20.10.2014 Views

(NABDP) 2nd Quarter Project Progress Report – 2009 - UNDP ...

(NABDP) 2nd Quarter Project Progress Report – 2009 - UNDP ...

(NABDP) 2nd Quarter Project Progress Report – 2009 - UNDP ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

1<br />

United Nations Development Programme<br />

Afghanistan<br />

National Area-Based Development Programme (<strong>NABDP</strong>)<br />

2 nd <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong> – <strong>2009</strong><br />

Construction of a water divider in Chakhansoor district of Nimroz province<br />

<strong>Project</strong> ID: 11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

Duration: Phase II (February 2006- June <strong>2009</strong>)<br />

Strategic Plan Component: Outcome 11<br />

CPAP Component: Outcome -7<br />

ANDS Component: Social and Economic Development<br />

Total Budget: USD 164 million<br />

Responsible Agency: <strong>NABDP</strong>/MRRD<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

2<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong> DONORS<br />

Spain Canada Denmark United Kingdom<br />

Japan Norway Netherlands Belgium<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong><br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

3<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Context…………………………………………………………………………………………………5<br />

Implementation <strong>Progress</strong> ............................................................................................................................................... 5<br />

Output 1. ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6<br />

Output 2 ................................................................................................................................................................................ 8<br />

Output 3 ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7<br />

Output 4:……………………………………………………………………………………………... 11<br />

Crosscutting Issues……...……………………………………..…………………………………… ...13<br />

Gender…….…………..…………………….…………………………………………………………13<br />

CapacityBuilding………...……………………………………….……………………………………14<br />

Challenges……………………………………………………………………..…………………..…..14<br />

Risks………… …….……………………………………………………………………………….…14<br />

Issues……………….…………………………………………………………………………………13<br />

Lessons Learned ............................................................................................................................................................... 14<br />

Future Plans ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15<br />

Financial Section .............................................................................................................................................................. 16<br />

Table 1. Funding Overview ..................................................................................................... 16<br />

Table 2: Expenditure Status (by activity) ................................................................................ 20<br />

Table 3. Expenditure Status (by donor) .................................................................................. 20<br />

Annexes ............................................................................................................................................................................... 24<br />

Annex I: Performance Tracking Matrix ................................................................................... 24<br />

Annex II: Risk Log ..................................................................................................................... 30<br />

Annex III: Issue Log .................................................................................................................. 32<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

4<br />

Executive Summary<br />

During the second quarter, <strong>NABDP</strong> has continued to make progress in line with the three goals of<br />

the programe, as laid out in the Phase II project document, while taking and increasingly<br />

sustainable and strategic approach. These goals include a) regional economic development, b)<br />

capacity development, and c) immediate recovery projects. An overview of the progress made<br />

during this quarter is as follows:<br />

Community Empowerment: In this quarter, 28 district development assemblies (DDAs) have<br />

been established and 28 district development plans (DDPs) were formulated. The Disaster<br />

Management unit (DM) conducted awareness workshops for sectoral departments in Nangarhar,<br />

Badakhshan and Ghor provinces. Capacity-building training has been carried out in Balkh,<br />

Kandahar, Ghor, and Kunar provinces.<br />

Economic Regeneration: Four facilitating partners are working to support the development of<br />

five SMEs in Balkh, Bamyan and Herat provinces. Business development officers are now working<br />

in all seven border provinces projects. Twenty-four newly-approved SMEs are expected to be<br />

rolled-out in the next quarter as part of the Border Provinces SME support project. In Phase III,<br />

economic regeneration (ER) projects will be phased out of <strong>NABDP</strong> and subsumed within the<br />

Afghanistan Rural Enterprise Development Programme (AREDP) of MRRD, particularly into its topdown<br />

approach for SMEs development.<br />

Institutional Development: The Institutional Development (ID) unit facilitated six DDA ‘Grant-in-<br />

Aid’ activities in Kunar, Nangarhar, Kandahar, Badakhshan and Balkh provinces. A revision of the ID<br />

budget has been made to include the expansion of ‘Grant-in-Aid’ to 52 districts of 11 provinces.<br />

For Phase III, the ID unit will be dissolved and replaced by the new Policy and Planning Unit (PPU).<br />

Implementation Unit: In this quarter, 359 projects have been contracted, and another 56 have<br />

been committed and are either under design or in the procurement phase. Seventeen projects<br />

have been canceled for a variety of reasons, including social conflicts and community disputes,<br />

irresolvable issues with the contracted companies, shortage of available funds, and lack of security<br />

in some areas.<br />

Context<br />

The National Area Based Development Programme (<strong>NABDP</strong>), a joint project of the United Nations<br />

Development Programme (<strong>UNDP</strong>) and the Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development<br />

(MRRD), aims to contribute to the sustainable reduction of poverty and the improvement of<br />

livelihoods in rural Afghanistan by empowering communities to articulate and address their needs<br />

and priorities. <strong>NABDP</strong> also aims to help enable the Government of Afghanistan (GoA) to support<br />

community-based rural rehabilitation and development in an integrated, people-focused,<br />

inclusive and participatory manner.<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong>’s second quarter activities have been in line with the outcomes and goals of the United<br />

Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF), the Afghanistan National Development<br />

Strategy (ANDS), and the Country Program Action Plan (CPAP). Those outcomes are as follows:<br />

• UNDAF Outcome 2: By 2008, opportunities, skills, land and infrastructure that allow for active<br />

participation in a strengthened formal economy and private sector are improved, particularly<br />

for poor and vulnerable groups.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

5<br />

• CPAP Output 7: Vulnerable groups (ex- combatants, returnees, disabled, women) empowered<br />

through improved access to social and economic opportunities (local poverty initiatives,<br />

private sector development, alternative livelihoods, and empowerment of women).<br />

• CPAP Indicator 7.1: Number of people receiving employment opportunities through skills<br />

training, agriculture support and small business starters support.<br />

• <strong>NABDP</strong> has also made major progress in the second quarter toward the achievement of ANDS<br />

Compact Benchmark 6.2 and 6.3 though its rural development projects. These benchmarks<br />

encourage 1) comprehensive rural development through community empowerment and<br />

local governance, which <strong>NABDP</strong> supports through the establishment of community councils<br />

and district assemblies; and 2) the implementation of programs to achieve a reduction in the<br />

amount of land under drug cultivation by the strengthening of licit livelihoods and other<br />

counter-narcotics measures, which <strong>NABDP</strong> supports through its economic regeneration<br />

programmes with the aid of the Counter Narcotics Trust Fund (CNTF).<br />

These above outcomes and outputs are specifically addressed through the continued emphasis<br />

on labor-intensive, economically-productive infrastructure projects, which are prioritized through<br />

the District Development Plans (DDPs) produced by DDAs and through small business planning<br />

and grant support to small and medium enterprises (SMEs).<br />

Implementation <strong>Progress</strong><br />

Output1: Comprehensive rural development plans, based on<br />

participatory community.<br />

(1.1) Development processes and economic regeneration assessments and<br />

strategies.<br />

Through a participatory process facilitated by Community Empowerment (CE), a total of 28 DDAs<br />

and 28 DDPs have been established in the second quarter of <strong>2009</strong>. This brings the total number to<br />

355, covering 88.5 percent of the country.<br />

Following their formation, DDAs undergo capacity building trainings in the areas of local<br />

governance, conflict resolution, gender equity, participatory project implementation and financial<br />

management. This quarter, training has been carried out in 13 districts of Kandahar, Ghor, Kunar<br />

and Balkh provinces. The new Disaster Management (DM) unit has also prepared a training<br />

module for DDAs and in this quarter has conducted training in eight districts of Nangarhar, five<br />

districts of Badakhshan, and two districts of Ghor. In a recent assessment undertaken by the<br />

Institutional Development (ID) component, DDA members revealed that the trainings helped<br />

them improve their knowledge of development-related issues and influenced development actors<br />

at the district level as well as helped them acquire skills for managing development activities.<br />

