20.10.2014 Views

Tradeflow Study - UNDP Black Sea Trade and Investment Promotion ...

Tradeflow Study - UNDP Black Sea Trade and Investment Promotion ...

Tradeflow Study - UNDP Black Sea Trade and Investment Promotion ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.<br />

divided by each mode of supply, for which three options are available. A Member can make<br />

No limitation on conditions for Market Access of National Treatment (None - N); make an<br />

unbound commitment in this area so that the country retains the policy space to change its<br />

commitments in these areas (Unbound – U); or countries can make some a bound<br />

commitment in the services sector which means that it will make a commitment to allow some<br />

access to its market (or provide some national treatment) but with exceptions (Bound – B).<br />

Tables 15a-15f provide a summary if the commitments made by each country in the BSEC<br />

region with regard to limitations on Market Access <strong>and</strong> National treatment 8 . The tables<br />

present the percentage of commitments made in each subsector of the services activity<br />

according to whether the commitment is none (N), bound (B) or unbound (U). Furthermore,<br />

the table makes the distinction between each mode of supply. Only six countries are<br />

members of the WTO <strong>and</strong> thus data could only be collected for these six countries.<br />

In Market Access, very few limitations are made in modes 1-3, except in financial services<br />

which for obvious regulatory reasons are considered more sensitive. Transport services are<br />

also relatively restricted <strong>and</strong> many subsectors remain unbound (for example, in mode 1, 45%<br />

of transport service subsectors have no limitations for market access, while the remaining<br />

subsectors (55%) have unbound commitments). Mode 4 remains heavily protected mainly as<br />

a result of immigration policies of the countries concerned.<br />

In National Treatment, <strong>and</strong> in mode 1, Albania, Armenia, Georgia <strong>and</strong> Romania have<br />

relatively few restrictions in subsectors. Exceptions include construction services,<br />

environmental services, financial services <strong>and</strong> tourism services. Turkey has a number of<br />

restrictions for subsectors of business <strong>and</strong> communications services. Greece has maintained<br />

limitations business, construction, distribution, environmental, health, tourism, recreational<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural, <strong>and</strong> transport services. In modes 2-3, nearly all countries have no limitation on<br />

National Treatment in all subsectors with the exception of Turkey, especially in financial<br />

services, business services <strong>and</strong> tourism services. Mode 4 tends to be unbound for most<br />

countries indicating that the temporary movement of natural persons remains restricted.<br />

Nevertheless, Albania, Romania <strong>and</strong> Turkey have a number of subsectors which have no<br />

limitations in National Treatment for the temporary movement of natural persons.<br />

8 The commitments made at the horizontal level have not been incorporated into the tables<br />

50/135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!