Development Cooperation Report 2012 - UNDP Afghanistan
Development Cooperation Report 2012 - UNDP Afghanistan
Development Cooperation Report 2012 - UNDP Afghanistan
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12<br />
Figure 5: Geographical Allocation of External Assistance (2011)<br />
500<br />
472<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
252<br />
181 172<br />
150<br />
100<br />
69 60 55 46 43 41 38<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Kabul<br />
Kandahar<br />
Helmand<br />
Nangarhar<br />
Uruzgan<br />
Paktya<br />
Bamyan<br />
Balkh<br />
Herat<br />
Baghlan<br />
Other Provinces<br />
$Millions<br />
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION REPORT<br />
It is worth noting that almost 90% of aid<br />
provided in 2011 had “nation-wide” impact,<br />
which includes spending through military<br />
means such as the Commanders Emergency<br />
Response Program (CERP), the <strong>Afghanistan</strong><br />
Security Force Fund (ASFF), and Provincial<br />
Reconstruction Teams (PRTs). Provincial<br />
breakdown of assistance provided through<br />
these mechanisms is not currently available<br />
at MoF. It has always been the view of the<br />
GoA that in order to make effective use of<br />
external resources and achieve sustainable<br />
development, there is a need for more<br />
equitable allocation of investments across<br />
sectors and geographical areas through regular<br />
Figures in $Millions<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Provinces<br />
11,500<br />
1,430<br />
Nation-Wide<br />
consultations with central ministries and MoF.
Change language