The establishment and capacity building of these local institutions constitutes the formalization of<br />

a mechanism for collective action in all districts of Afghanistan. Communities are empowered to<br />

articulate their needs and priorities through the formulation of development plans that reflect the<br />

community’s medium- and long-term development priorities. In the <strong>2nd</strong> quarter, 55 District<br />

Development Plans (DDPs) in Nangarhar, Kunar, Takhar, and Maidan Wardak provinces have been<br />

verified by the Community Empowerment office at <strong>NABDP</strong> and uploaded on to the <strong>NABDP</strong><br />

website, accessible for all development actors and the general public. DDPs of Kunar are in various<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

6<br />

stages of processing. All DDPs published are fully aligned to the DDA/DDP Operational Guidelines<br />

set by the <strong>NABDP</strong> team.<br />

The DDA establishment process also involves a dimension of institutional recognition and<br />

legitimacy as the DDAs receive a registration certificate in tandem with the handing over of<br />

relevant documentation to the Provincial Rural Rehabilitation Departments (PRRDs). In this<br />

quarter, 73 DDAs have been registered and issued certificates in seven provinces.<br />

In the case of those DDAs in ‘at-risk’ communities receiving a grant for community disaster<br />

preparedness from the Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR), a training module has<br />

been prepared. This quarter, these awareness workshops have been conducted in 15 districts,<br />

including five in Badakhshan, eight in Nangarhar, and two in Ghor. The participants included<br />

sectoral departments, PRRD social mobilizers, national and international NGO staff and DDA<br />

members. In addition, a District Disaster Management Committee was established within the<br />

DDAs in the districts of five provinces this quarter. These communities are now better able to<br />

mitigate and deal with major risks, e.g. droughts, floods or earthquakes.<br />

(1.2) Public investment priorities identified and implemented for SME<br />

improvement / development.<br />

In partnership with MRRD’s Afghanistan Rural Enterprise Development Program (AREDP), <strong>NABDP</strong>’s<br />

Economic Regeneration (ER) unit continued in the 2 nd quarter to contribute to the economic<br />

growth of the private sector. For Phase III, ER is leaving <strong>NABDP</strong> to become part of AREDP. To date,<br />

there has been no Ministry program solely dedicated to economic regeneration; thus, these types<br />

of projects have fallen under the responsibility of either NSP or <strong>NABDP</strong>’s ER unit, even though<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong>’s core business is local governance, renewable energy, and infrastructure, not economic<br />

regeneration. The core business area of AREDP, which is a project jointly designed by MRRD, the<br />

World Bank, and the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID), is economic<br />

development, income generation and enterprise development, thus making it the most<br />

appropriate program for ER to phase into. The decision to phase out ER into AREDP is in<br />

accordance with a decision made at the management level of <strong>NABDP</strong> during the design of Phase<br />

III that all MRRD programs are to refocus on their respective core business areas.<br />

This phase out process is underway and is expected to be finalized with the anticipated World<br />

Bank approval of AREDP later this year.<br />

Based on previously-developed business plans, four facilitating partners are working on five<br />

contracts for rural SME development support: ‘Hand in Hand’ for one melon and one almond<br />

enterprise in Balkh, Sanayee Development Organisation for carpet-making in Balkh and a saffron<br />

enterprise in Herat, Cooperation Centre for Afghanistan for a potato storage enterprise in Bamyan,<br />

and Ghazni, Rural Support Program for a carpet value chain development project in Bamyan.<br />

Initial progress reports have been submitted, and further instalment grants have been distributed.<br />

The timeline for the above-mentioned SMEs has been extended for three months, as the work has<br />

not been completed within the expected timeframe owing to delays in project start-up.<br />

Additionally, under the Border Provinces SME Support Program, twenty-four other SMEs have<br />

been verified, approved, and will be rolled out within the next quarter. One is currently being<br />

piloted in Nangarhar and will be expanded into other regions based on positive results.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

7<br />

In the first quarter, selected entrepreneurs in Bamyan and Balkh received trainings in business<br />

management, finance and operations. During the second quarter, more of these trainings were<br />

planned and will be administered to other entrepreneurs, local farmers, and traders who have<br />

contracts with the above mentioned enterprises through the facilitating partners over the next<br />

three months. These trainings enable entrepreneurs to function according to standards with<br />

enhanced management skills.<br />

In June, the ER unit renewed the contracts of 13 business development specialists working for the<br />

seven Border <strong>Project</strong> provinces, extending their work time until the proposed project end date of<br />

December <strong>2009</strong>. The specialists continue to work with SMEs on business planning, advice, training<br />

and provision of a matching grant for investment.<br />

Output 2: Rural development policies developed and adopted by the<br />

Government and other relevant stakeholders, providing frameworks for<br />

viable interventions for economic regeneration, poverty reduction and<br />

improving livelihoods.<br />

(2.1) Policy feedback and ongoing preparation of national level AREDP program<br />

AREDP is being jointly designed by MRRD, World Bank, and DFID. Because the World Bank funding<br />

cycle has several steps, approval can take anywhere between 6 months and 3 years. AREDP is<br />

currently in the pre-appraisal mission. A final appraisal mission by the World Bank is forthcoming<br />

in August, and program approval by the World Bank is anticipated in October <strong>2009</strong>. Soon after, the<br />

program is anticipated to become eligible for multi-donor funding through the Afghanistan<br />

Reconstruction Trust Fund (ARTF) mechanism and from bilateral donors with the support of<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong>/<strong>NABDP</strong>. AREDP is anticipated to be operating in eight provinces across the country within<br />

two months after its approval.<br />

Economic regeneration unit is collaborating with AREDP to support Small and Medium Enterprises<br />

(SMEs) as part of the Border Provinces project, which entails using Business Development<br />

Specialists (BDS) to identify and support promising SME business plans through matching grants<br />

and technical input and trainings, as described in the above section. The lessons learnt from these<br />

pilot projects will provide useful inputs in developing future strategies for AREDP’s support to<br />

SMEs in Afghanistan.<br />

(2.2) Support to Afghan Government energy policy development.<br />

The Energy for Rural Development in Afghanistan (ERDA) <strong>Project</strong> has developed a micro-hydro<br />

policy for Afghanistan in consultation with the National Solidarity Program (NSP) and Rural Energy<br />

and Enterprise Development (REED). This micro-hydro policy is complete and is expected to be<br />

approved in the next several months. The micro-hydro policy is part of a larger, more<br />

comprehensive rural energy policy. <strong>NABDP</strong>/ERDA hired a rural energy policy expert in April to<br />

prepare this comprehensive rural energy policy for Afghanistan. A draft of this policy was<br />

completed on July 20 and will be discussed within MRRD and then presented to the Inter-<br />

Ministerial Commission on Energy (ICE) Sub-committee for Renewable Energy and Rural<br />

Electrification for comments from organizations involved in rural energy promotion in the country.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

8<br />

The sub-committee will present the policy document to the ICE for approval and promulgation as<br />

the Afghanistan Rural Energy Policy.<br />

Output 3: Strengthened management and implementation capacity of<br />

MRRD and relevant partner institutions to address rural development<br />

and economic regeneration needs and priorities.<br />

(3.1) Improved MRRD capacity to implement rural energy projects<br />

The Energy for Rural Development in Afghanistan (ERDA) has been actively interacting with the<br />

Inter-Ministerial Commission on Energy (ICE), to discuss, coordinate, and plan renewable energy<br />

activities in Afghanistan. This component offered to deliver capacity building trainings to Rural<br />

Energy and Enterprise Development (REED), which are ongoing. ERDA works closely with this<br />

department and shares strategies, office space and coordinates activities. Currently, ERDA assists<br />

REED in assessing the performance of existing micro-hydro projects of MRRD. ERDA and REED<br />

technicians are assessing the status of micro-hydropower projects installed with NSP’s support in<br />

