<strong>economy</strong> approach will, again, be specific to country context. Discussions are needed, however, on whether this is the most appropriate way forward, or if an appropriate division of labour between institutions can be found. 3. What role can the international community play in supporting the integration of <strong>REDD+</strong> <strong>into</strong> a <strong>green</strong> <strong>economy</strong>? A final question concerns the engagement of multilateral institutions and the potential role of other countries in one nation’s pursuit of a <strong>green</strong> <strong>economy</strong>. With so much dependent on the national context, from ecological, social, economic and political points of view, how can support be provided and experiences transferred between countries? Or should each country seek its own solution? This issue is further complicated by the need to have nationally owned <strong>green</strong> <strong>economy</strong> plans that can foster greater public and political buy-in. While public finance is being used to support existing work in this area, greater foreign investment will require greater clarity on how donors can best support the integration of <strong>REDD+</strong> within a country’s <strong>transition</strong> to a <strong>green</strong> <strong>economy</strong>. 24
References Angelsen, A. (2010). Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 19639–19644. Angelsen, A. and McNeill, D. (2012). The evolution of <strong>REDD+</strong>. In: Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D. and Verchot, L.V. eds. (2012). Analysing <strong>REDD+</strong>: Challenges and choices. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. Babulo, B., Muys, B., Nega, F., Tollens, E., Nyssen, J., Deckers, J. and Mathijs, E. (2009). The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 109-117. Barbier, E.B. (2011). The policy challenges for <strong>green</strong> <strong>economy</strong> and sustainable economic development. Natural resources forum, 35 (3), 233-245. Barbier, E.B. and Markandya, A. (2013). A New Blueprint for a Green Economy. Earthscan, Oxon, UK. Barbier, E.B. and Tesfaw, A.T. (2012). Can <strong>REDD+</strong> Save the Forest? The Role of Payments and Tenure. Forests, 3, 881-895. Baumgärtner, S. and Strunz, S. (2009). The economic insurance value of ecosystem resilience. Department of Sustainability Sciences, Leuphana University of Luenberg, Germany. Bird, N. and Dickson, C. (2005). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: making the case for forestry. ODI forestry briefing number 7. ODI, London, UK. BMZ (2011). Green <strong>economy</strong>. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Bonn, Germany. Bowen, A. (2012). ‘Green’ Growth, ‘Green’ Jobs and Labor Markets. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5990. World Bank, Washington DC, USA. Brickell, E., McFarland, W. and Mwayafu, D. M. (2012). Unlocking progress on <strong>REDD+</strong>: sector coordination in Uganda. ODI Background Note. ODI, London, UK. Brockhaus, M. and Angelsen, A. (2012). Seeing <strong>REDD+</strong> through 4Is: a political <strong>economy</strong> framework. In: Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D. and Verchot, L.V., eds., 2012. Analysing <strong>REDD+</strong>: Challenges and choices. Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. Brockhaus, M., Obidzinski, K., Dermawan, A., Laumonier., Y and Luttrell, C. (2012). An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of <strong>REDD+</strong>? Forest policy and economics, 18, 30-57. CBD (2011). REDD-plus and biodiversity. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD Technical Series. CBD, Quebec, Canada. 25