01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp
01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp 01 NRDC Dyslexia 1-88 update - Texthelp
102 Research Report Galaburda, A. M., Rosen, G. D. and Sherman, G. F. (1989). ‘The neural origin of developmental dyslexia: implications for medicine, neurology, and cognition.’ In A. M. Galaburda (Ed.), From Reading to Neurons (pp. 377–388). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gayán, J. and Olson, R. K. (2003). ‘Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in printed word recognition.’ Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84(2), 97–123. Geiger, G. and Lettvin, J. Y. (1997). A view on dyslexia (A.I. Memo No. 1608/C.B.C.L. Paper No. 148). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and Center for Biological and Computational Learning Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences. Geiger, G., Lettvin, J. Y. and Zegarra-Moran, O. (1992). ‘Task-determined strategies of visual process.’ Cognitive Brain Research, 1(1), 39–52. Gersons-Wolfensberger, D. C. M. and Ruijssenaars, W. A. J. J. M. (1997). ‘Definition and treatment of dyslexia: a report by the Committee of Dyslexia of the Health Council of the Netherlands.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 209–213. Geschwind, N. (1984). ‘The biology of cerebral dominance: implications for cognition.’ Cognition, 17, 193–208. Geschwind, N. and Galaburda, A. M. (1985). ‘Cerebral lateralization: biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: 1. A hypothesis and a program for research.’ Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–459. Gilger, J. W., Ho, H.-Z., Whipple, A. D. and Spitz, R. (2001). ‘Genotype-environment correlations for language-related abilities: implications for typical and atypical learners.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(6), 492–502. Gilger, J. W. and Kaplan, B. J. (2001). ‘Atypical brain development: a conceptual framework for understanding developmental learning disabilities.’ Developmental Neuropsychology, 20(2), 465–481. Gilger, J. W. and Pennington, B. F. (1995). ‘Why associations among traits do not necessarily indicate their common etiology: a comment on the Geschwind-Behan-Galaburda model.’ Brain and Cognition, 27, 89–93. Gilger, J. W., Pennington, B. F., Harbeck, R. J., DeFries, J. C., Kotzin, B., Green, P. and Smith, S. (1998). ‘A twin and family study of the association between immune system dysfunction and dyslexia using blood serum immunoassay and survey data.’ Brain and Cognition, 36(3), 310–333. Gleitman, L. R. and Rozin, P. (1977). ‘The structure and acquisition of reading I: relation between orthography and the structured language.’ In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.), Toward a Psychology of Reading: the proceedings of the CUNY conferences (pp. 1–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Developmental dyslexia in adults: a research review 103 Gliner, J. A. and Morgan, G. A. (2000). Research Methods in Applied Settings: an integrated approach to design and analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Goodman, K. S. (1970). ‘Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game.’ In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 259–271). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Goodman, K. S. (Ed.). (1978). The Psycholinguistic Nature of the Reading Process. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. Goswami, U. and Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological Skills and Learning to Read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Goswami, U., Porpodas, C. and Wheelwright, S. (1997). ‘Children’s orthographic representations in English and Greek.’ European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(3), 273–292. Goswami, U., Thomson, J., Richardson, U., Stainthorp, R., Hughes, D., Rosen, S. and Scott, S. K. (2002). ‘Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: a new hypothesis.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(16), 10911–10916. Gottesman, R. L., Bennett, R. E., Nathan, R. G. and Kelly, M. S. (1996). ‘Inner-city adults with severe reading difficulties: a closer look.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(6), 589–597. Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Schools and Delinquency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gottlieb, G. (1992). Individual Development and Evolution: the genesis of novel behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press. Gottlieb, G. and Halpern, C. T. (2002). ‘A relational view of causality in normal and abnormal development.’ Development and Psychopathology, 14, 421–435. Gottlieb, G., Wahlstein, D. and Lickliter, R. (1998). ‘The Significance of Biology for Human Development: a developmental psychobiological systems view.’ In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Volume 1: Theoretical Models of Human Development (Fifth ed., pp. 233–273). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Gough, P. B. and Tunmer, W. E. (1986). ‘Decoding, reading, and reading disability.’ Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. Gough, P. B. and Wren, S. (1999). ‘Constructing meaning: the role of decoding.’ In J. Oakhill & R. Beard (Eds.), Reading Development and the Teaching of Reading: a psychological perspective (pp. 59–78). Oxford: Blackwell. Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C. and Perin, D. (1997). ‘Are word-reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level?’ Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 262–275.