Panjshir and Bamyan provinces. The expected long-term result is for REED to independently<br />

manage rural energy activities as <strong>NABDP</strong>-ERDA phases out.<br />

During the second quarter, ERDA has been supporting MRRD to implement 300 kW Farkhar Mini<br />

Hydropower <strong>Project</strong> in Takhar Province.<br />

(3.2) CARD mechanism developed on district level through DDAs and an interactive<br />

delivery mechanism designed based on the assessments carried out on district and<br />

provincial level.<br />

In April, the final draft of the Comprehensive Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD)<br />

mechanism was approved. The Inter-Ministerial Committee (ICM) convened for the first ICM<br />

meeting in April to discuss and adopt terms of reference and to formalise the mobilisation plan for<br />

the CARD mechanism. Present at the ICM meeting were ministers from the Ministry of Counter<br />

Narcotics (MCN), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation, and Livestock<br />

(MAIL), and the MRRD. In addition to establishing an interim financing plan, a communications<br />

plan, and an operations manual this quarter, there was an introductory mission trip to Nangarhar<br />

in April to introduce CARD and engage with the Governor and his team plus other stakeholders<br />

and development actors. Currently, Human Resources (HR) is in the process of recruiting and hiring<br />

a national CARD team.<br />

(3.3) The Grant-in-Aid programme piloted in Kandahar, Nangarhar, and Kunar.<br />

During the second quarter, the Institutional Development unit has been at the forefront of efforts<br />

to implement the DDA Grant-in-Aid scheme, which provides funding directly to DDAs to help<br />

them build their capacity. The ID unit is currently facilitating six DDA Grant-in-Aid activities in<br />

Kunar, Nangarhar, Kandahar, Badakhshan, Balkh, and Paktia provinces. In addition this quarter, the<br />

scheme has been started up in Argo district of Badakhshan province and Balkh district of Balkh<br />

province, and approved in Daman district of Kandahar. A revision of the ID budget has been made<br />

to include the expansion of ‘Grant-in-Aid’ to 52 districts of 11 provinces. Refer to the table below<br />

for a complete listing of districts receiving ‘Grant-in-Aid’:<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

9<br />

List of Districts for Grant in Aid Scheme<br />

S.No Province District<br />

1<br />

Achin<br />

2 Lalpor<br />

3 Dor baba<br />

4 Dehbala<br />

5 Spinghar<br />

6 Nangarhar<br />

Surkhrood<br />

7 Kot<br />

8 Dara e Noor<br />

9 Khaiwa<br />

10 Batikot<br />

11 Mohmand Dara<br />

12 Kandahar Daman<br />

13<br />

Sarkano<br />

14 Asad Abad<br />

15 Norgal<br />

16 Kunar<br />

Shegal<br />

17 Narang<br />

18 Asmar<br />

19 Chawki<br />

20<br />

Dand e Patan<br />

21 Jaji Aryoub<br />

22 Paktia<br />

Syed Karam<br />

23 Lija Mangal<br />

24 Chamkani<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

10<br />

(3.4) MRRD capacity building.<br />

Over the past two quarters, <strong>NABDP</strong>’s ID unit has provided technical assistance to the Community-<br />

Led Development Department (CLDD) and the Afghanistan Institute for Rural Development<br />

Department (AIRD). During the second quarter, the Institutional Development unit, in close<br />

consultation with relevant MRRD department heads and officials, prepared a draft of a new Terms<br />

of Reference (TOR) for CLDD. The objectives of CLLD have been revised in this new Terms of<br />

Reference. The role of the CLDD has been clarified as the supporting institution to local entities.<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong> continues to support the Rural Infrastructure and Technical Service (RITS) and PRRDs<br />

through its Technical Support Unit (TSU). The task of the TS U is to provide survey and design<br />

support to PRRDs, which often do not have an adequate level of staffing and technical capabilities<br />

to implement projects independently. During this quarter, a total of 29 projects have been<br />

surveyed and plotted by the TSU teams. The team of engineers recruited in the Kandahar regional<br />

TSU last quarter attended an irrigation workshop in Kabul during the second quarter. The TSUs<br />

across the provinces, located in Kabul, Mazar-i-Sharif, Jalalabad, Kunduz, Paktia and Kandahar,<br />

continue to closely monitor progress on <strong>NABDP</strong> projects.<br />

Output 4: High-quality and sustainable community-led rural<br />

development and economic regeneration investments that reduce<br />

poverty and improve livelihoods.<br />

(4.1) Preparation and implementation of rural infrastructure projects.<br />

In this quarter, 174 projects have been contracted, and another 56 have been committed and are<br />

either under design or in the procurement phase. Of that number, 17 infrastructure projects have<br />

been contracted in Ghazni, Nangarhar, Kunar, and Badakashan provinces, with three projects<br />

under procurement under the Japan-funded border provinces stabilization project. Sixty projects<br />

have been contracted and are underway through the Counternarcotics Trust Fund (CNTF) Labour-<br />

Based Rural Development (LBRD) project, which works in 10 provinces with the objective of<br />

reduced poppy growth. In addition, 97 regular infrastructure projects, exclusive of the above<br />

programmes, have been contracted in this quarter. Seventeen projects have been canceled for a<br />

variety of reasons, including social conflicts and community disputes, irresolvable issues with the<br />

contracted companies, shortage of available funds, and lack of security in some areas.<br />

Most CNTF efforts are devoted to simple water projects that communities can implement on their<br />

own as much as possible. This is done to improve security while improving water access for<br />

irrigation. <strong>Project</strong>s contracted in the second quarter of <strong>2009</strong> will provide 1 million working days in<br />

insecure areas. DDAs in Kandahar have reported that this year, very few people traveled to<br />

Helmand to work on poppy fields.<br />

As a part of <strong>NABDP</strong>’s stabilization efforts, the Disarming of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) program,<br />

regularly consults with the overall DIAG Joint Secretariat. It also cooperates with Afghanistan New<br />

Beginnings Programme (ANBP) to provide development projects in districts which have disarmed,<br />

and has provided assistance to the Ministry of Interior (MoI) in setting up an in-house DIAG unit.<br />

Up to this quarter, 13 DIAG projects have been completed, 27 are under construction, and 5 are in<br />

the design or survey phase.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

11<br />

<strong>Progress</strong> has been made this quarter in the Integrated Alternative Livelihoods Program (IALP) in<br />

Kandahar, funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). The nine-month<br />

work plan for IALP’s second phase, with a budget estimation of US$ 2.84 million, was submitted to<br />

headquarters in Kabul. Some main components of the work plan are as follows: the recruitment of<br />

a IALP-2K team by mid July <strong>2009</strong>; to conduct the Baseline Livelihoods Survey (BLS), interviewing<br />

1,600 individuals in four districts of Kandahar, and to design and implement livelihoods projects<br />

based on the BLS results; to provide capacity building to the district development assemblies<br />

(DDAs),the Department of Agriculture, Irrigation, and Livestock (DAIL), and the Provincial Rural<br />

Rehabilitation and Development department (PRRD); as well as the construction of the Kandahar<br />

Regional Agriculture and Rural Development Institute (KRARDI). In co-ordination with DAIL, IALP-<br />

2K managed to secure 20 jeribs of land at Tarnak farm for construction of KRARDI. Also at the<br />

operational level, the design for the KRARDI pipeline was finalized at the headquarters level in<br />

Kabul. At the administrative level, a deputy project manager was hired in April. The project<br />

manager resigned in June.<br />

(4.2) Monitoring, reporting and quality control activities.<br />

The activities of the Implementation Unit (IU) are supported and facilitated by the Quality Control<br />

