Development Cooperation Report 2012 - UNDP Afghanistan
Development Cooperation Report 2012 - UNDP Afghanistan Development Cooperation Report 2012 - UNDP Afghanistan
25 CHAPTER 2 ANALYSIS OF AID EFFECTIVENESS IN AFGHANISTAN DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION REPORT
INTRODUCTION 27 Building on the overview of the data provided in previous section, this chapter presents analyses of the progress achieved on aid effectiveness principles, the existing challenges and the way forward. The analysis will focus on developments since the last Development Cooperation Report (2010) and some general issues over the period 2002 to 2011. In the last two years (2010-2011), efforts to enhance international development cooperation experienced tremendous shifts at the local and global levels. Namely, the Fourth High Level Forum (HLF-4) in November-December 2011 in Busan introduced a new paradigm for development cooperation, enunciating more inclusive and broader partnerships while embracing diversity and emphasizing the key role of different development actors in improving the effectiveness of development aid. The HLF-4 rejuvenated the essence of South-South cooperation, triangular partnerships and the role of the private sector and wider civil society in the promotion of global development cooperation. Building upon the foundations laid in the Paris Declaration (PD) and Accra Agenda for Action (AAA), the HLF-4 produced the Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation and the New Deal for engagement in fragile states, marking a turning point in development partnerships. The so-called post-Busan framework complements previous efforts in reaching the agreed development targets with more efficient and quicker approach than before by encouraging ownership of development priorities by developing countries, considering context specificity of the fragile states and demanding flexibility on the part of donors. At the local level, however, in close partnership with the International Community, the Afghan Government sought to articulate these internationally agreed aid effectiveness commitments into tangible actions for implementation and application into its own development context. At the July 2010 Kabul Conference, the international community reaffirmed their London Conference commitments to channel at least 50% of development through the Afghan Governemnt budget and to progressively align 80% of their aid to Afghan-defined priority programs within two years. At a subsequent international conference on Afghanistan in Bonn in December 2011, the International Community affirmed the special status of Afghanistan to receive donor assistance from Transition through a Transformation Decade in greater measures than similarly situated nations. DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION REPORT
- Page 2 and 3: Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Min
- Page 4 and 5: II TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD......
- Page 6 and 7: IV LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Overvi
- Page 8 and 9: VI DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION REPORT M
- Page 10 and 11: 2 funding mechanisms such as the AR
- Page 12 and 13: 4 INTRODUCTION This report is a seq
- Page 14 and 15: 6 come. As a result, Afghanistan wi
- Page 16 and 17: DISCLAIMER: this section of the rep
- Page 18 and 19: 11 Figure 4: Volume of Disbursement
- Page 20 and 21: MAIN DELIVERY CHANNELS of EXTERNAL
- Page 22 and 23: appropriated a total amount of USD
- Page 24 and 25: Figure 10: Classification of Disbur
- Page 26 and 27: AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION TRUST FU
- Page 28 and 29: 21 Despite the fact that the volume
- Page 30 and 31: sectors, which in turn resulted in
- Page 34 and 35: 28 DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION REPORT U
- Page 36 and 37: 30 It is apparent from the above ta
- Page 38 and 39: 32 alignment with national prioriti
- Page 40 and 41: 34 BUILDING ON THE SUCCESS OF THE K
- Page 42 and 43: 36 investment of $30 million in the
- Page 44 and 45: 38 Table 6: DPs Financing for ANDS
- Page 46 and 47: 40 The peer review mechanism, which
- Page 48 and 49: 42 DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION REPORT S
- Page 50 and 51: CONCLUSION 45 FY 2011 was an except
- Page 52 and 53: ANNEX DCR 2011 TABLES
- Page 54 and 55: 49 36 Luxembourg 12 11 37 Hungary 6
- Page 56 and 57: 51 Total 1,353 723 1,092 1,141 242
- Page 58 and 59: Table 12: DELIVERY MECHANISMS OF EX
- Page 60 and 61: Table 14: SUMMARY OF DPS' COMMITMEN
- Page 62 and 63: 57 The Private Sector Development C
- Page 64 and 65: 59 14 The National Action Plan for
- Page 66 and 67: 61 TABLE 18: COUNTRIES/ORGANIZATION
- Page 68: Copyright © 2012 Aid Management Di
INTRODUCTION<br />
27<br />
Building on the overview of the data provided in previous section, this chapter<br />
presents analyses of the progress achieved on aid effectiveness principles, the<br />
existing challenges and the way forward. The analysis will focus on developments<br />
since the last <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Cooperation</strong> <strong>Report</strong> (2010) and some general issues over<br />
the period 2002 to 2011.<br />
In the last two years (2010-2011), efforts to enhance international development<br />
cooperation experienced tremendous shifts at the local and global levels. Namely, the<br />
Fourth High Level Forum (HLF-4) in November-December 2011 in Busan introduced<br />
a new paradigm for development cooperation, enunciating more inclusive and<br />
broader partnerships while embracing diversity and emphasizing the key role of<br />
different development actors in improving the effectiveness of development aid. The<br />
HLF-4 rejuvenated the essence of South-South cooperation, triangular partnerships<br />
and the role of the private sector and wider civil society in the promotion of global<br />
development cooperation. Building upon the foundations laid in the Paris Declaration<br />
(PD) and Accra Agenda for Action (AAA), the HLF-4 produced the Busan Partnership<br />
for Effective <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Cooperation</strong> and the New Deal for engagement in fragile<br />
states, marking a turning point in development partnerships. The so-called post-Busan<br />
framework complements previous efforts in reaching the agreed development targets<br />
with more efficient and quicker approach than before by encouraging ownership of<br />
development priorities by developing countries, considering context specificity of the<br />
fragile states and demanding flexibility on the part of donors.<br />
At the local level, however, in close partnership with the International Community,<br />
the Afghan Government sought to articulate these internationally agreed aid<br />
effectiveness commitments into tangible actions for implementation and application<br />
into its own development context. At the July 2010 Kabul Conference, the international<br />
community reaffirmed their London Conference commitments to channel at least<br />
50% of development through the Afghan Governemnt budget and to progressively<br />
align 80% of their aid to Afghan-defined priority programs within two years. At a<br />
subsequent international conference on <strong>Afghanistan</strong> in Bonn in December 2011, the<br />
International Community affirmed the special status of <strong>Afghanistan</strong> to receive donor<br />
assistance from Transition through a Transformation Decade in greater measures<br />
than similarly situated nations.<br />
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION REPORT