Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

19.10.2014 Views

To compute the LIFO index, both the latest acquisition and earliest acquisition methods require comparison of each vehicle in the current year’s ending inventory to a similarly equipped vehicle in the prior year. The difference between the two methods lies in which purchase cost is used in the computation. Dealers that elect to use the latest acquisition method must determine the last purchase (latest acquisition), during the current year, of each vehicle in ending inventory. (For latest acquisition, generally the vehicle on hand at the end of the year is the latest acquisition.) The cost of the latest acquisition of the vehicle must be compared to the cost of the latest purchase in the prior year of a similarly equipped vehicle. Dealers that elect to use the earliest acquisition method must determine the first purchase (earliest acquisition), during the current year, of each vehicle in ending inventory. The earliest acquisition must be determined for a vehicle similarly equipped to the vehicle in ending inventory. The cost of the first purchase of the vehicle must then be compared to the cost of the first purchase of a similarly equipped vehicle in the prior year. For example: the dealer has in ending inventory a fully loaded Dodge Intrepid. Review of purchase invoices indicates that the dealer first purchased a similarly equipped Intrepid in May of the current year. The cost of the May purchase is the current year cost for purposes of computing the LIFO index. The dealer must then analyze vehicle purchases for the prior tax year and determine the first purchase of a similarly equipped Dodge Intrepid. The cost of the first purchase in the prior year is the prior year cost for the purpose of the LIFO computation. Regardless of which method is elected, if the vehicle is determined to be a new item for purposes of the LIFO computation, the prior year cost is the same as the current year cost, i.e. 1.00 index. (Current year cost is determined as noted above.) From these invoices, the indices will be created. The agent needs to determine the manufacturer, model year and model type of the various distinct vehicles the dealership has in ending inventory, separated into two pools, cars and trucks. This is necessary to insure the same vehicles are being "compared" during the applicable measuring periods. To illustrate this concept consider the following: The current year and year of examination is 9312. The first year of the dealership LIFO election was for the year ending December 31, 1991. The Form 970 indicates this taxpayer has elected to use the Link Chain, Latest Acquisitions Method to value the inventory. Review of the general ledger indicates the 9112 dealership ending inventory has a dollar value of $224,000. This dollar value was represented by the following vehicles: Model Year 1992 - December 31, 1991 Extended Model Quantity Cost Cost Car A 1 $22,000 $ 22,000 Car B 2 23,000 46,000 Car C 6 26,000 156,000 8-20

Base Year Cost 9112 $224,000 You have obtained the necessary general ledger entries and invoices and have determined the following apply to 9212 and 9312 regarding this election: Model Year 1993 - December 31, 1992 Extended Model Quantity Cost Cost Car A 5 $23,000 $115,000 Car B 6 24,000 144,000 Car C 9 27,000 243,000 Current Year Cost 9212 $502,000 Model Year 1994 - December 31, 1993 Extended Model Quantity Cost Cost Car A 6 $24,000 $144,000 Car B 7 25,000 175,000 Car C 10 28,000 280,000 Current Year Cost 9312 $599,000 From this information the indices for each of the 3 years of this election can be computed as follows: The 1991 LIFO Index is 1.000. This is the Base Year of the election. There are no prior items in the inventory where comparison can be made and inflation (or deflation) is assigned. 8-21

To compute the LIFO index, both the latest acquisition and earliest acquisition methods require<br />

comparison of each vehicle in the current year’s ending inventory to a similarly equipped vehicle in<br />

the prior year. The difference between the two methods lies in which purchase cost is used in the<br />

computation.<br />

Dealers that elect to use the latest acquisition method must determine the last purchase (latest<br />

acquisition), during the current year, of each vehicle in ending inventory. (For latest acquisition,<br />

generally the vehicle on hand at the end of the year is the latest acquisition.) The cost of the latest<br />

acquisition of the vehicle must be compared to the cost of the latest purchase in the prior year of a<br />

similarly equipped vehicle.<br />

Dealers that elect to use the earliest acquisition method must determine the first purchase (earliest<br />

acquisition), during the current year, of each vehicle in ending inventory. The earliest acquisition<br />

must be determined for a vehicle similarly equipped to the vehicle in ending inventory. The cost<br />

of the first purchase of the vehicle must then be compared to the cost of the first purchase of a<br />

similarly equipped vehicle in the prior year.<br />

For example: the dealer has in ending inventory a fully loaded Dodge Intrepid. Review of<br />

purchase invoices indicates that the dealer first purchased a similarly equipped Intrepid in May of<br />

the current year. The cost of the May purchase is the current year cost for purposes of computing<br />

the LIFO index. The dealer must then analyze vehicle purchases for the prior tax year and<br />

determine the first purchase of a similarly equipped Dodge Intrepid. The cost of the first purchase<br />

in the prior year is the prior year cost for the purpose of the LIFO computation.<br />

Regardless of which method is elected, if the vehicle is determined to be a new item for purposes<br />

of the LIFO computation, the prior year cost is the same as the current year cost, i.e. 1.00 index.<br />

(Current year cost is determined as noted above.)<br />

From these invoices, the indices will be created. The agent needs to determine the manufacturer,<br />

model year and model type of the various distinct vehicles the dealership has in ending inventory,<br />

separated into two pools, cars and trucks. This is necessary to insure the same vehicles are being<br />

"compared" during the applicable measuring periods. To illustrate this concept consider the<br />

following:<br />

The current year and year of examination is 9312. The first year of the dealership LIFO election<br />

was for the year ending December 31, 1991. The Form 970 indicates this taxpayer has elected to<br />

use the Link Chain, Latest Acquisitions Method to value the inventory. Review of the general<br />

ledger indicates the 9112 dealership ending inventory has a dollar value of $224,000. This dollar<br />

value was represented by the following vehicles:<br />

Model Year 1992 - December 31, 1991<br />

Extended<br />

Model Quantity Cost Cost<br />

Car A 1 $22,000 $ 22,000<br />

Car B 2 23,000 46,000<br />

Car C 6 26,000 156,000<br />

8-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!