 4:<br />

Task 5:<br />

Task 6:<br />

Defining Scope of the CMP<br />

Data Collection and Analysis of the Existing <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Environment<br />

<strong>Development</strong> of Business as Usual (BAU) Scenario<br />

<strong>Development</strong> of Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Scenarios<br />

<strong>Development</strong> of <strong>Urban</strong> Mobility Plan<br />

Preparation of the Implementation Program<br />

Stakeholder Consultation<br />

Stakeholder consultation is an important exercise <strong>for</strong> various reasons:<br />

a) Understanding the city: It is necessary to engage with stakeholders who work in the city. Ground<br />

experience of the stakeholders with the city is valuable and need to be captured. This exercise will<br />

help us in understanding not just the characteristics of the city but also help us in understanding the<br />

main bottle necks and strengths of the city which will have to be dealt with in the course of our<br />

work. By understanding the limitations within which the stakeholders work, we will be able to<br />

develop more relevant scenarios <strong>for</strong> the city and make better recommendations.<br />

b) Stakeholder consultations have been widely recognized as an important exercise in recent times.<br />

The top down approach where, recommendations are made to a city without involving it in the<br />

deliberation process and using its know-how has been widely criticized. It is now recognized that<br />

each city has its unique character. The recommendations made, have to be suited to the unique<br />

circumstances under which the city functions.<br />

c) The scope of work of each organization: There are a number of agencies that operate in a city.<br />

Sometimes, multiple agencies will be involved in the same area. For example: Construction and<br />

maintenance of roads in a city won’t fall under the jurisdiction of a single agency. A number of<br />

agencies are involved in the same.<br />

d) There is usually but a clear demarcation of what the scope of work of each agency is. It is<br />

necessary to understand the exact jurisdiction of each agency. This will help us in understanding<br />

the exact tasks that each organization is responsible <strong>for</strong> and also identify areas where there is<br />

overlap of tasks and responsibilities. That is, stakeholder consultations will help us in capturing the<br />

exact institutional and organizational framework in the city.<br />

e) Developing alternative scenarios: CMP would involve developing alternative scenarios. The<br />

differences between the alternatives will be made of differences in policy; institutional framework;<br />

transport plans of the city; technological innovations and other such details. Stakeholder<br />

consultation will help in building these alternative scenarios<br />

f) Building a rapport with the city: By engaging with the stakeholders, we will be able to create a<br />

rapport in the city. This is highly necessary because certain recommendations will be made in the<br />

CMP which need to be implemented. Having a rapport with the city will ensure that the<br />

Page 8


ecommendations are smoothly implemented and problems and bottlenecks are minimized in the<br />

implementation stage.<br />

g) It is to be noted that certain stakeholders may not contribute to the creation of LCMP but could be<br />

powerful enough to hinder the implementation. By engaging these stakeholders and keeping them<br />

regularly in the loop of the project and taking some of their recommendations into consideration,<br />

will help in ensuring maximum support from the city.<br />

h) In making in<strong>for</strong>med plans with corrective mechanism<br />

Identifying Stakeholders<br />

Stakeholders to be included from a wide list which includes:<br />

a) Government Bodies like Municipal corporations, <strong>Development</strong> Authorities, Public Works<br />

Departments, Traffic Police, <strong>Transport</strong> Department, Environment Pollution Control Authority<br />

(EPCA), Fire and Ambulance Services, Environment Department, Cantonment Board, <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Corporations, etc.<br />

b) Experts in the field of transport from Academic Institutes and Research bodies and Consultants or<br />

practitioners in the field.<br />

c) Media- Both print and electronic media<br />

d) Non-governmental organisations (NGOs)/ Civil Society Organisations (CSOs)<br />

e) Elected Representatives from city (Ward councillors/ Corporators), state (MLAs, <strong>Transport</strong><br />

minister) or Centre (MP).<br />

f) Operators like auto rickshaw unions, private bus operators.<br />

g) Others like Unions, Bus and Cycle Manufactures, owners and operators of transport infrastructure<br />

h) User groups like resident welfare associations, local businesses, etc.<br />

Classifying stakeholders on the basis of their role in transport<br />

a) Organizations or individuals responsible <strong>for</strong> making decisions regarding transport. These<br />

organizations could be involved either at city level planning of transport or framing policies or in<br />

transport operations. That is, government organizations <strong>for</strong> which transport is one of the primary<br />

focus and thus they are directly involved.<br />

b) Organizations or individuals who are not part of the government but are directly involved in the<br />

transport operations in the city. This could include auto rickshaw unions, taxi drivers<br />

association, parking lot managers or owners, travel association, etc. This group could also include<br />

Private players who are involved with the government in various transport based PPP operations<br />

like operation of buses, toll roads, etc.<br />

c) Organizations or individuals (government or non-government) whose activities tend to shape<br />

the transport needs and demands of the city. This will include large industrial units, urban<br />

development authorities, ports, railways, etc. as well as regular citizen groups represented through<br />

RWAs.<br />

d) Organizations and individuals (government or non-government) who hold prominent positions<br />

are important opinion makers in the city. This will include the Press; Universities, colleges and<br />

other educational institutes; popular NGOs and other popular representative organizations like<br />

Confederation of Indian Industry.<br />

Another way of classifying the stakeholders is on the basis of their location (centre, state and city<br />

level) and roles in the transport system (planning & policy, infrastructure, operations and monitoring<br />

/evaluation). A classification done <strong>for</strong> Visakhapatnam during the LCMP is provided in Annexure 3<br />

Page 9


Managing Stakeholders<br />

Stakeholder management is important to ensure a long term involvement in planning and<br />

implementation of CMP. The stakeholders identified should be classified according to their attitude<br />

towards sustainable transport initiatives as well as their level of power or influence on the same. Such<br />

an exercise would help in grouping similar stakeholders together. ‘Ecology of actors’ framework used<br />

<strong>for</strong> mapping and managing the stakeholders is shown in Figure below.<br />

Figure 2.<br />

Ecology of Actors 7 framework <strong>for</strong> managing stakeholders<br />

This framework classifies stakeholders into four categories depending on their power/ influence levels<br />

and their attitude towards sustainable transport. These four groups are:<br />

a) Partners: High on influence/power and positive attitude;<br />

b) Fans/ weak partners: Low on Influence and positive attitude;<br />

c) Opponents: High on power/ influence and negative attitude;<br />

d) Outsiders/ weak opponents: Low on power/Influence and negative attitude.<br />

Stakeholders who fall under the opponents’ category are the most important obstacles. The priority<br />

should be given to make these stakeholders, partners to the issue. If this is not possible, ef<strong>for</strong>ts should<br />

7 Source: Lake Sagaris’s Presentation: “Inclusive planning <strong>for</strong> GOOD, JUST, LIVEABLE cities”, March 2012<br />

(Tom Godefrooij, I-CE/Brabant planners, The Netherlands)<br />

Page<br />

10


e made to at least make these stakeholders outsiders/ weak opponents to the whole issue.<br />

Stakeholders who are classified under the partners list should be roped in as partners to help in the<br />

implementation of the projects or increase its popularity. Stakeholders who are fans could also<br />

potentially be involved in the same. This is because, certain ‘fan’ stakeholders in spite not being very<br />

powerful in the whole issue will have a large influence on a particular ‘opponent’ stakeholder. This<br />

classification also helps in understanding which stakeholders can be classified and targeted together<br />

under a single campaign.<br />

It is to be noted that in most cases, attitude to a topic like sustainable transport is not explicitly<br />

mentioned. That is none of the agencies would openly declare themselves to be against the idea of<br />

sustainability. Attitude is thus not based on the defined official policy of the organization but<br />

according to their response to implementation of sustainable transport on ground in the city. This<br />

requires knowledge about how exactly each of these above mentioned stakeholders responded to<br />

sustainable transport projects like implementation of BRT or a parking policy in the city.<br />

This exercise is best carried out by a group of transport experts from the city. It is highly necessary<br />

that the experts have experience in the city and a good understanding on transport projects within the<br />

city. This group could comprise of: Academicians from transport departments; Practitioners/<br />

consultants in the field; prominent members from civil society organizations; Official from civic<br />

agencies, etc. In cases where it is not possible to create such an expert panel, the consultants may<br />

themselves take the task of classifying stakeholders after the preliminary round of discussions with<br />

each stakeholder.<br />

Mapping also helps in prioritizing the stakeholders that need to be targeted. A few powerful<br />

organizations with negative attitude can delay the implementation of a project <strong>for</strong> a long time. It is<br />

hence necessary to identify the exact stakeholders who need to be engaged (For illustration of type of<br />

stakeholder consultation carried <strong>for</strong> Visakhapatnam refer Annexure 3)<br />

Stages of CMP where stakeholder Consultations play a role<br />

Table 2.<br />

Tasks where SH are involved<br />

Task Description Whether SH are involved Why<br />

Task 1 Delineation of<br />

Planning area,<br />

planning horizon<br />

and vision <strong>for</strong> city<br />

Yes To develop a shared<br />

vision <strong>for</strong> the city<br />

Task 2<br />

Data collection and<br />

analysis of existing<br />

urban transport<br />

environment<br />

Yes To identify<br />

Stakeholders<br />

To map stakeholders<br />

according to: Role in<br />

transport sector,<br />

Functionality and<br />

Attitude towards<br />

Page<br />

11


Task Description Whether SH are involved Why<br />

sustainable transport<br />

Task 3 <strong>Development</strong> of<br />

Business As Usual<br />

(BAU) scenario <strong>for</strong><br />

horizon years<br />

To map preferences<br />

of stakeholders<br />

No -<br />

Task 4 <strong>Development</strong> of<br />

Yes For feedback on<br />

Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong><br />

BAU scenario and<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Scenario<br />

city indicators<br />

For feedback on<br />

storylines <strong>for</strong> on<br />

sustainable urban<br />

scenarios proposed<br />

For confirmation of<br />

benchmarks<br />

Task 5 <strong>Urban</strong> Mobility Plan Yes For feedback on plans<br />

related to land use, public<br />

transport, road network,<br />

NMT, etc.<br />

Task 6<br />

Prefeasibility<br />

pilot projects<br />

<strong>for</strong><br />

No -<br />

Preparing <strong>for</strong> a CMP: Where to Start?<br />

Master Plan <strong>for</strong> the city can be taken as a starting point <strong>for</strong> preparation of CMP. Land use structure<br />

and transport proposal indicated in the Master Plan can serve as guidance <strong>for</strong> the BAU scenario. CMP<br />

however analyses alternative land use scenarios and accordingly the required changes in the land use<br />

structure may be suggested <strong>for</strong> incorporation in the revised version of the Master Plan.<br />

Page<br />

12


Figure 3.<br />

Flowchart of How to Use the CMP Toolkit<br />

Consultation <strong>for</strong> Validation of CMP<br />

CMP is a roadmap document with long-term, inclusive and integrated vision. The intent of the process<br />

is to validate the CMP document through consultation with stakeholders/agencies which will have<br />

important role during the implementation of the CMP and whose validation is important <strong>for</strong><br />

acceptability of the CMP. The consultations <strong>for</strong> the validation of the document would follow two<br />

processes: i) Stakeholder consultations within the city (Described under stakeholder consultation), ii)<br />

Consultation with and analysis by verifying agency (e.g. by client / government either in-house or by<br />

outsourcing).<br />

Page<br />

13


Example Work Schedule<br />

Task Month<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Inception Meeting (Stakeholders) X<br />

Task 1<br />

Defining Scope<br />

Inception Report X<br />

Task 2<br />

Task 2-1 to 2-4<br />

Task 2-5 to 2-7<br />

Task 2-8<br />

Submit Draft Report Task 2 X<br />

Task 3<br />

Task 3-1 to 3-3<br />

Task 3-4 to 3-7<br />

Submit Draft Report Task 3 X<br />

Task 4<br />

Task 3-1 to 3-3<br />

Stakeholder consultation X<br />

Task 3-4 to 3-7<br />

Submit Draft Report Task 4 X<br />

Task 5<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Mobility Plan<br />

Task 6<br />

Programs / Project<br />

Stakeholder consultation X<br />

Final CMP Report X<br />

X – Indicates Milestone<br />

Page<br />

14


SECTION II:<br />

TASK DESCRIPTIONS<br />

TASK 1: Defining the Scope of the CMP<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e preparing a CMP, its scope should be clearly defined. Specifically, the inception report <strong>for</strong><br />

CMP should indicate:<br />

• The planning area; and<br />

• The target year or planning horizon (long, medium, short-term and immediate measures)<br />

Planning Area<br />

The planning area should be clearly defined at the beginning of the CMP. It should cover the urban<br />

agglomeration area, planning area, urbanisable area, or city region as identified in the Master<br />

Plan/Regional Plan. In many aspects, the Master Plan should be used as a base <strong>for</strong> preparing the<br />

CMP.<br />

Size of City<br />

Metro city (> 10 lakhs)<br />

Large city (5 – 10 lakhs)<br />

Other city (> 1 lakh)<br />

Planning Area<br />

Metropolitan area / Region<br />

(as identified by state government)<br />

Planning area / urbanisable area<br />

(as indicated in the Master Plan)<br />

Municipal / urbanisable area<br />

A CMP must address not only city transportation needs, but also the needs <strong>for</strong> interconnections with<br />

satellite towns and Special Economic Zones (SEZs) adjacent to the city. Since it is clear that cities<br />

will continue to grow beyond municipal boundaries, and will likely expand to the urban<br />

agglomeration, the planning area <strong>for</strong> the CMP needs to include the urban agglomeration. Care should<br />

be taken, however, that the zone size <strong>for</strong> analysing travel behaviour and impacts is small enough to<br />

take into account non-motorized trips and access/egress trips made <strong>for</strong> using public transport<br />

(discussed in detail in later this section).<br />

Planning Horizon<br />

If we consider that CMP leads to investments in transport infrastructures with long-term impacts on<br />

climate change and other issues, the CMP long-term planning horizon should be at least 20 years from<br />

the base year. Short- and medium-term target ranges should be five and ten years, respectively. Since<br />

the social and economic situation in Indian cities is changing rapidly, CMPs should be updated at least<br />

every five years. The CMP horizon should be aligned with the Master Plan horizon, as much as this is<br />

possible. Constant monitoring and review mechanism should be built in the process.<br />

Vision <strong>for</strong> the City<br />

A vision statement <strong>for</strong> the direction of the city’s transport system should be based on a diagnosis of<br />

the current urban transport environment and the future urban scenario. It must be in line with the<br />

overall vision of city growth indicated in the Master Plan. Qualitative and quantitative targets <strong>for</strong><br />

major indicators should be indicated <strong>for</strong> the horizon years.<br />

Page<br />

15


TASK 2: Data Collection and Analysis of the Existing <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Environment<br />

Task 2-1 Review of the City Profile<br />

To study the city’s present socio-economic profile and trends over a period of time, data needs to be<br />

collected on the location, regional linkages, demography, land area and socio-economic groups. These<br />

trends must then be studied in order to develop scenarios. The table below shows the data requirement<br />

<strong>for</strong> the CMP. The areas shaded green reflect data required to ensure that CMPs are inclusive.<br />

Table 3.<br />

City Profile<br />

Data required Description Data Source Data level 2<br />

Geographical location Master Plans of the city and region if City wide<br />

Location<br />

available<br />

Climatic condition Master Plans/CDP City wide<br />

Total land area<br />

Master Plan of the city and region City wide<br />

/Census<br />

Land area Growth pattern Master Plan of the city and region City wide<br />

Identification of notified Master Plan of the city and region City wide<br />

areas<br />

Regional linkages Regional Master Plan/CDP City wide<br />

Population growth trend by Census<br />

City wide<br />

census wards or enumeration<br />

Demography blocks<br />

Number and size of HH Census City wide<br />

Age-sex pyramid Census City wide<br />

Population by social group 1 Census and surveys City wide<br />

Population<br />

by If city level GIS data available or EB City wide<br />

income/expenditure at TAZ data of the Census and surveys<br />

Socio-economic<br />

or ward level<br />

data<br />

Vehicle ownership EB data of the Census and surveys City wide<br />

(including bicycles) by<br />

social group<br />

1 social groups are defined as i) slum dwellers; ii) within the slums, households living in katcha<br />

housing, indicating BPL households; iii) recent migrants to the city and temporary migrants to the<br />

city; iv) households living in relocated sites; v) SC households; vi) minority groups; and vii) street<br />

vendors, etc. The data should also be disaggregated by sex.<br />

2<br />

Citywide data available through secondary sources or through reprocessing of census data.<br />

Regional linkage required <strong>for</strong> the CMP refers to railway and national highway links with other cities<br />

and towns. It also refers to the linkages with the immediate hinterland. Detailed travel behaviour<br />

needs to be studied at city level, however, it is also necessary to understand the commuting pattern<br />

within urban agglomerations and to and from the agglomeration’s immediate hinterlands.<br />

Task 2-2 Delineation of Traffic Analysis Zones<br />

CMPs aim to ensure safe accessibility <strong>for</strong> all, irrespective of their socio-economic background<br />

(gender, income and caste) and in a way that does not compromise environmental health. The CMP<br />

should provide a roadmap, or in other words, infrastructure development and investment options that<br />

both provide a desirable level of mobility and accessibility as well as carbon emissions rates that are<br />

Page<br />

16


aligned with the national vision. CMP relies on “avoid, shift and improve methodology” (avoid<br />

motorized trips when possible and offer public transport options), to encourage the shift to low-carbon<br />

modes (e.g., non-motorized transport (NMT) modes) and improve the efficiency of motorized<br />

vehicles in a way that is beneficial to the environment. This requires modelling and estimating the<br />

impacts of various policies and strategies on NMT and Public <strong>Transport</strong> use in cities. It must be<br />

ensured that walking, bicycle and access/egress trips 8 are considered in the model and the structured<br />

and orderly behaviour of the population being modelled is captured as well. Data at enumeration<br />

block (EB) level consisting of 100 to 120 households can be obtained from the local authority or<br />

census office. This will help in getting the data required <strong>for</strong> spatial mapping of socio-economic groups<br />

using EB area as the smallest spatial unit and possible TAZ size.<br />

Task 2-3 Review of Land Use Pattern & Population Density<br />

When deciding which data, methods and<br />

sources to use to collect, represent and<br />

analyse land use and density data sets, there<br />

are some essential issues to consider. First, it<br />

is important to identify the smallest unit of<br />

analysis (See Task 2-2). Secondly, data from<br />

higher or lower spatial units (e.g., census<br />

ward) must be quantified in a way that<br />

represents the ground reality accurately (as<br />

we move towards higher spatial aggregation<br />

zones, a lot of variation in data is lost or<br />

averaged out). Thirdly, slums should be<br />

considered as part of residential land use and<br />

not a separate land use. Lastly, residential<br />

land use marked should have income groups<br />

marked. This can be done through proxy of<br />

per capita floor area in case income details<br />

are not available.<br />

National <strong>Urban</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mation Scheme (NUIS)<br />

NUIS data is available online and also provides a<br />

possibility to merging it with property tax data, thus<br />

creating an extensive data set with in<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

use of land, along with floor space developed per<br />

land use. NUIS Scheme has GIS databases <strong>for</strong> 152<br />

towns / cities (March 2009) in the country in two<br />

scales i.e., 1:10,000 and 1:2000. Apart from spatial<br />

data, this database has attribute data which will be<br />

useful <strong>for</strong> preparation of Master/<strong>Development</strong><br />

plans, detailed town planning schemes and serve as<br />

decision support <strong>for</strong> e-governance. NIUS database<br />

was used <strong>for</strong> the LCMP of Rajkot and consisted of<br />

spatial data of each building, in<strong>for</strong>mation on all<br />

roads, and other utilities including street furniture.<br />

Land Use Data<br />

CDP or Master Plans are a prime data source <strong>for</strong> reviewing existing land-use patterns. However, there<br />

are well-documented concerns about poor development control in India, 9 and development plans and<br />

Master plans often do not represent actual development on the ground 10 . An alternative source <strong>for</strong> land<br />

8 NMT modes account <strong>for</strong> more than 50% <strong>for</strong> travel in most Indian cities<br />

9 See Pucher, J., et al. (2005). "<strong>Urban</strong> transport crisis in India." <strong>Transport</strong> Policy 12(3): 185-198.; , Dimitriou, H. T.<br />

(2006). "Towards a generic sustainable urban transport strategy <strong>for</strong> middle-sized cities in Asia: Lessons from<br />

Ningbo, Kanpur and Solo." Habitat International 30(4): 1082-1099., Alan, T. (1992). "<strong>Urban</strong> planning in the<br />

developing world: Lessons from experience." Ibid. 16(2): 113-126.,<br />

10 See Munshi, T. (2013). Built <strong>for</strong>m , Travel Behaviour and Low Carbon Develpment in Ahmedabad, India.<br />

Faculty of ITC. Enschede, the Netherlands, University of Twente. PhD.<br />

Page<br />

17


use in<strong>for</strong>mation that is more accurate and reliable is the data collected by the National <strong>Urban</strong><br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Scheme (NIUS) 11 (see box).<br />

In cities where NIUS data is not available, CDP or Master Plans can be used in conjunction with<br />

remote sensing data and property tax data. One important land use element that is missing in all<br />

conventionally available statutory and non-statutory data sets in India is in<strong>for</strong>mation on street<br />

activities like hawkers and other temporary establishments. These activities are significant in terms of<br />

their share in the city’s overall activities (residential and non-residential) and should thus be included<br />

as part of the land use analysis.<br />

Data on Densities<br />

In addition to residential densities, jobs densities must also be studied and analysed. Data on<br />

population is available from the census of India <strong>for</strong> the year 2011. However, this statistical data is<br />

commonly available only <strong>for</strong> census wards. As stated earlier, these levels of aggregation might be too<br />

high to capture NMT movements within the city, which are crucial from a mobility perspective.<br />

Hence, TAZs, which can be smaller than a ward, will be essential. In the Indian census data, an EB 12<br />

is a smaller unit than a census ward. The TAZs can be determined using census EB data. If building<br />

footprint data is available, per capita floor space—calculated from the census data superimposed on<br />

the property tax data—can be used to compute the per capita residential floor space <strong>for</strong> every TAZ. In<br />

some Indian cities like Rajkot, number of jobs can be pinned to the building footprint using property<br />

tax dataset. However, in most other cities, data on jobs is available only at the city scale and needs to<br />

be disaggregated to TAZ level. For this purpose, one could make use of the value <strong>for</strong> average per-job<br />

space consumption in the city and the location and extent of commercial and industrial activities in<br />

the land use map.<br />

Analysing Land Use<br />

The pattern of land use needs to be analysed, which can be determined by analysing land/floor area<br />

consumption per land use in each TAZ. It is also important to understand how land use is mixed by<br />

calculating the ratio of the number of jobs to the number of household in each zone. Similarly, to<br />

understand how individuals are accessing activities, it is important to analyse the average time taken<br />

to reach retail stores and other nearby facilities. This can be calculated from primary surveys and the<br />

trip diary method discussed under “Household Surveys” (Task 2-5).<br />

Analysing Density<br />

The analysis of density in Indian cities should be done to determine two indicators: the number of<br />

person/jobs per unit area, and floor space used per activity per unit area. Using floor space per activity<br />

as an indicator will help in comparing the BAU urban development projection with sustainable urban<br />

policy scenarios. For example, comparing land use scenarios when a different Floor Space Index 13<br />

11 Available online at http://urbanindia.nic.in/programme/lsg/nuis.htm ) that is in town where such data sets are not<br />

available.<br />

12<br />

Data on census enumeration block boundaries is available from Census of India<br />

(http://censusindia.gov.in/Maps/Map_Products/Rate_link/rate_list_<strong>for</strong>_maps.html), and data on population in these<br />

wards is easily available from local census office.<br />

13 Ratio of built-up area to land area<br />

Page<br />

18


(F.S.I) norm is introduced may reveal changes in either the per-activity consumption of floor space or<br />

in the sheer number of activities available in the same amount of land as be<strong>for</strong>e.<br />

Identifying Low Income Groups<br />

Housing characteristics can be a useful indicator of income. For example, slum housing indicates a<br />

low-income, poor population. Within the slum, low-income households often live in kutcha houses.<br />

The TAZ data from property taxes, which also indicates per capita floor space, is also an indicator of<br />

a low-income household.<br />

Task 2-4 Review of the Existing <strong>Transport</strong> Systems<br />

A review of existing transport infrastructure and facilities needs to be done <strong>for</strong> each transport mode,<br />

including walking, bicycle, cycle rickshaw, auto rickshaw, shared auto-rickshaw and public transport.<br />

The review should include all types of facilities and amenities including pavement description,<br />

intersection treatments, lighting, parking space, parking cost and operation-related parameters.<br />