(QC) unit, which has prepared design guidelines, technical manuals, and specifications for a variety<br />

of projects to assure and assess the quality implementation of projects. During the second quarter,<br />

the QC unit reviewed and approved numerous projects throughout the provinces, including two<br />

gravel road projects in Herat province, eight irrigation projects in Kandahar, and four irrigation<br />

projects in Nangarhar. Furthermore, the QC unit prepared survey forms for <strong>NABDP</strong> regional offices<br />

and distributed these forms.<br />

During the first quarter, <strong>NABDP</strong>’s Monitoring and Result-based <strong>Report</strong>ing unit (MRRU) developed<br />

and finalized a result-based monitoring manual. During this quarter, the manual was handed over<br />

to the Community Empowerment unit and will be shared with and taught to the DDAs to enhance<br />

the monitoring function through the CE unit. Next week, the manual will be piloted in Helmand<br />

province. From January to July <strong>2009</strong>, the field engineers visited 164 different projects for<br />

monitoring missions. Furthermore this quarter, MRRU has proposed a reporting flow structure<br />

based on the needs of <strong>NABDP</strong>. This has been shared with the unit heads and the regional<br />

managers.<br />

(4.3) Preparation and implementation of 8 MHP and 100 biogas projects.<br />

This past quarter, ERDA identified more than 50 potential sites for micro-hydropower projects and<br />

conducted detailed studies of 32 sites. The scale of these plants ranges between 15 and 60<br />

kilowatts. Detailed project reports of 12 sites have been prepared and construction work is<br />

underway in seven sites in Bamyan and Badkhshan . Furthermore, an 18 kW Zarshang micro-hydro<br />

plant in Bamyan was recently tested and the community is extending the distribution lines from<br />

the powerhouse to the settlements. In addition, ERDA is providing technical assistance in the<br />

construction of a 20 M 3 biogas plants in Charasiab, Kabul. ERD is supporting community members<br />

in the Jalalabad district of Nangarhar to install 10 biogas plants.<br />

(4.4) SMEs in Border Provinces improved/ established<br />

Under the Border Provinces SME Support Program, 13 Business Development Services Officers<br />

have carried out a situation analysis of business opportunities in the border provinces. ER has<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

12<br />

received 53 grant applications from the seven border provinces. After ground verification of all<br />

submitted applications, 36 applications have been approved, and 16 declined by the Grant Review<br />

Committee. Letters of offer have been sent out to the qualified SMEs. Upon acceptance of the<br />

offers, the practical work of utilizing the approved grants for the SMEs will begin.<br />

Crosscutting Issues<br />

Gender<br />

All DDAs established by the Community Empowerment unit in the second quarter have been<br />

mixed or include a women’s group or advisory committee, with an average of 14 women members<br />

each. In total, women comprise 2,829 (28%) of the total 10,050 DDA members. Trainings were also<br />

conducted for established DDAs. Gender equity trainings as part of the requisite 14-day trainings<br />

for the DDAs were provided to a total of 13 DDAs this quarter (347 participants, 94 of them<br />

female). Training sessions at the community intra-agency level to promote gender awareness have<br />

been carried out, and more are planned for Phase III.<br />

The Ministry of Women’s Affairs (MoWA), along with PRRD and <strong>NABDP</strong> regional offices, have<br />

discussed coordinating activities based on the memo of coordination between MRRD and MoWA<br />

which was completed on March 8, <strong>2009</strong>.<br />

Field visits to Mazar, Herat, and Jalalabad provinces took place during the second quarter with the<br />

aim to identify the existing challenges pertaining to gender-related issues. Some new DDAs were<br />

established and some reshuffled, and the gender advisor was there to observe how women are<br />

included in the process of DDA and DDP establishment. Separate meetings were conducted with<br />

the women to make them aware of what the process is for and the importance of their role in the<br />

DDA. In two districts of Jalalabad, gender focal points were assigned for DDAs for further<br />

coordination of activities among the DDA and the Department of Women’s Affairs. Gender focal<br />

points at the regional level were also identified in order to help mainstream gender at regional<br />

level.<br />

At the headquarters level, efforts have been undertaken during the second quarter to<br />

institutionalize gender awareness by drafting a comprehensive work plan and through<br />

coordination among the different directorates and programs of MRRD. Trainings conducted<br />

during the second quarter included a workshop on gender and Islam for <strong>NABDP</strong> staff in the Kabul<br />

office. Orientation sessions on gender-sensitive indicators and gender basics have been conducted<br />

for the provincial community mobilisers.<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong>’s gender strategy paper, which shifts the gender mainstreaming approach of <strong>NABDP</strong>, has<br />

been developed for implementation in Phase III.<br />

Capacity Building<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong> is increasingly focusing its capacity-building efforts at the district level. The Institutional<br />

Development and Community Empowerment units are continuing to cooperate on a programme<br />

of capacity building for DDAs, which will be a major feature of the upcoming Phase III of <strong>NABDP</strong>.<br />

Training has been completed in various districts of eight provinces and assessments of how DDAs<br />

take part in development activities have been completed in Kunar, Badakhshan, Mazar and<br />

Nangarhar. The implementation of the Grant-in-Aid scheme, which empowers DDAs to build their<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

13<br />

own physical and institutional capabilities, will be piloted in Nangarhar and Kunar in the next<br />

quarter.<br />

Challenges<br />

Risks<br />

Insecurity: The Implementation Unit consistently reported insecurity to be the most serious<br />

obstacle during the second quarter. During the second quarter, work on two projects in Zhari,<br />

Kandahar had been severely delayed as they were nearing completion. The head of the<br />

construction company who was implementing the project in this district was kidnapped by<br />

insurgents. <strong>Project</strong> operations were also interrupted in Farah province due to security concerns.<br />

Also, as two site supervisors travelled to monitor a canal project in Sarkano district of Kunar<br />

province, a remote control bomb exploded on the road, killing a national army soldier. These<br />

security incidents occurred in addition a suicide attack at the provincial council in Kandahar.<br />

In response to such security situations, MRRD relies heavily on the DDAs to implement the<br />

projects and contract directly with communities as often as possible to reduce the likelihood of<br />

security problems and to create local employment opportunities, though the security situation<br />

consistently leads to other problems such as delays or cancelations.<br />

Seasonal Risks: During the second quarter, flooding has been the prime issue, leading to the<br />

delay of some projects. The construction of the Sholgara Bridge in Balkh province was stopped<br />

this quarter due to the flooding of the Sholgara River. The flood destroyed the middle pillar of the<br />

bridge. Furthermore, the construction of Chimtal Bridge in Balkh province was stopped due to<br />

flooding. Heavy flooding also affected projects in Samangan, Badakhshan, and Jawzjan, destroying<br />

progress on these projects, and delaying the progress.<br />

Social Conflicts: Since <strong>NABDP</strong> has a participatory approach to identifying needs and priorities,<br />

social conflicts within communities often arise on project selection. There are two projects still<br />

experiencing social conflicts at the community level this quarter. For a school in Nahoor district of<br />

Ghazni, the community has not been able to decide on where to build the school, which has<br />

delayed the implementation of this project. The second conflict concerns a school project in Argo<br />

district of Badakhshan, which is 70 percent complete but was stopped because the contractor is no<br />

longer able to do the work. These conflicts were initially reported during the first quarter and have<br />

not yet been resolved. The regional staff has not been able to resolve these conflicts; thus, the<br />

provincial team was tasked by <strong>NABDP</strong> head quarter office in Kabul to resolve the issue as soon as<br />

possible in coordination with the governor and the Provincial Rural Rehabilitation Department<br />

(PRRD). Usually, such conflicts are solved through the intervention of DDAs, the district or<br />

provincial governor, and occasionally through ISAF mediation.<br />

Issues<br />

Lack of Resources: A second risk is lack of adequate human and technological resources, which is<br />

a pervasive and consistent problem across the country that is being gradually improved upon<br />

through capacity building activities and recruitment. <strong>NABDP</strong>’s infrastructure projects often have a<br />

technical nature; therefore, the lack of technical resources affects the proper and timely<br />

implementation of projects. Often, communities have proposed projects that are too complex<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

