Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
To compute the LIFO index, both the latest acquisition and earliest acquisition methods require comparison of each vehicle in the current year’s ending inventory to a similarly equipped vehicle in the prior year. The difference between the two methods lies in which purchase cost is used in the computation. Dealers that elect to use the latest acquisition method must determine the last purchase (latest acquisition), during the current year, of each vehicle in ending inventory. (For latest acquisition, generally the vehicle on hand at the end of the year is the latest acquisition.) The cost of the latest acquisition of the vehicle must be compared to the cost of the latest purchase in the prior year of a similarly equipped vehicle. Dealers that elect to use the earliest acquisition method must determine the first purchase (earliest acquisition), during the current year, of each vehicle in ending inventory. The earliest acquisition must be determined for a vehicle similarly equipped to the vehicle in ending inventory. The cost of the first purchase of the vehicle must then be compared to the cost of the first purchase of a similarly equipped vehicle in the prior year. For example: the dealer has in ending inventory a fully loaded Dodge Intrepid. Review of purchase invoices indicates that the dealer first purchased a similarly equipped Intrepid in May of the current year. The cost of the May purchase is the current year cost for purposes of computing the LIFO index. The dealer must then analyze vehicle purchases for the prior tax year and determine the first purchase of a similarly equipped Dodge Intrepid. The cost of the first purchase in the prior year is the prior year cost for the purpose of the LIFO computation. Regardless of which method is elected, if the vehicle is determined to be a new item for purposes of the LIFO computation, the prior year cost is the same as the current year cost, i.e. 1.00 index. (Current year cost is determined as noted above.) From these invoices, the indices will be created. The agent needs to determine the manufacturer, model year and model type of the various distinct vehicles the dealership has in ending inventory, separated into two pools, cars and trucks. This is necessary to insure the same vehicles are being "compared" during the applicable measuring periods. To illustrate this concept consider the following: The current year and year of examination is 9312. The first year of the dealership LIFO election was for the year ending December 31, 1991. The Form 970 indicates this taxpayer has elected to use the Link Chain, Latest Acquisitions Method to value the inventory. Review of the general ledger indicates the 9112 dealership ending inventory has a dollar value of $224,000. This dollar value was represented by the following vehicles: Model Year 1992 - December 31, 1991 Extended Model Quantity Cost Cost Car A 1 $22,000 $ 22,000 Car B 2 23,000 46,000 Car C 6 26,000 156,000 8-20
Base Year Cost 9112 $224,000 You have obtained the necessary general ledger entries and invoices and have determined the following apply to 9212 and 9312 regarding this election: Model Year 1993 - December 31, 1992 Extended Model Quantity Cost Cost Car A 5 $23,000 $115,000 Car B 6 24,000 144,000 Car C 9 27,000 243,000 Current Year Cost 9212 $502,000 Model Year 1994 - December 31, 1993 Extended Model Quantity Cost Cost Car A 6 $24,000 $144,000 Car B 7 25,000 175,000 Car C 10 28,000 280,000 Current Year Cost 9312 $599,000 From this information the indices for each of the 3 years of this election can be computed as follows: The 1991 LIFO Index is 1.000. This is the Base Year of the election. There are no prior items in the inventory where comparison can be made and inflation (or deflation) is assigned. 8-21
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2 Getting Started The key t
- Page 23 and 24: entities and their purpose and rela
- Page 25 and 26: It is recommended that officer comp
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 3 Standard Audit Index Numb
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 4 Books and Records Charact
- Page 31 and 32: c. Reconcile (2): Beginning Trial B
- Page 33 and 34: 3 Repair Order Sales 4 Parts Sales
- Page 35 and 36: Conclusion Although intimidating at
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 5 Balance Sheet Why do we c
- Page 39 and 40: When an adjustment to a balance she
- Page 41 and 42: Part 2 Inventory Chapter 6 General
- Page 43 and 44: . Purchasing c. Handling, processin
- Page 45 and 46: dealerships use specific identifica
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 7 LIFO Background Overview
- Page 49 and 50: A Short History of LIFO Application
- Page 51 and 52: improper inflation through unwarran
- Page 53 and 54: Introduction Chapter 8 Computing LI
- Page 55 and 56: The double extension index formula
