01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp

01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp 01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp

19.10.2014 Views

148 Research Report Appendix 3 Some research criteria used in studies of dyslexia Caveat: ‘ … the majority of research investigations seeking to elucidate the characteristics of dyslexia … have yielded findings that are difficult to interpret, replicate, and generalise’ (page 7). Lyon, G. R. (1995). ‘Toward a definition of dyslexia’. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3–27. Study Construct group(s) Selection criteria Bourassa, D. and Treiman, R. (2003). ‘Spelling in children with dyslexia: analyses from the Treiman-Bourassa early spelling test’. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(4), 309-333. Dyslexic (vs. younger, spelling-level matched non-dyslexic) children For dyslexia: Prior classification by their schools as developmentally dyslexic and then full-scale standard IQ score of at least 85, performance below the 25th percentile for their age group on both spelling and reading subtests of the Wide Range Achievement Test-3 (based on the combined performance across the two forms of each subtest) and performance below the fourth-grade level on the spelling subtests of the Wide Range Achievement Test-3, based on the combined performance across the two forms. Pogorzelski, S. and Wheldall, K. (2002). ‘Do differences in phonological processing performance predict gains made by older low-progress readers following intensive literacy intervention?’ Educational Psychology, 22(4), 413–427. Dyslexic (vs. garden variety) low-progress readers For the study: attendance at a programme for children who were at least two years behind in reading accuracy, socially disadvantaged and at serious risk of disaffection from school. For dyslexia: severe reading disability as defined by the Phonological Assessment Battery, i.e. scores falling one SD below the mean on at least three out of the nine subtests. Chiappe, P., Stringer, R., Siegel, L. S. and Stanovich, K. E. (2002). ‘Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults’. Reading and Writing, 15, 73–107. Reading-disabled (vs. age-matched and reading-level matched normally-reading) children For reading disability: reading at or below the 25th percentile on the reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test-3, which is an untimed confrontational naming task. Heiervang, E., Stevenson, J. and Hugdahl, K. (2002). ‘Auditory processing in children with dyslexia.’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(7), 931–938. Dyslexic (vs. normal control) children For dyslexia: At the first stage, a score below the 10th percentile on a spelling test administered by teachers; at the second stage, a mean score of at least 2 SD below the mean age level on five reading tasks from a standardised battery of computerised reading tests.

Developmental dyslexia in adults: a research review 149 Study Construct group(s) Selection criteria Zabell, C. and Everatt, J. (2002). ‘Surface and phonological subtypes of adult developmental dyslexia’. Dyslexia, 8, 160–177. Pisecco, S., Baker, D. B., Silva, P. A. and Brooke, M. (2001). ‘Boys with reading disabilities and/or ADHD: distinctions in early childhood’. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(2), 98–106. Dyslexic (vs. nondyslexic) adults Reading-disabled only (vs. RD/ADHD, ADHD only, and normal comparison) children For the study: current or recent university student status. For dyslexia: Educational Psychological Assessments confirming a diagnosis of dyslexia based on poor performance on measures of literacy and phonological processing in the absence of known general intellectual deficits, perceptual impairments and psychoemotional dysfunction and selfreported difficulty in learning to read. For reading disability: a reading score at least 1.5 SD below the male sample’s average reading score. Kirk, J. and Reid, G. (2001). ‘An examination of the relationship between dyslexia and offending in young people and the implications for the training system’. Dyslexia, 7, 77–84. Dyslexic (vs. nondyslexic) young offenders For dyslexia: ‘positive’ indicators of dyslexia as calculated by the computerised self-assessment screening test for dyslexia, QuickScan (normed on university students). Curtin, S., Manis, F. R. and Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). ‘Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two subgroups of developmental dyslexics’. Reading and Writing, 14(5–6), 515–547. de Martino, S., Espesser, R., Rey, V. and Habib, M. (2001). ‘The ‘temporal processing deficit’ hypothesis in dyslexia: new experimental evidence’. Brain and Cognition, 46(1–2), 104–108. Phonological and surface dyslexic children vs. normal readers Phonological dyslexic vs. normal control children For poor readers: initially, teacher nomination based on estimates that subjects were in the bottom quartile for reading; subsequently, classification by difficulty with either nonword reading or exception word reading. For dyslexia: normal IQ; no neurological, auditory or visual disorders of any kind; no attention deficit; and a two-year lag in reading ability. Facoetti, A., Turatto, M., Lorusso, M. L. and Mascetti, G. G. (2001). ‘Orienting of visual attention in dyslexia: evidence for asymmetric hemispheric control of attention’. Experimental Brain Research, 138(1), 46–53. Dyslexic children vs. normal readers For dyslexia: absence of spoken language impairment; full-scale IQ >85 as measured by WISC-R; no known gross behavioural or emotional problems; normal or corrected-tonormal vision and hearing; normal visual field; absence of ADHD; right manual preference.

