Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
and accessories with profit center costing allocations. They often have related used car and truck ventures usually resulting from trade-ins for new vehicles sold. These trade-ins may be accounted for under the LCM method discussed previously. Certain items are accounted for under the specific identification method due to rarity, such as repossessions. It is recommended that all inventories be scrutinized as they have a material impact on taxable income and could be used incorrectly. Example 3 Jumbo Auto is a large new auto dealership (Form 1120S) that maintains a separate lot down the street for used cars and trucks. These vehicles are acquired through trade in by customers purchasing their new vehicles. The lot does not always have an attendant and the dealership typically sells about 30 percent of the used cars to walk-ons and the other 70 percent to auto auction companies. The books revealed a LCM write down in the year under audit of $100,000 entered as an Adjusting Journal Entry at yearend. Supporting information was requested which showed mark-downs conforming to "low" blue book. Car jackets were requested to sample the vehicles and it was noted that most of them were sold in early January to the auctioneer. The rest of the jackets were requested. Of the 50 vehicles in inventory, 40 were written down and 30 were sold in January of the subsequent year. The taxpayer stated that mark-downs were done in accordance with Treas. Reg. section 1.471-2(c). Although the mark-down was computed at the end of the taxable year when the vehicles were in inventory, lower of cost or market from a valuation guide was used for the computation when better information was available. Namely, the sales price. Given that the vehicles were sold in an arms-length transaction, and that the sale occurred so close in proximity to the end of the taxpayer’s taxable year when "valuation" occurred, the sales price represents market, California Canneries Co., 2 B.T.A. 109 (1925), acq., for the prior period given that the industry did not incur a major decline in the short period, Estate of Charles Stearns v. Commissioner, 8 B.T.A. 884 (1927); Abbeville Cotton Mills v. Commissioner, 10 B.T.A. 646, (1928) acq; Willard Mfg Co. v. Kennedy, (1940, CA2) 109 F.2d 83, cert. denied, (1940, S Ct) 311 U.S. 660 (1940). The LCM adjustment should be recalculated using the sales price in lieu of the "low" blue book amount for the vehicles sold in January. The various methods of inventory valuation and the authority for utilizing them are: 1. First-in, First-out (FIFO), Treas. Reg. section 1.471-2(d)(2) 2. Lower of Cost or Market (LCM), Treas. Reg. section 1.471-2(c) 3. Specific Identification, Treas. Reg. section 1.471-3 4. Last-in, First-out (LIFO), Treas. Reg. section 1.472 FIFO is only advantageous in a deflationary economy, and historically the United States economy has exhibited inflationary tendencies. LCM on the other hand, offers an attractive method for handling used vehicles since their value at the end of the year may be less. Most, if not all, 6-4
dealerships use specific identification for the inventory value of new vehicles for book purposes. This is based on the actual flow of goods. FIFO is an assumed flow of goods and is different from specific identification (cost or LCM) or LIFO. They may not use FIFO for vehicle inventory since the vehicles can be identified with specific invoices. Lastly, LIFO, given the inflationary nature of the United States economy, is attractive to auto dealers and is frequently the inventory valuation method of choice. Full consideration of this topic demands a working knowledge of the rules and procedures governing it. 6-5
- Page 1 and 2: Internal Revenue Service Market Seg
- Page 3 and 4: Preface One of the goals envisioned
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents Preface .........
- Page 7 and 8: The Reinsurance Transaction .......