- Page 57 and 58: as one item, there would probably n
- Page 59 and 60: (existing items) and non-comparable
- Page 61 and 62: The current-year costs that can be
- Page 63 and 64: Assuming the dealership elects LIFO
- Page 65 and 66: matching of revenues and costs. Thu
- Page 67 and 68: section 1.471-9. Both of these regu
- Page 69 and 70: providing to the credit subsidiary
- Page 71: Under elections made prior to Decem
- Page 75 and 76: BLS Sanity Check A simpler means to
- Page 77 and 78: CYC = Current Year Cost. This is th
- Page 79 and 80: Computation of 1993 Increment and R
- Page 81 and 82: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 83 and 84: Specific Identification Increment M
- Page 85 and 86: which may be identified by a unique
- Page 87 and 88: Step # 3 For each item category, ad
- Page 89 and 90: Step # 10 Compute the total cost of
- Page 91 and 92: 1991 Inventory Value at Current Yea
- Page 93 and 94: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 95 and 96: Dealers may offer the contracts as
- Page 97 and 98: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 99 and 100: 2. Principal/Obligor A principal is
- Page 101 and 102: Rev. Proc. 97-38 provided for an al
- Page 103 and 104: Contract Construction Generally, a
- Page 105 and 106: Rev. Proc. 97-27 provides the admin
- Page 107 and 108: The Court ruled that when the deale
- Page 109 and 110: Considerations for Forming a Produc
- Page 111 and 112: The Reinsurance Transaction To illu
- Page 113 and 114: insurance contract reinsured throug
- Page 115 and 116: (1979). The Service’s position is
- Page 117 and 118: While not all captive situations in
- Page 119 and 120: 3. IRC section 845 tax avoidance 4.
- Page 121 and 122: section, seemingly compliant arrang
To compute the LIFO index, both the latest acquisition and earliest acquisition methods require<br />
comparison of each vehicle in the current year’s ending inventory to a similarly equipped vehicle in<br />
the prior year. The difference between the two methods lies in which purchase cost is used in the<br />
computation.<br />
Dealers that elect to use the latest acquisition method must determine the last purchase (latest<br />
acquisition), during the current year, of each vehicle in ending inventory. (For latest acquisition,<br />
generally the vehicle on hand at the end of the year is the latest acquisition.) The cost of the latest<br />
acquisition of the vehicle must be compared to the cost of the latest purchase in the prior year of a<br />
similarly equipped vehicle.<br />
Dealers that elect to use the earliest acquisition method must determine the first purchase (earliest<br />
acquisition), during the current year, of each vehicle in ending inventory. The earliest acquisition<br />
must be determined for a vehicle similarly equipped to the vehicle in ending inventory. The cost<br />
of the first purchase of the vehicle must then be compared to the cost of the first purchase of a<br />
similarly equipped vehicle in the prior year.<br />
For example: the dealer has in ending inventory a fully loaded Dodge Intrepid. Review of<br />
purchase invoices indicates that the dealer first purchased a similarly equipped Intrepid in May of<br />
the current year. The cost of the May purchase is the current year cost for purposes of computing<br />
the LIFO index. The dealer must then analyze vehicle purchases for the prior tax year and<br />
determine the first purchase of a similarly equipped Dodge Intrepid. The cost of the first purchase<br />
in the prior year is the prior year cost for the purpose of the LIFO computation.<br />
Regardless of which method is elected, if the vehicle is determined to be a new item for purposes<br />
of the LIFO computation, the prior year cost is the same as the current year cost, i.e. 1.00 index.<br />
(Current year cost is determined as noted above.)<br />
From these invoices, the indices will be created. The agent needs to determine the manufacturer,<br />
model year and model type of the various distinct vehicles the dealership has in ending inventory,<br />
separated into two pools, cars and trucks. This is necessary to insure the same vehicles are being<br />
"compared" during the applicable measuring periods. To illustrate this concept consider the<br />
following:<br />
The current year and year of examination is 9312. The first year of the dealership LIFO election<br />
was for the year ending December 31, 1991. The Form 970 indicates this taxpayer has elected to<br />
use the Link Chain, Latest Acquisitions Method to value the inventory. Review of the general<br />
ledger indicates the 9112 dealership ending inventory has a dollar value of $224,000. This dollar<br />
value was represented by the following vehicles:<br />
Model Year 1992 - December 31, 1991<br />
Extended<br />
Model Quantity Cost Cost<br />
Car A 1 $22,000 $ 22,000<br />
Car B 2 23,000 46,000<br />
Car C 6 26,000 156,000<br />
8-20