- Page 52 and 53: 52 Research Report the ‘normal’
- Page 54 and 55: 54 Research Report overcome by skil
- Page 56 and 57: 56 Research Report Separate concurr
- Page 58 and 59: 58 Research Report Naming-speed def
- Page 60 and 61: 60 Research Report comprehension. O
- Page 62 and 63: 62 Research Report While the DDAT e
- Page 64 and 65: 64 Research Report deficit) are uni
- Page 66 and 67: 66 Research Report & Nicolson, 1991
- Page 68 and 69: 68 Research Report By stressing the
- Page 70 and 71: 70 Research Report The self-organis
- Page 72 and 73: 72 Research Report Part four Toward
- Page 74 and 75: 74 Research Report is likely to pro
- Page 76 and 77: 76 Research Report method suited th
- Page 78 and 79: 78 Research Report procedural knowl
- Page 80 and 81: 80 Research Report devising. There
- Page 82 and 83: 82 Research Report dyslexic speaker
- Page 84 and 85: 84 Research Report severely dyslexi
- Page 86 and 87: 86 Research Report assistive techno
- Page 88 and 89: 88 Research Report We end with answ
- Page 90 and 91: 90 Research Report American Psychia
- Page 92 and 93: 92 Research Report Bishop, D. V. M.
- Page 94 and 95: 94 Research Report Caplan, D. and W
- Page 96 and 97: 96 Research Report Coles, G. (2000)
- Page 98 and 99: 98 Research Report Ehri, L. C., Nun
- Page 100 and 101: 100 Research Report Fischer, K. W.
- Page 104 and 105: 104 Research Report Griffiths, Y. M
- Page 106 and 107: 106 Research Report HM Prison Servi
- Page 108 and 109: 108 Research Report Klein, C. (1998
- Page 110 and 111: 110 Research Report Lovett, M. W.,
- Page 112 and 113: 112 Research Report McCrory, E. (20
- Page 114 and 115: 114 Research Report Morris, R. D.,
- Page 116 and 117: 116 Research Report Oakland, T., Bl
- Page 118 and 119: 118 Research Report Purcell-Gates,
- Page 120 and 121: 120 Research Report Richardson, A.
- Page 122 and 123: 122 Research Report Seidenberg, M.
- Page 124 and 125: 124 Research Report Snowling, M. J.
- Page 126 and 127: 126 Research Report Stein, J. F. (1
- Page 128 and 129: 128 Research Report Torgesen, J. K.
- Page 130 and 131: 130 Research Report Wadsworth, S. J
- Page 132 and 133: 132 Research Report Yule, W. and Ru
- Page 134 and 135: 134 Research Report This definition
- Page 136 and 137: 136 Research Report Note 3 ‘We be
- Page 138 and 139: 138 Research Report Note 2 The comm
- Page 140 and 141: 140 Research Report mastery of read
- Page 142 and 143: 142 Research Report read. These are
- Page 144 and 145: 144 Research Report should be descr
- Page 146 and 147: 146 Research Report Note ‘No reas
- Page 148 and 149: 148 Research Report Appendix 3 Some
- Page 150 and 151: 150 Research Report Study Construct
Developmental dyslexia in adults: a research review 103<br />
Gliner, J. A. and Morgan, G. A. (2000). Research Methods in Applied Settings: an integrated<br />
approach to design and analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />
Goodman, K. S. (1970). ‘Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game.’ In H. Singer & R. B.<br />
Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 259–271). Newark, DE:<br />
International Reading Association.<br />
Goodman, K. S. (Ed.). (1978). The Psycholinguistic Nature of the Reading Process. Detroit, MI:<br />
Wayne State University Press.<br />
Goswami, U. and Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological Skills and Learning to Read. Hove:<br />
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />
Goswami, U., Porpodas, C. and Wheelwright, S. (1997). ‘Children’s orthographic<br />
representations in English and Greek.’ European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(3),<br />
273–292.<br />
Goswami, U., Thomson, J., Richardson, U., Stainthorp, R., Hughes, D., Rosen, S. and Scott, S.<br />
K. (2002). ‘Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: a new hypothesis.’<br />
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(16),<br />
10911–10916.<br />
Gottesman, R. L., Bennett, R. E., Nathan, R. G. and Kelly, M. S. (1996). ‘Inner-city adults with<br />
severe reading difficulties: a closer look.’ Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(6), 589–597.<br />
Gottfredson, D. C. (20<strong>01</strong>). Schools and Delinquency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Gottlieb, G. (1992). Individual Development and Evolution: the genesis of novel behaviour.<br />
New York: Oxford University Press.<br />
Gottlieb, G. and Halpern, C. T. (2002). ‘A relational view of causality in normal and abnormal<br />
development.’ Development and Psychopathology, 14, 421–435.<br />
Gottlieb, G., Wahlstein, D. and Lickliter, R. (1998). ‘The Significance of Biology for Human<br />
Development: a developmental psychobiological systems view.’ In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner<br />
(Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Volume 1: Theoretical Models of Human Development<br />
(Fifth ed., pp. 233–273). New York: John Wiley & Sons.<br />
Gough, P. B. and Tunmer, W. E. (1986). ‘Decoding, reading, and reading disability.’ Remedial<br />
and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.<br />
Gough, P. B. and Wren, S. (1999). ‘Constructing meaning: the role of decoding.’ In J. Oakhill &<br />
R. Beard (Eds.), Reading Development and the Teaching of Reading: a psychological<br />
perspective (pp. 59–78). Oxford: Blackwell.<br />
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C. and Perin, D. (1997). ‘Are word-reading processes the same or<br />
different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level?’ Journal<br />
of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 262–275.
Change language