Review of Existing Road Network Inventory<br />

Road users can be classified as motorized (cars, two-wheelers, para-transit, shared and private auto<br />

rickshaw, and bus) and non-motorized (pedestrians, bicyclists and cycle rickshaw). For each mode,<br />

there are different requirements <strong>for</strong> ensuring easy, com<strong>for</strong>table and safe mobility. It is thus necessary<br />

to assess the existing infrastructure quality with respect to each of the modes as in the table below (the<br />

fields in green cover aspects related to inclusiveness and accessibility).<br />

Table 4.<br />

Road inventory data<br />

Data required Description Data<br />

level 1<br />

Width<br />

Sample<br />

Single sided/both side Sample<br />

Continuity<br />

Sample<br />

Footpath (Survey Encroachment by other Sample<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 1a)<br />

activity/vehicles<br />

Pavement condition<br />

Sample<br />

Lighting<br />

Sample<br />

Clear markings<br />

Sample<br />

Infrastructure <strong>for</strong> pedestrians (Survey Format<br />

2)<br />

Infrastructure <strong>for</strong> bicycle and cycle rickshaws<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 2)<br />

Intersections<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 1b)<br />

Access<br />

Lanes<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 2a)<br />

(Survey<br />

Signalized crossing<br />

Level/raised crossing<br />

Traffic calming tools like<br />

speed breakers<br />

Intermediate crossing<br />

sections<br />

Crossing distance<br />

Barrier free access to bus<br />

stops (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4b)<br />

Barrier free access to<br />

footpaths (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 1a)<br />

Cycle lanes/tracks<br />

Width of cycle lanes/tracks<br />

Both sided/single sided<br />

Encroachment by other<br />

activity/vehicles<br />

Lighting<br />

Pavement condition<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Page<br />

19


Data required Description Data<br />

level 1<br />

Intersection<br />

treatment (Survey<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 2b)<br />

Parking<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 2c)<br />

(Survey<br />

Para-transit (auto rickshaw including shared auto rickshaws and<br />

cycle rickshaw) (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3)<br />

Public transport (bus) - In absence of bus<br />

services, a similar analysis can also be made<br />

of the existing shared rickshaw services in<br />

the given city. (0)<br />

Personal motorized vehicles (PMV)- cars and<br />

two wheelers (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5)<br />

1 For sampling technique, refer to Task 2.5<br />

Infrastructure<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4a)<br />

Bus stop (Survey<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 4b)<br />

Road infrastructure<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5a)<br />

Intersections<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5b)<br />

Parking<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 5c)<br />

(Survey<br />

Signalized intersections<br />

Traffic calming tools<br />

Traffic calming <strong>for</strong> access to<br />

properties<br />

Number of parking<br />

Distance of parking from PT<br />

stop<br />

Parking charges<br />

Restricted / non-restricted<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5a)<br />

Number of parking by<br />

specification of parking areas<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3e)<br />

Distance of <strong>for</strong>mal parking<br />

from bus stop (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat<br />

3e)<br />

Distance between parking<br />

stations(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3e)<br />

Parking charges(Survey<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 3e)<br />

Dedicated bus lanes if any<br />

(type and description)<br />

Average speed on different<br />

roads<br />

Number of bus stops<br />

Bus stop inventory<br />

Average distance between<br />

bus stop<br />

Location of bus stop with<br />

respect to junction<br />

Passenger amenities on bus<br />

stop<br />

Number of bus terminals<br />

ROW<br />

Number of lanes<br />

Average speed on different<br />

roads<br />

Road encroachment<br />

Lighting<br />

Type of intersectionsignalized/un-signalized<br />

Turning time from each<br />

direction<br />

Signal phasing<br />

Parking regulations<br />

Number of parking<br />

Parking charges by mode<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

Sample<br />

The data requirement listed above determines the existing status of infrastructure type. Furthermore, it<br />

is necessary to assess the system’s quality through parameters like traffic flow, delays, frequency and<br />

waiting time. This in<strong>for</strong>mation helps technical experts in model development and well as calibration<br />

(traffic flow simulation, etc.).<br />

Page<br />

20


Review of the Public <strong>Transport</strong> System<br />

Data must be collected regarding the per<strong>for</strong>mance and level of service provision <strong>for</strong> public transport<br />

users. The data differs from CMP methodology in terms of determining taxes levied and the subsidies<br />

being given. This identifies the ULB’s priorities <strong>for</strong> promoting the city’s public transport system. The<br />

table below lists the data requirements <strong>for</strong> the public transport system (See 0).<br />

Table 5. Data <strong>for</strong> public transport system (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4)<br />

Data required Description Data Source Data<br />

level<br />

Number of buses by type of bus ULB & RTO Citywide 1<br />

(standard, mini, low floor), fuel used<br />

and age<br />

Fleet utilization rate<br />

State Road <strong>Transport</strong> Corporation Citywide 1<br />

(SRTC) report & city’s bus company<br />

Fleet usage detail<br />

if any<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4c)<br />

Vehicular kilometers SRTC report Citywide 1<br />

Average kilometers per bus per day SRTC report Citywide 1<br />

Percentage occupancy- peak hour SRTC report & city’s bus company Citywide 1<br />

and average<br />

if any<br />

Total passengers per day SRTC report Citywide 1<br />

Route detail Route inventory<br />

SRTC report & city’s bus company Citywide 1<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4e)<br />

if any<br />

Headway on different routes Survey Sample 2<br />

Average route speed Survey Sample 2<br />

Service reliability Survey Sample 2<br />

Cost and fare Operation cost per km<br />

SRTC report & city’s bus company Citywide 1<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4d)<br />

if any<br />

Tax levied<br />

SRTC report & city’s bus company Citywide 1<br />

if any<br />

Fare structure<br />

SRTC report & city’s bus company Citywide 1<br />

if any<br />

Revenue per km<br />

SRTC report & city’s bus company Citywide 1<br />

if any<br />

Profit/loss<br />

SRTC report & city’s bus company Citywide 1<br />

if any<br />

1 City wide data is available through secondary sources..<br />

2 Sampling technique refer Task 2.5<br />

Review of Para-Transit System<br />

The data <strong>for</strong> para-transit (auto-rickshaw, cycle rickshaw and shared auto-rickshaw) should be filled in<br />

Survey Format 3.<br />

Table 6.<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 3)<br />

Para-transit system(*) – auto-rickshaw, cycle rickshaw and shared auto-rickshaw (Survey<br />

Data required Description Data Source Data<br />

level<br />

Type of ownership RTO, para-transit Citywide1<br />

Fleet usage detail<br />

workers’ union &<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3a and<br />

3b)<br />

Number of para-transit by type (shared,<br />

survey<br />

RTO, para-transit Citywide1<br />

personal autos and cycle rickshaw), fuel used workers’ union &<br />

Page<br />

21


Data required Description Data Source Data<br />

level<br />

and age<br />

survey<br />

Vehicular kilometers para-transit workers’ Citywide1<br />

union & survey<br />

Route inventory <strong>for</strong> shared auto para-transit workers’ Citywide1<br />

Route detail (Survey<br />

union & survey<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 3c)<br />

Average waiting time <strong>for</strong> auto, cycle rickshaw para-transit workers’ Sample2<br />

and shared auto<br />

union & survey<br />

Operation cost per km para-transit workers’ Citywide1<br />

union & survey<br />

Tax levied para-transit workers’ Citywide1<br />

union & survey<br />

Cost and fare (Survey Fare structure para-transit workers’ Citywide1<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 3d)<br />

union & survey<br />

Revenue per km para-transit workers’ Citywide1<br />

union &survey<br />

Profit/loss para-transit workers’ Citywide1<br />

union & survey<br />

(*) This is not an exhaustive lists of options and can be extended to include water transport, ropeways,<br />

etc<br />

1 City wide data is available through secondary sources. Citywide surveys are possible <strong>for</strong> cities except<br />

the large 8-10 metropolises.<br />

2 Sampling technique refer Task 2.5<br />

Review of Freight <strong>Transport</strong><br />

This is an essential component necessary to track freight movement within city. This may include<br />

through trips and within city trips. The following data is required <strong>for</strong> both.<br />

Table 7. Freight movement survey (See 0)<br />

Data required Description Data Source Data level<br />

Freight vehicle movement Origin and destination points Surveys Sample 1<br />

Freight vehicle parking Parking areas <strong>for</strong> freight vehicles and cost Surveys Sample 1<br />

Review of Traffic Conditions on Roads<br />

The existing traffic situation is the outcome of the travel demand, modes used to meet travel demand,<br />

transport infrastructure and the level of service. Studying traffic conditions will not only allow<br />

technical experts to calibrate the transport demand model but also analyze and identify the loopholes<br />

in traffic management and transport infrastructure. In order to study traffic conditions, the following<br />

data must be collected (0):<br />

Table 8. Traffic volume count, delay and queue length (See survey <strong>for</strong>mat 6)<br />

Data required Description Data Source Data level<br />

Traffic count<br />

Screen line by modes Surveys Sample1<br />

At intersection by modes Surveys Sample 1<br />

Queue length by mode Surveys Sample 1<br />

Delay and Queue length<br />

Delay by mode Surveys Sample 1<br />

Travel speed by mode Surveys Sample 1<br />

1 For sampling technique, refer to Task 1.<br />

Page<br />

22


Review of Traffic Safety<br />

Accident data is reported as minor (slight injuries), serious and fatal and often minor and serious<br />

accidents are underreported There<strong>for</strong>e we recommend only analysing fatal accidents. Measuring<br />

indicators <strong>for</strong> traffic safety requires quantifying the number of victims and identifying the vehicle of<br />

impact (survey <strong>for</strong>mat 8).<br />

Table 9. Data required <strong>for</strong> safety analysis (See survey Format 8)<br />

Data required Description Data Source Data level<br />

Number of victim involved in traffic By victim mode Traffic police FIR City level<br />

fatalities and location<br />

By impacting vehicle Traffic police FIR City level<br />

Security<br />

It is difficult to measure security levels <strong>for</strong> each mode because of the underreporting of data. Security<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation should be collected from two sources: through police records and through household<br />

surveys that indicate perceptions about security levels while using each of the modes. The table below<br />

describes the data source and data to be collected <strong>for</strong> security from police records.<br />

Table 10. Security aspects (See survey <strong>for</strong>mat 9)<br />

Data required Description Data Source<br />

Reported crimes (to include sexual Disaggregated by mode and Police records & household survey<br />

harassment)<br />

location<br />

regarding perception<br />

Task 2-5 Data Collection Approach – Methodology and Sources<br />

The data collected and the model developed is to be publicly shared with the Knowledge Management<br />

Centre (IUT) and cities.<br />

Type of Data<br />

Citywide and sample data related to city structure, transport infrastructure, vehicle profile in the city,<br />

municipal budgets and investments, police reported crimes and accidents and travel behaviour must<br />

be collected in order to prepare CMPs. Relevant data can be collected from secondary sources like a<br />

previous year’s published reports (CDP, CMP or CTTS), city authorities, or primary surveys.<br />

Sampling Methodology <strong>for</strong> Primary Surveys<br />

Primary surveys are administered <strong>for</strong> sampled zones; stratified sampling is recommended <strong>for</strong><br />

collecting the required data. The city can be divided into six to eight broad zones, based on land use<br />

patterns and distance from the city core area or central business district (CBD) to capture variation in<br />

infrastructure and the socio-economic profile of city residents (Table 11).<br />

Table 11.<br />

Broad categories of zones<br />

Distance from<br />

CBD<br />

0 -1 km<br />

1 – 3 km<br />

3 – 5 km<br />

more than 5 km<br />

Residential Slums Commercial/<br />

Industrial<br />

Page<br />

23


Sampling technique <strong>for</strong> household surveys<br />

CMPs need to account <strong>for</strong> different cross sections of society, and thus a representative sample survey<br />

from all levels of society is necessary. It is also important to distribute the sample geographically. If<br />

NUIS and property tax data is already available <strong>for</strong> the city, the building footprint and its attribute can<br />

be used <strong>for</strong> the sampling exercise.<br />

From the broad zone categories defined in Table 11, sample TAZs are selected <strong>for</strong> surveying and<br />

collecting data. A stratified sample is done based on the socio-economic construct of the city such that<br />

it is significant at the level of 95% confidence interval level (A more detailed description is available<br />

under Annex I, provided at the end of the survey <strong>for</strong>mats).<br />

Sampling technique <strong>for</strong> collecting data related to infrastructure<br />

In order to prepare an infrastructure inventory, in<strong>for</strong>mation about the existing level of service and<br />

infrastructure type is to be collected <strong>for</strong> non-motorised transport (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 1 & 2), para transit<br />

(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3), public transport (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4) and personal motor transport (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5).<br />

Data on roads and infrastructure type is collected <strong>for</strong> three categories of roads, based on the ROW and<br />

the purpose served: arterial or sub-arterial; collector roads; and local roads. The road inventory <strong>for</strong> the<br />

entire city is developed on GIS plat<strong>for</strong>m and data is collected using a sample of road amenities and<br />

facilities. From each of the broad category of zones defined earlier (Table 11), sample TAZs are<br />

selected based on their spatial distribution. From each of the selected TAZs, a detailed survey is<br />

conducted on 30 - 40 randomly selected roads covering arterial, collector and local roads. Based on<br />

the land use characteristic and spatial distribution of TAZs, a relationship can be drawn to extrapolate<br />

the infrastructure type.<br />

Sampling technique <strong>for</strong> freight<br />

Both motorized and non-motorized vehicles carrying goods coming into the city and moving within<br />

city needs to be surveyed. This can be done at sampled outer cordons and cordon points where these<br />

vehicles enter core city area. For example, in case of Visakhapatnam, five out of twenty sampled<br />

intersections were selected <strong>for</strong> collecting data related to freight movement in the city. Of these three<br />

were outer cordons while other two were entry points to the core-city area. 16 hour turning movement<br />

counts have been carried out at each of these intersections on a typical working day.<br />

Along with origin destination of the trips, the survey also needs to capture type of vehicle used and<br />

commodity carried (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 6)<br />

Sampling Methodology <strong>for</strong> the Petrol Pump Survey<br />

The choice of petrol pumps should be based on convenience sampling, but preferably in different<br />

areas of the city. Random vehicles are surveyed in proportion to the population of different vehicle<br />

categories to develop a confidence level at 95% significance. Simultaneously, a crosscheck on the<br />

composition of vehicles (age and type) needs to be done as per number of registered vehicles. A<br />

Page<br />

24


sample of at least 3000 14 vehicles (two-wheelers, cars, buses, autos and trucks) should be collected to<br />

cover a sufficient number of vehicles of different vintage.<br />

Task 2-6 Study of Existing Travel Behaviour<br />

Two important considerations should be taken into account while collecting data on travel patterns:<br />

the collected data should be representative and cover the travel behaviour of all individuals within a<br />

household; and the data should be segregated by social group and trip purpose. The household survey<br />

is designed to assess different social groups effectively and to represent people’s perceptions towards<br />

different modes of transport in terms of time, cost, com<strong>for</strong>t, safety and security. The questionnaire is<br />

divided into two parts (0):<br />

1. General or household questionnaire<br />

2. Individual questionnaire<br />

Household interview<br />

Socio-demographic characteristics, activity patterns and travel behaviour are inter-related. In order to<br />

effectively understand transport demand and supply, personal as well as socio-demographic<br />

characteristics such as age, gender, employment status, caste, religion, family size, income levels, etc.<br />

must be taken into consideration. The study of travel behaviour based upon these characteristics will<br />

also help ensure that transport proposals are inclusive (that is, the benefits, and costs are distributed<br />

proportionally across socio-demographic sectors). There<strong>for</strong>e, it is essential to collect the above<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation while conducting the household survey <strong>for</strong> the comprehensive and inclusive mobility<br />

plan. It is possible that the income data gathered might not be representative. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>for</strong><br />

determining the income status it is important that details on household assets are also collected during<br />

the household survey.<br />

Individual survey<br />

In the household survey methods that are conventionally employed, trips are often grossly under<br />

reported, especially <strong>for</strong> the members within the family who passively participate in the interview. The<br />

result is that both short-distance and obligatory trips are vastly under-reported. Where good data on<br />

social groups and building conditions are available, a variety of techniques are available to overcome<br />

this shortcoming. In this case, it should be possible to stratify the population with a reasonable<br />

accuracy and conduct a more detailed travel survey <strong>for</strong> a smaller but representative sample. For this<br />

survey, the travel diary method is considered to be the most comprehensive tool, as it provides details<br />

on each activity and how much time is spent on both the activity and travel to and from the activity. In<br />

India, the flipside of using this method is that it requires extensive ef<strong>for</strong>ts from the respondent and<br />

might not work in cases where the respondent is illiterate. To meet this challenge, the respondent<br />

might be asked to recount his or her travel behaviour on the previous day, and all trips, including the<br />

trip-chains, short distance and causal trips are carefully noted down by the surveyor (as done in the<br />

conventional method). An analysis of travel behaviour should only draw on data collected from<br />

14 The sample size of 3000 is recommended based on surveys carried in Delhi, Vishakhapatnam, Rajkot and<br />

Udaipur to achieve statistically significant sample <strong>for</strong> each vehicle category <strong>for</strong> different vintage<br />

Page<br />

25


individuals who have been interviewed <strong>for</strong> the survey. For this sample to be truly representative, it is<br />

important to collect and include data on the travel behaviour of women, children and old people.<br />

The household survey questionnaire can be broadly divided into two sections: a revealed preference<br />

survey and a stated preference choice. The revealed preference survey must include questions related<br />

to in<strong>for</strong>mation on the household and its members as well as their choices under existing conditions,<br />

whereas the stated preference choice includes their alternative choices which may be non-existent.<br />

Household and personal level in<strong>for</strong>mation will provide details on the number of members of each<br />

household and their details, assets, housing and living conditions, vehicular ownership, accessibility<br />

to important destinations and mode choices, along with their opinions. The other part of the revealed<br />

choice survey includes the travel diary, including details of trips, mode choices, origin, destination,<br />

travel time, etc. The stated preference survey involves individual mode choice in two alternative<br />

scenarios with different conditions of travel time, efficiency, safety, com<strong>for</strong>t, etc.<br />

Based on the identified indicators <strong>for</strong> CMP, it is necessary to collect in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding the<br />

existing use and availability of modes, and criteria related to safety, security and cost. Also, the trip<br />

chain data should be able to capture details <strong>for</strong> multi-modal use and include in<strong>for</strong>mation like access<br />

and egress mode, distance, travel time and cost.<br />

Table 12.<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat 10)<br />

Travel behavior - Household in<strong>for</strong>mation (to be collected through household survey<br />

Data required<br />

Personal in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Trip making in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Description<br />

Age<br />

Gender<br />

Occupation (to get idea about current and future travel demand/ need)<br />

Monthly income<br />

Migration status<br />

Caste and Religion<br />

Vehicle ownership and age of vehicle<br />

Monthly expenditure on transport<br />

Trip purpose<br />

Trip origin<br />

Trip destination<br />

Travel distance<br />

Mode used<br />

Access mode<br />

Egress mode<br />

Access Public <strong>Transport</strong> (PT) stop<br />

Egress PT stop<br />

Distance to access PT stop<br />

Distance of egress PT stop<br />

Travel time to access<br />

Travel time to egress<br />

Average waiting time <strong>for</strong> PT (or shared auto)<br />

Total travel time<br />

Total travel cost<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> infrastructure<br />

rating <strong>for</strong> different modes<br />

Perception about Safety<br />

Perception about security<br />

Perception about com<strong>for</strong>t<br />

Perception about cost<br />

Page<br />

26


The following should 15 be taken care of while conducting the household survey:<br />

Conducting Pilot Surveys<br />

Since every city has different travel patterns and transport infrastructure, people’s responses are likely<br />

to vary. For this reason, it is necessary to conduct pilot surveys on 100 to 200 households, allowing<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>mat changes.<br />

Instruction to Surveyors<br />

A detailed workshop should be conducted with surveyors to explain the purpose of the surveys and<br />

the data that needs to be collected. Specific instructions include:<br />

1. The trips taken and travel needs <strong>for</strong> the last day are to be recorded. This will include all multiple or<br />

single trips made during the last day by every member of household.<br />

2. The access and egress part of the trips needs to be recorded if public transport or para-transit<br />

modes of transport are used. This means there will be a minimum of three segments <strong>for</strong> each trip:<br />

the access trip, the inhaul trip and the egress trip. Boarding and alighting time, boarding and<br />

alighting stations, access and egress distance and access and egress modes will all be included. If<br />

transfers are made to change the bus or other route it should be defined as a separate segment.<br />

3. Surveyors need to record parking charges if respondent or person making trip is using private<br />

modes of transport (including bicycle).<br />

Cross-checks and Continuous Monitoring<br />

Survey <strong>for</strong>ms should be randomly checked at regular intervals to keep track of the quality of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation being collected. Also, cross checks are required regarding the type of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

collected. It is advised that <strong>for</strong> survey personel suitable number of supervisors are provided by the<br />

consultant. A second way of cross checking is triangulation <strong>for</strong> data so that some data are collected<br />

using different approaches to see the differences.<br />

Task 2-7 Review of Energy and Environment<br />

Quantifying energy consumption <strong>for</strong> transport is important <strong>for</strong> estimating the CO 2 and local air<br />

pollution emissions from transport-related activities. In order to create a complete picture, both topdown<br />

and bottom-up approaches <strong>for</strong> estimating energy consumptions are required. The top-down<br />

approach makes use of the energy balances and relies on in<strong>for</strong>mation provided by energy suppliers<br />

(generally few). On the other hand, he bottom-up approach relies on a primary survey of vehicle users<br />

to assess the energy consumption of different vehicle categories, which are then combined with the inuse<br />

vehicle population to provide an estimate <strong>for</strong> total energy use within a city. Triangulation of data<br />

in this fashion is essential, as vehicle inventory figures within a city can be incorrect.<br />

Energy Balance<br />

Energy balances are a way of representing aggregate energy flows from energy suppliers to energy<br />

consumers, and are used as an accounting tool <strong>for</strong> estimating energy-related emissions. In general,<br />

energy balances cover all fuels, however since the focus here is on transport, only diesel, petrol, LPG,<br />

15 Based on the feedbacks received from consultants and experience on household surveys in the cities of<br />

Vishakaptnam, Rajkot and Udaipur<br />

Page<br />

27


CNG and electricity will be covered. A simplified energy balance <strong>for</strong>mat <strong>for</strong> energy consumption at<br />

the city level within the transport sector is provided in Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 12.<br />

Table 13.<br />

Energy balance<br />

Data required Description Data Source Data<br />

level<br />

Consumption of fossil<br />

fuels <strong>for</strong> transportation<br />

Diesel, Petrol, CNG, LPG consumption within the<br />

city on the basis of sales made by retail outlets and<br />

Oil companies City<br />

Consumption<br />

electricity<br />

transportation<br />

of<br />

<strong>for</strong><br />

company operated depots<br />

Electricity consumed <strong>for</strong> Metro /Trams / Sub <strong>Urban</strong><br />

Trains<br />

Railways & mass<br />

transit operators<br />

Vehicles: Fuel Types and Efficiency<br />

The vehicle stock can be obtained from the vehicle registration records (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 13). However,<br />

these records include no details regarding how many of these vehicles are actually in use, how much<br />

they travel on an average in a year, what fuel they use, or their fuel economy. These details need to be<br />

obtained by conducting primary survey of vehicles at petrol pumps (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 14) and refer task<br />

2-5 <strong>for</strong> sampling approach.<br />

City<br />

Table 14.<br />

Vehicle Inventory<br />

Data required Description Data Source Data<br />

level<br />

Vehicle<br />

Inventory<br />

Stock of vehicles by year of manufacture (Passenger<br />

Road<br />

transport<br />

City<br />

Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 13<br />

and Goods)<br />

authority & survey<br />

Vehicle<br />

efficiency<br />

Efficiency characteristics of vehicle categories with<br />

Survey at petrol<br />

Sample<br />

Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 14<br />

vintage (mileage, average vehicle kms travelled)<br />

pumps<br />

Ambient Air Quality<br />

The data related to ambient air quality is helpful <strong>for</strong> understanding the impacts of transport on air<br />

pollution. In some cities, the pollution control department has installed measurement instruments in a<br />

few places within the city. However, data on ambient air quality is not available <strong>for</strong> all cities, and in<br />

such cases the data can be collected using balloons, which can then be analysed in laboratories 16 or<br />

16 This approach was used <strong>for</strong> Rajkot and air samples collected in this manner were analysed in a laboratory in<br />

Ahmedabad<br />

Page<br />

28


using mobile air quality analysers 17 . The data collected <strong>for</strong> air quality is required <strong>for</strong> calibration of air<br />

quality models 18 .<br />

Table 15.<br />

Data<br />

required<br />

Air quality<br />

levels<br />

Data related to emissions and environment<br />

Description Data Source Data level<br />

NOx, CO, SOx, Particulate Matter PM10, 2.5<br />

concentration by location<br />

Pollution<br />

boards<br />

control<br />

Sampling stations<br />

only<br />

Noise Levels<br />

Motorised transport contributes to noise in cities. In general noise levels near highways and<br />

expressways are high on account of fast moving transport; however, there is no systematic recording<br />

of noise levels. That said, it is quite feasible to monitor noise levels using mobile instruments to<br />

document the baseline situation.<br />

Task 2.8 Analysis and Indicators (Comparison with Benchmarks)<br />

Indicators provide an easy way to communicate a city’s transport status, or to make comparisons<br />

across alternative scenarios. The indicators <strong>for</strong> transport at the city level19(see Table 16) can be<br />

broadly divided into i) indicators <strong>for</strong> mobility and accessibility; ii) infrastructure and land use; iii)<br />

safety and security; iv) environmental impacts; and v) economic. Most of the indicators can also be<br />

directly linked to the Service Level Benchmarks 20. A comparison of the indicators to SLB is<br />

provided in Annex 4.<br />

The details of the selected indicators (relevance and data sources) have been furnished in reports on<br />

city level indicators. However, some of the indicators specifically related to investment trends and<br />

impact on af<strong>for</strong>dability might be difficult to use <strong>for</strong> business as usual and alternate scenarios (Table<br />

