Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
improper inflation through unwarranted "reconstructions" of supposed like kind vehicles. In some<br />
cases, there was no vehicle that previously existed which could be compared to a new vehicle.<br />
Recall the Suzuki Samurai as an example where no vehicle which preceded it could be compared.<br />
Such improper comparisons known as "reconstructions" would produce unwarranted higher<br />
indices, thus a higher unwarranted deferral in the reserve and an unwarranted increased annual<br />
cost of goods sold deduction.<br />
There were other problems. The one concerned a lack of adequate record retention. Some<br />
dealers were not maintaining records, as mandated by the regulations, which would enable the<br />
Service to determine the level of dealership compliance.<br />
An additional problem concerning the computation of option indices was encountered. The Link<br />
Chain Method envisions accounting for each item in ending inventory. Once the items in ending<br />
inventory are determined, each item needs to be priced and inflation assigned to it. LIFO<br />
contemplates two methods of costing or pricing items in ending inventory. One of these pricing<br />
methods would be elected on the dealers Form 970. Pricing entails going back 1 year under the<br />
Latest Acquisitions Method or 2 years under the Earliest Acquisitions Method.<br />
Application of these methods of costing encompasses the following analysis. If there were 300<br />
vehicles in ending inventory for a particular year, those invoices needed to be secured. It is not<br />
uncommon for a midsized dealership to have this volume in ending inventory. Then the invoices<br />
were scheduled and a determination was made they represent the items in ending inventory. Once<br />
this was done, each vehicle was listed showing the current year price and the price for this same<br />
item in the preceding year or years, if it was in existence. Doing this with 300 vehicles was<br />
cumbersome, but workable. Such was not the case concerning options.<br />
Some domestic vehicles listed almost everything as an option. It was not uncommon for the<br />
invoices associated with these domestic vehicles to have 10, or more, options per vehicle. Each<br />
option needed specific pricing for the necessary measuring years, just as the vehicles did. Foreign<br />
vehicles were better, but not much. Invoices utilized for a particular manufacturer at this time<br />
showed about 5 options per vehicle.<br />
The domestic vehicles and associated options for the ending inventory cited above would require<br />
individualized accounting and pricing for approximately 3,300 items for each year of the LIFO<br />
election using the Latest Acquisitions Method. The number of accounting and pricing<br />
requirements would double if the Earliest Acquisitions Method was used. The foreign vehicles<br />
cited above would require pricing for approximately 1,800 items under the Latest Acquisitions<br />
Method and 3,600 under the Earliest Acquisitions Method for each year of the LIFO election.<br />
Some of the cases being worked at this time had 10 years or more of LIFO indices that required<br />
individualized accounting and pricing of each item in those ending inventories.<br />
Statistical sampling was contemplated, but deemed not appropriate for two reasons. First, the<br />
pure Link Chain Method contemplated actual pricing of each item in ending inventory. Second,<br />
the dealers would not allow the Service to perform a statistical sample, although many used one<br />
themselves. They wanted the Service to price every item if their indices were going to be<br />
challenged knowing this was very difficult, if not impractical.<br />
7-5