14<br />

given the present resources in the country. As a result, plans are often put on hold until further<br />

resources can be mobilized, sometimes from neighboring provinces and countries. Shortage of<br />

staff in regional offices is a recurring problem that is being gradually improved upon through<br />

recruitment.<br />

Lessons Learned<br />

Community Empowerment: Building the capacity and institutionalization of DDAs greatly effects<br />

the smooth implementation of projects, cost effectiveness and timeliness of project completion. It<br />

also produces effective facilitation and coordination of the development activities in districts.<br />

About 800 small projects implemented through DDAs had positive project results. However, when<br />

undertaking DDA capacity-building trainings in the provinces, the CE unit depends on <strong>NABDP</strong><br />

Regional Administration and Finance Officers to disburse the cash advances needed for the<br />

training to go ahead. However, the funds for these advances this quarter were not always allocated<br />

on time, slowing the process. Regional managers have therefore been requested to ensure their<br />

officers complete the DDA training documents as quickly as possible. It has been communicated<br />

to regional managers that they should prioritize timely processing of payments for such trainings<br />

to ensure their full effectiveness.<br />

Economic Regeneration: During Phase II, it was realized that it is better to work with community<br />

based associations such as shuras, community developments councils (CDCs), DDAs, producers’<br />

associations, cooperative federations, etc. rather than individual entrepreneurs. For a greater<br />

community benefit and a larger impact on poverty alleviation, working with community-based<br />

organizations should be adopted as an important strategy. Furthermore, the addition of valueadded<br />

and value chain opportunities into rural enterprise development requires multi-sector,<br />

multi-agency, and multi-level strategy and cooperation. Hence partnership with other<br />

organizations involved in similar programmes is necessary in order to achieve the synergy with<br />

other programmes and achieve major impact in rural economic development. Also, the lack of<br />

rural infrastructure and business development services (BDS) are some of the most important<br />

causes withholding the growth of SME growth in Afghanistan.<br />

Institutional Development: Lessons are being learned through the piloting of the Grant-In-Aid<br />

scheme in Nangarhar and Kunar provinces, which aims to develop the physical and institutional<br />

capacity of DDAs. The program was successful. The ID unit’s assessment of district-level<br />

development service delivery mechanisms in Badakashan and Kunar provinces will also provide<br />

valuable guidance for future <strong>NABDP</strong> interventions. Furthermore, more cooperation from<br />

stakeholders has allowed for better support for the implementation of DDA activities; for example,<br />

the PRT in Nangarhar province has offered to provide support to local DDA offices.<br />

Implementation Unit: The successful experience of implementing the decentralized Kandahar<br />

model was shared with five other regional managers. Based on the lessons-learned from Kandahar<br />

and considering the existing capacity in the other five regions, <strong>NABDP</strong> embarked upon expanding<br />

the model to other regions. This included revisiting regional managers’ terms of reference and the<br />

delegation of higher decision-making authority to them, including independence for higher<br />

financial control, planning, recruitment and reorganization of resources at regional level.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

15<br />

Future Plans<br />

Overall: Drawing on the lessons learned from Phase II, the third phase, a five-year programme, was<br />

launched on 1 July <strong>2009</strong> and will increase assistance to the government, primarily to MRRD, to<br />

adopt a more strategic stance toward its mandate in terms of policy formulation, service delivery<br />

and resource management. At the recent Steering Committee Meeting held on 16 th April, <strong>NABDP</strong><br />

Phase III plans and strategies were introduced to donors. The final Phase III programme document<br />

was shared with donors at a follow-up meeting on 15 th June.<br />

Community Empowerment: <strong>NABDP</strong> will step up the pace of DDA establishment in the coming<br />

months, following a recent period of consolidation. Capacity-building training for DDAs in project<br />

management, gender mainstreaming, organizational development and disaster management are<br />

underway in several provinces. Phase III of <strong>NABDP</strong> will have a heavy emphasis on the role of DDAs<br />

as a district-level development coordination body. The CE unit has completed its DDA formation<br />

and training activities planned for the border provinces for the last quarter and will continue to<br />

focus on improving DDA’s linkages with other district and provincial entities and monitor the<br />

assemblies.<br />

Economic Regeneration: As part of strategic reorganization of programs within MRRD and<br />

focusing each program on its respective area of comparative advantage, and subsequent to the<br />

launching of the design of AREDP program, Economic Regeneration activities will be gradually<br />

phased out of <strong>NABDP</strong> in the third phase and progressively merged with AREDP. The 13 Provincial<br />

Business Development Specialists (BDSs) of the ER unit will continue their work in assessing SMEs<br />

for business planning and grant provision assistance until the end of <strong>2009</strong>.<br />

Institutional Development: The Institutional Development unit will cease to exist, and will be<br />

replaced by the new Policy and Planning unit for Phase III. In Phase III, PPU will continue to assess<br />

and analyze the Grant-in-Aid pilot program’s outcomes and expand to remaining provinces<br />

accordingly. The institutional development advisors will continue to work closely with relevant<br />

MRRD departments to develop program alignment at district and national levels.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