- Page 9 and 10: Part 1 General Focus and Procedure
- Page 11 and 12: 1. Type A Return Information Schedu
- Page 13 and 14: Percentage has gone down. The incre
- Page 15 and 16: the principal shareholders to finan
- Page 17 and 18: Rents $ 500,000 Interest $ 50,000 C
- Page 19 and 20: Conclusion "Financial status" is on
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2 Getting Started The key t
- Page 23 and 24: entities and their purpose and rela
- Page 25 and 26: It is recommended that officer comp
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 3 Standard Audit Index Numb
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 4 Books and Records Charact
- Page 31 and 32: c. Reconcile (2): Beginning Trial B
- Page 33 and 34: 3 Repair Order Sales 4 Parts Sales
- Page 35 and 36: Conclusion Although intimidating at
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 5 Balance Sheet Why do we c
- Page 39 and 40: When an adjustment to a balance she
- Page 41 and 42: Part 2 Inventory Chapter 6 General
- Page 43: . Purchasing c. Handling, processin
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 7 LIFO Background Overview
- Page 49 and 50: A Short History of LIFO Application
- Page 51 and 52: improper inflation through unwarran
- Page 53 and 54: Introduction Chapter 8 Computing LI
- Page 55 and 56: The double extension index formula
- Page 57 and 58: as one item, there would probably n
- Page 59 and 60: (existing items) and non-comparable
- Page 61 and 62: The current-year costs that can be
- Page 63 and 64: Assuming the dealership elects LIFO
- Page 65 and 66: matching of revenues and costs. Thu
- Page 67 and 68: section 1.471-9. Both of these regu
- Page 69 and 70: providing to the credit subsidiary
- Page 71 and 72: Under elections made prior to Decem
- Page 73 and 74: Base Year Cost 9112 $224,000 You ha
- Page 75 and 76: BLS Sanity Check A simpler means to
- Page 77 and 78: CYC = Current Year Cost. This is th
- Page 79 and 80: Computation of 1993 Increment and R
- Page 81 and 82: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 83 and 84: Specific Identification Increment M
- Page 85 and 86: which may be identified by a unique
- Page 87 and 88: Step # 3 For each item category, ad
- Page 89 and 90: Step # 10 Compute the total cost of
- Page 91 and 92: 1991 Inventory Value at Current Yea
- Page 93 and 94: This page intentionally left blank.
and accessories with profit center costing allocations. They often have related used car and truck<br />
ventures usually resulting from trade-ins for new vehicles sold. These trade-ins may be accounted<br />
for under the LCM method discussed previously. Certain items are accounted for under the<br />
specific identification method due to rarity, such as repossessions. It is recommended that all<br />
inventories be scrutinized as they have a material impact on taxable income and could be used<br />
incorrectly.<br />
Example 3<br />
Jumbo <strong>Auto</strong> is a large new auto dealership (Form 1120S) that maintains a separate lot down<br />
the street for used cars and trucks. These vehicles are acquired through trade in by customers<br />
purchasing their new vehicles. The lot does not always have an attendant and the dealership<br />
typically sells about 30 percent of the used cars to walk-ons and the other 70 percent to auto<br />
auction companies. The books revealed a LCM write down in the year under audit of<br />
$100,000 entered as an Adjusting Journal Entry at yearend. Supporting information was<br />
requested which showed mark-downs conforming to "low" blue book. Car jackets were<br />
requested to sample the vehicles and it was noted that most of them were sold in early January<br />
to the auctioneer. The rest of the jackets were requested. Of the 50 vehicles in inventory, 40<br />
were written down and 30 were sold in January of the subsequent year. The taxpayer stated<br />
that mark-downs were done in accordance with Treas. Reg. section 1.471-2(c).<br />
Although the mark-down was computed at the end of the taxable year when the vehicles were<br />
in inventory, lower of cost or market from a valuation guide was used for the computation<br />
when better information was available. Namely, the sales price. Given that the vehicles were<br />
sold in an arms-length transaction, and that the sale occurred so close in proximity to the end<br />
of the taxpayer’s taxable year when "valuation" occurred, the sales price represents market,<br />
California Canneries Co., 2 B.T.A. 109 (1925), acq., for the prior period given that the<br />
industry did not incur a major decline in the short period, Estate of Charles Stearns v.<br />
Commissioner, 8 B.T.A. 884 (1927); Abbeville Cotton Mills v. Commissioner, 10 B.T.A.<br />
646, (1928) acq; Willard Mfg Co. v. Kennedy, (1940, CA2) 109 F.2d 83, cert. denied, (1940,<br />
S Ct) 311 U.S. 660 (1940). The LCM adjustment should be recalculated using the sales price<br />
in lieu of the "low" blue book amount for the vehicles sold in January.<br />
The various methods of inventory valuation and the authority for utilizing them are:<br />
1. First-in, First-out (FIFO), Treas. Reg. section 1.471-2(d)(2)<br />
2. Lower of Cost or Market (LCM), Treas. Reg. section 1.471-2(c)<br />
3. Specific Identification, Treas. Reg. section 1.471-3<br />
4. Last-in, First-out (LIFO), Treas. Reg. section 1.472<br />
FIFO is only advantageous in a deflationary economy, and historically the United States economy<br />
has exhibited inflationary tendencies. LCM on the other hand, offers an attractive method for<br />
handling used vehicles since their value at the end of the year may be less. Most, if not all,<br />
6-4