16).<br />

17 This is a relatively more expensive option than balloons however air quality over a 24 hour period can be<br />

collected in this fashion<br />

18<br />

More details on air quality models are available from <strong>Urban</strong> Emissions website<br />

http://www.urbanemissions.info/<br />

19 The indicator classification is based on city level indicators developed <strong>for</strong> the cities in <strong>UNEP</strong> project <strong>for</strong> Low<br />

Carbon Comprehensive Mobility Plan. Available at<br />

http://www.unep.org/transport/lowcarbon/newsletter/pdf/ANNEX%202%20City%20level%20Indicators_%2<br />

04oct.pdf<br />

20<br />

Service Level Benchmarks <strong>for</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Available http://jnnurm.nic.in/wpcontent/uploads/2010/12/SLB-<strong>Urban</strong>-<strong>Transport</strong>.pdf<br />

Page<br />

29


Table 16.<br />

Indicators to be measured <strong>for</strong> existing and future scenarios<br />

√ √<br />

Indicator Name Description Existing Scenarios<br />

Mobility and Accessibility<br />

Modal shares by trip purpose i.e. work, education, health and<br />

Modal shares*<br />

others 21<br />

Modal shares by social groups i.e. by income, women headed √ √<br />

householdError! Bookmark not defined.<br />

Average travel time by trip purpose i.e. work, education, health √ √<br />

and others using different modesError! Bookmark not<br />

Travel time* defined.<br />

Trip purpose wise average travel time disaggregated by social √ √<br />

groups<br />

Average trip length frequency distribution √ √<br />

Mode wise average trip length disaggregated by social √ √<br />

groupsError! Bookmark not defined.<br />

Trip length* Trip purpose wise average trip length disaggregated by social<br />

groups<br />

√ √<br />

Af<strong>for</strong>dability* Af<strong>for</strong>dability of PT and para-transit fare by social group √<br />

Cost of commuting<br />

√<br />

Infrastructure and Land use<br />

Infrastructure<br />

quality<br />

Land<br />

parameters<br />

use<br />

Safety and Security<br />

Safety<br />

Security<br />

Average speed on roads of different modesError! Bookmark √ √<br />

not defined.<br />

Percentage of Household within 10 min walking distance of PT √ √<br />

and para-transit stop<br />

Average number of interchanges per PT trip √ √<br />

Accessibility of disadvantaged groups by different modesError!<br />

Bookmark not defined.<br />

√ √<br />

Land use mix intensity √ √<br />

Income level heterogeneity √ √<br />

Kernel density of roads, junctions and PT stop √ √<br />

Risk exposure mode wiseError! Bookmark not defined. √ √<br />

Risk imposed by modesError! Bookmark not defined. √ √<br />

Overall safety √ √<br />

Speed limit restrictions √ √<br />

Quality of footpath infrastructure √ √<br />

Percentage of road lighted<br />

Percentage of footpaths lighted<br />

√<br />

√<br />

√<br />

√<br />

21 Needs to be measured <strong>for</strong> all modes including pedestrians, bicycles, public transport (bus <strong>for</strong>mal), public<br />

transport (tempos), para-transit (cycle rickshaw), para-transit (auto), motorized two wheeler and cars<br />

*For these indicators the data should be collected separately <strong>for</strong> vulnerable groups such as: i) Slum dwellers ii) Within the<br />

slums, households living in kutcha housing as that is indicating BPL households iii) Recent migrants to the city and<br />

temporary migrants to the city iv) Households living in relocated sites v) SC households vi) Minority groups vii) street<br />

vendors etc. The data should also be disaggregated by sex<br />

Page<br />

30


Indicator Name Description Existing Scenarios<br />

Percentage of people feeling safe to walk/cycle and use PT in city √<br />

by gender*<br />

Environmental Impacts<br />

Emissions GHG emissions √ √<br />

Lifecycle cost of different modesError! Bookmark not √ √<br />

defined.<br />

Per capita consumption of land <strong>for</strong> transport activity √ √<br />

Depletion of land<br />

Land consumed <strong>for</strong> different transport activitiesError! √ √<br />

resource<br />

Bookmark not defined.<br />

Health hazards<br />

Percentage of population exposed to air pollution √ √<br />

Percentage of population exposed to noise levels > 50 dB* √ √<br />

Economic (Response Indicators)<br />

Investment<br />

Trend in investments <strong>for</strong> development of infrastructure <strong>for</strong> various √<br />

modes Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

Tax burden mode wise Error! Bookmark not defined. √<br />

Cost borne by Fuel prices at pumps by fuel type<br />

√<br />

operators<br />

Other charges levied as applicable at city level disaggregated by √<br />

modesError! Bookmark not defined.<br />

Fare policy<br />

Percentage of subsidies granted<br />

√<br />

Percentage of population owning passes<br />

√<br />

TASK 3: <strong>Development</strong> of Business As Usual (BAU) Scenario<br />

Task 3-1 Framework <strong>for</strong> Scenarios<br />

BAU Storylines<br />

Storylines are narrative descriptions of scenarios that are useful <strong>for</strong> communicating between different<br />

modelling teams. As they do not go into detailed quantifications, storylines are helpful in<br />

communicating a scenario to a wide range of user communities and stakeholders. Good examples of<br />

scenario storylines can be found in the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports<br />

on emission scenarios. 22<br />

BAU Scenario: This scenario represents the future based on the continuation of past trends,, and is<br />

often used as a counter factual reference or benchmark <strong>for</strong> assessing policy interventions.. For a<br />

developing country in a rapid growth phase like India, the scenario assumes that future socioeconomic<br />

development would mimic the resource-intensive development path currently followed by developed<br />

countries. The BAU scenario extrapolates existing trends and does not assume any radical policy<br />

interventions <strong>for</strong> sustainable development and emission mitigation. However, it does incorporate<br />

infrastructure development and land use according to the Master Plans (see Task 3-2). Future<br />

transport demand is based on the preferences of different socioeconomic groups in the base year. In<br />

terms of passenger transport, the BAU scenario predicts increased car ownership and a higher demand<br />

<strong>for</strong> motorisation. In terms of technologies, the scenario <strong>for</strong>esees continued reliance on fossil fuel cars,<br />

with improved efficiency and a greater share of electric and hybrid cars. The share of bio-fuels and<br />

electricity is also expected to improve in the transport sector (see Task 3-5 <strong>for</strong> fuel, vehicle and<br />

electricity transitions in BAU).<br />

22<br />

IPCC four storylines (A1, A2, B1 and B2) are available at<br />

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.php?idp=12<br />

Page<br />

31


Identification and Quantification of Drivers<br />

A wide range of <strong>for</strong>ces can drive scenarios, including demographic, social, land use, infrastructures<br />

and economic issues. Since these driving <strong>for</strong>ces can be quite uncertain, it is good practice to include<br />

alternative quantifications <strong>for</strong> the most important drivers. For example, a CMP might include both<br />

high and low growth scenarios <strong>for</strong> population. It is also a good practice to link the scenario driver<br />

assumptions to published literature. Sources <strong>for</strong> socioeconomic and land use assumptions have been<br />

provided in Task 3-2 and 3-3.<br />

Model Framework<br />

Models link scenario drivers to the outcomes to be analysed. For CMPs, the key outcomes include<br />

mobility and accessibility, safety, infrastructures, energy and environment. Given this wide variety of<br />

outcomes, it is obvious that a combination of models is required. A description of the model <strong>for</strong> CMP<br />

work is provided in Task 3-4 (the transport planning model) and Task 3-6 (overall model framework<br />

and linkage between transport planning and CO 2 emissions and air quality model).<br />

Task 3-2 Socioeconomic Projections<br />

A city’s future economic transitions depend on the current economic transitions taking place across<br />

the country. It is also necessary to understand the city’s role in state and countries economic<br />

development planning goals. For example, if the proposed DMIC corridor 23 includes a certain city, it<br />

would lead to more economic development than the secular trend <strong>for</strong> the country as a whole, or past<br />

trends <strong>for</strong> the city. Economic transition also leads to social transitions in terms of population (local<br />

and migrant), household size, income levels and vehicle ownership.<br />

Demographic Projections:<br />

Demographic projection includes population projections <strong>for</strong> the city, along with other demographic<br />

variables like family size, age cohorts, gender proportion, etc. The population projections scenarios<br />

should also consider besides rural urban migration out and into the city from outside India. A good<br />

starting point <strong>for</strong> demographic numbers is the census; the <strong>UNEP</strong> Guidebook 24 (Section 4.1) also<br />

provides a good overview.<br />

Employment Projection:<br />

Census office data provides a nine-level workers classification, including manufacturing,<br />

construction, trade and commerce, transport, communication and other services. The coming<br />

transition from agriculture to industry and other sectors also needs to be projected with national goals<br />

in mind. In some of cities, like Rajkot, enumerators at the municipal property tax department collect<br />

data <strong>for</strong> each residential and non-residential building. Thus, the jobs <strong>for</strong> each activity in a particular<br />

unit like TAZ can be calculated by dividing the floor area in that TAZ <strong>for</strong> that activity to the activity’s<br />

total floor area in the entire urban area. This can be further projected <strong>for</strong> horizon years and population<br />

projections. According to CMP, the change in socioeconomic groups will be 12% from lower class to<br />

middle class and 8% from middle class to upper class in 2031.<br />

23 Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) is a major infrastructure development stretching across the states of<br />

Maharashtra, Gujrat, Rajasthan, MP, Delhi, Haryana and UP and will lead to high industrial growth in the corridor<br />

area.<br />

24<br />

Low Carbon City: A Guidebook <strong>for</strong> City Planners and Practitioners available at<br />

http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/LowCarbonCity_Guidebook.pdf<br />

Page<br />

32


Industrial Growth Projection<br />

Industrial growth projection depends on the national and state level policies <strong>for</strong> the region and the<br />

growth trend <strong>for</strong> each of the city’s existing and planned industrial sectors. The growth rates <strong>for</strong> large<br />

industrial sectors (e.g., steel, cement, chemicals, textiles, etc.) are linked to the overall economic<br />

growth projections <strong>for</strong> India. The growth projections <strong>for</strong> the 12th five-year plan are available from the<br />

Planning Commission document 25. Longer term projections are provided in the <strong>UNEP</strong> guidebook 26 .<br />

Task 3-3 Land Use Transitions<br />

The objective of successful land-use development and growth models is to identify where, how much<br />

and what kinds of land use will develop. When modelling urban developments, it is necessary to<br />

consider changes from vacant to built-up land and the reverse, as well as changes to the land use<br />

itself, such as from residential to commercial. Simulation tools should be used to study these types of<br />

land use changes.<br />

The input requirements needed <strong>for</strong> land use simulation consist of the existing land use type and its<br />

floor area, as well as the floor space requirement per capita <strong>for</strong> each land use within the city. The land<br />

use type should be disaggregated into residential, commercial, retail, recreational, industrial,<br />

educational, religious, and other categories. Land use projections and allocations <strong>for</strong> the horizon years<br />

should be done in three steps. The first step includes the projection of socio demographics and the per<br />

capita space requirements <strong>for</strong> each activity in the city. The second step involves the allotment of<br />

activities based on connectivity and distances, as well as the availability of space. The third step<br />

includes the scope of the land use transition. For example, the probability that a certain area will<br />

become completely commercial will shift the residential space in the city’s outer areas in the coming<br />

years. Once the allocation of activities is completed, the impact of land use on transport needs to be<br />

analysed. When that is done, either the allocation of activities is accepted, or activity allocation<br />

process continues and the loop from land use simulation to transport impacts can is re-assessed until<br />

low carbon transport mobility goals are achieved.<br />

Task 3-4 <strong>Transport</strong> Demand Analysis<br />

Demand <strong>for</strong> passenger transport can be estimated using a four-step model (see Annex 5 <strong>for</strong> a detailed<br />

description). The four-step model is based on an understanding of existing travel behaviour obtained<br />

from the household survey (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 10), and provisioning existing transport infrastructure and<br />

service quality. First set up <strong>for</strong> the base year, the transport traffic flows on different road links are<br />

compared with the actual traffic volume counts observed at various locations observed across the city.<br />

The model is then recalibrated to match actual volume counts.<br />

Once the transport demand model is calibrated <strong>for</strong> the base year, it can be used <strong>for</strong> analyzing the<br />

horizon years of the BAU scenario (see Task 3). The inputs <strong>for</strong> this analysis will be the planned<br />

strategies, changes in socioeconomic drivers (Task 3-2) and changes in land use (Task 3-3). The BAU<br />

scenario assumes that people’s travel behaviour (within the same age and socioeconomic group)<br />

remains the same as the base year.<br />

25 For example <strong>for</strong> 12 th Five Year refer http://planningcommission.gov.in/plans/planrel/12thplan/welcome.html<br />

26<br />

Low Carbon City: A Guidebook <strong>for</strong> City Planners and Practitioners available at<br />

http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/LowCarbonCity_Guidebook.pdf<br />

Page<br />

33


Task 3-5 Technology Transitions<br />

An understanding of vehicles, fuels and CO 2 emissions from electricity is essential to understanding<br />

the implications of travel demand on CO 2 emissions and air quality (Task 3-6).<br />

Vehicles and Fuels<br />

The transport sector relies primarily on fossil fuels. The dependence on fossil fuels is linked to the<br />

domination of internal combustion engine drive train technology on a global scale. In future, however,<br />

multiple transitions may effect vehicles and associated infrastructures: i) a change in fuels due to<br />

greater use of CNG, bio-fuels, and cleaner petrol and diesel; ii) more efficient engines; and iii) more<br />

electricity <strong>for</strong> transportation such as metros and other rail based transit, as well as electric vehicles (2<br />

wheelers, cars, etc.) <strong>for</strong> road transport.<br />

The drivers behind these potential changes are a desire to address urban air quality issues and improve<br />

energy security. For example, natural gas has been used as an option <strong>for</strong> improving air quality in<br />

Indian cities, and as a result many cities have built fuelling infrastructures <strong>for</strong> compressed natural gas<br />

(CNG). Bio ethanol blending in petrol is on-going and a 2% blend has already been achieved. By and<br />

large, the fuel mix <strong>for</strong> transport is projected to be quite different between the base year and the future,<br />

even in the BAU (Figure 4).<br />

Figure 4. Fuel Mix <strong>for</strong> the BAU Scenario 27<br />

27 Figure is from the Low Carbon City: A Guidebook <strong>for</strong> City Planners and Practitioners available at<br />

http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/LowCarbonCity_Guidebook.pdf. According to WEO 2012 by 2035<br />

nearly 11% of energy demand from transport would be met by electricity, biofuels and other fuels (IEA, 2012).<br />

Page<br />

34


While cities have little role in <strong>for</strong>mulating fuel mix policy, they are heavily impacted by any changes.<br />

To understand these transitions, it is important to refer to national studies that document these<br />

transitions 28 .<br />

Plans <strong>for</strong> improvements in the future should take into account vehicle efficiency. The aggregate fuel<br />

efficiency is expected to improve in the BAU, improvement is much in a fuel economy scenario<br />

where India achieves the 4 lit per 100 km global target in 2050 (Figure 5).<br />

Figure 5.<br />

Fuel Economy Improvement in Cars<br />

Electricity<br />

Electricity is expected to play an increasing role in the future (Figure 4) of transport in cities, due to<br />

the introduction of metros, the electrification of rail tracks and a wider diffusion of electric vehicles<br />

(including two wheelers, cars and buses). In many cases, electricity is supplied to cities from outside<br />

municipal boundaries, freeing the cities from local pollutants (SO2, NOx, particulates, etc.). However,<br />

cities are obliged to account <strong>for</strong> CO 2 emissions as per the scope 2 emission guidelines from the IPCC.<br />

The Central Electricity Authority (CEA) 28 shows the grid emission electricity intensity that is<br />

compatible with UNFCCC requirements <strong>for</strong> the base year (latest available 2011). The future grid<br />

emission intensity is expected to improve in the BAU (See Figure 6).<br />

28 CEA CO 2 Database , Available at http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/planning/cdm_co2/user_guide_ver8.pdf.<br />

Page<br />

35


Task 3-6 CO 2 Emissions and Air Quality<br />

Figure 6. CO 2 Intensity of Electricity from Grid 29<br />

Model Framework<br />

The framework <strong>for</strong> sustainable urban mobility needs to utilise the four strategic levers: urban <strong>for</strong>m,<br />

Non Motorised <strong>Transport</strong> (NMT), public transport and technology. The framework should study the<br />

impacts of alternative strategies using key indicators <strong>for</strong> mobility, safety, and local environment, as<br />

well as more aggregate indicators like CO 2 and energy use. It is difficult to find a single model that<br />

can estimate all these indicators. One approach is to use a model framework (Figure 7) that combines<br />

a GIS-based transport planning model (as described inTask 3-4) with an emission inventory and air<br />

diffusion model (e.g. SIM AIR), which can then analyse the impact of activities from different<br />

sectors, including transport, on the local environment, energy use and CO 2 emissions.<br />

29 Figure 8 is from the Low Carbon City: A Guidebook <strong>for</strong> City Planners and Practitioners available at<br />

http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/LowCarbonCity_Guidebook.pdf. According to WEO 2012 by 2035 the<br />

grid CO 2 intensity in BAU would be around 0.56 t CO 2 /Mwh (IEA, 2012)<br />

Page<br />

36


Figure 7. Overall Modelling Framework <strong>for</strong> CMP 30<br />

CO 2 Emissions<br />

The outputs from travel activity (available from Task 3-4) in vehicle kilometres can be used to<br />

estimate fuel consumption by simply multiplying vehicle kilometres with the average fuel economy of<br />

the different vehicle categories from the petrol pump vehicle survey (see Task 2-7). The CO 2<br />

emissions can then be estimated using the CO 2 intensity <strong>for</strong> fossil fuels (see Table 17).<br />

Table 17. CO 2 Emission coefficients <strong>for</strong> different fossil fuels based on Scope 1<br />

Fuel Giga gram CO 2 /PJ kg CO 2 /tonne of fuel Kg CO2/lit of fuel<br />

Motor spirit (petrol) 69.30 3101 2.30<br />

High speed diesel (diesel) 74.1 3214 2.71<br />

Compressed Natural Gas 56.1 1691 1.69*<br />

(CNG)<br />

Liquefied Petroleum Gas 63.1 2912 2.91*<br />

(LPG)<br />

(*) For CNG and LPG it is per kg of fuel<br />

Local Air Quality<br />

Travel demand (disaggregated geospatially and by vehicle type) can be trans<strong>for</strong>med into pollutant<br />

loads by multiplying vehicle kilometres with emission coefficients <strong>for</strong> PM 2.5, NOx, CO, HC, SO2<br />

and Black Carbon. These pollutant loads can be trans<strong>for</strong>med into air pollutant concentrations through<br />

dispersion modelling. City scale models are available <strong>for</strong> doing this. For example, AIM Enduse/AIM<br />

30<br />

Figure 20, Low Carbon City: A Guidebook <strong>for</strong> City Planners and Practitioners available at<br />

http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/LowCarbonCity_Guidebook.pdf<br />

Page<br />

37


Air Models and SIM Air Model 31 have been used <strong>for</strong> Asian cities. These models include a description<br />

of technologies at an aggregate level (e.g., two wheeler, car, bus, etc.) and also contain default<br />

emission coefficient and vehicle efficiencies.<br />

Figure 8.<br />

Air Pollutant Concentrations Map , PM10 <strong>for</strong> Udaipur Using SIM AIr Model<br />

Local air quality modelling can help in creating maps of air pollutant concentrations (see Figure 8),<br />

which can help in estimating mortality and morbidity due to air pollution as related to the human<br />

population. Modelling can also help analyse air concentrations related to different strategies (Task 4-<br />

1) <strong>for</strong> achieving sustainable urban mobility.<br />

Task 3-7 Analysis and Indicators (Comparison with Benchmarks)<br />

The indicators <strong>for</strong> the BAU scenario are similar to those estimated <strong>for</strong> the base year (Task 2.8),<br />

however, some of the indicators are more difficult to measure <strong>for</strong> the future and can be left out of the<br />

list of indicators to be estimated.<br />

31 More details on air quality models are available from <strong>Urban</strong> Emissions website http://www.urbanemissions.info/<br />

Page<br />

38


TASK 4: <strong>Development</strong> of Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Scenarios<br />

Task 4-1 Framework <strong>for</strong> Scenario<br />

Review of National Carbon Indicators<br />

CO 2 is the principal greenhouse gas, and there<strong>for</strong>e indicators <strong>for</strong> CO 2 at the national level are more<br />

easily available than <strong>for</strong> other greenhouse gases (e.g., CH4 and N20). The per capita CO 2 emissions<br />

based on the second national communication 32 33<br />

was 1.0 t CO 2 in 2000. Due to the rapid pace of<br />

development, the per capita CO 2 emissions climbed to 1.33 tCO2 34 in 2010. For future emission<br />

trajectories, reference can be made to studies undertaken by the Climate Modelling <strong>for</strong>um 35 in 2009,<br />

or to more recent modelling work under a <strong>UNEP</strong> project 36 that provides CO 2 indicators <strong>for</strong> the BAU<br />

as well as sustainable scenarios.<br />

Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Storyline<br />

The sustainable urban transport scenario visualises social, economic and technological transitions<br />

through which societies respond to climate change, local environment and mobility challenges. The<br />

scenario assumes deep emissions cuts using low carbon energy sources (e.g., renewables, natural gas,<br />

etc.) and highly efficient technologies (e.g., improved vehicle efficiency). The scenario also includes<br />

the adoption of behavioural and consumption styles consistent with sustainable development. The<br />

sustainable development pathway allows CO2 mitigation at lower costs and without having to<br />

sacrifice the original objective of enhancing economic and social development. The transport demand<br />

is set on a sustainable path through changes to urban <strong>for</strong>m and improvement of non-motorised and<br />

public transport infrastructures.<br />

Identification and Quantification of Drivers<br />

The socioeconomic projections in the BAU scenario can be used, however <strong>for</strong> changes in land use,<br />

infrastructures and policies please refer to Task 4-2.<br />

Model Framework<br />

Same as provided in Task 3-1.<br />

Task 4-2 Strategies <strong>for</strong> Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Scenario<br />

The scenarios described here are related to the plans and policies aimed at limiting private vehicle<br />

ownership and use. The scenarios also assume an increase in motorised transport to some extent,<br />

32 Ministry of Environment & Forests (2012) India: Second National Communication to UNFCCC available at<br />

http://moef.nic.in/downloads/publicin<strong>for</strong>mation/India%20Second%20National%20Communication%20to%20UNFCCC.pdf.<br />

33 Considering population as 1021 million and excluding bunker fuel emissions<br />

34 As per IEA (2012), World Energy Outlook total CO 2 emissions from energy 1635 Million tCO2 in 2010 and the the<br />

population in 2010 as 1224 million<br />

35 Climate Modelling Forum (2009) India's GHG Emissions Profile http://moef.nic.in/downloads/home/GHG-report.pdf<br />

36<br />

See Figure 13, Low Carbon City: A Guidebook <strong>for</strong> City Planners and Practitioners available at<br />

http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/LowCarbonCity_Guidebook.pdf<br />

Page<br />

39


which is inevitable given the low level of vehicle use on a per capita basis. There<strong>for</strong>e, emphasis is<br />

also placed on improving technology in terms of efficiency and emissions. The strategies can be<br />

typically categorised into four categories. These strategies will deliver full benefits if they are<br />

implemented collectively, however <strong>for</strong> analysis it may be useful to present them one by one to see the<br />

individual effect. The storylines presented here are indicative and the consultants can adapt them to a<br />

city’s specific circumstances.<br />

1. Reserving ROW<br />

2. Planning transport<br />

network<br />

3. Improvement in<br />

NMT infrastructures<br />

1. Route planning &<br />

scheduling<br />

2. Road Pricing<br />

3. Investment in PT<br />

4. Taxation of private<br />

vehicles<br />

1. Zoning Regulation<br />

2. Shelter policy<br />

3. Floor Area Ratio<br />

1.R&D Investment<br />

2. Standards &<br />

Labelling<br />

3. Tax incentives<br />

Figure 9.<br />

Four broad strategies and accompanying policies used <strong>for</strong> sustainable scenarios<br />

A: <strong>Urban</strong> Structure<br />

The existing structure of Indian cities is compact, with high density and multi-nuclei development<br />

resulting in shorter trip length. However, existing development strategies could result in increased trip<br />

lengths. For this reason, the scenario explores alternate development strategies <strong>for</strong> reducing trip<br />

lengths and improving access to public transport through changes in zoning regulations and floor area<br />

ratio to achieve density, diversity and better design.<br />

B: Non-Motorised <strong>Transport</strong> Infrastructure<br />

The scenario considers how to improve NMT user experience by enhancing footpaths and bicycle<br />

lanes. It also addresses how to improve safety and access <strong>for</strong> pedestrians and bicycles at intersections.<br />

