20.10.2014 Views

Tradeflow Study - UNDP Black Sea Trade and Investment Promotion ...

Tradeflow Study - UNDP Black Sea Trade and Investment Promotion ...

Tradeflow Study - UNDP Black Sea Trade and Investment Promotion ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Executive Summary<br />

The BSEC region has experienced significant macroeconomic, political, institutional <strong>and</strong><br />

regulatory reforms in the last decade, with the effect of dramatically altering the business<br />

environment in which firms operate <strong>and</strong> creating an enabling framework for fostering foreign<br />

investment in emerging manufacturing <strong>and</strong> service sectors.<br />

The Member States of the <strong>Black</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> Economic Cooperation (BSEC) are diverse in terms of<br />

population size, economic power, production <strong>and</strong> export structures, as well as the depth <strong>and</strong><br />

breadth of trade <strong>and</strong> investment policies. The performance of trade is equally disparate, with<br />

Russia, Turkey <strong>and</strong> Greece dominating trade flows, owing in particular to their economic size<br />

since they account for over four fifths of the GDP of BSEC, but also due to the diversification<br />

of their production base. Member States remain predominantly entrenched in merch<strong>and</strong>ise<br />

trade. Total trade in goods represents between 33 percent (Greece) <strong>and</strong> 120 percent of GDP<br />

(Moldova), while total trade in services represents between 8 percent of GDP (Russia) <strong>and</strong> 30<br />

percent of GDP (Moldova). Thus the outward orientation varies between countries though all<br />

countries trade more in goods than services.<br />

The study on trade <strong>and</strong> investment potential for the BSEC is a quantitative analysis of trade<br />

<strong>and</strong> investment flows amongst Member States, <strong>and</strong> identifies a number of sectors in which<br />

trade between Member States is underperforming according to the estimated potentials. The<br />

study draws on a number of trade indicators which are used to calculate trade<br />

complementarity in intra <strong>and</strong> inter industry trade, as well as more classical theoretical<br />

economic models to identify underperformance of trade.<br />

According to the indicators computed in the study, the highest levels of trade complementarity<br />

exist between Azerbaijan (exporter) <strong>and</strong> Ukraine (importer), Greece (exporter) <strong>and</strong> Bulgaria<br />

(importer), Romania (exporter) <strong>and</strong> Ukraine (importer), Russia (exporter) <strong>and</strong> Romania<br />

(importer) <strong>and</strong> Ukraine (importer), <strong>and</strong> Ukraine (exporter) <strong>and</strong> Russia (importer). The level of<br />

intra-industry intra-regional trade for Bulgaria, Romania, Greece, Russia <strong>and</strong> Turkey is<br />

relatively high, whereas it is very low for Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Serbia <strong>and</strong><br />

Montenegro, <strong>and</strong> Ukraine.<br />

Using an econometric model for estimating bilateral untapped potential, a number of key<br />

sectors which present opportunities for intra-regional trade appear to be under exploited. The<br />

7/135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!