01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp
01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp 01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp
148 Research Report Appendix 3 Some research criteria used in studies of dyslexia Caveat: ‘ … the majority of research investigations seeking to elucidate the characteristics of dyslexia … have yielded findings that are difficult to interpret, replicate, and generalise’ (page 7). Lyon, G. R. (1995). ‘Toward a definition of dyslexia’. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3–27. Study Construct group(s) Selection criteria Bourassa, D. and Treiman, R. (2003). ‘Spelling in children with dyslexia: analyses from the Treiman-Bourassa early spelling test’. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(4), 309-333. Dyslexic (vs. younger, spelling-level matched non-dyslexic) children For dyslexia: Prior classification by their schools as developmentally dyslexic and then full-scale standard IQ score of at least 85, performance below the 25th percentile for their age group on both spelling and reading subtests of the Wide Range Achievement Test-3 (based on the combined performance across the two forms of each subtest) and performance below the fourth-grade level on the spelling subtests of the Wide Range Achievement Test-3, based on the combined performance across the two forms. Pogorzelski, S. and Wheldall, K. (2002). ‘Do differences in phonological processing performance predict gains made by older low-progress readers following intensive literacy intervention?’ Educational Psychology, 22(4), 413–427. Dyslexic (vs. garden variety) low-progress readers For the study: attendance at a programme for children who were at least two years behind in reading accuracy, socially disadvantaged and at serious risk of disaffection from school. For dyslexia: severe reading disability as defined by the Phonological Assessment Battery, i.e. scores falling one SD below the mean on at least three out of the nine subtests. Chiappe, P., Stringer, R., Siegel, L. S. and Stanovich, K. E. (2002). ‘Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults’. Reading and Writing, 15, 73–107. Reading-disabled (vs. age-matched and reading-level matched normally-reading) children For reading disability: reading at or below the 25th percentile on the reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test-3, which is an untimed confrontational naming task. Heiervang, E., Stevenson, J. and Hugdahl, K. (2002). ‘Auditory processing in children with dyslexia.’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(7), 931–938. Dyslexic (vs. normal control) children For dyslexia: At the first stage, a score below the 10th percentile on a spelling test administered by teachers; at the second stage, a mean score of at least 2 SD below the mean age level on five reading tasks from a standardised battery of computerised reading tests.
Developmental dyslexia in adults: a research review 149 Study Construct group(s) Selection criteria Zabell, C. and Everatt, J. (2002). ‘Surface and phonological subtypes of adult developmental dyslexia’. Dyslexia, 8, 160–177. Pisecco, S., Baker, D. B., Silva, P. A. and Brooke, M. (2001). ‘Boys with reading disabilities and/or ADHD: distinctions in early childhood’. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(2), 98–106. Dyslexic (vs. nondyslexic) adults Reading-disabled only (vs. RD/ADHD, ADHD only, and normal comparison) children For the study: current or recent university student status. For dyslexia: Educational Psychological Assessments confirming a diagnosis of dyslexia based on poor performance on measures of literacy and phonological processing in the absence of known general intellectual deficits, perceptual impairments and psychoemotional dysfunction and selfreported difficulty in learning to read. For reading disability: a reading score at least 1.5 SD below the male sample’s average reading score. Kirk, J. and Reid, G. (2001). ‘An examination of the relationship between dyslexia and offending in young people and the implications for the training system’. Dyslexia, 7, 77–84. Dyslexic (vs. nondyslexic) young offenders For dyslexia: ‘positive’ indicators of dyslexia as calculated by the computerised self-assessment screening test for dyslexia, QuickScan (normed on university students). Curtin, S., Manis, F. R. and Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). ‘Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two subgroups of developmental dyslexics’. Reading and Writing, 14(5–6), 515–547. de Martino, S., Espesser, R., Rey, V. and Habib, M. (2001). ‘The ‘temporal processing deficit’ hypothesis in dyslexia: new experimental evidence’. Brain and Cognition, 46(1–2), 104–108. Phonological and surface dyslexic children vs. normal readers Phonological dyslexic vs. normal control children For poor readers: initially, teacher nomination based on estimates that subjects were in the bottom quartile for reading; subsequently, classification by difficulty with either nonword reading or exception word reading. For dyslexia: normal IQ; no neurological, auditory or visual disorders of any kind; no attention deficit; and a two-year lag in reading ability. Facoetti, A., Turatto, M., Lorusso, M. L. and Mascetti, G. G. (2001). ‘Orienting of visual attention in dyslexia: evidence for asymmetric hemispheric control of attention’. Experimental Brain Research, 138(1), 46–53. Dyslexic children vs. normal readers For dyslexia: absence of spoken language impairment; full-scale IQ >85 as measured by WISC-R; no known gross behavioural or emotional problems; normal or corrected-tonormal vision and hearing; normal visual field; absence of ADHD; right manual preference.
- Page 98 and 99: 98 Research Report Ehri, L. C., Nun
- Page 100 and 101: 100 Research Report Fischer, K. W.
- Page 102 and 103: 102 Research Report Galaburda, A. M
- Page 104 and 105: 104 Research Report Griffiths, Y. M
- Page 106 and 107: 106 Research Report HM Prison Servi
- Page 108 and 109: 108 Research Report Klein, C. (1998
- Page 110 and 111: 110 Research Report Lovett, M. W.,
- Page 112 and 113: 112 Research Report McCrory, E. (20
- Page 114 and 115: 114 Research Report Morris, R. D.,
- Page 116 and 117: 116 Research Report Oakland, T., Bl
- Page 118 and 119: 118 Research Report Purcell-Gates,
- Page 120 and 121: 120 Research Report Richardson, A.