Reducing barriers and impediments on roads to improve bicycle speed is another aspect considered<br />

under the scenario. Reduced conflicts between NMT users and buses on roads can result in a small<br />

increase in bus speed.<br />

Page<br />

40


C: Public <strong>Transport</strong><br />

The public transport storyline includes NMT, as any public transit trip includes a NMT component <strong>for</strong><br />

access and egress. Since most Indian cities lack reliable bus service, two kinds of storylines <strong>for</strong> public<br />

transport should be considered:<br />

1. Improved bus service with compatible pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure<br />

In this scenario, bus infrastructure and operations are improved so that reliable bus service is available<br />

at least along all arterial roads. In addition, operational interventions like better routing and<br />

scheduling, improved frequency and better bus stop design improve bus speed, overall safety and bus<br />

user com<strong>for</strong>t. Para transit modes are available on the sub arterial and connecting roads so that the<br />

maximum access/egress trip length is less than 1 km. In order to facilitate walking and cycling, the<br />

scenario includes optimally designed footpaths and cycle tracks to improve NMT user com<strong>for</strong>t and<br />

safety. Other support infrastructures, like bicycle parking near bus stations, are also considered.<br />

2. Improved bus service and mass transit with compatible pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure<br />

This scenario includes all improvements detailed above in the improved bus service storyline, as well<br />

as a mass transit system on select traffic corridors. Mass transit options could include BRT (exclusive<br />

lanes on all arterial roads), light rail or a metro system 37 . (If the demand exceeds 15000 persons per<br />

hour along a 10 km long corridor)<br />

D: Improving Public <strong>Transport</strong>, NMT and <strong>Urban</strong> Structure:<br />

This scenario looks at how the implementation of NMT, public transport and urban structure<br />

strategies combine and complement each other.<br />

E: Technology<br />

Technology changes can encompass changes to vehicles, fuels and CO 2 emissions related to<br />

electricity. See Task 4-4.<br />

F: Regulatory and Financial Measures (Incentives and Disincentives)<br />

A wide variety of measures can be undertaken to help shift people from private transport modes to<br />

sustainable urban transport under a regulatory and financial measure scenario. Examples of such<br />

measures include parking policies, congestion pricing and carbon-taxes.<br />

1. Increased parking cost and distance to parking area<br />

Parking is generally cheap—if not free—in Indian cities. As a result, there is no disincentive <strong>for</strong><br />

owners of private transport modes like cars and motorized two-wheelers to stop using them to get<br />

from one place to another.<br />

Instead, there are plenty of incentives to keep using them, as they offer a high amount of personal<br />

mobility. However, carriageways are neither cheap nor private. Using carriageways and footpaths <strong>for</strong><br />

37 For an overview of Mass Transit Options see Table 9. Low Carbon City: A Guidebook <strong>for</strong> City Planners and Practitioners<br />

available at http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/LowCarbonCity_Guidebook.pdf<br />

Page<br />

41


parking purposes to the detriment of cyclists, pedestrians and other NMT users is unjustifiable, and<br />

encourages private transport modes that lead to higher per-capita carbon emissions.<br />

Like scenario D, in this scenario, infrastructure improvements are made <strong>for</strong> pedestrians, bicycles and<br />

public transport, but with increased parking cost, longer distances to parking areas and less parking<br />

spaces, resulting in increased discom<strong>for</strong>t <strong>for</strong> personal motorized vehicle users. The purpose of this<br />

scenario is to analyze user sensitivity to fiscal policies impacting the use of personal motorized<br />

vehicles.<br />

2. Congestion pricing<br />

Congestion pricing is a way of harnessing the power of the market to reduce waste associated with<br />

traffic congestion. Congestion pricing works by shifting purely discretionary rush hour travel to other<br />

transportation modes or to off-peak periods. By removing a fraction of the vehicles from a congested<br />

roadway, pricing enables the system to flow much more efficiently, allowing more people to move<br />

through the same physical space.<br />

Indian cities have dense cores with a heavy concentration of activities, thereby generating a high<br />

demand <strong>for</strong> transport. By an extension of the same logic as detailed above, congestion pricing would<br />

also help dis-incentivize car owners from consuming precious road space in already congested core<br />

areas, which could then be used by NMT and PT users.<br />

However, such measures would require adoption of additional technologies in Indian cities, which<br />

would entail high initial as well as overhead costs. Also, pricing should be based on the amount of<br />

kilometres travelled within the designated area, instead of an entry fee as in a cordon system.<br />

Congestion pricing must also be based on amount of congestion on a particular road as well as the<br />

time of the day during which the trip is made. Additionally, improvements must be made in the<br />

existing PT system and NMT infrastructure to make the shift from private modes attractive to the<br />

user.<br />

Based on the development strategies stated above, several alternate scenarios are be developed. These<br />

scenarios are then evaluated against the meta-indicator <strong>for</strong> per capita CO 2 emissions <strong>for</strong> low carbon<br />

transport at the national level. If the per capita emissions at the city level exceed the per capita<br />

emissions at the national level, then additional measures are identified <strong>for</strong> aligning the CMP with the<br />

national transport action plan using a back casting approach.<br />

Task 4-3 <strong>Transport</strong> Demand Analysis of Alternative Strategies <strong>for</strong> Sustainable <strong>Urban</strong><br />

<strong>Transport</strong><br />

The above scenario storylines (A, B, C, D and F) aim to improve transport infrastructure and increase<br />

the cost of using personal motorized vehicles. Two methods can be used to estimate travel demand <strong>for</strong><br />

different modes under alternative scenarios:<br />

Method 1: Repeating four step model<br />

In this method, a four-step model (as discussed in Task 3-4) is repeated, taking into account changes<br />

in parameters associated with different modes like cost, travel time, availability, com<strong>for</strong>t and safety.<br />

These changes result in changed impedence to different modes and consequently, changes in people’s<br />

Page<br />

42


transport choices. Likely changes to be accounted in the four-step model in alternate scenarios are<br />

described in the table below.<br />

Table 18.<br />

Differences in four-step models <strong>for</strong> alternative scenarios<br />

Trip<br />

production<br />

Trip<br />

distribution<br />

Mode<br />

choice<br />

Traffic<br />

assignment<br />

Change due<br />

to<br />

Age-sex<br />

distribution<br />

and<br />

population<br />

growth<br />

Change in<br />

land use<br />

parameters<br />

and change<br />

in impedence<br />

<strong>for</strong> different<br />

modes<br />

Change in<br />

impedence<br />

and trip<br />

length<br />

Change in<br />

impedence<br />

<strong>Urban</strong><br />

structure<br />

Population<br />

distribution<br />

in city<br />

Distribution<br />

of activities<br />

(residential,<br />

commercial<br />

and<br />

industrial)<br />

NMT<br />

infrastructure<br />

Change in<br />

impedence<br />

(Bicycle<br />

Compatibility<br />

Index and<br />

similar <strong>for</strong><br />

pedestrians)<br />

Public<br />

transport<br />

Change in<br />

impedence<br />

(travel time,<br />

travel cost,<br />

accessibility<br />

and<br />

reliability)<br />

Technology<br />

Change in<br />

travel cost<br />

Regulatory<br />

and<br />

financial<br />

measures<br />

Change in<br />

travel cost<br />

by different<br />

modes<br />

Change in<br />

travel cost<br />

by different<br />

modes<br />

Method 2: Stated preference surveys <strong>for</strong> mode choice modelling<br />

The scenarios specifically related to improving infrastructure directly impact people’s mode choice. In<br />

such cases, the effect of different scenarios on the attributes of individual modes should be presented<br />

to the respondents. The respondents are then asked to choose the preferred mode within each scenario.<br />

This allows analysts to determine which factors can be compensated <strong>for</strong> and which factors have major<br />

impact on people’s mode choice. This in turn makes it possible to predict the demand <strong>for</strong> each mode<br />

in different scenarios, even when there is no existing alternative. Also, with the help of this<br />

methodology, new alternatives that have not yet been surveyed can be introduced later in the model.<br />

This requires incorporating a stated preference choice survey along with the main household survey<br />

(survey <strong>for</strong>mat 11).<br />

This survey <strong>for</strong>mat is designed to capture people’s behaviour in making choices when an improved<br />

alternative mode is available. In order to do this, the respondents must be provided choices that<br />

include both the improved and existing alternatives. The respondents can then either choose among<br />

the given alternatives or choose an alternative within a scenario.<br />

There are certain points of concern to be addressed when <strong>for</strong>mulating the choice set within each<br />

scenario:<br />

People tend to be pre-biased either negatively or positively <strong>for</strong> a certain alternative<br />

Time and cost attributes are comparatively easy to introduce and understand, however the change<br />

in safety and security parameters needs to be strongly highlighted<br />

Page<br />

43


It is likely that middle and high income groups will not consider inferior modes as an available<br />

alternative<br />

It is extremely important to ensure that one particular alternative within a choice set does not<br />

dominate, as it is then difficult to determine the trade-offs between different alternatives<br />

Stated preference choice surveys can help analysts identify the respondent’s probability of shifting<br />

from one mode to other under varying conditions, and thus estimate shifts in alternative scenarios <strong>for</strong><br />

CMP. This requires analyzing the effect of various factors on people’s mode choice. In the survey, a<br />

range of scenarios that show variations in the attributes of different modes or options are presented to<br />

the respondent. The respondent is then asked to choose one preferred mode of travel <strong>for</strong> each<br />

scenario. Using the variations in attributes of modes and respondent choice, parameters <strong>for</strong> making<br />

mode choices can be extrapolated based on the socioeconomic profile of the respondent. BIOGEME<br />

(freeware) or N-logit (licensed) can be used by the analyst to determine the co-efficient of each of the<br />

individual parameters taken into account. The survey methodology enables the analyst to understand<br />

the impact of improving infrastructure, taxation and pricing regimes or introducing a new mode<br />

choice mode in alternative scenarios.<br />

Task 4-4 Technology Transitions under a Low Carbon Scenario<br />

In the low carbon scenario, the fuel mix is expected to diversify further from BAU towards biofuels,<br />

electricity and natural gas (Figure 10). Vehicle efficiency will also improve (Figure 8), and thus the<br />

overall demand <strong>for</strong> fuels will be lower.<br />

Figure 10. Fuel Mix <strong>for</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> in Sustainable Low Carbon Scenario 38<br />

38 Adapted from Figure 11, Low Carbon City: A Guidebook <strong>for</strong> City Planners and Practitioners available at<br />

http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/LowCarbonCity_Guidebook.pdf. World Energy Outllook 2012 from<br />

IEA shows a diversification towards biofuels and other fuels from oil.<br />

Page<br />

44


Another major trans<strong>for</strong>mation has to do with electricity, which is quite low in CO 2 intensity (Figure 6)<br />

and there<strong>for</strong>e electricity-powered transport modes can become low carbon options.<br />

Task 4-5 CO 2 Emissions and Air Quality (Refer task 3-6)<br />

The model framework is same as the BAU scenario <strong>for</strong> estimating CO 2 emissions and air quality.<br />

Task 4-6 Analysis and Indicators (Comparison with Benchmarks)<br />

The indicators <strong>for</strong> the sustainable urban transport scenario are similar to those estimated <strong>for</strong> the base<br />

year (Task 2.8), however, some of the indicators are more difficult to measure <strong>for</strong> the future and can<br />

be left out of the list of indicators to be estimated.<br />

TASK 5: <strong>Development</strong> of <strong>Urban</strong> Mobility Plan<br />

The <strong>Urban</strong> Mobility Plan should be developed in consultation with stakeholders and on the basis of<br />

the analysis carried under Task 3 and 4. The urban mobility plan can be defined along the following<br />

lines however it is important that the plan includes a timeframe, financing options, and<br />

implementation agencies.<br />

Task 5-1 Integrated Land Use and <strong>Urban</strong> Mobility Plan<br />

CMP advocates integrating the urban mobility plan with the land use plan and vice-versa. In most<br />

cities, the land use plan is already in <strong>for</strong>ce via the DP mechanism, even as the urban mobility plan is<br />

being prepared. In such cases, the urban mobility plan must respond to the mobility demands created<br />

as a result of the DP. Ideally, the urban mobility plan should be an integral part of the DP document.<br />

This would help in guiding land use allocation in a manner that facilitates and encourages low-carbon<br />

mobility.<br />

Integrating land use with the urban mobility plan would entail a two-way interaction between the two<br />

plans. High density residential areas intertwined with high density employment areas, along with<br />

increased travel costs and an efficient public transport system would incite people to use NMT <strong>for</strong><br />

shorter trips and public transport <strong>for</strong> longer ones, thus encouraging low-carbon mobility. The land use<br />

should be allocated in a manner that encourages shorter but more frequent trips, thereby enabling<br />

improved accessibility to activities. This would also help people shift from private travel modes such<br />

as cars to NMT (including cycling and walking). To additionally encourage NMT, neighbourhood<br />

design measures such as variety in public spaces, pedestrian footpaths and cycling tracks must be<br />

implemented. To summarize, the land use plan should locate activities in a manner that encourages<br />

low-carbon mobility and the urban mobility plan, in turn, should facilitate access to activities.<br />

Task 5-2 Formulation of the Public <strong>Transport</strong> Improvement Plan<br />

CMP divides Public <strong>Transport</strong> Improvement Plans into a number of sections, including service<br />

improvements <strong>for</strong> buses, trams and para-transit, appropriate MRT options and development plans,<br />

trunk and feeder network systems and intermodal facility plans.<br />

Formulating a public transport improvement plan in small sized Indian city can involve several<br />

challenges. These range from assessing transport demand to service provision and its alignment with<br />

land use. Most Indian cities, especially middle-sized ones, do not have an extensive public transport<br />

Page<br />

45


network. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is very difficult to judge the demand <strong>for</strong> public transport based on revealed<br />

preferences, and data collected on stated preferences should be used <strong>for</strong> demand assessment of PT<br />

systems.<br />

Improvement in public transport involves infrastructural improvements like reserving lanes and<br />

tracks, improving the location and design of stops, and operational improvements like optimizing<br />

routes and scheduling. It is necessary to identify the type of improvement required to improve the<br />

level of service. The improvement in level of service is likely to not only maintain the existing modal<br />

share of public transport but also create a shift from other modes to public transport. These shifts are<br />

determined by city structure and travel behaviour. Important consideration needs to be given to<br />

optimizing the fleet based on demand: instead of offering a 50-seat bus every 30 minutes, it might be<br />

better to provide 25-seat buses every 15 minutes. Secondly, most of these small cities are likely to<br />

grow into larger metropolitan towns in future, so a gradual progression towards public transport<br />

technology can be also suggested. For example, a strategy could start with city buses and progress to<br />

BRT and eventually to a metro. This is also important from the low-carbon point of view, as operating<br />

a public transport system at low capacities will result in higher per-capita carbon emissions from<br />

transport use, in comparison to a PT transport system operating near its capacity.<br />

System planning should consider not only where it’s placed (i.e. routes and stops), but also whether it<br />

is accessible to all potential users. Plans <strong>for</strong> the system should take into account accessibility issues<br />

<strong>for</strong> pedestrians and cyclists, the disabled and elderly, as well as private vehicle users once they have<br />

parked.<br />

Task 5-3 Preparation of Road Network <strong>Development</strong> Plan<br />

CMP lists road projects to be developed, including hierarchical road network, arterial road<br />

construction/widening projects, secondary road construction/widening projects, intersection<br />

improvement projects, flyover projects and railway over bridge or underpass projects.<br />

According to CMP, the hierarchical road network should be based on travel demand. In addition to<br />

assigning the proper hierarchy to the road network, which is derived from its land use, it is important<br />

to consider urban roads as streets and assigned functions. Considering that more than half of the trips<br />

recorded in India are NMT, it is essential roads provide proportionate space <strong>for</strong> NMT. Despite the<br />

latent demand <strong>for</strong> motorized vehicle use, proposals to improve motorized vehicle mobility by<br />

increasing road space under the pretext of easing congestion should be discouraged as much as<br />

possible.<br />

Task 5-4 Preparation of NMT Facility Improvement Plan<br />

In preparing NMT facility improvement plans, the most important consideration to keep in mind is<br />

that a large proportion of urban travel involves using these transport modes. Thus, is essential to<br />

identify specific streets and the street types preferred by individuals when walking or using a bicycle.<br />

This, in turn, will lead to ranking streets <strong>for</strong> walking and bicycle use. As stated earlier, if the TAZ<br />

sizes are small, the spatial interaction between zones can be captured and assigned to the network<br />

using street ranking <strong>for</strong> walking and bicycle use. The modelling spatial interaction should represent<br />

the current preferences and demand, as well as <strong>for</strong> stated choices, which represent demand <strong>for</strong><br />

walking and bicycling if a certain level infrastructure is provided. When planning NMT infrastructure,<br />

due consideration should be given to the existing networks and not patches. For example, all roads<br />

where individual are likely to walk should include at least 2 metres of clear, walkable footpath.<br />

Moreover, all potential walking or bicycling locations should have NMT infrastructure, including<br />

Page<br />

46


com<strong>for</strong>table footpaths, cycle tracks, streetlights, zebra crossings and NMT-designed signals at all<br />

junctions. Access to activities and transport services should also be taken into account. The design of<br />

these facilities should be such that they are inclusive, and provide travel opportunities to the so-called<br />

disadvantaged sectors of society (the physically challenged, urban poor, women, children, individuals<br />

with special needs, etc.).<br />

While at a policy level, NMT planning may be accepted, detailed NMT improvement plans and traffic<br />

management measures should be worked out <strong>for</strong> CBD, commercial centres, and other major activity<br />

centres. These detailed plans define NMT policy <strong>for</strong> the whole region, and provide the cost basis <strong>for</strong><br />

implementing such policy. CMP refers to on-the-ground traffic management <strong>for</strong> pedestrians and<br />

cyclists, but does not talk about a city level infrastructure planning <strong>for</strong> pedestrians and cyclists, who<br />

account <strong>for</strong> 40 to 50% of trips in mid-sized cities like Rajkot.<br />

Task 5-5 Preparation of Mobility Management Measures<br />

In CMP, traffic management plans cover parking plans, traffic control measures, intermodal facilities,<br />

demand management measures, traffic safety plan and ITS.<br />

Mobility management measures suggested in the CMP should enable use of public transit and NMT<br />

modes. As shown below, additional measures should be added to increase the cost and discourage the<br />

use of motorized travel, including the taxation of cars and fuel, land use planning that encourages<br />

shorter travel distances and traffic management by reallocating space on the roads.<br />

Table 19.<br />

TDM measures varying from push and pull factors<br />

TDM Measures<br />

Taxation of cars and fuel<br />

Closure of city centres <strong>for</strong> car traffic<br />

Road pricing<br />

Parking control<br />

Decreasing speed limits<br />

Avoiding major new road infrastructure<br />

Sourced from Gärling et al. (2002)<br />

Tele-working<br />

Land-use planning encouraging shorter travel distances<br />

Traffic management reallocating space between modes and<br />

vehicles<br />

Park and ride schemes<br />

Improved infrastructure <strong>for</strong> walking and biking<br />

Task 5-6 Preparation of Regulatory and Institutional Measures<br />

Effective development of urban land use and transport systems often requires regulatory and<br />

institutional changes. Such requirements should be thoroughly worked out and documented in the<br />

CMP. These measures can be developed region-wide or be project specific. The regulatory and<br />

institutional plan should include the following:<br />

Regulatory measures in relation to:<br />

Bus service improvement (concession, privatization, and lease contract);<br />

Page<br />

47


Traffic safety improvement (traffic regulation, mandatory road user education, en<strong>for</strong>cement<br />

systems);<br />

Introduction of <strong>Transport</strong> Demand Management (TDM) measures;<br />

Vehicle emissions (focus on non-fuel based vehicles and compressed natural gas/CNG vehicles);<br />

and<br />

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs).<br />

Institutional measures in relation to:<br />

Coordination mechanism to integrate public transport operation and to integrate fares;<br />

Establishment of Unified Metropolitan <strong>Transport</strong> Authorities (UMTA);<br />

Establishment of SPVs <strong>for</strong> the implementation of proposed projects; and<br />

Other changes necessary to promote PPPs.<br />

Task 5-7 <strong>Development</strong> of Fiscal Measures<br />

Fiscal measures should also be considered to achieve a balanced modal split, and to secure the budget<br />

necessary to implement urban transport projects. As fiscal measures usually correspond to<br />

institutional and regulatory measures, the following aspects may have to be examined in the CMP<br />

document:<br />

Fare policy <strong>for</strong> public transportation, and parking;<br />

Subsidy policy <strong>for</strong> public transport operators;<br />

Taxation on private vehicles and public transport vehicles; and<br />

Potential <strong>for</strong> road congestion charging.<br />

Task 5-8 Mobility Improvement Measures and NUTP Objectives<br />

The land use and transport measures proposed in the CMP will improve mobility in the metropolitan<br />

area and cover the critical issues addressed in the NUTP. A table can be prepared summarizing the<br />

relationship between the NUTP objectives and the measures proposed in the study, together with a<br />

classification of the measures according to their implementation time frame (short, medium and long<br />

term).<br />

TASK 6: Preparation of the Implementation Program<br />

Task 6-1 Preparation of Implementation Programs<br />

Task 5 involves the development of various urban mobility measures like public transport<br />

improvement plans, road development plans, NMT facility improvement plans and mobility<br />

management measures. The necessary interventions <strong>for</strong> these measures are listed next into a set of<br />

actionable projects to be implemented in the city. and prioritised into the following categories<br />

Immediate priority / actions (0 - 2 years)<br />

Short term (next 2-5 years)<br />

Medium term (5-10 years)<br />

Long term (more than 10 years)<br />

All the projects are presented to the city stakeholders and the likely implementing agency <strong>for</strong> each<br />

project is identified.<br />

Page<br />

48


It should be made clear in the CMP that the project list is merely a description of priority projects.<br />

Detailed project reports with cost estimates and financing will have to be prepared by the city<br />

authorities and approved by the local urban body and state government be<strong>for</strong>e applying <strong>for</strong> funding<br />

from the MoUD or any other agency.<br />

Task 6-2 Identification and Prioritisation of Projects<br />

The prioritisation into immediate, short term, medium term and long term can be done using the<br />

following criteria<br />

Immediate and short-term measures are aimed at improving the safety and accessibility of<br />

pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users, area level traffic circulation plans and measures<br />

like implementing traffic signals<br />

Medium-term measures typically involve corridor-level projects like implementing cycle tracks<br />

and mass-transit corridors, city level initiatives like public transport fleet improvement and<br />

efficient scheduling, developing area level cycle networks and Public Bicycle Sharing (PBS)<br />

schemes, parking policy development and implementation in the city. They are primarily aimed at<br />

halting the decrease in the city’s public transport and non-motorised transport mode shares<br />

Long-term measures include implementing the overall vision of the CMP. This includes<br />

developing city level networks <strong>for</strong> walking and cycling, bus systems, mass-transit networks,<br />

parking regulation measures and pricing strategies as a demand management tool, improving the<br />

overall road network to provide adequate accessibility <strong>for</strong> existing developed areas and new ones<br />

as the city grows, centralised control measures <strong>for</strong> traffic signal systems and public transport<br />

operations<br />

An additional set of criteria <strong>for</strong> prioritising projects can be<br />

Balance between improving existing infrastructure and creating new infrastructure in upcoming<br />

areas of development<br />

Costs versus project’s benefits measured in terms of mobility and accessibility, safety, energy,<br />

environment and CO 2 mitigation.<br />

These project ideas are presented to the stakeholders in order to get their feedback on both the<br />

projects and their prioritisation. Multi Criteria Assessment (MCA) technique 39 can be used to<br />

evaluate alternate options using stakeholder feedback. The final list of identified projects then<br />

undergoes detailed studies on implementation, cost estimates and likely funding agencies.<br />

Task 6-3 Funding of Projects<br />

Over time and following constitutional amendments (73rd and 74th), the strategic importance of<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Local Bodies (ULBs) in developing urban amenities and delivering services which directly<br />

influence the wellbeing of city’s local populace have significantly increased without a commensurate<br />

increase in the ULB’s resource base. This constitution-led inbuilt imbalance has resulted in the<br />

growing dependence of ULBs on the state government and subsequently on the central government<br />

<strong>for</strong> financing urban infrastructure projects. The present structure of fiscal dependence of ULBs is<br />

outlined in the following diagram.<br />

39<br />

Refer MCA handbook <strong>for</strong> methodology <strong>for</strong> prioritisation http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/12761/1/Multicriteria_Analysis.pdf<br />

Page<br />

49


Figure 1.<br />

Fiscal Dependence of ULBs<br />

Source: RBI working paper<br />

As the CMP is a long-term vision <strong>for</strong> the city authority, the overall ownership of the CMP lies with<br />

ULBs. Given the ULB’s dependence on funding, a city’s CMP should make a resource assessment <strong>for</strong><br />

all the projects listed in the CMP and should suggest the city authority, city specific and project<br />

specific indicative source of financing <strong>for</strong> the project.<br />

Assessing financing options <strong>for</strong> urban transport needs to be carried out on two broad levels:<br />

Level 1: Review and Assessment of Available Resource Bases and Awareness Campaign.<br />