16<br />

Financial Section<br />

Table 1. Funding Overview<br />

Donor Funding Status 2002-<strong>2009</strong><br />

S.No Donor<br />

Commitment<br />

(Currency of the<br />

Agreement)<br />

Received (Currency<br />

of the Agreement) Received (USD) UNORE<br />

Balance (Currency<br />

of the Agreement) Remarks<br />

1 DFID GBP 8,345,069.00 GBP 2,500,000.00 5,154,639.18 0.48<br />

On-going<br />

GBP 1,250,000.00 2,173,913.04 0.58<br />

GBP 1,250,000.00 1,795,977.01 0.70<br />

GBP 3,345,069.00 4,806,133.62 0.70 -<br />

2 UK USD 1,548,031.53 1,548,031.53 - - Closed<br />

3 Japan DIAG USD 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 - - On-going<br />

4 Japan USD 5,454,450.00 5,454,450.00 - - Closed<br />

5 Japan CRD JPY 3,248,000,000.00 JPY 2,575,988,800.00 21,830,413.56 118.00 JPY 672,011,200.00 On-going<br />

6 Govt of Japan (DIAG_MoI) USD 365,332.76 365,207.76 - USD 125.00 On-going<br />

7 Japan Border USD 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 - - On-going<br />

8 Norway NOK 19,000,000.00 NOK 3,500,000.00 566,343.04 6.18<br />

Closed<br />

NOK 8,500,000.00 1,313,755.80 6.47<br />

NOK 7,000,000.00 1,166,686.14 6.00 -<br />

9 Norway NOK 20,000,000.00 NOK 10,000,000.00 1,694,915.25 5.90<br />

On-going<br />

NOK 10,000,000.00 1,694,915.25 5.90 -<br />

10 Netherlands USD 2,100,000.00 1,470,000.00 -<br />

Closed<br />

630,000.00 - -<br />

11 Netherlands USD 5,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 -<br />

On-going<br />

2,289,920.00 - USD 1,210,080.00<br />

12 Belgium EUR 13,500,000.00 EUR 3,283,990.29 4,355,432.75 0.75<br />

EUR 1,215,996.29 1,573,087.05 0.77<br />

On-going<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

17<br />

EUR 4,500,000.00 5,739,795.92 0.78<br />

EUR 2,776,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.69<br />

EUR 1,700,000.00 2,367,688.02 0.72 EUR 24,013.42<br />

13 Govt of Canada_00078 CAD 18,100,000.00 CAD 6,000,000.00 4,958,677.69 1.21<br />

On-going<br />

CAD 3,000,000.00 2,631,578.95 1.14<br />

CAD 3,000,000.00 2,654,867.26 1.13<br />

CAD 3,100,000.00 2,792,792.79 1.11<br />

CAD 3,000,000.00 2,586,206.90 1.16 -<br />

14 Govt of Canada_00078 CAD 5,000,000.00 CAD 5,000,000.00 4,385,964.91 1.14 - On-going<br />

15 Govt of Canada_00078 CAD 5,650,000.00 CAD 5,650,000.00 5,150,727.00 1.10 - Closed<br />

16 CIDA 00550 CAD 11,000,000.00 CAD 5,000,000.00 5,112,474.44 0.98<br />

On-going<br />

CAD 6,000,000.00 4,934,210.53 1.22 -<br />

17 CIDA 00550 CAD 8,000,000.00 CAD 4,000,000.00 3,289,473.68 1.22 CAD 4,000,000.00 On-going<br />

18 CIDA 00550 USD 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 - - Closed<br />

19 Spain EUR 6,000,000.00 EUR 1,923,665.00 2,524,494.75 0.76<br />

On-going<br />

EUR 1,003,381.00 1,321,977.60 0.76 EUR 3,072,954.00<br />

20 ITALY EUR 3,000,000.00 EUR 3,000,000.00 5,767,087.00 0.52 - Closed<br />

21 UNHCR USD 4,702,967.00 4,345,296.00 - USD 357,671.00 Closed<br />

22 USAID_<strong>NABDP</strong> USD 8,165,309.00 8,165,309.00 - - Closed<br />

23 USAID_WATSAN USD 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 - -<br />

24 <strong>UNDP</strong> TTF USD 583,000.00 583,000.00 - - Closed<br />

25 <strong>UNDP</strong> Core 2008 USD 3,600,000.00 3,600,000.00 - - Closed<br />

26 <strong>UNDP</strong> Core <strong>2009</strong> USD 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 - - On-going<br />

27 BCPR 2008-09 USD 1,205,197.00 1,205,197.00 - - On-going<br />

Total: USD 181,500,640.42<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

18<br />

Table 2: Expenditure Status (by activity)<br />

[Note: All financial data presented in this report are provisional. From <strong>UNDP</strong> Bureau of Management/Office of Finance and Administration, an annual certified<br />

financial statement as of 31 December will be submitted every year no later than 30 June of the following year.]<br />

Activity Donor Budget<br />

ACTIVITY16<br />

(Economic<br />

Regeneration)<br />

ACTIVITY17<br />

(Institutional<br />

Development)<br />

ACTIVITY18<br />

(Immediate<br />

Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s)<br />

Expenditure Status at<br />

(1QTR-09)<br />

Expenditure <strong>2nd</strong> QTR-<br />

<strong>2009</strong><br />

<strong>2nd</strong> QTR-09<br />

Expenditur<br />

e<br />

Total<br />

Expenditur<br />

e<br />

Commitme<br />

nt<br />

Disburseme<br />

nt<br />

Commitme<br />

nt<br />

Disburseme<br />

nt<br />

Balance<br />

Deliver<br />

y<br />

Japan CRD 1,170,382 15,015 166,366 166,366 181,381 989,001 15.50%<br />

Japan Border 1,095,800 79,898 2,630 105,931 108,561 188,459 907,341 17.20%<br />

CIDA 500,000 12,399 259,002 259,002 271,401 228,599 54.28%<br />

DFID - (630) (630) (630) 630 0.00%<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> Core 7,500 656 - - 656 6,844 8.75%<br />

Belgium (3,856) - - (3,856) 3,856 0.00%<br />

Gov of Canada - - - - 0.00%<br />

Japan CRD (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) 5,000 0.00%<br />

Japan Border 1,476,480 285,667 525,506 525,506 811,173 665,307 54.94%<br />

Norway - - - - - 0.00%<br />

Spain 0 - - - 0.01 0.00%<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> Core 40,000 703 448 448 1,151 38,849 2.88%<br />

Belgium 1,487,000 276,355 39,398 39,398 315,753 1,171,247 21.23%<br />

Japan CRD 2,400,000 (227,369) 1,290,565 1,290,565 1,063,196 1,336,804 44.30%<br />

Japan Border 3,154,341 929,870 127,341 1,535,256 1,662,597 2,592,467 561,874 82.19%<br />

Netherlands 2,573,192 529,364 1,994,549 1,994,549 2,523,913 49,279 98.08%<br />

105.90<br />

Norway 1,367,725 329,208 1,119,156 1,119,156 1,448,364 (80,639)<br />

%<br />

CIDA 700,293 195,776 - 155,528 155,528 351,304 348,989 50.17%<br />

DFID 2,102,473 777,745 795,393 795,393 1,573,138 529,335 74.82%<br />

Spain 327,000 372,512 372,512 372,512 (45,512) 113.92<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

19<br />

ACTIVITY19<br />

(Program<br />

Management)<br />

ACTIVITY20<br />

(Community<br />

Empowerment)<br />

ACTIVITY21<br />

(IALP Program)<br />

ACTIVITY22<br />

(DIAG Program)<br />

ACTIVITY23<br />

(Energy for Rural<br />

Dev of Afg)<br />

ACTIVITY1<br />

(Program<br />

Management_D<br />

%<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> Core 571,900 323,754 5,869 193,310 199,178 522,932 48,968 91.44%<br />

DIAG 31,220 15,603 15,603 15,603 31,206 14 99.96%<br />

Belgium 491,200 329,394 - - 329,394 161,806 67.06%<br />

Japan Border 615,507 241,419 10,638 114,071 124,710 366,128 249,379 59.48%<br />

359.57<br />

Netherlands 20,000 56,421 15,492 15,492 71,913 (51,913)<br />

%<br />

Norway 321,145 140,297 (16,171) 166,990 150,819 291,116 30,029 90.65%<br />

CIDA 22,000 811 (25,600) 45,368 19,768 20,578 1,422 93.54%<br />

DFID 295,174 136,061 (605) 144,016 143,411 279,472 15,702 94.68%<br />

Spain 186,200 173,980 173,980 173,980 12,220 93.44%<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> Core 250,000 49,336 149,287 149,287 198,623 51,377 79.45%<br />

BCPR 570,197 3,851 90,230 90,230 94,081 476,116 16.50%<br />

Belgium 66,000 28,875 31,982 31,982 60,857 5,143 92.21%<br />

Gov of Canada (907,707) (907,707) (907,707) 907,707 0.00%<br />

105.26<br />

Japan CRD 44,000 39,901 6,414 6,414 46,315 (2,315)<br />

%<br />

Japan Border 434,122 220,600 210,191 210,191 430,791 3,331 99.23%<br />

Netherlands 71,000 44,085 22,974 22,974 67,059 3,941 94.45%<br />

100.00<br />

CIDA 907,707 907,707 907,707 907,707 -<br />

%<br />

DFID 195,000 69,806 69,806 69,806 125,194 35.80%<br />

Gov of Canada 814,927 25,268 406,134 406,134 431,402 383,525 52.94%<br />

CIDA 500,000 345,829 345,829 345,829 154,171 69.17%<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> Core 30,600 - - - 30,600 0.00%<br />

DIAG 1,758,861 667,957 1,064,512 1,064,512 1,732,469 26,392 98.50%<br />

Gov of Japan<br />

DAIG_MoI 175,238 5,052 - 54,235 54,235 59,287 115,951 33.83%<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> Core - - - - 0.00%<br />

Japan Border 976,600 87,347 124,031 124,031 211,378 765,222 21.64%<br />

215.48<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> Core 100,000 73,163 142,315 142,315 215,478 (115,478)<br />

%<br />

Belgium 7,200 - - - 7,200 0.00%<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

20<br />

EX) Japan Border 84,000 2,383 52,598 52,598 54,981 29,019 65.45%<br />

Norway 5,400 - - - 5,400 0.00%<br />

DFID 22,800 - - - 22,800 0.00%<br />

GMS 1,747,575 351,180 1,307,342 1,307,342 1,658,521 89,053 94.90%<br />

Total 29,717,758 - 6,044,187 104,102 13,300,691 13,404,793 19,448,980<br />

10,268,7<br />

78 65.45%<br />

Note: GMS under Expenditure is calculated based on the allocated Budget Revision # 19, which needs to be adjusted.<br />