- Page 122 and 123: 122 Research Report Seidenberg, M.
- Page 124 and 125: 124 Research Report Snowling, M. J.
- Page 126 and 127: 126 Research Report Stein, J. F. (1
- Page 128 and 129: 128 Research Report Torgesen, J. K.
- Page 130 and 131: 130 Research Report Wadsworth, S. J
- Page 132 and 133: 132 Research Report Yule, W. and Ru
- Page 134 and 135: 134 Research Report This definition
- Page 136 and 137: 136 Research Report Note 3 ‘We be
- Page 138 and 139: 138 Research Report Note 2 The comm
- Page 140 and 141: 140 Research Report mastery of read
- Page 142 and 143: 142 Research Report read. These are
- Page 144 and 145: 144 Research Report should be descr
- Page 146 and 147: 146 Research Report Note ‘No reas
- Page 150 and 151: 150 Research Report Study Construct
- Page 152 and 153: 152 Research Report Study Construct
- Page 154 and 155: 154 Research Report Appendix 5 Refe
- Page 156 and 157: 156 Research Report Checklist item
- Page 158 and 159: 158 Research Report Function Checkl
- Page 160 and 161: 160 Research Report Function Checkl
- Page 162 and 163: 162 Research Report Appendix 7 A
- Page 164 and 165: 164 Research Report value (although
- Page 166 and 167: 166 Research Report reading-related
- Page 168 and 169: 168 Research Report Harris, M. and
- Page 170 and 171: 170 Research Report Appendix 10 Ana
- Page 172 and 173: 172 Research Report Brodmann Functi
- Page 174 and 175: 174 Research Report Figure B: Later
- Page 176: 176 Research Report Figure D: Corti
148<br />
Research Report<br />
Appendix 3<br />
Some research criteria used in studies of<br />
dyslexia<br />
Caveat: ‘ … the majority of research investigations seeking to elucidate the<br />
characteristics of dyslexia … have yielded findings that are difficult to interpret,<br />
replicate, and generalise’ (page 7). Lyon, G. R. (1995). ‘Toward a definition of dyslexia’.<br />
Annals of <strong>Dyslexia</strong>, 45, 3–27.<br />
Study Construct group(s) Selection criteria<br />
Bourassa, D. and Treiman, R.<br />
(2003). ‘Spelling in children with<br />
dyslexia: analyses from the<br />
Treiman-Bourassa early spelling<br />
test’. Scientific Studies of<br />
Reading, 7(4), 309-333.<br />
Dyslexic (vs. younger,<br />
spelling-level matched<br />
non-dyslexic) children<br />
For dyslexia: Prior classification by<br />
their schools as developmentally<br />
dyslexic and then full-scale standard<br />
IQ score of at least 85, performance<br />
below the 25th percentile for their age<br />
group on both spelling and reading<br />
subtests of the Wide Range<br />
Achievement Test-3 (based on the<br />
combined performance across the two<br />
forms of each subtest) and<br />
performance below the fourth-grade<br />
level on the spelling subtests of the<br />
Wide Range Achievement Test-3,<br />
based on the combined performance<br />
across the two forms.<br />
Pogorzelski, S. and Wheldall, K.<br />
(2002). ‘Do differences in<br />
phonological processing<br />
performance predict gains made<br />
by older low-progress readers<br />
following intensive literacy<br />
intervention?’ Educational<br />
Psychology, 22(4), 413–427.<br />
Dyslexic (vs. garden<br />
variety) low-progress<br />
readers<br />
For the study: attendance at a<br />
programme for children who were at<br />
least two years behind in reading<br />
accuracy, socially disadvantaged and<br />
at serious risk of disaffection from<br />
school.<br />
For dyslexia: severe reading disability<br />
as defined by the Phonological<br />
Assessment Battery, i.e. scores falling<br />
one SD below the mean on at least<br />
three out of the nine subtests.<br />
Chiappe, P., Stringer, R., Siegel, L.<br />
S. and Stanovich, K. E. (2002).<br />
‘Why the timing deficit hypothesis<br />
does not explain reading disability<br />
in adults’. Reading and Writing,<br />
15, 73–107.<br />
Reading-disabled (vs.<br />
age-matched and<br />
reading-level matched<br />
normally-reading)<br />
children<br />
For reading disability: reading at or<br />
below the 25th percentile on the<br />
reading subtest of the Wide Range<br />
Achievement Test-3, which is an<br />
untimed confrontational naming task.<br />
Heiervang, E., Stevenson, J. and<br />
Hugdahl, K. (2002). ‘Auditory<br />
processing in children with<br />
dyslexia.’ Journal of Child<br />
Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(7),<br />
931–938.<br />
Dyslexic (vs. normal<br />
control) children<br />
For dyslexia: At the first stage, a score<br />
below the 10th percentile on a spelling<br />
test administered by teachers; at the<br />
second stage, a mean score of at least<br />
2 SD below the mean age level on five<br />
reading tasks from a standardised<br />
battery of computerised reading tests.