On this level, an assessment of the existing resource base needs to be carried out according to<br />

different tasks and sub-tasks. The city civic authority and state government officials should be made<br />

aware of the different sources of funding based on best practices.<br />

Task 1: Assessment of ULB’s resource base.<br />

Sub-Task 1: Review of ULB budgets (Municipal Authority, <strong>Development</strong> Authority etc.). A review of<br />

at least the three most recent budgets is required. The budget review will enable planners to<br />

understand the pattern of revenue source and expenditure.<br />

Sub-Task 2: Review of the status of urban governance re<strong>for</strong>ms achieved by the ULB. As per the<br />

MoUD/JnNURM/UIDSSMT etc. guidelines, cities are required to per<strong>for</strong>m various re<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>for</strong><br />

improving the financial transparency and accountability of the ULBs. Based on the city’s re<strong>for</strong>m<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance, potential sources of revenue must be identified, taking into account the city’s level of<br />

preparedness. Suggestions <strong>for</strong> augmenting revenue generation through increasing FAR/FSI <strong>for</strong><br />

funding transportation infrastructure projects should be based on city’s preparedness. For example, if<br />

a particular city is not able to achieve property tax re<strong>for</strong>m, then suggestions <strong>for</strong> Transferable<br />

Page<br />

50


<strong>Development</strong> Rights, selling of extra FAR/FSI, etc. should be made once the city civic authorities are<br />

sensitized on the importance of property tax re<strong>for</strong>m during stakeholder consultation.<br />

Sub-Task 3: Identification of potential sources of revenue based on past experience in other cities (<strong>for</strong><br />

example, citing the best case study involving the issuance of municipal bonds by Ahmadabad<br />

Municipal Corporation). During the stakeholder consultations, the city civic authority should be made<br />

aware of alternative sources of revenue, which in turn can be used as innovative mechanisms <strong>for</strong><br />

financing urban transport infrastructures.<br />

Task 2: Assessment of State Government’s Resource Base <strong>for</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Development</strong>.<br />

Sub-Task 1: Review of state’s five-year plans and the state’s annual budgets. This review will help<br />

planners understand the state’s priority areas regarding its ability to mobilize and disburse resources.<br />

Sub-Task 2: Review of the status of urban transport re<strong>for</strong>ms achieved by the state. The <strong>for</strong>mation of<br />

the Unified Metropolitan <strong>Transport</strong> Authority (UMTA) and the development of the <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Fund (UTF) will enhance the state’s resource base <strong>for</strong> developing and maintaining the state’s urban<br />

transport infrastructures. During stakeholder consultations, officials from the state government and<br />

city civic authority should be made aware of urban transport re<strong>for</strong>ms and the same should be<br />

documented in the CMP.<br />

Task 3: Review of Central Government’s Schemes and Policies <strong>for</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong><br />

<strong>Development</strong>.<br />

Sub-Task 1: Review of the central government’s schemes and policies <strong>for</strong> urban transport<br />

development, such as JnNURM, etc., will help state government and city authority officials structure<br />

projects indentified in the CMP so they are in alignment with the central government’s schemes, and<br />

thus receive funding. During the stakeholder consultations, state government and city civic authority<br />

officials should be made aware of all such central government-sponsored schemes and the same<br />

should be documented in the CMP.<br />

Task 4: Review of Funding Patterns of Banks, Financial Intermediaries and Multilateral<br />

Funding Agencies (MFAs) in Terms of Developing <strong>Urban</strong> Amenities.<br />

Sub-Task 1: Financial intermediaries such as HUDCO, IL&FS, IDFC, commercial banks and MFAs<br />

such as the Asian <strong>Development</strong> Bank, World Bank and JICA provide term loans <strong>for</strong> infrastructure<br />

development based on certain terms and conditions. A review of the funding pattern of these banks,<br />

financial intermediaries and MFAs will help the city authority structure the projects indentified in the<br />

CMP according to the financial institution’s guidelines.<br />

During the stakeholder consultations, state government and city civic authority officials should be<br />

made aware of the funding pattern of banks, financial intermediaries and MFAs and the same should<br />

be documented in the CMP.<br />

Task 5: Assessment of Tapping Private Resources in <strong>Development</strong> and/or Management of<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Infrastructure.<br />

Sub-Task 1: Review of the state’s successful PPP projects in urban infrastructure (these projects<br />

should not necessarily in urban transport; they may also be in water supply or solid wastes or other<br />

domains). Reviewing of successful PPP projects will indicate the quantum of the state’s<br />

Page<br />

51


conduciveness towards private investment in developing / managing infrastructural projects. This will<br />

also help civic authorities to evaluate the confidence level of private players in investing its funds in<br />

developing and or managing public amenities. Based on the state’s current trends, the city civic<br />

authorities and state government officials should be made aware of PPP/private funding as alternative<br />

source <strong>for</strong> developing urban transport infrastructure during stakeholder consultations.<br />

Task 6: Listing and Sensitization to Innovative Financing Options <strong>for</strong> Developing <strong>Urban</strong><br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Infrastructure.<br />

Sub-Task 1: Sensitization to market-based financing options. During the stakeholder consultations,<br />

the civic authority and state government officials should be made aware of various market based tools<br />

such as issuance of taxable and tax free municipal bonds, pooled financing, and other mechanisms as<br />

alternative sources <strong>for</strong> financing urban transport.<br />

Sub-Task 2: Sensitization to PPP as financing options. During the stakeholder consultations, the civic<br />

authority and state government officials should be made aware of various PPP options such as<br />

management contracts, BOT and other possibilities as alternative sources <strong>for</strong> financing urban<br />

transport.<br />

Sub-Task 3: Sensitization to climate financing. During the stakeholder consultations, the civic<br />

authority and state government officials should made aware of various climate financing options such<br />

as CDM, NAMA financing and carbon credits as alternative sources <strong>for</strong> financing urban transport.<br />

Sub-Task 4: Sensitization to capturing indirect user benefits and pricing. During the stakeholder<br />

consultations, the civic authority and state government officials should be made aware of capturing<br />

indirect user benefits and pricing such as land value capture, TOD, transferable development rights,<br />

financing from increases in FAR/FSI, congestion pricing, establishment levies, etc.<br />

Level 2: Suggestions <strong>for</strong> Financing Options <strong>for</strong> Project Implementation<br />

Based on review of the civic authority’s existing resource base and preparedness, the CMP should<br />

suggest project and city specific financing options <strong>for</strong> the projects identified in the CMP. These<br />

should take into account the options or combination of options, but not limited to the options<br />

mentioned in the Table 1. The CMP should always encourage the civic authority to fund their<br />

transport infrastructure projects through innovative and self-sustainable means of financing, such as<br />

PPP options, issuance of bonds etc. Various financing options <strong>for</strong> urban transport infrastructure are<br />

listed in Table 1, details of which are described in Annexure 1.<br />

Further, as the CMP is a vision document, the projects identified in the CMP should be detailed by<br />

preparing Detailed Project Reports (DPR) and/or Feasibility Reports <strong>for</strong> each individual project. The<br />

CMP should also suggest funding sources <strong>for</strong> preparation of DPRs and Feasibility Reports. Various<br />

financing options <strong>for</strong> project development (preparation of DPR/Feasibility Report) are described in<br />

Annex 7.<br />

Page<br />

52


Table 20. Financing options <strong>for</strong> urban transport 40<br />

Funding Source Type Options Responsibility<br />

Funding from Domestic<br />

Public<br />

fund<br />

Advertisement/Fare<br />

box<br />

ULB<br />

Source at Local Level<br />

Domestically<br />

revenue/Parking Fee<br />

(ULB)<br />

Mobilized<br />

Creation of City Level UTF<br />

Congestion pricing<br />

Cess on fuel, private vehicle<br />

taxation/ green cess on existing<br />

private vehicles<br />

Property development/TOD<br />

Land value capture/ Betterment<br />

charges/ Vacant land tax<br />

Municipal bonds<br />

Pooled Financing<br />

Funding<br />

from<br />

Public<br />

fund<br />

General budget funding<br />

State Govt.<br />

Domestic Source at<br />

Domestically<br />

Viability gap funding<br />

State Level<br />

Mobilized<br />

Loans from Financial<br />

Institution/Banks<br />

Creation of State Level UTF<br />

Funding<br />

from<br />

Public<br />

fund<br />

General budget funding<br />

Central Govt.<br />

Domestic Source at<br />

Domestically<br />

National level funding Scheme<br />

National Level<br />

Mobilized<br />

like JnNURM<br />

Viability gap funding<br />

Climate Funding (NAMA<br />

Financing)<br />

Funding<br />

from<br />

Public<br />

fund<br />

Loans from Multilateral<br />

State Govt. and<br />

International Source<br />

Mobilized<br />

from<br />

Funding Agency<br />

ULB<br />

International<br />

Carbon Finance<br />

Source<br />

Climate Funding (NAMA<br />

Financing)<br />

Funding from Private<br />

Private<br />

fund<br />

PPP<br />

Options<br />

State Govt. and<br />

Source<br />

Domestically<br />

(BOOT/BOT/Lease/Annuity<br />

ULB<br />

Mobilized<br />

etc.)<br />

40 Various financing options <strong>for</strong> Implementation of Project are described in Annexure 1<br />

Page<br />

53


Task 6-4 Monitoring, of CMP Implementation<br />

CMP is the basis <strong>for</strong> approving projects, plans and various regulatory measures within the city related<br />

to transport and it is there<strong>for</strong>e important to monitor and measure the impact of interventions taken as<br />

an outcome of CMP.<br />

The first level of monitoring can be with regard to the status of implementation of the <strong>Urban</strong> Mobility<br />

Plan (Task 5) in terms of time frames proposed and achieved. This is helpful to understand the pace of<br />

CMP implementation.<br />

The second level of monitoring can be to understand the impacts of CMP implementation. The<br />

indicators created as a part of CMP can <strong>for</strong>m the basis of this monitoring and this monitoring can be<br />

done on a biannual basis. CO2 emissions are also a part of these indicators and if a city wants to<br />

register their CMP as a nationally appropriate mitigation action 41 (NAMA) then a more<br />

comprehensive approach <strong>for</strong> monitoring reporting and verification (MRV42) is required.<br />

41 Cities have registered their Comprehensive Mobility Plans as NAMA (Shukla, P.R., Sharma, S, & Dhar,S 2013 NAMA in<br />

transport sector http://www.unep.org/<strong>Transport</strong>/lowcarbon/Pdf's/NAMA_ClimateFinancing.pdf or visit UNFCCC website<br />

<strong>for</strong> a listing of NAMAs http://www4.unfccc.int/sites/nama/SitePages/Home.aspx )<br />

42<br />

For a detailed guidance on MRV <strong>for</strong> NAMAs is available in the following guidebook<br />

http://www.lowemissiondevelopment.org/docs/resources/Guidance_<strong>for</strong>_NAMA_Design_2013_.pdf<br />

Page<br />

54


SECTION III:<br />

ANNEXES<br />

Annex 1 Sample Survey Forms<br />

Page<br />

55


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 1. Inventory <strong>for</strong> pedestrian facility<br />

Along Road (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 1a)<br />

Name Width of Segregation tools to From To Length Encroachment/ other Pavement Lighting Barrier free design<br />

of<br />

road<br />

footpath<br />

(m)<br />

separate footpath from<br />

(km)<br />

MV lane (kerbs/ green<br />

barriers (Parking/<br />

vendors/trees/ light<br />

condition<br />

(Good/<br />

(Access at entry/<br />

guiding tiles/<br />

belt/ fences/ others)<br />

poles/ other services) Average/ Bad)<br />

audible/none)<br />

L R Left Right<br />

Page<br />

56


At Intersection (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 1b)<br />

Name of intersection Type of<br />

intersection At<br />

grade/ flyover/<br />

clover leaf/<br />

roundabout/<br />

others<br />

Type of crossing<br />

Level/ raised/<br />

foot over bridge/<br />

subway<br />

Signalized Y/N Pedestrian<br />

accentuated<br />

signal (y/n)<br />

Traffic<br />

calming tools<br />

Rumble strips/<br />

speed<br />

breakers<br />

Crossing<br />

distance<br />

(meters)<br />

Barrier<br />

free access<br />

guiding tiles/ audible<br />

pedestrian crossing /<br />

none<br />

Page<br />

57


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 2. Inventory <strong>for</strong> NMV (bicycles and cycle rickshaws) facilities<br />

Along Road(Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 2a)<br />

Name Width Segregation tools to separate NMV lane From To Length<br />

of<br />

road<br />

of<br />

NMV<br />

lane<br />

from other modes (Painted marking/<br />

(km)<br />

kerbed/ none)<br />

(m)<br />

L R<br />

Encroachment<br />

(Parking/<br />

vendors)<br />

Pavement<br />

condition<br />

(Good/<br />

Average/<br />

Bad)<br />

Lighting<br />

L<br />

R (y/n)<br />

(y/n)<br />

Page<br />

58


At Intersection (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 2b)<br />

Name of<br />

Type of intersection (At grade/ flyover/<br />

intersection<br />

clover leaf/ roundabout, etc)<br />

Type<br />

of crossing (Level/<br />

raised/ grade separated)<br />

Signalized<br />

(y/n)<br />

NMV<br />

accentuated<br />

signal (y/n)<br />

Traffic<br />

calming<br />

tools<br />

(Rumble<br />

strips/<br />

speed<br />

breakers)<br />

Crossing<br />

distance<br />

Other facilities (NMV<br />

box etc.)<br />

Page<br />

59


Parking Area (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 2c)<br />

Name of Parking lot Location Nearest Pt stop Distance to PT stop Number of Parking Parking charges<br />

Bicycle Cycle Rickshaw<br />

Page<br />

60


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3. Inventory <strong>for</strong> cycle rickshaws and autos<br />

Fleet inventory- cycle rickshaw (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3a)<br />

Owner (Owned/ Fleet Average Vehicular Average Vehicle Average passenger<br />

Rented)<br />

size km/day<br />

age<br />

carried<br />

Peak hour Average<br />

Access<br />

to legal<br />

parking (y/n)<br />

Average earning<br />

per day<br />

Average Passenger<br />

per day<br />

Page<br />

61


Fleet inventory – auto rickshaw (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3b)<br />

Owner (Owned/ Fleet Type of fleet Use (Shared<br />

Rented)<br />

size (Capacity) or not)<br />

Average Vehicular<br />

km/day<br />

Average<br />

Vehicle age<br />

Access to legal<br />

parking<br />

y/n<br />

Occupancy Average Passenger<br />

per day<br />

Peak Average<br />

hour<br />

Page<br />

62


Route inventory <strong>for</strong> shared auto rickshaws (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3c)<br />

Route<br />

Route<br />

Locations covered Headway<br />

number<br />

length<br />

(minutes)<br />

Average<br />

passengers/day<br />

Average routing time Average Delays<br />

Peak hr Average<br />

Page<br />

63


Cost and Fare (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3d)<br />

Operator Operation cost per km Tax levied Fare structure Revenue per km (Rs) Profit/ loss (Rs)<br />

Parking Area (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 3e)<br />

Name of<br />

Parking lot<br />

Location Nearest Pt stop Distance to PT stop Number of Parking Parking charges<br />

Page<br />

64


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4. Inventory <strong>for</strong> public transport (bus)<br />

Along Road (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4a)<br />

Name<br />

Applicable in case of BRT corridor No. of<br />

of<br />

road<br />

Width of<br />

Bus lane<br />

(m)<br />

From To Length<br />

(km)<br />

Bus lane location wrt road<br />

section (Median/ left side)<br />

Type of bus infrastructure<br />

(open/close)<br />

Bus lane Segregation tools<br />

(Kerbs/lane marking/ fences)<br />

routes<br />

catered<br />

L R<br />

Average<br />

speed<br />

(kmph)<br />

Page<br />

65


Bus stop details (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4b)<br />

Name<br />

of Bus<br />

Location<br />

(coordinates)<br />

Bus stop<br />

capacity<br />

stop<br />

X Y<br />

Applicable <strong>for</strong> BRT Near/ far<br />

junction<br />

Location wrt Type of bus<br />

road section<br />

(Median/ left<br />

stop<br />

(Staggered/<br />

side)<br />

island)<br />

Traffic calming<br />

tools (Rumble<br />

strips/ speed<br />

breakers)<br />

Safe crossing<br />

facility (Zebra<br />

crossing/ signalized<br />

crossing/ FOB/<br />

subways)<br />

Access<br />

distance to<br />

bus stop from<br />

either side<br />

(m)<br />

Barrier<br />

free<br />

access<br />

(y/n)<br />

Passenger<br />

amenities<br />

(Sitting area/<br />

toilets/<br />

hawkers)<br />

Page<br />

66


Fleet inventory (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4c)<br />

Owner Fleet size Type of fleet (Mini bus/ standard) Fleet utilization rate Vehicular km Average vehicle age Occupancy Average Passenger per day<br />

Peak hour Average<br />

Page<br />

67


Cost and Fare (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4d)<br />

Operator Operation cost per km (Rs) Tax levied (Rs) Fare structure (straight / incremental) Revenue per km (Rs) Profit/ loss (Rs)<br />

Page<br />

68


Route inventory (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 4e)<br />

Route number Route length Location covered Headway (minutes) Average passengers/ day Average routing time (hour) Average Delays (minute)<br />

Peak hr Average<br />

Page<br />

69


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5. Inventory <strong>for</strong> private motorized vehicles<br />

Along Road (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5a)<br />

Name of Width From To Lengt No. Lighting Average speed (kmph) Road encroachment<br />

road (m)<br />

h (km) of<br />

lane<br />

(Parking/vendor/oth<br />

er)<br />

L R MTW Cars IPT<br />

On<br />

road Parking<br />

restriction (Restricted /<br />

Unrestriced)<br />

Vehicle restriction<br />

PMV NM<br />

IPT<br />

V<br />

Page<br />

70


At intersection (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5b)<br />

Name of<br />

Type<br />

of intersection (At grade/<br />

intersection<br />

flyover/ cloverleaf, etc)<br />

Signalized<br />

(y/n)<br />

Turning time from each<br />

direction<br />

Type<br />

of traffic operation<br />

(Automated/ Human)<br />

Signal<br />

Phasing<br />

Intersection<br />

design<br />

Page<br />

71


Parking areas (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 5c)<br />

Name of<br />

Parking charge<br />

Location Type of Parking (On/off road) Nearest Pt stop Distance to PT stop<br />

Parking lot<br />

(Paid/ unpaid)<br />

(km)<br />

Number of<br />

Parking<br />

Parking<br />

charges (Rs)<br />

MTW Car MTW Car<br />

Page<br />

72


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 6. Freight Survey<br />

Along Road (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 6a)<br />

Date of Survey: Survey Corridor From: Name of Enumertor:<br />

Day of<br />

Survey:<br />

Direction of Survey: To: Name of Supervisor:<br />

Time Vehicle Type Origin Destination Type of Commodity Tonnage Trip Frequency<br />

Vehicle Code Commodity Code Commodity Code Trip Frequency Code<br />

LCV 1<br />

Empty<br />

1<br />

Iron coils/pipes/ cables/ wire<br />

/machines<br />

9 Daily<br />

Way)<br />

once (one-<br />

1<br />

2-Axle Truck 2<br />

Vegetables/Fruits/Milk/ Fish<br />

2<br />

Minerals<br />

(Limestone/Lignite,etc.,)<br />

10 Daily Twice (Up &<br />

Down)<br />

2<br />

3 Axle Truck 3<br />

3<br />

Food Grains (Rice/Wheat/etc.,<br />

Petrol/ Diesel/Gas/ LPG/etc<br />

11 Daily Thrice or 3<br />

More<br />

Multi Axle Vehicle 4<br />

4<br />

12 Others 4<br />

Salt<br />

Fertilizer<br />

Tractor 5 Sand/Cement/Aggregate/Steel/<br />

Brick/Tiles<br />

Tempo 6<br />

Wood<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Finished consumer Goods<br />

Paint/dyes<br />

13<br />

14<br />

NMT 7<br />

7<br />

15<br />

Textile Materials/Cotton /Leather<br />

Others<br />

Plastic Products<br />

8<br />

Page<br />

73


Parking areas (Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 6b)<br />

Name of Parking lot Parking charge (Paid/ unpaid) Location Type of Parking (On/off road) Parking charges (Rs)<br />

Page<br />

74


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 7. Traffic volume count at screen line, cordon and intersection<br />

Location Direction from Date/Month Year<br />

Count station no Direction Right Straight Left turn Day<br />

Passenger vehicle Goods vehicle<br />

Heavy fast Light fast Slow Other Heavy fast Light fast Slow<br />

Bus Mini bus Car MTW Auto Cycle Pedestrian Truck LCV Others Cycle rickshaw trolley Others<br />

6 – 7 am<br />

….<br />

5 – 6 pm<br />

….<br />

Page<br />

75


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 8. Traffic safety<br />

Road Accident Recording Form<br />

Accident In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Form No.<br />

Filled By Date filled (dd/mm/yyyy) / /<br />

Police Report Available 0=No 1=Yes FIR No.<br />

City/Town/Village/Highway<br />

Time of Accident 9999=Unknown<br />

Date (DD) (MM) (YYYY)<br />

Day 1=Monday 2=Tuesday 3=Wednesday 4=Thursday 5=Friday 6=Saturday 7=Sunday 9=Unknown<br />

Holiday 0 = No 1 = Yes 9=Unknown<br />

Hit and Run 0 = No 1 = Yes 9=Unknown<br />

Accident Severity 1=Damage only 2= Injury 3=Fatal 9= Unknown<br />

No. of Fatalities<br />

No. of Injured 999=Many<br />

No. of Vehicles Involved<br />

Multiple Collisions 0=No 1=Yes<br />

Page<br />

76


Collision Type<br />

1 = Hit pedestrian 2 = Vehicles head on 3 = Vehicle hit from back<br />

4 = Vehicle hit from side at right angle 5 = Sideswipe (same direction) 6= Vehicle sideswipe (opposite direction)<br />

7 = Overturn 8 = Vehicle hit fixed object 9 = Run off the road<br />

10= Others 99 = Unknown<br />

Collision Spot 1 = On straight road 2 = Road junction 3 = Other 9 = Unknown<br />

Type of Road 1= Un-metalled 2=Metalled (Black topped/Concrete) 3=Others 9=Unknown<br />

Divider 1=Two-way without raised median 2= Two-way with raised median 3= One-way 4=Other<br />

9= Unknown<br />

Location 1=<strong>Urban</strong> 2=Rural 3=Semi-<strong>Urban</strong> 4=Other 9=Unknown<br />

Road Category RURAL : 1= State Highway 2= National Highway 3= Other district road<br />

URBAN : 4=Arterial 5= Local street 6= Other 9= Unknown<br />

Distance Km post. In the absence of km post - from the nearest police station (km) (m)<br />

Police Station Name Highway No.<br />

Global Position (latitude) (longitude)<br />

Page<br />

77


Road 1<br />

Road 2<br />

Road 3<br />

Landmark<br />

Brief Description of Accident Special Case 0=No 1=Yes<br />

Vehicle In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Form No. Vehicle No.<br />

Page<br />

78


Vehicle Type<br />

1 = Multi-Axle Heavy Goods Vehicle 2 = 2-Axle Heavy Goods Vehicle 3=Light Goods Vehicle 4 =Mini Bus<br />

5= Bus 6 = Car/Van/Jeep/Taxi 7= Ambulance 8= Fire Fighting Vehicle<br />

9= Three Wheeler Passenger 10=Three Wheeler Goods 11 =Thela 12=Electric Cycle<br />

13 = Tractor without Trailer 14= Tractor with Trailer 15 = Cycle Rickshaw 16 = Motorcycle/Scooter/Moped17 = Animal Drawn Vehicle 18=Bicycle 98=Others<br />

99=Unknown<br />

Maneuver of Vehicle at Crash Time<br />

1 = Proceeding Straight 2 = Turning 3 = Reversing 4 = Overtaking 5=Parked/Stopped<br />

6= Going Wrong Way 7= Making U turn 8=Other 9 = Unknown<br />

Impacted 1=Rear 2=Front 3=Left 4=Right 5=Side 6=Other 9=Unknown<br />

Loading 1=Normal 2= Overloaded 3= Others 9= Unknown<br />

Disposition 0=Not Roadworthy (needs to be towed away) 1= Roadworthy ( can drive away ) 9 = Unknown<br />

Mechanical Failure 0=No 1=Yes 9=Unknown<br />

Hazardous Cargo 0=No 1=Yes 9=Unknown<br />

Fire 0=No 1=Yes 9=Unknown<br />

Impacting-Vehicle/Object<br />

If another vehicle impacted this vehicle use Vehicle Type from above 20=Tree 21=Kerb<br />

22=Median 23= Pole 24=Pedestrian 98= Other 99=Unknown<br />

Page<br />

79


Model-Make Model – Year Impacting Vehicle No.<br />

Form No. Vehicle No.<br />

Type<br />

1 = Multi-Axle Heavy Goods Vehicle 2 = 2-Axle Heavy Goods Vehicle 3=Light Goods Vehicle 4 =Mini Bus<br />