148<br />

Research Report<br />

Appendix 3<br />

Some research criteria used in studies of<br />

dyslexia<br />

Caveat: ‘ … the majority of research investigations seeking to elucidate the<br />

characteristics of dyslexia … have yielded findings that are difficult to interpret,<br />

replicate, and generalise’ (page 7). Lyon, G. R. (1995). ‘Toward a definition of dyslexia’.<br />

Annals of <strong>Dyslexia</strong>, 45, 3–27.<br />

Study Construct group(s) Selection criteria<br />

Bourassa, D. and Treiman, R.<br />

(2003). ‘Spelling in children with<br />

dyslexia: analyses from the<br />

Treiman-Bourassa early spelling<br />

test’. Scientific Studies of<br />

Reading, 7(4), 309-333.<br />

Dyslexic (vs. younger,<br />

spelling-level matched<br />

non-dyslexic) children<br />

For dyslexia: Prior classification by<br />

their schools as developmentally<br />

dyslexic and then full-scale standard<br />

IQ score of at least 85, performance<br />

below the 25th percentile for their age<br />

group on both spelling and reading<br />

subtests of the Wide Range<br />

Achievement Test-3 (based on the<br />

combined performance across the two<br />

forms of each subtest) and<br />

performance below the fourth-grade<br />

level on the spelling subtests of the<br />

Wide Range Achievement Test-3,<br />

based on the combined performance<br />

across the two forms.<br />

Pogorzelski, S. and Wheldall, K.<br />

(2002). ‘Do differences in<br />

phonological processing<br />

performance predict gains made<br />

by older low-progress readers<br />

following intensive literacy<br />

intervention?’ Educational<br />

Psychology, 22(4), 413–427.<br />

Dyslexic (vs. garden<br />

variety) low-progress<br />

readers<br />

For the study: attendance at a<br />

programme for children who were at<br />

least two years behind in reading<br />

accuracy, socially disadvantaged and<br />

at serious risk of disaffection from<br />

school.<br />

For dyslexia: severe reading disability<br />

as defined by the Phonological<br />

Assessment Battery, i.e. scores falling<br />

one SD below the mean on at least<br />

three out of the nine subtests.<br />

Chiappe, P., Stringer, R., Siegel, L.<br />

S. and Stanovich, K. E. (2002).<br />

‘Why the timing deficit hypothesis<br />

does not explain reading disability<br />

in adults’. Reading and Writing,<br />

15, 73–107.<br />

Reading-disabled (vs.<br />

age-matched and<br />

reading-level matched<br />

normally-reading)<br />

children<br />

For reading disability: reading at or<br />

below the 25th percentile on the<br />

reading subtest of the Wide Range<br />

Achievement Test-3, which is an<br />

untimed confrontational naming task.<br />

Heiervang, E., Stevenson, J. and<br />

Hugdahl, K. (2002). ‘Auditory<br />

processing in children with<br />

dyslexia.’ Journal of Child<br />

Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(7),<br />

931–938.<br />

Dyslexic (vs. normal<br />

control) children<br />

For dyslexia: At the first stage, a score<br />

below the 10th percentile on a spelling<br />

test administered by teachers; at the<br />

second stage, a mean score of at least<br />

2 SD below the mean age level on five<br />

reading tasks from a standardised<br />

battery of computerised reading tests.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!