Table 3: Expenditure Status (by donor)<br />

Expenditure Status<br />

at (1QTR-09)<br />

Expenditure <strong>2nd</strong> QTR-<br />

<strong>2009</strong><br />

Donor Activity Budget<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> Core<br />

(00012_040<br />

00)<br />

Commit<br />

ment<br />

Disbursem<br />

ent<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> QTR-09<br />

Expenditure<br />

Total<br />

Expenditure<br />

Sub Total (BCPR) 570,197 - 3,851 - 90,230 90,230 94,081 476,116 16.50%<br />

DIAG Programme Management 31,220 15,603 15,603 15,603 31,206 14<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong><br />

Commit<br />

ment<br />

Disburseme<br />

nt<br />

Balance<br />

Institutional Development 7,500 656 - - 656 6,844<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 40,000 703 448 448 1,151 38,849<br />

Programme Management<br />

(NEX) 571,900 323,754 5,869 193,310 199,178 522,932 48,968<br />

Community Emp 250,000 49,336 149,287 149,287 198,623 51,377<br />

DIAG Programme 30,600 - - - 30,600<br />

Programme Management<br />

(DEX) 100,000 73,163 142,315 142,315 215,478 (115,478)<br />

Sub Total (<strong>UNDP</strong>) 1,000,000 - 447,612 5,869 485,360 491,228 938,840 61,160 93.88%<br />

BCPR<br />

(00012_041<br />

60) Community Emp 570,197 3,851 90,230 90,230 94,081 476,116<br />

Deliver<br />

y


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

21<br />

(00044_300<br />

71)<br />

BELGIUM<br />

(00061_420<br />

19)<br />

Govt of<br />

Canada<br />

(00078_300<br />

00)<br />

CIDA<br />

(00550_300<br />

00)<br />

(NEX)<br />

DIAG Programme 1,758,861 667,957 1,064,512 1,064,512 1,732,469 26,392<br />

GMS* 5% 94,215 - 35,977 49,642 49,642 85,619 8,596<br />

Sub Total (Japan DIAG) 1,884,296 - 719,537 - 1,129,757 1,129,757 1,849,294 35,002 98.14%<br />

Institutional Development (3,856) - - (3,856) 3,856<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 1,487,000 276,355 39,398 39,398 315,753 1,171,247<br />

Programme Management<br />

(NEX) 491,200 329,394 - - 329,394 161,806<br />

Community<br />

Empowerment 66,000 28,875 31,982 31,982 60,857 5,143<br />

Programme Management<br />

(DEX) 7,200 - - - - 7,200<br />

GMS* 3% 63,445 - 19,508 - 43,714 43,714 63,223 223<br />

Sub Total (Belgium) 2,114,845 - 650,276 - 115,094 115,094 765,370 1,349,475 36.19%<br />

Community<br />

Empowerment - (907,707) (907,707) (907,707) 907,707<br />

IALP Programme 814,927 25,268 406,134 406,134 431,402 383,525<br />

GMS* 5% 42,891 - 1,330 - (6,213) (6,213) (4,883) 47,774<br />

-<br />

Sub Total (Govt of Canada) 857,818 - 26,598 - (507,786) (507,786) (481,188) 1,339,006 56.09%<br />

Economic Regeneration 500,000 12,399 259,002 259,002 271,401 228,599<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 700,293 195,776 - 155,528 155,528 351,304 348,989<br />

Programme Management<br />

(NEX) 22,000 811 (25,600) 45,368 19,768 20,578 1,422<br />

Community<br />

Empowerment 907,707 907,707 907,707 907,707 -<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s(Kand) 500,000 345,829 345,829 345,829 154,171<br />

GMS* 7% 197,957 - 15,730 205,162 205,162 220,892 (22,935)<br />

Sub Total (CIDA) 2,827,957 - 224,716 (25,600) 1,918,596 1,892,996 2,117,712 710,245 74.88%<br />

JAPAN CRD Economic Regeneration 1,170,382 15,015 166,366 166,366 181,381 989,001<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

22<br />

(00141_300<br />

00)<br />

DIAG_MoI<br />

(00141_300<br />

00)<br />

JAPAN<br />

Border<br />

(00141_320<br />

45)<br />

NETHERLAN<br />

DS<br />

(00182_300<br />

00)<br />

Institutional Development - (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) 5,000<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 2,400,000 (227,369) 1,290,565 1,290,565 1,063,196 1,336,804<br />

Community<br />

Empowerment 44,000 39,901 6,414 6,414 46,315 (2,315)<br />

GMS* 5% 190,231 - (9,076) 199,307 199,307 190,231 -<br />

Sub Total (Japan) 3,804,613 - (181,529) - 1,657,652 1,657,652 1,476,123 2,328,490 38.80%<br />

DIAG Programme<br />

(DIAG_MoI) 175,238 5,052 - 54,235 54,235 59,287 115,951<br />

GMS* 3% 5,420 - 156 5,263 5,263 5,420 -<br />

Sub Total (DIAG_MoI) 180,658 - 5,208 - 59,498 59,498 64,707 115,951 35.82%<br />

Economic Regeneration 1,095,800 79,898 2,630 105,931 108,561 188,459 907,341<br />

Institutional Development 1,476,480 285,667 525,506 525,506 811,173 665,307<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 3,154,341 929,870 127,341 1,535,256 1,662,597 2,592,467 561,874<br />

Programme Management<br />

(NEX) 615,507 241,419 10,638 114,071 124,710 366,128 249,379<br />

Community<br />

Empowerment 434,122 220,600 210,191 210,191 430,791 3,331<br />

Energy for Rural Dev. of<br />

Afg. 976,600 87,347 124,031 124,031 211,378 765,222<br />

Programme Management<br />

(DEX) 84,000 2,383 - 52,598 52,598 54,981 29,019<br />

GMS* 7% 589,870 - 139,035 444,513 444,513 583,548 6,323<br />

Sub Total (Japan_Border) 8,426,720 - 1,986,219 140,609 3,112,097 3,252,706 5,238,925 3,187,795 62.17%<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 2,573,192 529,364 1,994,549 1,994,549 2,523,913 49,279<br />

Programme Management<br />

(NEX) 20,000 56,421 15,492 15,492 71,913 (51,913)<br />

Community<br />

Empowerment 71,000 44,085 22,974 22,974 67,059 3,941<br />

GMS* 7% 200,531 - 47,410 154,427 154,427 201,837 (1,306)<br />

100.00<br />

Sub Total (Netherlands) 2,864,722 - 677,279 - 2,187,443 2,187,443 2,864,722 0.21<br />

%<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

23<br />

NORWAY<br />

(00187_300<br />

00)<br />

DFID<br />

(00551_300<br />

00)<br />

Spanish<br />

(10216_300<br />

00)<br />

Institutional Development - - - - -<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 1,367,725 329,208 1,119,156 1,119,156 1,448,364 (80,639)<br />

Programme Management<br />

(NEX) 321,145 140,297 (16,171) 166,990 150,819 291,116 30,029<br />

Programme Management<br />

(DEX) 5,400 - - - 5,400<br />

GMS* 7% 127,526 32,329 85,162 85,162 117,491 10,035<br />

Sub Total (Norway) 1,821,796 - 501,833 (16,171) 1,371,308 1,355,137 1,856,971 (35,175)<br />

Economic Regeneration - (630) (630) (630) 630<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 2,102,473 777,745 795,393 795,393 1,573,138 529,335<br />

Programme Management<br />

(NEX) 295,174 136,061 (605) 144,016 143,411 279,472 15,702<br />

Community<br />

Empowerment 195,000 69,806 69,806 69,806 125,194<br />

Programme Management<br />

(DEX) 22,800 - - - 22,800<br />

GMS* 7% 196,862 - 68,781 126,364 126,364 195,145 1,716<br />

101.93<br />

%<br />

Sub Total (Dfid) 2,812,308 - 982,587 (605) 1,134,949 1,134,345 2,116,932 695,377 75.27%<br />