5 = Bus 6 = Car/Van/Jeep/Taxi 7= Ambulance 8= Fire Fighting Vehicle<br />

9 = Three Wheeler Passenger 10=Three Wheeler Goods 11 =Thela 12=Electric Cycle<br />

13 = Tractor without Trailer 14= Tractor with Trailer 15 = Cycle Rickshaw 16 = Motorcycle/Scooter/Moped 17 = Animal Drawn Vehicle 18=Bicycle 98=Others<br />

99=Unknown<br />

Maneuver of Vehicle at Crash Time<br />

1 = Proceeding Straight 2 = Turning 3 = Reversing 4 = Overtaking 5=Parked/Stopped<br />

6= Going Wrong Way 7= Making U turn 8=Other 9 = Unknown<br />

Impacted 1=Rear 2=Front 3=Left 4=Right 5=Side 6=Other 9=Unknown<br />

Loading 1=Normal 2= Overloaded 3= Others 9= Unknown<br />

Disposition 0=Not Roadworthy (needs to be towed away) 1= Roadworthy ( can drive away ) 9 = Unknown<br />

Mechanical Failure 0=No 1=Yes 9=Unknown<br />

Hazardous Cargo 0=No 1=Yes 9=Unknown<br />

Fire 0=No 1=Yes 9=Unknown<br />

Page<br />

80


Impacting-Vehicle/Object<br />

If another vehicle impacted this vehicle use Vehicle Type from above 20=Tree 21=Kerb<br />

22=Median 23= Pole 24= Pedestrian 98=Other 99=Unknown<br />

Model-Make Model – Year Impacting Vehicle No.<br />

Victim In<strong>for</strong>mation Victim No.<br />

Form No. Vehicle No.<br />

Road User 1= Passenger 2= Driver 3= Pedestrian 4=Others 9= Unknown<br />

Seating Position 1= Front 2= Back 3= Other 4= Not Applicable 9=Unknown<br />

Location of Non Motorised Traffic 1=Motorised Vehicle Lane 2=Pedestrian Pathway 3=Median<br />

4=Shoulder 5=Cycle Lane 6=Others 9=Unknown<br />

Age<br />

Sex 1 = Male 2 = Female<br />

Injury 1 = No injury 2= Injured 3 = Fatal 9 = Unknown<br />

Impacting Vehicle No.<br />

Mode of Treatment 1=None 2=First aid only 3=Discharge after casualty ward treatment 4=Admitted to hospital<br />

5=Dead Be<strong>for</strong>e Reaching Hospital 6=Others 9=Unknown<br />

No. of Days in Hospital<br />

Page<br />

81


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 9. Security<br />

SI.<br />

FIR<br />

Location Time of<br />

No.<br />

no.<br />

occurrence<br />

Nature of<br />

security issue<br />

Victim profile Offender profile Mode in which victim was there (Pedestrian/ Bicyclists/<br />

Age Sex Marital<br />

Age Sex Marital<br />

MTW/ Car/ Bus users/ Autos/ cycle rickshaw)<br />

status<br />

status<br />

Page<br />

82


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 10. Household Survey – Part I (Revealed Preference Survey)<br />

1. Reference<br />

Form No. Date: Surveyor name:<br />

Area: Settlement Code: Settlement name:<br />

Traffic zone: Contact number of respondent (Landline and mobile):<br />

2. Household In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Relation<br />

S.No. Name<br />

with<br />

head<br />

Sex<br />

(M/F)<br />

Age Education Main<br />

Activity<br />

Subsidiary<br />

Household Assets owned<br />

activity<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Y/N Number<br />

1 Head 1 Phone / Mobile phone<br />

2 Desktop/Laptop Computer<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5 A.C.<br />

6 T.V.<br />

Page<br />

83


7 Car<br />

8 Cycle<br />

9 Scooter (M2W)<br />

Code (Relation with Head of the Household) (2) Education (5) Activities (6-7)<br />

1. Self 1. No school education 1. Salaried employment (regular waged)<br />

2. Wife / Husband 2. Primary education (Upto 8 th ) 2. Daily Wages employment (casual labour)<br />

3. Son / Daughter 3. Matriculation/upto 12 th 3. Self Employed (work in h/h enterprise)<br />

4. Mother / Father 4. Graduate 4. Domestic Worker at Fixed Rate<br />

5. Others 5. Others (Specify) 5. Honorary Worker<br />

6. Home-based paid work<br />

7. Home-based unpaid work (house manager)<br />

8. Attending educational institute<br />

9. Pensioners/remittance recipient<br />

10. Unemployed – due to disability<br />

11. Unemployed – seeking work<br />

Page<br />

84


12. Others - specify<br />

3. Housing and Living Conditions (Desirable)<br />

1 What is the type of the house? Kutcha Semi-Pucca Pucca<br />

2 What is the tenure arrangement of the house you live in? Tick the right option Owned Rented Shared<br />

Household Tap (Y/N) Piped Sewerage (Y/N) H/h Toilets (Y/N) No.<br />

4. Vehicle Ownership in the household 5. Accessibility to important destination<br />

Present Be<strong>for</strong>e 2 year Distance (km) Walking minutes<br />

Type Make (Year) Type Make (Year) School<br />

1 Doctor<br />

2 Others (specify)<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Type: Car, MTW, Bicycle, Auto-rickshaw, Cycle Rickshaw, Bus<br />

Page<br />

85


6. Choices and opinions<br />

How far is the nearest public transport/shared transport station from your house?<br />

No. Mode Nearest stop<br />

(distance)<br />

Time<br />

taken to<br />

Avg.<br />

Waiting<br />

How often do you use it in a<br />

week? (no. of times per week)<br />

Is it reliable service? Is it safe? Is it too<br />

expensive?<br />

reach<br />

time<br />

1 Public Bus Good Ok Bad Good Ok Bad Good Ok Bad<br />

2 BRTS (if any) Good Ok Bad Good Ok Bad Good Ok Bad<br />

3 Shared Auto Good Ok Bad Good Ok Bad Good Ok Bad<br />

4 Do you think it is safe and convenient to walk on roads of ………………. city? Good Ok Bad<br />

5 Are you satisfied with the way you travel in the city? Yes No<br />

6 If No, What do you think needs to be improved?<br />

Instruction <strong>for</strong> travel diary: In the survey one trip is the round trip made by the respondent. Here a trip is divided into 6 segments, where each segment of the trip presents<br />

the additional activity taken within a trip that can be either changing mode of transport, doing interchange or additional trip purpose like buying vegetables or dropping kids.<br />

Primary trip purpose is the main trip being made by the respondent. For example, main trip is going to work while dropping child or buying vegetables on the way is the<br />

secondary trip. If number of segments in the round trip is more <strong>for</strong> a respondent then he/she can use the other table <strong>for</strong> filling up the details.<br />

Page<br />

86


7. Travel Diary (Similar <strong>for</strong>mat will be filled <strong>for</strong> each member of the household travelling on the previous day)<br />

HH member no Day of trip Mon/tue/wed/thur/frid<br />

Origin Start time<br />

Primary Trip purpose 43 Mode used<br />

Seg Mode Sec trip Start Location Start<br />

purpose 44 time<br />

Waiting Time Arrival time Distance (km) Arrival location Fare / parking cost No. of HH<br />

member<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

43 Primary Trip purpose: pick up or drop off, work (office, factory, field, and shop), school/education, shopping, access social services (religious etc), leisure, go home, buy vegetables and<br />

others (please specify)<br />

44 Sec trip purpose: pick up or drop off, shopping, access social services, leisure, buy vegetables and others<br />

Page<br />

87


HH member no Day of trip Mon/tue/wed/thur/frid<br />

Origin Start time<br />

Primary Trip purpose<br />

Mode used<br />

Seg Mode Sec trip<br />

purpose<br />

Start Location Start<br />

time<br />

Waiting Time Arrival time Distance (km) Arrival location Fare / parking cost No. of HH<br />

member<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

HH member no Day of trip Mon/tue/wed/thur/frid<br />

Origin Start time<br />

Primary Trip purpose<br />

Mode used<br />

Seg Mode Sec trip<br />

purpose<br />

Start Location Start<br />

time<br />

Waiting Time Arrival time Distance (km) Arrival location Fare / parking cost No. of HH<br />

member<br />

Page<br />

88


2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

HH member no Day of trip Mon/tue/wed/thur/frid<br />

Origin Start time<br />

Primary Trip purpose<br />

Mode used<br />

Seg Mode Sec trip<br />

purpose<br />

Start Location Start<br />

time<br />

Waiting Time Arrival time Distance (km) Arrival location Fare / parking cost No. of HH<br />

member<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

1<br />

Page<br />

89


8. Surveyor’s remarks<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Modes: walk, bicycle, cycle rickshaw, auto, taxi, bus, shared auto, two wheeler, car, other<br />

Page<br />

90


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 11. Household Survey – Part II (Stated Preference Choice survey)<br />

This survey <strong>for</strong>mat is designed to capture the people’s behavior in making choices when alternative mode is available and improved. This requires providing<br />

choices to the respondents including the improved and existing alternatives. The respondents can then either choose among the given alternatives or choose an<br />

alternative within a scenario.<br />

However, there are certain points of concern while <strong>for</strong>mulating the choice set within each scenario-<br />

People are likely to be pre-biased <strong>for</strong> a certain alternative either on negative or on positive side<br />

Time and cost attributes are comparatively easy to introduce and understand however the change in safety and security parameters needs to be<br />

strongly addressed.<br />

It is likely that inferior modes are not considered as an alternative available <strong>for</strong> middle income and high income group<br />

It is extremely important to take care that an alternative within a choice set does not dominate as then it is difficult to determine the trade-offs<br />

between different alternatives<br />

Stated preference choice surveys can help analyst to identify the probability of shifting from one mode to other by the respondent under varying conditions<br />

and thus estimate shifts in alternative scenarios <strong>for</strong> LCMP. This requires analyzing the effect of factors on the mode choice of people. Thus, in the survey<br />

various scenarios are presented to respondent that shows variations in the attributes of different modes/options and the respondent is asked to choose one<br />

preferred mode of travel in each scenario. With the help of variations in attributes of modes and respondent choice, effect of parameters can be determined in<br />

making mode choice that can be extrapolated based on the socio-economic profile of the respondent. BIOGEME (freeware) or N-logit (licensed) can be used<br />

by the analyst to determine the co-efficient of each of the individual parameter taken into account. The survey methodology enables the analyst to understand<br />

the impact of improving infrastructure, taxation and pricing regime or introducing new choice mode in alternative scenarios.<br />

Page<br />

91


9. Stated preference survey and perception study<br />

State the second preferred mode if 1st mode is not available Choice sets / Choice cards (examples shown below) : sample<br />

Bicycl<br />

Mem no. Walk<br />

e Bus MTW Car Auto Card 1 Card 2 Card 3 Card 4 Card 5<br />

1 Fare<br />

2 Com<strong>for</strong>t<br />

3 Safety<br />

4 Travel time<br />

Inaccessible Not socially acceptable Parking cost<br />

Unaf<strong>for</strong>dable Unavailable<br />

Fear of accident Others (specify) For trips (Scenario 1)<br />

Existing<br />

Mem no<br />

work trip Buying vegetables/daily needs Going school<br />

Rate safety between 1 to 5 1<br />

Bicycl<br />

Walk<br />

e Bus MTW Car Auto 2<br />

Page<br />

92


1 3<br />

2 4<br />

3 5<br />

4 6<br />

5 7<br />

Rate security between 1 to 5<br />

Bicycl<br />

Mem no Walk<br />

e Bus MTW Car Auto<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

Page<br />

93


Description of scenarios: Choice sets / Choice cards (examples shown below) : sample<br />

Card 1 Card 2 Card 3 Card 4<br />

Walk Bicycle Bus MTW Car Walk Bicycle Bus MTW Car Walk Bicycle Bus MTW Car Walk Bicycle Bus MTW Car<br />

Fare<br />

Com<strong>for</strong>t<br />

Safety<br />

Travel time<br />

Parking cost<br />

Each card represents one scenario. Based on scenarios attributes of modes in each card is defined by the consultants as given in example which is presented to<br />

respondents one by one and asked to select mode of travel in each scenario (to be filled in table below).<br />

Which mode will you use <strong>for</strong> each of the following scenarios?<br />

Member No. Trip Purpose Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4<br />

work trip<br />

1<br />

shopping <strong>for</strong> daily needs<br />

Going to School<br />

2 work trip<br />

Page<br />

94


Member No. Trip Purpose Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4<br />

shopping <strong>for</strong> daily needs<br />

Going to School<br />

work trip<br />

3<br />

shopping <strong>for</strong> daily needs<br />

Going to School<br />

work trip<br />

4<br />

shopping <strong>for</strong> daily needs<br />

Going to School<br />

work trip<br />

5<br />

shopping <strong>for</strong> daily needs<br />

Going to School<br />

work trip<br />

6<br />

shopping <strong>for</strong> daily needs<br />

Going to School<br />

Page<br />

95


Addendum to Household Survey Formats<br />

Sampling method note<br />

The purpose of the household surveys is to quantify and analyze the travel characteristics of people<br />

belonging to various socio-economic groups in the city. Besides, the household level survey will also<br />

help in modelling origin-destination of trips, vehicle emissions and stated preferences etc. This survey<br />

mainly captures the existing conditions of the respondents and their preferences or choices as stated<br />

by them.<br />

Sampling<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> areas are large and highly diverse. An assessment of the full universe <strong>for</strong> an appropriate<br />

sampling is itself a hard task, given that many of the available data from the census tracks, which can<br />

be used <strong>for</strong> getting the characteristics of the universe, are not available in the public domain.<br />

Secondly, <strong>for</strong> such large universes, a stratified systematic sampling is required provided we are able to<br />

identify the strata from the available data set. Thereafter the task is to decide the strata <strong>for</strong> survey and<br />

then identify samples within each stratum. More diversified the sample, more the strata identified and<br />

better the identification of strata more representative the sample is. We discuss below the process of<br />

identifying different strata and sub-strata in a city and then selecting sample households <strong>for</strong> detailed<br />

structured questionnaire surveys.<br />

1. Stratifying the city by spatial (geographic) units<br />

The urban areas need to be selected <strong>for</strong> survey on the basis of unbiased spatial representation. The<br />

first task is to identify the spatial units from within which the second level of stratification is done.<br />

Based on the demographic characteristics and delineation of traffic analysis zones (TAZs), the first<br />

level of strata can be identified. At the first level, the city can be divided into different spatial units<br />

based on either population density or delineated TAZ in case the latter data are available. Since the<br />

data of TAZs is not available, the demographic data has to be used.<br />

For the use of demographic data, the hypothesis is: ‘people of same economic and social<br />

characteristics congregate in the same area’ and that densities indicate economic characteristics of a<br />

neighborhood. Population census gives the demographic characteristics and from among the available<br />

data, four can be of use in combination or individually (i) housing characteristics – katcha housing<br />

representing the poor and pucca housing representing the rich and the middle classes (ii) female<br />

literacy rate – higher the income higher is the female literacy, (iii) density and (iv) proportion of<br />

Scheduled Castes/ minorities.<br />

The census has the data <strong>for</strong> each household but when the data is given out, it is by wards of the city.<br />

Ward can be used as a basic unit of spatial stratification, if the wards are not too large. If the wards are<br />

too large then we have to go at the sub-ward level and we need to find out from the <strong>Urban</strong> Local Body<br />

(ULB) if it has this data. If it is not available with the ULB then one can use the data of the<br />

enumeration block of the census, which is a data aggregated <strong>for</strong> about 100 to 120 households. This<br />

data can be plotted on the map to get the spatial divisions and then pick up the strata <strong>for</strong> sampling.<br />

This is the First Stage Stratification. Some of the cities now have a Geographic In<strong>for</strong>mation System<br />

(GIS) data with building footprints and from mapping these; we can identify homogenous zones as<br />

First Stage Strata (FSS). Since the demographic data are available at a micro spatial unit level, these<br />

96


data can be used to prepare an index, which is mapped on a GIS base to identify zones of different<br />

economic strata.<br />

Scheduled caste dominated zones can also be identified thus and these can be superimposed on the<br />

economic strata to identify different zones/ spatial units with different economic and social<br />

characteristics. The challenge will remain to identify spatial units with concentration of minority<br />

groups, if they are in substantial numbers. Many Indian cities are segmented by religion as well and<br />

through discussions with key in<strong>for</strong>mants and physically moving across the city, the spatial units where<br />

minorities are concentrated can be identified.<br />

2. Second stage strata <strong>for</strong> transport studies<br />

If the TAZs are available then that can be used. If not then it is assumed that spatial units located at<br />

different distance from the city centre would have different travel characteristics’ and hence second<br />

level of stratification can be based on different distance from the city centre. In Indian cities,<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mality allows people to stay near their work place if they cannot af<strong>for</strong>d a <strong>for</strong>mal house and hence<br />

industrial workers tend to stay in or near industrial areas and loaders-unloaders tend to stay near the<br />

railway station or wholesale markets. Distance from the city centre can be interpreted as distance from<br />

the work centres and hence zones can be delineated based on the landuse. The city would definitely<br />

have a land-use map and through physical movement in the city by the researchers, a broad idea of the<br />

city’s employment centres can be obtained. This can be used <strong>for</strong> preparing zones. Subsequently a<br />

further stratification can be done based on location by distance from the centre, e.g. core, intermediate<br />

zone, periphery and outer periphery depending on the size of the city and landuse structure (or<br />

morphology) of the city.<br />

To summarize, the urban areas in a city can be selected representing following criteria to represent<br />

unbiased spatial distribution:<br />

I. Spatial distribution determined by administrative units (based on demographics) such as<br />

municipal wards to get spatial units representing different economic and social groups.<br />

II. Landuse structure or city’s morphology<br />

III. Distance from the city centre (Core city, intermediate, peripheral and outer periphery)<br />

IV. Spatial distribution determined by traffic-analysis zones if available<br />

While ensuring unbiased spatial distribution, it is important to ensure that various socio-economic<br />

groups are also well-represented as part of these samples. Within each spatially representative<br />

area/zone/cluster of zones, the low-income group housing or slum households should be included in<br />

the sample. The sample of slum households in each selected zone/area should be at least as much as<br />

the percentage population residing in slums at the city level (or at the zone level if data is the zonal<br />

level data is available).<br />

3. Identifying settlements <strong>for</strong> survey<br />

Once the spatial zones/ units have been identified <strong>for</strong> survey, settlements within them have to be<br />

identified. At this stage, housing typology can be used <strong>for</strong> decision. The housing typologies are: (i)<br />

slums and chawls (ii) independent bungalows, (iii) twin bungalows, (iv) low rise apartments and (v)<br />

high rise apartments. Low-rise apartments tend to house lower middle income groups whereas high<br />

rise apartments tend to house higher middle income to high income groups. Bunglows tend to house<br />

high income groups and elites. After selecting the settlement, either random sampling using random<br />

97


numbers or systematic sampling (every nth house depending on the sample size required <strong>for</strong> the<br />

settlement) can be deployed. If the settlement is large, as some of the slum or housing board colonies<br />

may be then clusters can be identified in the settlement to capture the homogenous groups within a<br />

settlement after which random or systematic sampling method can be applied.<br />

Within the selected area, it should be ensured that all socio-economic groups are well-represented.<br />

While surveying in low-income housing or slums, it should be ensured that housing typologies (i.e.<br />

Katcha houses) and socially vulnerable groups (i.e. female headed households). In slums, care must<br />

be taken to pick up samples of households living in katcha housing to be able to get a sample of the<br />

poorest of the poor.<br />

Logistics<br />

The h/h surveys should be conducted in the household settings answered by one adult member of<br />

the family.<br />

There should be a team of two senior people to monitor the survey teams.<br />

Ideally, data-entry of the surveys should be simultaneously done so that in case of missing<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation or errors, the surveyor can be sent back again <strong>for</strong> the survey.<br />

This is a generic sampling guide <strong>for</strong> the purpose of transport related household survey in Indian<br />

cities. Indian cities have diverse set of data and situations, the researchers can use this note as a<br />

guide while taking cognizance of the diverse situation in different cities based on their own<br />

perceptions and intuition.<br />

98


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 12.<br />

Fuel Name:<br />

Energy Consumption in transport : City Level<br />

Unit:<br />

Sr.No. Item Year<br />

TRANSPORT<br />

1 Road<br />

2 Rail based<br />

3 Water based<br />

Instructions <strong>for</strong> filling:<br />

1 A separate <strong>for</strong>mat will be furnished <strong>for</strong> Petrol (MS), Diesel (HSD), Compressed Natural Gas<br />

(CNG), LPG and Electricity<br />

2 Priority should be on collecting data <strong>for</strong> latest year or the year <strong>for</strong> which the in<strong>for</strong>mation is<br />

collected <strong>for</strong> other activities<br />

3 The in<strong>for</strong>mation should be collected at an aggregate level from the respective Oil Companies,<br />

Electricity Utility, Public <strong>Transport</strong> Utilities, Railways or Mass Transit Operators<br />

4 If the in<strong>for</strong>mation is not available at city level then district wise figures should be recorded. In<br />

order to make the in<strong>for</strong>mation consistent with CMP planning area population should be used as<br />

a proxy.<br />

99


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 13.<br />

Vehicle inventory – registered vehicles at city level<br />

Vehicle Type Fuel Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4<br />

Latest<br />

Year<br />

Two Wheelers<br />

Petrol<br />

Others<br />

Three Wheelers<br />

Petrol<br />

Diesel<br />

CNG<br />

Others<br />

Four Wheelers<br />

Petrol<br />

Diesel<br />

CNG<br />

Others<br />

Taxis<br />

Petrol<br />

Diesel<br />

CNG<br />

Others<br />

Buses<br />

Diesel<br />

CNG<br />

Others<br />

Trucks (LCV)<br />

(Upto 7.5 tonnes)<br />

Trucks (HCV)<br />

Diesel<br />

Others<br />

Diesel<br />

Others<br />

100


Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 14. Vehicle Survey at petrol pump<br />

1. Type of vehicle (Tick one) Car SUV 3 wheeler 2 wheeler Bus Truck Other(Specify)<br />

2. Type of fuel (Tick one) Petrol Diesel CNG LPG Other (Specify)<br />

3. Make 4. Model 5. Year of Mfg<br />

6. Mileage Km/Iitre 7. Odometer Reading kilometers<br />

Instructions <strong>for</strong> filling questionnaire:<br />

1. To be carried out at petrol pumps or CNG stations and preferably at stations with PUC checking so that vehicle pollution parameters can also be<br />

measured. Vehicles sampled should be in proportion to their population as per Survey <strong>for</strong>mat 13<br />

101


Annex 2 Sample Project Sheets<br />

Title<br />

Purpose<br />

Categories<br />

‣ Pick amongst the following - Non-motorised transport (NMT) , Mass Transit,<br />

Para Transit, Transit Oriented <strong>Development</strong>, Demand Management, Traffic<br />

Management, Vehicles and Fuels, Others<br />

Project Duration ‣ XX years<br />

Brief description of project<br />

and proposed activities<br />

Cost<br />

Estimated GHG Emission<br />

Reductions<br />

Project proponents<br />

‣ Provide brief account of target policy, measures, relevant Ministries &<br />

Government Departments, activities (project features – technology, capacity<br />

building measures- workshops, financing – model etc.,) etc.,<br />

‣ Lumpsum cost <strong>for</strong> project<br />

‣ Estimated Annual Average (MtCO 2 / year)<br />

‣ Provide specific details of proponents and their responsibilities in<br />

implementation<br />

‣ Provide details of agencies involved in design, development, implementation,<br />

management and financing<br />

102


Annex 3 Stakeholder Engagement<br />

Table 21.<br />

Institutional framework <strong>for</strong> urban and regional transport functions <strong>for</strong> Vishakapatnam<br />

Mode Hierarchy Planning and<br />

Policy<br />

Infrastructure Operations Monitoring and<br />

Evaluation<br />

Private<br />

Motorised<br />

Centre HPCL NHAI<br />

State VUDA Traffic Police RTA, APPCB<br />

City<br />

GVMC<br />

Non-<br />

Motorised<br />

Centre<br />

NHAI<br />

State VUDA Traffic Police<br />

City<br />

GVMC<br />

IPT Centre HPCL NHAI<br />

State VUDA IPT Operators,<br />

Traffic Police<br />

RTA, APPCB<br />

City<br />

GVMC<br />

City Bus Centre HPCL NHAI<br />

State<br />

VUDA,<br />

APSRTC<br />

APSRTC, Traffic<br />

RTA, APPCB<br />

APSRTC<br />

Police<br />

City<br />

GVMC<br />

BRT Centre HPCL<br />

State VUDA APSRTC, Traffic<br />

Police<br />

VUTCL<br />

City GVMC GVMC<br />

Intercity<br />

Bus<br />

Centre HPCL NHAI<br />

State APSRTC, AP<br />

R&B (PWD)<br />

Dept.<br />

APSRTC<br />

103


Mode Hierarchy Planning and<br />

Policy<br />

Infrastructure Operations Monitoring and<br />

Evaluation<br />

City<br />

Railways Centre East Coast<br />

East<br />

Coast<br />

East<br />

Coast<br />

Railway<br />

Railway<br />

Railway<br />

State<br />

City<br />

Airport Centre AAI AAI Airlines DGCA<br />

State<br />

City<br />

Port Centre Ministry of<br />

Shipping<br />

Ministry of<br />

Shipping, VPT<br />

VPT<br />

State<br />

City<br />

Goods Centre NHAI<br />

State<br />

VUDA<br />

City GVMC Private Operators<br />

Table 22.<br />

Stages of CMP Project where SH consultation carried<br />

Task Description Work involved Approach (exemplified by Vizag)<br />

Vizag <strong>Urban</strong> Agglomerattion (VUA) shall be<br />

Delineation of Planning<br />

considered. GVMC area, which includes the Vizag,<br />

Task 1<br />

Delineation of<br />

Planning area and<br />

area<br />

Gajuwaka and 32 other villages shall be considered.<br />

Even the Census considered GVMC as the VUA area.<br />

planning horizon<br />

i) Short term-5 years---Emphasis on safety and<br />

Planning Horizons<br />

accessibility of all<br />

ii) Medium Term-10 years---Corridor +network level<br />

projects<br />

104


Task Description Work involved Approach (exemplified by Vizag)<br />

iii) Long term> 20 years---Vision <strong>for</strong> the city-mode<br />

shifts towards PT<br />

Vision <strong>for</strong> the city<br />

Review of City Profile<br />

For the area and the horizon, set a vision and targets <strong>for</strong><br />

the city in addition to the Low carbon goals<br />

Regional linkages, demography etc.<br />

Existing land use pattern Master Plan of Vizag- 2021<br />

CDP <strong>for</strong> road network, PCTR; RTA <strong>for</strong> Vehicle<br />

