Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

19.10.2014 Views

Chapter 11 Extended Service Contracts Dealerships frequently offer extended service contracts to their customers in connection with the sale of a vehicle. Extended service contracts provide for repairs to covered vehicle components during a designated term. The dealership often sells more than one type or brand of service contract and may be either the "principal" / "obligor" or an "agent." If the dealer is an agent of the administrator, insurer, or other party, the contract will contain language that indicates that the contract is between the vehicle purchaser and the other party, not the dealership. The contract administrator may also be named in the contract. If the dealer is the principal, the contract will contain language indicating that the contract is between the dealer and the vehicle purchaser. The contract may also contain language indicating the administrator and the party that insures that dealer’s interest. In addition to the vehicle service contract, other documents are important to the extended service contract program. Other documents include an administrator agreement and an insurance policy. Regardless of whether the dealer acts as an agent or the extended service contract is a dealer obligor plan, the administrator generally provides the vehicle service contract documents. All contracts related to the service contract plan must be examined too determine whether a dealership is an agent or principal. Proper tax treatment of extended service contracts depends on an accurate determination of who is obligated under the contract. Agent versus Principal/Obligor A dealer can market aftersale products as either an agent or as a principal. Dealers sometimes attempt to structure these transactions so they will be classified as agents due to the favorable tax treatment. What an agent or principal/obligor is in the context of the sale of extended service contracts can be loosely defined as follows: 1. Agent An agent is one who sells the products of a third party insurer without assuming the legal obligations or insurance risk of the product sold. The agent receives a fee for the sale and necessary administrative services rendered. The activities of an agent are not strictly limited to sales of insurance. In the past, some dealerships were selling factory extended "warranties" as agents for a product that was not then considered by the parties to be an "insurance" product. 11-1

2. Principal/Obligor A principal is a party to the contract who assumes the risk contemplated in the contract, is directly responsible for any ensuing liabilities that may arise and derives compensation from the profit built into the product sold. The principal in the automobile context will generally insure the obligations undertaken in these contracts with a third party insurer, but remains the primary obligor to the consumer. As a principal/obligor, dealers should include in income the full amount received from the consumer for the mechanical breakdown contract. The amount remitted for the insurance premium should then be amortized over the term of the contract. Dealer "Agent" Extended Service Contracts If the extended service contract is between the vehicle purchaser and an administrator, insurance company or other party, the dealership acts as an agent and earns a commission. Generally, the dealership determines the selling price of the extended service contract and forwards a portion to the administrator based on a "cost schedule." The commission income must be accrued when the contract is sold. The commission amount is the difference between the extended service contract selling price and the amount the dealer forwards to the administrator, insurance company, or other party. Dealer "Obligor" Extended Service Contract When the extended service contract is between the vehicle purchaser and the dealership, the dealership is the "obligor" or "principal" on the contract. When a dealership acts as obligor or principal, it may purchase an insurance policy that insures its liability under the service contract. Thus, there are two transactions: one between the dealer and the customer, and the second between the dealer and an insurance company. Dealerships that sell dealer obligor contracts and purchase insurance to cover their risks often report the income in a manner similar to a dealer agent contract, i.e. report only the commission income. To properly account for a dealer obligor contract, the dealership must include in income the entire sales price of the service contract. Generally, taxpayers that determine their taxable income using the accrual method of accounting must include advance payments in income when received. The Supreme Court applied this rule in Automobile Club v. Commissioner, 353 U.S. 180 (1957) to membership dues collected 1 year in advance. The rule was also applied to service contracts in Streight Radio and Television, Inc. v. Commissioner, 280 F.2d 883 (7th Cir. 1960) where the taxpayer had unrestricted use of the funds. Rev. Proc. 71-21, 71-2 C.B. Page 549 provides for an election to defer advance payments for services where the services are to be performed by the end of the next tax year. 11-2

2. Principal/Obligor<br />

A principal is a party to the contract who assumes the risk contemplated in the contract, is<br />

directly responsible for any ensuing liabilities that may arise and derives compensation from<br />

the profit built into the product sold. The principal in the automobile context will generally<br />

insure the obligations undertaken in these contracts with a third party insurer, but remains the<br />

primary obligor to the consumer.<br />

As a principal/obligor, dealers should include in income the full amount received from the<br />

consumer for the mechanical breakdown contract. The amount remitted for the insurance<br />

premium should then be amortized over the term of the contract.<br />

Dealer "Agent" Extended Service Contracts<br />

If the extended service contract is between the vehicle purchaser and an administrator,<br />

insurance company or other party, the dealership acts as an agent and earns a commission.<br />

Generally, the dealership determines the selling price of the extended service contract and<br />

forwards a portion to the administrator based on a "cost schedule." The commission income<br />

must be accrued when the contract is sold. The commission amount is the difference<br />

between the extended service contract selling price and the amount the dealer forwards to the<br />

administrator, insurance company, or other party.<br />

Dealer "Obligor" Extended Service Contract<br />

When the extended service contract is between the vehicle purchaser and the dealership, the<br />

dealership is the "obligor" or "principal" on the contract. When a dealership acts as obligor<br />

or principal, it may purchase an insurance policy that insures its liability under the service<br />

contract. Thus, there are two transactions: one between the dealer and the customer, and the<br />

second between the dealer and an insurance company.<br />

<strong>Dealerships</strong> that sell dealer obligor contracts and purchase insurance to cover their risks often<br />

report the income in a manner similar to a dealer agent contract, i.e. report only the<br />

commission income. To properly account for a dealer obligor contract, the dealership must<br />

include in income the entire sales price of the service contract.<br />

Generally, taxpayers that determine their taxable income using the accrual method of<br />

accounting must include advance payments in income when received. The Supreme Court<br />

applied this rule in <strong>Auto</strong>mobile Club v. Commissioner, 353 U.S. 180 (1957) to membership<br />

dues collected 1 year in advance. The rule was also applied to service contracts in Streight<br />

Radio and Television, Inc. v. Commissioner, 280 F.2d 883 (7th Cir. 1960) where the<br />

taxpayer had unrestricted use of the funds.<br />

Rev. Proc. 71-21, 71-2 C.B. Page 549 provides for an election to defer advance payments for<br />

services where the services are to be performed by the end of the next tax year.<br />

11-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!