Immediately Recovery<br />

<strong>Project</strong>s 327,000 372,512 372,512 372,512 (45,512)<br />

Programme Management<br />

(NEX) 186,200 173,980 173,980 173,980 12,220<br />

GMS* 7% 38,628 - - - - - 38,628<br />

Sub Total (Spain) 551,828 - - - 546,492 546,492 546,492 5,336 99.03%<br />

Grand Total 29,717,758 - 6,044,187 104,102 13,300,691 13,404,793 19,448,980 10,268,778 65.45%<br />

Note: GMS under Expenditure is calculated based on the allocated Budget Revision # 19, which needs to be adjusted. Also to remove deficit the expenditure<br />

is being in adjustment stage.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

24<br />

Annexes<br />

Annex I: Performance Tracking Matrix<br />

Result/Goals<br />

Performance<br />

Indicators<br />

Baseline<br />

Info<br />

Performance<br />

Benchmark and<br />

Targets (6 months)<br />

Implementation<br />

<strong>Progress</strong> in reporting<br />

quarter<br />

1. Comprehensive rural<br />

development plans,<br />

based on participatory<br />

community development<br />

processes and economic<br />

regeneration<br />

assessments and<br />

strategies<br />

1. No. of DDAs<br />

established, No.<br />

of trainings<br />

carried out, No. of<br />

DDPs uploaded<br />

to <strong>NABDP</strong><br />

website, No. of<br />

BDS trainings and<br />

grants provided<br />

to SME.<br />

NA 1. 30 DDAs<br />

established, 78<br />

trainings, 90 DDPs<br />

uploaded.<br />

1. 28 DDAs established, 13<br />

trainings carried out, 55<br />

DDPs uploaded to <strong>NABDP</strong><br />

website, 35 BDS trainings<br />

and grants provided to<br />

SME.<br />

2. Rural development<br />

policies developed and<br />

adopted by the<br />

Government and other<br />

relevant stakeholders,<br />

providing frameworks for<br />

viable interventions for<br />

economic regeneration,<br />

poverty reduction, and<br />

improving livelihoods.<br />

2. Policy support<br />

to AREDP, Draft<br />

MHP and<br />

proposals<br />

prepared.<br />

2. AREDP to have<br />

improved capacity,<br />

improved MHP policy,<br />

number of MHP<br />

proposals prepared.<br />

2. Policy support to<br />

AREDP, draft micro-hydro<br />

projects (MHP) and<br />

proposals prepared.<br />

3. Strengthened<br />

management and<br />

implementation capacity<br />

of MRRD and relevant<br />

partner institutions to<br />

address<br />

rural<br />

development and<br />

economic regeneration<br />

needs and priorities.<br />

3. No. of capacity<br />

building trainings<br />

for REED, No. of<br />

DACs<br />

established, no of<br />

Grant-in-Aid<br />

DDAs, improved<br />

coordination<br />

with AIRD and<br />

CLDD.<br />

3. Improved REED<br />

capacity, DACs<br />

established/facilitated<br />

, 4 DDAs on Grant-in-<br />

Aid scheme, AIRD and<br />

CLDD to have<br />

improved capacity<br />

and coordination.D<br />

3. 13 capacity building<br />

trainings for REED, 17<br />

DACs established, 6 Grantin-Aid<br />

DDAs, improved<br />

coordination with AIRD<br />

and CLDD.<br />

4. High-quality and<br />

sustainable communityled<br />

rural development<br />

and<br />

economic<br />

regeneration<br />

investments that reduce<br />

poverty and improve<br />

livelihoods.<br />

4. No. of rural<br />

infrastructure<br />

projects under<br />

way, No. of<br />

monitoring<br />

missions, No. of<br />

ERDA projects,<br />

No. of SMEs and<br />

economic<br />

4. All Border Province<br />

Infrastructure <strong>Project</strong>s<br />

underway, majority of<br />

Phase II infrastructure<br />

projects completed, 2<br />

Monitoring missions<br />

per<br />

month<br />

completed, 8 MHP<br />

and 100 Biogas<br />

projects underway, 14<br />

4. 415 rural infrastructure<br />

projects under way, 45<br />

monitoring missions, 30<br />

ERDA biogas and 7 MHP<br />

projects underway, 5<br />

SMEs and economic<br />

infrastructure projects<br />

underway in Border<br />

Provinces.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

25<br />

infrastructure<br />

projects<br />

underway in<br />

Border Provinces.<br />

SMEs<br />

improved/established<br />

, 14 economic<br />

infrastructure projects<br />

completed.<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

26<br />

Annex II: Risk Log<br />

RISK LOG<br />

<strong>Project</strong> Title: <strong>NABDP</strong> Award ID: 00011020 Date: 27/7/09<br />

# Description Date<br />

Identified<br />

Type<br />

Impact &<br />

Probability<br />

1 Insecurity NA Environmental Lack of security in<br />

certain regions severely<br />

delays the progress of<br />

projects or leads to their<br />

termination, as well as<br />

endangering labourers<br />

and staff/monitors<br />

working in the affected<br />

area.<br />

P = 5<br />

Countermeasures /<br />

Mngt response<br />

MRRD relies heavily on<br />

the DDAs to implement<br />

projects and contract<br />

directly<br />

with<br />

communities as often as<br />

possible to reduce the<br />

likelihood of security<br />

problems.<br />

Owner<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong><br />

Submitted,<br />

updated by<br />

<strong>Project</strong><br />

Manager<br />

Last<br />

Update<br />

June<br />

Status<br />

Increasing<br />

I =5<br />

2 Social<br />

Conflicts<br />

Operational Two projects still are<br />

experiencing social conflicts<br />

reported in the first quarter.<br />

Since <strong>NABDP</strong> has a<br />

participatory approach to<br />

identifying needs and<br />

priorities, social conflicts of<br />

a political nature often arise<br />

within communities during<br />

project selection. These<br />

issues are usually resolved<br />

by the PRRD, or by<br />

intervention of DDAs, the<br />

district of provincial<br />

Problem currently being<br />

dealt with at provincial<br />

level.<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong><br />

<strong>Project</strong><br />

Manager<br />

June<br />

Currently<br />

being<br />

dealt with<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

27<br />

3 Seasonal<br />

conditions<br />

governor, and occasionally<br />

ISAF mediation.<br />

P =5<br />

I = 5<br />

Environmental/Seasonal This quarter, due to<br />

heavy flooding in some<br />

areas, some project<br />

construction has been<br />

delayed and destroyed<br />

progress must be<br />

repaired.<br />

Funds have been<br />

processed in order to<br />

make the repairs on<br />

project destruction due<br />

to flooding.<br />

<strong>NABDP</strong><br />

<strong>Project</strong><br />

Manager<br />

June<br />

P =5<br />

I = 5<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>


National Area Based Development<br />

Programme<br />

11020 (NEX), 11012 (DEX)<br />

28<br />

Annex III: Issue Log<br />

ISSUES LOG Date: 27/07/09<br />

Award ID: 00011020 <strong>Project</strong>: <strong>NABDP</strong><br />

ID Type Date<br />

Identified<br />

Description<br />

Status/Priority<br />

Status<br />

Change<br />

Date<br />

Author<br />

Lack of<br />

Technical<br />

Human<br />

Resources<br />

NA<br />

The technical nature of <strong>NABDP</strong>’s infrastructure<br />

projects and lack of technical and human resources<br />

affect the proper and timely implementation of<br />

projects.<br />

Capacity<br />

building<br />

trainings carried<br />

out; further<br />

resources<br />

mobilized;<br />

materials<br />

imported.<br />

NA Implementation Unit<br />

reported the problem<br />

<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>2009</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!