Existing transport system<br />

ownership; DPRs made <strong>for</strong> BRT, NMT; PT from<br />

APSRTC; Primary road inventory surveys (including<br />

Task 2<br />

Review of existing<br />

scenario<br />

Existing<br />

energy<br />

PED, NMT and PT infra)<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> energy from gas station data i.e. total fuel<br />

consumption<br />

consumed<br />

Existing emissions<br />

Ambient air quality measures<br />

Demand surveys<br />

HHI, TVC, OD-cordon, point sources,<br />

Indicators<br />

Developed from the above data as per methodology<br />

specified<br />

Population growth---From Census, urbanisation trends<br />

Task 3<br />

Analysing<br />

Business As Usual<br />

(BAU) scenario<br />

<strong>for</strong> horizons<br />

Future socio-economic<br />

profile<br />

Travel Demand<br />

Modelling<br />

Economic Growth--- From economic survey, CSO, state<br />

investments Vehicle ownership--- From RTA trends<br />

Sectoral growth--- From central government initiatives<br />

??<br />

4 step modelling to be used and its description; Accurate<br />

demand estimation from HHI, OD surveys; PT<br />

modelling <strong>for</strong> future;<br />

Energy and Emissions<br />

Carbon benchmarking, <strong>Urban</strong> Air quality <strong>for</strong>ecastig<br />

modelling<br />

system<br />

Task 4<br />

Alternative<br />

Scenario Analysis<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Structure<br />

PT Improvement<br />

Land-Use <strong>Transport</strong> interaction, street hierarchy<br />

Mode-choice modelling <strong>for</strong> BRT corridors+ improved<br />

105


Task Description Work involved Approach (exemplified by Vizag)<br />

bus systems<br />

NMT Improvement<br />

Effect of segregated walkways and cycle tracks<br />

Technology Improvement<br />

Reduction in emission factors<br />

Developing<br />

Scenario analysis<br />

Each scenario indicators + best scenario identification<br />

indicators<br />

<strong>for</strong><br />

Modelling results<br />

For scenario to convert to measures<br />

future<br />

Back casting<br />

Technologies+Measures <strong>for</strong> best scenario<br />

Policy re<strong>for</strong>ms<br />

City policies towards NMT, Parking, PT<br />

Task 5<br />

Mobility<br />

Plan<br />

Institutional re<strong>for</strong>ms<br />

Projects+Funding options<br />

UMTA, division of responsibilities etc.<br />

For projects based on existing funding patterns i.e.<br />

MoUD, state etc.<br />

Modelling <strong>for</strong> selected<br />

Detailed feasibility like ridership, people benefiting<br />

projects<br />

from project<br />

Task 6<br />

Implementation<br />

Program<br />

Funding<br />

Implementation<br />

and<br />

Cost estimates+Agency responsible+Timelines of<br />

implementation<br />

Template <strong>for</strong> funding<br />

JNNURM/ ADB/ World bank <strong>for</strong>mat<br />

106


Table 23.<br />

Types of Stakeholders Consultation (exemplified by Vizag Consultations)<br />

Type Process Purpose<br />

Stage I: Focus Group<br />

Discussion<br />

i. GVMC Commissioner convened a SHC<br />

meeting introducing LCMP and iTrans<br />

ii. LCMP methodology and approach<br />

outlined by iTrans<br />

iii. A questionnaire survey of all SHs on<br />

their views on Low Carbon <strong>Transport</strong><br />

vision <strong>for</strong> Visakhapatnam.<br />

i. Identifying relevant Stakeholders<br />

ii. Discussions and views<br />

summarised into mode-wise subthemes<br />

i.e. Public transport, Nonmotorised<br />

transport, IPT,<br />

congestion management, safety and<br />

security, pollution control<br />

Stage II: Individual SH<br />

meetings<br />

i. Meeting the identified stakeholders<br />

individually<br />

ii. Discussion on the mode-wise sub<br />

themes identified in Stage I<br />

iii. Stakeholders’ views, existing measures<br />

and challenges towards sustainable<br />

transport in the city to be used <strong>for</strong><br />

scenario analysis in the future<br />

i. Mapping the institutional<br />

framework governing urban<br />

transport of Visakhapatnam, Scope<br />

of<br />

various<br />

agencies and overlapping<br />

jurisdictions between different<br />

agencies<br />

ii. Inputs <strong>for</strong> low-carbon scenario<br />

analysis<br />

Stage III: Joint meeting<br />

with GVMC and VUDA<br />

Stage IV: Meeting<br />

Political decision makers<br />

i. Meeting with Vice-Chairman, VUDA,<br />

Commissioner, GVMC, Engineering<br />

and Planning departments of VUDA<br />

and GVMC<br />

ii. Progress update and discussion on Task<br />

1 of LCMP<br />

iii. Discussion on integrating LCMP with<br />

the Master Plan and other upcoming<br />

initiatives in Visakhapatnam<br />

i. Meeting with the MP of Visakhapatnam 45 on<br />

the LCMP approach and objectives, progress<br />

update up to Task 1 of study and Stage III of<br />

SHCs.<br />

i. Identifying the existing transport<br />

projects envisioned by VUDA and<br />

GVMC like Metro system and<br />

MMTS <strong>for</strong> regional connectivity<br />

and NMT in core-city<br />

ii. Inputs from both agencies on<br />

future Tasks of LCMP<br />

i. Go-ahead on the existing<br />

progress of the work ii. Inputs on<br />

identifying the executing agencies<br />

<strong>for</strong> the longlist of projects that are<br />

to be proposed in the LCMP<br />

45 MP <strong>for</strong> Vishakapatnam was also the Minister of State in the Centre at the time of LCMP <strong>for</strong>mulation<br />

107


Annex 4 Indicators and Benchmarks<br />

Indicator<br />

Name<br />

Description Measurement/ data source Benchmarks<br />

Mobility and Accessibility<br />

Modal shares*<br />

Travel time*<br />

Modal shares<br />

by trip purpose<br />

i.e. work,<br />

education,<br />

health and<br />

others<br />

Household surveys and some relevant<br />

data may also be available in City Traffic<br />

and <strong>Transport</strong> Study (CTTS) and<br />

Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP)<br />

Modal shares<br />

by social<br />

groups i.e. by National Sample Survey Organization<br />

income, women (NSSO) data and household surveys<br />

headed<br />

household<br />

Average travel<br />

time by trip<br />

purpose<br />

work,<br />

education,<br />

health<br />

others<br />

different<br />

i.e.<br />

and<br />

using<br />

Trip purpose<br />

wise average<br />

travel time<br />

disaggregated<br />

by social<br />

groups<br />

Average trip<br />

length<br />

frequency<br />

distribution<br />

Household surveys or use validated four<br />

step model <strong>for</strong> different cities<br />

Four step model to capture travel time by<br />

specific social groups <strong>for</strong> different trip<br />

purpose<br />

CMP or CTTS <strong>for</strong> specific cities or four<br />

step model<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To<br />

city<br />

averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To<br />

city<br />

averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar<br />

towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Trip length*<br />

Mode wise<br />

average trip<br />

length<br />

disaggregated<br />

Household survey<br />

by social<br />

groups1<br />

Trip purpose<br />

wise average<br />

trip length<br />

disaggregated<br />

by social<br />

Household survey or relevant data<br />

from NSSO<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

108


Indicator<br />

Name<br />

Description Measurement/ data source Benchmarks<br />

Af<strong>for</strong>dability of<br />

PT and paratransit<br />

fare by<br />

social group<br />

Measured as percentage of Household<br />

income likely to be spent if PT/ paratransit<br />

is used<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Af<strong>for</strong>dability*<br />

Cost<br />

commuting<br />

of<br />

% of Household income spent on<br />

travelling disaggregated by social groups<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

INFRASTRUCTURE AND LAND USE<br />

Average<br />

speed<br />

roads<br />

different<br />

modes1<br />

on<br />

of<br />

Available in CTTS, CMP and City<br />

<strong>Development</strong> Plan (CDP) <strong>for</strong> specific<br />

roads in cities<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Infrastructur<br />

e quality<br />

Percentage of<br />

Household<br />

within 10<br />

min walking<br />

distance of<br />

PT and paratransit<br />

stop<br />

Average number<br />

of interchanges<br />

per PT trip<br />

Needs to be calculated based on the PT<br />

stop inventory and number of<br />

households in census records<br />

Household surveys<br />

To<br />

city<br />

averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar<br />

towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Accessibility of<br />

disadvantaged<br />

groups by<br />

different<br />

modes1<br />

More specific indicators to be able to<br />

measure accessibility <strong>for</strong> disadvantaged<br />

people needs to be developed and data<br />

collected<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Land<br />

parameters<br />

use<br />

Land use mix<br />

intensity<br />

Income level<br />

heterogeneity<br />

Job-housing balance determined using<br />

census data available at ward or<br />

electoral block level<br />

Concentration index of different income<br />

groups in a zone determined by the<br />

asset ownership or housing type data in<br />

census- households<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

109


Indicator<br />

Name<br />

Description Measurement/ data source Benchmarks<br />

Kernel density of<br />

Requires road inventory and public<br />

roads, junctions<br />

transport network data in vector <strong>for</strong>m<br />

and PT stop<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

SAFETY AND SECURITY<br />

Risk exposure<br />

mode wise1<br />

Number of fatal accident per 100,000<br />

users of the mode. Detailed accident data<br />

can be collected from traffic police<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Risk imposed<br />

by modes1<br />

Number of accidents involving<br />

different vehicles and victims per<br />

100,000 of all the road users.<br />

Detailed accident data can be<br />

collected from traffic police<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Overall safety<br />

Number of fatal accidents per 100,000<br />

populations. Detailed accident data can<br />

be collected from traffic police.<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Safety<br />

Speed limit<br />

restrictions<br />

Percentage of roads having speed limit ≥<br />

50 kmph<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Quality of<br />

footpath<br />

infrastructure<br />

Percentage of roads with ≥ 2 m<br />

MOUD SLB Benchmarks<br />

Percentage<br />

road<br />

lighted<br />

of<br />

Data needs to be collected<br />

MOUD SLB Benchmarks<br />

Security<br />

Percentage<br />

footpaths<br />

lighted<br />

of<br />

Data needs to be collected<br />

MOUD SLB Benchmarks<br />

110


Indicator<br />

Name<br />

Description Measurement/ data source Benchmarks<br />

Percentage of<br />

people feeling<br />

safe to Specially designed stated household<br />

walk/cycle and surveys<br />

use PT in city<br />

by gender*<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS<br />

GHG emissions Equivalent CO 2 emissions per<br />

passenger km by mode<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Emissions<br />

Depletion of<br />

land<br />

resource<br />

Lifecycle cost<br />

of different<br />

modes1<br />

Per capita<br />

consumption of<br />

land <strong>for</strong><br />

transport<br />

activity<br />

Land consumed<br />

<strong>for</strong> different<br />

transport<br />

activities1<br />

Total of-<br />

CO2 emissions from construction of<br />

facility per km<br />

CO2 emissions from production of<br />

vehicle or mode per unit<br />

Co2 emission unit transit<br />

Land use data from CDP or master plans<br />

of cities<br />

Percentage of total land used in transport<br />

<strong>for</strong> different type of transport<br />

infrastructure- road, parking bus lanes,<br />

railways, etc.<br />

Need to map air quality in city and mark<br />

households in the buffer area<br />

Percentage of<br />

O<br />

population<br />

r<br />

exposed to air<br />

Get the relevant morbidity data<br />

pollution<br />

from hospitals or medical<br />

authorities<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To<br />

city<br />

averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar<br />

towns<br />

Health hazards<br />

Percentage of<br />

population<br />

exposed to<br />

noise levels ><br />

50 dB*<br />

Need to map exceedance of noise levels<br />

in city and mark households in the buffer<br />

area<br />

111


Indicator<br />

Name<br />

Description Measurement/ data source Benchmarks<br />

ECONOMIC (RESPONSE INDICATORS)<br />

Investment<br />

Trend in<br />

investments <strong>for</strong><br />

development of<br />

Data from city budgets across years<br />

infrastructure<br />

<strong>for</strong> various<br />

modes 1<br />

Tax burden<br />

mode wise 1<br />

Data to be collected from Regional<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Office<br />

To<br />

city<br />

averages/proportio<br />

n averages <strong>for</strong><br />

similar towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Fuel prices at<br />

pumps by<br />

fuel type<br />

Cost borne by<br />

operators Other charges<br />

levied as<br />

applicable at<br />

city level<br />

disaggregated<br />

by modes1<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Department<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Percentage<br />

subsidies<br />

granted<br />

of<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> department<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

Fare policy<br />

Percentage of<br />

population<br />

owning passes<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> department<br />

To city averages/proportion<br />

averages <strong>for</strong> similar towns<br />

112


Annex 5 Four Step Modelling<br />

Model Framework (Four Step Modelling)<br />

The four step model approach <strong>for</strong> CMP needs to account different social groups and gender (See<br />

Figure 4) and <strong>for</strong> all modes of transport including NMT, para-transit and public transport and this is<br />

slightly different from conventional four step modelling where there is no differentiation in terms of<br />

socio economic groups and gender and where the focus is mainly on motorised transport. Modeling<br />

softwares like QuantumGIS, ArcGIS, TransCAD, CUBE, VISUM, EMME, OmniTrans, etc can be<br />

used to create the travel demand model of the city. However these softwares are designed primarily<br />

to model motorised modes like cars, two-wheelers and buses. Omnitrans is the only software among<br />

these that has specific modelling capabilities elating to cycle users. Hence adequate care should be<br />

taken in specifying the modelling parameters to suit the softwares <strong>for</strong> cycles. Various stages of the<br />

modelling procedure have been explained in the following sections.<br />

Figure 2.<br />

Four Step Model Framework<br />

The base year travel demand model is required to replicate the road network and travel patterns of the<br />

city in modelling software and to test <strong>for</strong> various short term measures that can be taken to improve the<br />

existing transportation systems. The following table gives the input parameters and their data sources<br />

used <strong>for</strong> developing the base year model.<br />

113


Table 24.<br />

Modeling components and input sources<br />

Model Component<br />

Traffic Analysis Zone Map<br />

Road Network<br />

Trip Production Patterns<br />

Trip Attraction Patterns<br />

Trip Distribution<br />

Base Year Mode Shares<br />

Trip Assignment<br />

Input Source<br />

Derived from Ward Map<br />

Derived from Property Tax Data,<br />

Primary Data collected <strong>for</strong> road inventory &<br />

Link speeds and secondary data on road widths<br />

Household Interview Data<br />

Land Use Data from Master Plan and<br />

Building wise usage type from Property Tax Database<br />

Trip length distribution patterns from Household Interview data to<br />

calibrate the Gravity Model<br />

Household Interview Data<br />

Traffic Volume Counts used <strong>for</strong> network calibration<br />

Trip Generation<br />

Trip generation involves estimating the total number of trips produced and attracted to each TAZ.<br />

Trip production is dependent on socio-economic characteristics of households within the TAZ while<br />

trip attraction depends on the land-use type of the TAZ as explained below.<br />

Trip production<br />

Household interview data is normally used to estimate the trip production trends <strong>for</strong> various types of<br />

households using the following steps:<br />

Purpose wise trips produced in each household are derived as a function of the socio-economic<br />

attributes of the household like household size, income and vehicle ownership.<br />

Total number of households in each TAZ is derived from the census data or the property tax<br />

database and its total households and number of trips produced are estimated.<br />

The socio-economic characteristics of each TAZ are derived from the HH Interview data.<br />

If detailed household level data is not available, TAZ level data and parameters like TAZ<br />

population, employment opportunities etc. are used to derive the productions <strong>for</strong> each TAZ<br />

Trip Attraction<br />

The number of trips attracted to each TAZ is estimated in this step. The attractiveness of a zone is a<br />

function of the type of land-use of that zone. For example residential land uses produce trips while<br />

commercial, institutional and industrial areas typically attract trips. Hence the existing land use mix is<br />

considered as the critical variable in determining the trips attracted to each TAZ. Land use data at the<br />

city level is provided by the Master plan of the city, but they are only indicative as the land use<br />

allocation in the master plan and the actual usage of land use is observed to be varying widely in<br />

practice.<br />

The Property tax data from the municipal corporations maintain building wise land use type and its<br />

plinth area. Types of land use in the buildings include: Residential, Commercial, Educational,<br />

Industrial, Public Use, Shops, Hospital, Cinema/Pub Entertainment, Others. Except residential, all<br />

other land use types attract trips. Hence, the total plinth area of each type of attracting land uses can<br />

be calculated and used as a measure of attractiveness of the TAZ.<br />

114


Purpose wise Trips attracted to each zone from the household interviews is correlated with land use<br />

types in each TAZ using multiple linear regression technique to derive the relation between the trips<br />

attracted and the land uses of the TAZ. Based on these equations, the number of trips attracted to each<br />

zone is re-calculated using the equations. This will however only give the number of trips at the scale<br />

of the sample size of data, since the sample trips are used <strong>for</strong> deriving the equation. There<strong>for</strong>e these<br />

attractions are used as the relative attractiveness of each zone. The attractions of each zone are then up<br />

scaled proportionally to the total attractions based on the total trips produced <strong>for</strong> each purpose.<br />

Trip Distribution<br />

Trip distribution is used to derive the Origin-Destination (OD) matrix from the Production Attraction<br />

PA table prepared in trip generation. Gravity Method is generally adopted <strong>for</strong> trip distribution. In this<br />

method trips between zone i and zone j are distributed in proportion to the number of trips produced<br />

in i, number of trips produced in j and in the inverse proportion of the impedance between these zones<br />

i.e. travel time, travel cost, relative safety etc.<br />

Trip Distribution can be carried out purpose wise or mode-wise based on city specific characteristics.<br />

Trip length distribution should be observed both purpose wise and mode wise and whichever<br />

parameter has more clearly defined trip length distribtions should be selected <strong>for</strong> distribution. If the<br />

type of mode is affecting trip length more, mode share split can be carried out be<strong>for</strong>e the trip<br />

distribution. The following is the step wise procedure to be followed.<br />

The purpose wise peak hour trips are added up to get the total trips produced and attracted to each<br />

TAZ.<br />

The TAZ wise mode-share values can be derived from the HH Interview data and applied to the<br />

PA table to get the mode-wise PA table <strong>for</strong> all zones<br />

Current users: The mode share of cycles in each TAZ is derived from the household interview data<br />

and is used to derive the PA table <strong>for</strong> current cycling trips. The PA table can be <strong>for</strong> the peak hour<br />

or <strong>for</strong> the entire day based on the study requirements.<br />

Potential users: The rest of the trips in the city <strong>for</strong>m the potential cycle users in the city and it is<br />

important to model these trips in parallel to estimate their potential shift to cycles.<br />

One of the features of the four-stage demand modelling process is that only the interzonal trips are<br />

considered <strong>for</strong> assignment. Hence, the proportion of intrazonal trips in each TAZ is calculated<br />

from the HH Interview data and these trips are excluded from the demand modelling process.<br />

The PA table containing inter-zonal cycling trips is used as the input <strong>for</strong> trip distribution.<br />

A holistic model to calculate the impedance between zones <strong>for</strong> the cyclists is the Bicycle<br />

Compatibility Index (BCI). BCI reflects the safety and com<strong>for</strong>t levels and perceptions of bicyclists<br />

based on observed geometric, land use, street environment and operational conditions of the road<br />

network. The four parameters which affect bicycle compatibility and measured by their variables are:<br />

Physical safety - volume of motorized vehicles, speed of motorized vehicles, frequency of buses<br />

and other heavy vehicles<br />

Social security- land use mix and density, in<strong>for</strong>mal sectors on road side, lighting, other bicyclists<br />

and pedestrians<br />

Barriers and attractiveness- parked vehicles, pedestrians on the road, bus stop density, pavement<br />

quality, shade, gradient etc.<br />

115


Intersections- density of non-controlled vehicular access, type and level of controlled vehicular<br />

access (signalized intersections).<br />

Impedance <strong>for</strong> NMT(pedestrians and bicycles) and public transport trips have to be developed<br />

separately from cars and motorised two wheelers.<br />

Mode Choice<br />

Mode choice models should be developed <strong>for</strong> all modes of transport including NMT, public transport<br />

and para-transit modes. As discussed in Task 2-2 TAZ size <strong>for</strong> modelling thus needs to be small<br />

enough to cater to walk, bicycle trips and account <strong>for</strong> impact of access/egress trips on public transport.<br />

Mode choice <strong>for</strong> walk and bicycle<br />

One of the major differences in modelling NMT modes as compare to motorized modes is the impact<br />

of speed on mode choice. Speed of NMT (walk and bicycle) is constant and there is negligible impact<br />

of congestion. While other parameters like distance to be travelled, infrastructure quality, safety and<br />

security concerns have wider impact over mode choice of walk and bicycle. Along with the mode<br />

related parameters individual socio-economic in<strong>for</strong>mation needs to be accounted <strong>for</strong> modelling mode<br />

choice <strong>for</strong> NMT modes of transport.<br />

Mode choice <strong>for</strong> public transport<br />

Utility of public transport has minimum three inter-related segments i.e. access trip, haul trip and<br />

egress trip. Studies have shown that access/egress trip has significant impact over public transport as a<br />

mode choice. The impact is not only in terms of public transport in vicinity to origin/destination but is<br />

also in terms of the discom<strong>for</strong>t and disutility associated with the modes used <strong>for</strong> access/egress trips<br />

and mode interchanges. The utility function <strong>for</strong> public transport thus involves waiting time and<br />

discom<strong>for</strong>t of changing modes other than mode related parameters <strong>for</strong> access/egress trip and haul trip.<br />

Trip Assignment<br />

This step is per<strong>for</strong>med to determine number of trips made by different modes on each of the existing<br />

transport network link during peak and off-peak hour period. Trip assignment <strong>for</strong> NMT should<br />

account to land use and density parameters in the vicinity of the infrastructure/facility. While trip<br />

assignment <strong>for</strong> bicycle also includes parameters related to pavement quality, slope, traffic volume and<br />

speed. This involves using bicycle compatibility index (BCI) and other such measures.<br />

The person trip OD matrices <strong>for</strong> current and potential users are converted to vehicle trips based on the<br />

average occupancy observed in each mode from the occupancy survey carried out in the city.<br />

However, the floating populations coming into the city through the numerous entry points are<br />

captured from OD surveys at these locations. These sample surveys are up scaled to total volume<br />

based on the traffic volume counts at those locations. The OD matrices from these surveys are added<br />

to the OD from trip distribution to develop the overall OD matrix of the city.<br />

The mode-wise calibrated OD matrices derived from the above step are assigned on to the road<br />

network using User-Equilibrium or Capacity Restraint methods <strong>for</strong> motorised modes. For cyclists All<br />

or Nothing (AON) method is used in general by considering the minimum BCI or travel distance<br />

between ODs of the cyclists as the determining factor <strong>for</strong> route choice. Since most links are assumed<br />

116


to have enough capacity <strong>for</strong> cyclists and since cyclists are sensitive to safety and security issues more<br />

than the speed, AON method is adopted.<br />

Network Calibration<br />

The link flows observed from trip assignment are compared with the actual traffic flows observed<br />

from traffic volume counts conducted at various locations across the city. If it is observed that the link<br />

flows from traffic assignment vary from the traffic volume counts the network needs to be re-checked<br />

<strong>for</strong> its accuracy. Some missing links in the road network are identified through this procedure.<br />

However, the larger contributing factor to this error can be the OD matrix derived from trip<br />

distribution. OD matrix have to be re-calibrated <strong>for</strong> it to match the traffic volume counts. For this, an<br />

iterative process available in modelling softwares called the OD matrix estimation (TransCAD,<br />

