19.10.2014 Views

01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp

01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp

01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Developmental dyslexia in adults: a research review<br />

149<br />

Study Construct group(s) Selection criteria<br />

Zabell, C. and Everatt, J. (2002).<br />

‘Surface and phonological<br />

subtypes of adult developmental<br />

dyslexia’. <strong>Dyslexia</strong>, 8, 160–177.<br />

Pisecco, S., Baker, D. B., Silva, P.<br />

A. and Brooke, M. (20<strong>01</strong>). ‘Boys<br />

with reading disabilities and/or<br />

ADHD: distinctions in early<br />

childhood’. Journal of Learning<br />

Disabilities, 34(2), 98–106.<br />

Dyslexic (vs. nondyslexic)<br />

adults<br />

Reading-disabled only<br />

(vs. RD/ADHD, ADHD<br />

only, and normal<br />

comparison) children<br />

For the study: current or recent<br />

university student status.<br />

For dyslexia: Educational<br />

Psychological Assessments<br />

confirming a diagnosis of dyslexia<br />

based on poor performance on<br />

measures of literacy and phonological<br />

processing in the absence of known<br />

general intellectual deficits,<br />

perceptual impairments and psychoemotional<br />

dysfunction and selfreported<br />

difficulty in learning to read.<br />

For reading disability: a reading score<br />

at least 1.5 SD below the male<br />

sample’s average reading score.<br />

Kirk, J. and Reid, G. (20<strong>01</strong>). ‘An<br />

examination of the relationship<br />

between dyslexia and offending in<br />

young people and the implications<br />

for the training system’. <strong>Dyslexia</strong>,<br />

7, 77–84.<br />

Dyslexic (vs. nondyslexic)<br />

young<br />

offenders<br />

For dyslexia: ‘positive’ indicators of<br />

dyslexia as calculated by the<br />

computerised self-assessment<br />

screening test for dyslexia, QuickScan<br />

(normed on university students).<br />

Curtin, S., Manis, F. R. and<br />

Seidenberg, M. S. (20<strong>01</strong>). ‘Parallels<br />

between the reading and spelling<br />

deficits of two subgroups of<br />

developmental dyslexics’. Reading<br />

and Writing, 14(5–6), 515–547.<br />

de Martino, S., Espesser, R., Rey,<br />

V. and Habib, M. (20<strong>01</strong>). ‘The<br />

‘temporal processing deficit’<br />

hypothesis in dyslexia: new<br />

experimental evidence’. Brain and<br />

Cognition, 46(1–2), 104–108.<br />

Phonological and<br />

surface dyslexic<br />

children vs. normal<br />

readers<br />

Phonological dyslexic<br />

vs. normal control<br />

children<br />

For poor readers: initially, teacher<br />

nomination based on estimates that<br />

subjects were in the bottom quartile<br />

for reading; subsequently,<br />

classification by difficulty with either<br />

nonword reading or exception word<br />

reading.<br />

For dyslexia: normal IQ; no<br />

neurological, auditory or visual<br />

disorders of any kind; no attention<br />

deficit; and a two-year lag in reading<br />

ability.<br />

Facoetti, A., Turatto, M., Lorusso,<br />

M. L. and Mascetti, G. G. (20<strong>01</strong>).<br />

‘Orienting of visual attention in<br />

dyslexia: evidence for asymmetric<br />

hemispheric control of attention’.<br />

Experimental Brain Research,<br />

138(1), 46–53.<br />

Dyslexic children vs.<br />

normal readers<br />

For dyslexia: absence of spoken<br />

language impairment; full-scale IQ<br />

>85 as measured by WISC-R; no<br />

known gross behavioural or emotional<br />

problems; normal or corrected-tonormal<br />

vision and hearing; normal<br />

visual field; absence of ADHD; right<br />

manual preference.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!