CUBE)/ t-flow fuzzy (VISUM). Using this procedure the network is calibrated to match the actual<br />

volume counts observed on ground.<br />

117


Annex 6 Financing Options <strong>for</strong> Implementation of Projects<br />

Funding from Domestic Source at Local Level (ULB)<br />

1. Fare box revenue/Parking Fee /Advertisement Revenue:<br />

The accumulated profit earned from ULB operated/promoted transport system can be used as partial<br />

source of funding urban transport.<br />

Parking fee collected from parking lots located within the jurisdiction of ULB can also be partial<br />

source of funding urban transport.<br />

City authorities charges fee on advertisement on hoarding, billboards etc., within its jurisdiction. The<br />

accumulated fund generated from such source can be used as partial source of funding urban<br />

transport. In case of Public <strong>Transport</strong> Projects, the rolling stock can also be an excellent medium <strong>for</strong><br />

advertising. In addition, stations, en-route stops and the corridor also provide ample space <strong>for</strong><br />

advertisements. These rights may be sold on the basis of a fixed fee or even on revenue sharing basis.<br />

In a booming economy the up-side potential from revenue sharing may be quite high while rates may<br />

drop-off precipitously during a downturn. These rights may also be renewed periodically so that the<br />

best option may be chosen depending upon the scenario and competition <strong>for</strong> the space.<br />

2. Creation of City Level UTF<br />

A dedicated urban transport fund would need to be created at the city level through other sources,<br />

especially land monetization, betterment levy, land value tax, enhanced property tax or grant of<br />

development rights, advertisement, employment tax, congestion, a cess on the sales tax, parking<br />

charges reflecting a true value of the land, traffic challans etc.<br />

Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation has already set up a dedicated urban transport fund through<br />

land monetization and advertisement rights. Similarly, Karnataka has set up a dedicated urban<br />

transport fund through MRTS cess on petrol and diesel sold in Bangalore, which is being used to fund<br />

the metro rail projects. The various sources of funding that can be used to set up the urban transport<br />

fund is given below:<br />

i. Anticipated purchase of land<br />

This method involves public authorities buying land be<strong>for</strong>e announcing that an infrastructure will be<br />

built or where the route will run. In this way, the purchase can be made at market price without the<br />

infrastructure. The strategy then consists in:<br />

Directly selling the land to private developers including the estimated added value in the sale price,<br />

such as was done in Aguas Claras on the periphery of Brasilia, or in Copenhagen;<br />

Developing the area as part of an urban renewal project and then selling it at market price, as was<br />

done in Copenhagen or in Japan, where rail companies were the first to use this method to finance<br />

their operations<br />

A city can also levy additional stamp duty (5%) on registration of property.<br />

118


ii.<br />

Betterment Tax<br />

A betterment tax is not the same as a property tax, because the increase in value of property is not due<br />

to the action of the owner (such as would be the case with renovations and improvements) but from a<br />

community action, thus justifying the public authorities to impose such a tax. However, it is not easy<br />

to implement, which no doubt explains why this financing mechanism is still underused.<br />

This tax must be levied on all areas that benefit from the new transport infrastructure. The land is<br />

valued each year based on an optimal use of each site, without taking into account the existing<br />

facilities. A tax based on the value of the land is then levied in order to generate funds <strong>for</strong> the public<br />

sector. Thus, if the value of the land increases, the tax collected also increases. This means that a<br />

vacant plot of land in the city centre which has been earmarked <strong>for</strong> building a residential and<br />

commercial complex will pay the same tax as an identical site which has already been developed in a<br />

similar manner. Unlike construction taxes, no tax reduction is available to landowners who leave the<br />

site empty. Likewise, taxes are not increased if the site is built upon. Landowners will there<strong>for</strong>e to<br />

seek to capitalise on the use of their land.<br />

iii.<br />

Land Value Tax<br />

Once an area is well connected by public transport and is accessible to the commercial area and also<br />

the liveability of the area increases it is possible that the price of the land will increase. Such increase<br />

in price can be source revenue <strong>for</strong> the municipality. Similar to parking, the obtained revenue needs to<br />

be utilized <strong>for</strong> improvement of the area and other areas in the vicinity. A substantial amount of<br />

revenue could be generated through cess on turnover, particularly in cities, based on industry, trade<br />

and commerce activities. Such cess has already been levied <strong>for</strong> Bangalore MRTS project. Bangalore<br />

has also levied luxury tax and professional tax towards the metro fund.<br />

iv.<br />

Advertising<br />

This is another important source of revenue <strong>for</strong> the city. When properly utilised this source can be of<br />

immense value in supporting sustainable urban transport measures in a city. The revenues from<br />

advertising in the city can be used to improve the existing transport system and/or create new schemes<br />

in sustainable transport.<br />

Paris, France has used the advertising money in developing a public bike scheme, which is now a well<br />

renowned model. Similarly, <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>for</strong> London (TfL) has made a deal with the advertising<br />

specialist, Clear Channel, <strong>for</strong> the regular maintenance and design of the street furniture in return <strong>for</strong><br />

the advertising space on bus shelters.<br />

One important aspect that needs to be considered is that the advertising money needs to be utilised <strong>for</strong><br />

improving the transport system rather than spending it on building more roads. In the similar way, the<br />

advertising should not be overdone to avoid visual pollution. Further, ideally advertising revenue<br />

should not be a reason <strong>for</strong> building of pedestrian overpasses as the greater good <strong>for</strong> the society from<br />

these overpasses is minimal.<br />

v. Green Fee<br />

The Municipal Corporation of Shimla charges a fee on vehicles entering in Shimla bearing<br />

registration numbers other than the State of Himachal Pradesh. The rate of fees is valid <strong>for</strong> a period of<br />

119


only 7 days and would be called as Composite Environment Fees (CEF). Municipal Corporation<br />

Shimla utilizes the fees collected basically <strong>for</strong> tourism related activities, however a certain percentage<br />

of proceeds can be transferred to the <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> fund.<br />

The cities of hilly states or /and the cities famous <strong>for</strong> tourism can explore of adopting this type of fee.<br />

3. Congestion pricing<br />

Based on urban economics principles of "polluters pay", congestion pricing is a system of surcharging<br />

users of public goods like urban transport infrastructure that are subject to congestion through excess<br />

demand. Congestion pricing allows civic authority to manage the demand without increasing the<br />

supply of that public good. Further, it generates an additional source of revenue <strong>for</strong> the public<br />

exchequer.<br />

Cities like London, Singapore, Stockholm etc. have implemented congestion pricing system in urban<br />

roads. Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, GoI has issued letter in this regard, details of which can<br />

accessed from the ministry’s website.<br />

4. Property development/TOD<br />

Transit Oriented <strong>Development</strong> (TOD) is a mechanism to shape land use policy to support public<br />

transport system. In order to promote TOD along the public transport network, transit station should<br />

be made nucleus of transit center or say center of various activities like housing, schools, commercial<br />

and public places etc. It will help to increase the transit system rider ship and revenue thereof and<br />

other revenue by levying extra taxes on the development along the transit network which can be in the<br />

following <strong>for</strong>ms (but not limited):<br />

<strong>Development</strong> Charges –<strong>Development</strong> fee on all <strong>for</strong>ms of new buildings-residential, commercial and<br />

industrial along a buffer zone of 100 to 500 m depth on either side of each corridor.<br />

Revenue through incremental FSI - Areas which fall within a certain radius from the transit terminals<br />

shall be eligible <strong>for</strong> a higher FAR <strong>for</strong> all permissible uses, irrespective of the FAR applicable <strong>for</strong> the<br />

respective uses.<br />

Property Tax – By providing better infrastructure facilities to residents along the proposed corridors,<br />

the city civic authority can increase the property tax rates.<br />

Betterment tax –Levying of betterment tax at the time of transaction on the properties in the identified<br />

buffer zones along the transit corridors.<br />

Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, GoI has issued letter in this regard, details of which can accessed<br />

from the ministry’s website.<br />

5. Municipal bonds<br />

Based on Indo-US Financial Institutions Re<strong>for</strong>m and Expansion Program—Debt &Infrastructure,<br />

known as the FIRE (D) Program, began in the early 1990s, in support of the Government of India’s<br />

initiatives to liberalize the economy and decentralize government authority to the local level, ULBs<br />

are encouraged to develop market based bond market.<br />

120


Issuance of tax free and taxable bonds by the ULBs is one of best self sustainable mode of financing<br />

urban transportation infrastructure. Ahmadabad Municipal Corporation is the pioneer in issuance of<br />

bonds. MoUD has guidelines <strong>for</strong> issuance of tax free and taxable bonds.<br />

6. Pooled Financing<br />

As majority of ULBs are weak in terms of approaching capital market <strong>for</strong> raising funds based on their<br />

own balance-sheet. In such case, by pooling a group of ULBs can collectively raise fund from the<br />

market by issuing municipal bonds. MoUD has guidelines <strong>for</strong> Pooled finance.<br />

Funding from Domestic Source at State Level<br />

1. General budget funding<br />

State Govt. can earmark funds specially meant <strong>for</strong> development of urban transport in the state,<br />

through general budget provision under both planned and unplanned expenditure head.<br />

2. Viability gap funding<br />

The Government of India through Department of Economic Affairs encourages the ULBs and the<br />

State Governments to structure projects on a PPP model. In order to make projects commercially<br />

viable, the Government will provide support in <strong>for</strong>m of capital grants upto 20% of the total project<br />

cost. An additional grant of 20% may be made available by the implementing agency, state<br />

government or local bodies.<br />

3. Loans from Financial Institution/Banks<br />

Under the aegis respective State Government, in <strong>for</strong>m of guarantor, ULBs can take term loans from<br />

banks and various Financial Institutions including MFAs. According to the Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong><br />

<strong>Development</strong> (MoUD), under JNNURM about 17% (Rs. 1,280 crore or US$285 million) of local<br />

governments’ share of capital costs has been raised through term loans from banks and state-level<br />

funds, as of 2009. Thus, it is apparent that fraction of urban investment required over the next two<br />

decades will come from either bonds or commercial lending.<br />

4. Creation of State Level UTF<br />

As per the guidelines of National <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Policy, an <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Fund (UTF) is desired<br />

to be set up to sustain and expand the transit operations and to develop the transit infrastructure. As<br />

cities and towns are generators of national wealth, there is a growing recognition that the resources<br />

needed <strong>for</strong> urban development be generated from within the urban economies by use of principles like<br />

"beneficiaries pay", "users pay" and "polluters pay".<br />

In this regard, it is proposed to set up a "Mass Rapid Transit System Fund" <strong>for</strong> implementation of the<br />

transit system in the State by the State Government. The fund may be generated by cess to be levied<br />

on various taxes collected in the city, as follows:<br />

121


Table 25.<br />

Potential source <strong>for</strong> state level UTF<br />

Commercial Tax Department<br />

A. Sales Tax<br />

0.25 paise per litre<br />

(1) Petrol<br />

0.10 paise per litre<br />

(2) Diesel<br />

5%<br />

(3) On goods other than declared goods<br />

B. Luxury Tax 5% on lodging charges of Rs. 750/- and<br />

above.<br />

C. Professional Tax 5% on Professional Tax<br />

C. Betting Tax 5% on Betting Tax<br />

Motor Vehicles Department<br />

A. Motor Vehicle Tax 5% on Motor Vehicle Tax<br />

Registration Department<br />

A. Stamp Duty 5% additional duty<br />

Excise Department<br />

A. Licensing Fee 15% additional licensing fee on liquor<br />

manufacturing and liquor selling<br />

The above mentioned fund shall be meant <strong>for</strong> urban transport infrastructure in general, though a<br />

significant part of the collections shall go to the SPV <strong>for</strong> city bus operations and the City Metro Rail<br />

Corporation Limited. Further scaling up of the catchment area of this fund shall be done in the due<br />

course and the proceeds shall be used towards creating better transport facilities in Metropolitan area.<br />

Funding from Domestic Source at National Level<br />

1. General budget funding<br />

Central Govt. can earmark funds specially meant <strong>for</strong> development of urban transport in the country by<br />

allocating additional funds to the states through general budget provision under both planned and<br />

unplanned expenditure head.<br />

122


2. National level funding Scheme like JnNURM<br />

Central Govt. through various ministries such as MoUD introduces and implements number of<br />

Additional Central Assistance schemes such as JnNURM, IDSMT time to time to fund urban<br />

infrastructure including urban transport. MoUD website has detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation on such schemes.<br />

3. Viability gap funding<br />

The Government of India through Department of Economic Affairs encourages the ULBs and the<br />

State Governments to structure projects on a PPP model. In order to make projects commercially<br />

viable, the Government will provide support in <strong>for</strong>m of capital grants upto 20% of the total project<br />

cost. An additional grant of 20% may be made available by the implementing agency, state<br />

government or local bodies.<br />

4. Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action 46 (NAMA)<br />

NAMA are voluntary actions taken by a developing country to reduce GHG emissions from a<br />

Business as Usual (BAU) scenario. These actions can be policies or projects. The NAMA are<br />

generally assumed to have a strong contribution of finances from the country itself with possibility of<br />

additional finances from the international donors (multilateral or bilateral). For political reasons the<br />

NAMA can be distinguished as unilateral i.e., without any international support or supported. A key<br />

feature of NAMA is a focus on Measurement Reporting and Verification (MRV). The NAMA need to<br />

communicated to the UNFCCC where a registry of NAMA projects is maintained<br />

Funding from International Source<br />

1. Loans from Multilateral Funding Agency<br />

Multilateral Funding Agencies such as Asian <strong>Development</strong> Bank, World Bank, JICA etc. provide<br />

term loan <strong>for</strong> infrastructure development based on certain terms and conditions <strong>for</strong> promotion of<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong>, Non-motorized <strong>Transport</strong>, Low-carbon transports etc. Detailed guidelines of<br />

funding by Multilateral Funding Agencies are available on the respective websites.<br />

2. Clean <strong>Development</strong> Mechanism (CDM)<br />

Clean <strong>Development</strong> Mechanism has been a major source of climate financing <strong>for</strong> developing<br />

countries. In the transport sector CDM did not get major success baring a few cases <strong>for</strong> example Delhi<br />

Metro which had success in getting financing from CDM,<strong>for</strong> a project on regetrative braking<br />

Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action 47 (NAMA)<br />

46<br />

Guidance <strong>for</strong> NAMA Design: Building on Country Experiences Available at<br />

http://mitigationpartnership.net/sites/default/files/guidance_<strong>for</strong>_nama_design_2013.pdf<br />

47<br />

Guidance <strong>for</strong> NAMA Design: Building on Country Experiences Available at<br />

http://mitigationpartnership.net/sites/default/files/guidance_<strong>for</strong>_nama_design_2013.pdf<br />

123


NAMA as pointed earlier can be funded by multilateral or bilateral donors in which cases they are<br />

referred as supported NAMA.<br />

Funding from Private Source<br />

1. PPP Options (BOOT/BOT/Lease/Annuity etc.)<br />

Public-Private Partnerships is cooperation between a public authority and private companies, created<br />

to carry out a specific project. They can take on a number of <strong>for</strong>ms, and can be a useful method of<br />

capturing property value gains generated by transport infrastructure. In a PPP <strong>for</strong> a new transport<br />

infrastructure development project, the public authority creates a secure environment <strong>for</strong> the private<br />

sector to carry out the project, and the private partner offers its industry expertise, provides funding<br />

and shares in the project’s risk.<br />

The decision to undertake a public-private partnership and the choice of the most suitable <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

partnership greatly depends on the context and the type of project to be developed are given below:<br />

Governing Factors<br />

The project context may influence the type of PPP to be implemented. The public partner must<br />

evaluate the total cost of the project, its importance in terms of public need, the time frame, the<br />

number of actors involved and the geographic area in question. Does providing this public service<br />

require a major infrastructure? Will it require high levels of human and financial resources to<br />

provide this service? Be<strong>for</strong>e a decision can be made, it is necessary to fully understand the context<br />

of the proposed project.<br />

The cost of the project is of course a critical factor, which will weigh on the choice. Many PPP<br />

concern projects <strong>for</strong> underground systems, LRT and BRT requiring significant levels of financing<br />

which the local authorities would have difficulty assuming alone.<br />

A well-structured institutional framework and the local authority’s experience in developing<br />

transport projects are also decisive factors. <strong>Urban</strong> transport is an industrial and commercial<br />

activity, which involves financial risk. Bringing in experienced partners is one way of<br />

compensating <strong>for</strong> a lack of certain skills in this field, though a good PPP should call upon other<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms of expertise on the part of the public authority. This can sometimes facilitate obtaining a<br />

loan, in particular from international funding agencies.<br />

The tasks entrusted to the private sector (design, construction, development, operation,<br />

maintenance) will influence the type of contract.<br />

The sharing of responsibilities and risks will determine the degree of involvement of each partner<br />

and the type and clauses of the contract. There are many types of contracts but it is primarily the<br />

sharing of financial risk, which will determine the key characteristics. There are two categories of<br />

risk: commercial risk, related to trends in revenue, and industrial risk, related to the cost of<br />

construction and trends in operating and maintenance expenses. if both types of risk are covered by<br />

the public partner, then it would be a management contract in which the private partner is merely<br />

per<strong>for</strong>ming the work. The private partner must meet the specifications but will not be motivated to<br />

improve the service nor propose innovative techniques or management;<br />

If the project is not self-financing, i.e. if, at the end of the contract, the total revenues and gains do<br />

not balance out the total costs, the transit authority may be required to provide compensation,<br />

depending on the clauses of the contract.<br />

124


PPP Variants<br />

Design-Build (DB): Under this model, the government contracts with a private partner to design<br />

and build a facility in accordance with the requirements set by the government. After completing<br />

the facility, the government assumes responsibility <strong>for</strong> operating and maintaining the facility. This<br />

method of procurement is also referred to as Build-Transfer (BT).<br />

Design-Build-Maintain (DBM): This model is similar to Design-Build except that the private<br />

sector also maintains the facility. The public sector retains responsibility <strong>for</strong> operations.<br />

Design-Build-Operate (DBO): Under this model, the private sector designs and builds a facility.<br />

Once the facility is completed, the title <strong>for</strong> the new facility is transferred to the public sector, while<br />

the private sector operates the facility <strong>for</strong> a specified period. This procurement model is also<br />

referred to as Build-Transfer-Operate (BTO).<br />

Design-Build-Operate-Maintain (DBOM): This model combines the responsibilities of designbuild<br />

procurements with the operations and maintenance of a facility <strong>for</strong> a specified period by a<br />

private sector partner. At the end of that period, the operation of the facility is transferred back to<br />

the public sector. This method of procurement is also referred to as Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT).<br />

Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT): The government grants a franchise to a private partner to<br />

finance, design, build and operate a facility <strong>for</strong> a specific period of time. Ownership of the facility<br />

is transferred back to the public sector at the end of that period.<br />

Build-Own-Operate (BOO): The government grants the right to finance, design, build, operate and<br />

maintain a project to a private entity, which retains ownership of the project. The private entity is<br />

not required to transfer the facility back to the government.<br />

Design-Build-Finance-Operate/Maintain (DBFO, DBFM or DBFO/M): Under this model, the<br />

private sector designs, builds, finances, operates and/or maintains a new facility under a long-term<br />

lease. At the end of the lease term, the facility is transferred to the public sector. In some countries,<br />

DBFO/M covers both BOO and BOOT.<br />

PPPs can also be used <strong>for</strong> existing services and facilities in addition to new ones. Some of these<br />

models are described below.<br />

Service Contract: The government contracts with a private entity to provide services the<br />

government previously per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />

Management Contract: A management contract differs from a service contract in that the private<br />

entity is responsible <strong>for</strong> all aspects of operations and maintenance of the facility under contract.<br />

Lease: The government grants a private entity a leasehold interest in an asset. The private partner<br />

operates and maintains the asset in accordance with the terms of the lease.<br />

Concession: The government grants a private entity the exclusive rights to provide operate and<br />

maintain an asset over a long period of time in accordance with per<strong>for</strong>mance requirements set <strong>for</strong>th<br />

by the government. The public sector retains ownership of the original asset, while the private<br />

operator retains ownership over any improvements made during the concession period.<br />

Divestiture: The government transfers an asset, either in part or in full, to the private sector.<br />

Generally, the government will include certain conditions with the sale of the asset to ensure that<br />

improvements are made and citizens continue to be served.<br />

125


Annex 7: Financing Options <strong>for</strong> Project <strong>Development</strong> (Preparation of<br />

DPRs/Feasibility Report)<br />

Central Govt. Sponsored Scheme of <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> Planning of Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong><br />

<strong>Development</strong>, GoI JnNURM Scheme<br />

The possible sources of funds <strong>for</strong> preparation of DPR / Feasibility report from Central Government<br />

and Central Govt. sponsored scheme such as JnNURM are given in the Table below:<br />

Possible source of Finance (<strong>for</strong> DPR preparation)<br />

S.No Project Head Projects<br />

JNNURM Scheme Centrally Sponsored<br />

Scheme of <strong>Urban</strong><br />

<strong>Transport</strong> Planning of<br />

Ministry of <strong>Urban</strong><br />

<strong>Development</strong>, GoI<br />

1 Public <strong>Transport</strong><br />

Projects<br />

City bus<br />

service(Bus<br />

Augmentation)/<br />

Bus based Mass<br />

Rapid Transit<br />

System such as<br />

BRTS/ Rail<br />

based Mass<br />

Rapid Transit<br />

System such as<br />

Metro Rail,<br />

Light Rail, Tram<br />

etc.<br />

0.75% to 2% of<br />

the project cost<br />

depending on the<br />

project cost.<br />

Bypass 0.5% to 0.75%<br />

of the project<br />

cost depending<br />

on the project<br />

cost<br />

50% in case of DPR <strong>for</strong><br />

MRTS projects and 80%<br />

of the cost <strong>for</strong> undertaking<br />

studies/ surveys<br />

50% in case of DPR <strong>for</strong> MRTS<br />

projects<br />

80% of the cost <strong>for</strong><br />

undertaking studies/ surveys<br />

2<br />

Network<br />

Improvement<br />

New Road 0.5% to 0.75%<br />

of the project<br />

cost depending<br />

on the project<br />

cost<br />

80% of the cost <strong>for</strong><br />

undertaking studies/ surveys<br />

Tunnels 1.25% to 1.75%<br />

of the project<br />

cost depending<br />

on the project<br />

cost<br />

3 Parking Off street parking<br />

facilities<br />

1.0% to 1.5% of<br />

the project cost<br />

depending on the<br />

80% of the cost <strong>for</strong><br />

undertaking studies/ surveys/<br />

master plans<br />

126


project cost<br />

4<br />

Non Motorized<br />

<strong>Transport</strong><br />

Construction of foot<br />

path<br />

Pedestrian<br />

crossing/pedestrian<br />

phase signal<br />

Improvement of<br />

pathways<br />

Bike Sharing Scheme<br />

Construction of<br />

Lifts and Escalator<br />

100% of the<br />

project cost <strong>for</strong><br />

bike sharing<br />

scheme. For<br />

other NMT<br />

infrastructure<br />

0.6% to 1.25%<br />

of the project<br />

cost depending<br />

on the project<br />

cost<br />

80% of the cost <strong>for</strong><br />

undertaking studies/ surveys/<br />

master plans<br />

5 Freight Traffic Truck<br />

terminal/<strong>Transport</strong><br />

Nagar etc.<br />

1.0% to 1.5% of<br />

the project cost<br />

depending on the<br />

project cost<br />

80% of the cost <strong>for</strong><br />

undertaking studies/ surveys/<br />

master plans<br />

State /ULB budget Funding<br />

State Govt. /ULB can earmark funds specially meant <strong>for</strong> preparation of Project Report<br />

(DPRs/feasibility Report) through general budget provision under both planned and unplanned<br />

expenditure head.<br />

Multilateral Funding Agency (International Source)<br />

Multilateral Funding Agencies such as Asian <strong>Development</strong> Bank, World Bank, JICA etc. provide<br />

both Technical Assistance (TA) and aid to prepare Project Report <strong>for</strong> promotion and development of<br />

Public <strong>Transport</strong>, Non-motorized <strong>Transport</strong>, Low-carbon transports etc related projects based on its<br />

own set of guidelines. Detailed guidelines of funding by Multilateral Funding Agencies are available<br />

on the respective websites.<br />

India Infrastructure Project <strong>Development</strong> Fund (IIPDF)<br />

GoI has established India Infrastructure Project <strong>Development</strong> Fund with 100 crore revolving<br />

corpus. It has been established with a view that most PPP projects require specialist support to<br />

ascertain project viability, feasibility and other preparatory works which need to be funded by the<br />

sponsoring department. Provision has been made to provide upto 75% of total project development<br />

cost from GoI as long as there is a commitment from the sponsoring authority to bring in the balance<br />

25%. Also in such project Sponsoring Agency/Department/State can give additional 20% of the<br />

project cost as VGF support. Project development funding, ordinarily, will be an interest free financial<br />

assistance to meet the project development expenses. This is expected to be recovered from the<br />

successful private sector partner on award of the project. The Sponsoring Authority will reimburse the<br />

IIPDF, the project development expenses along with a fee up to 40% of the funding as provided<br />

below. The Sponsoring Authority must provide a plan <strong>for</strong> the same.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!