Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

19.10.2014 Views

losing their franchise rights and the manufacturer audits the dealerships frequently. For this reason, manufacturer’s statements can be utilized to establish confidence in the taxpayer’s books early and quickly in the examination process. The tax return filed by the dealership should be similar to the manufacturer’s statements. For example, gross receipts should tie in to the tax return and any differences scrutinized. Any differences between the manufacturer’s statements and the tax return that are large or unusual should be questioned. The use of different documents to verify return items, given this reliable resource, is inefficient and should be avoided where circumstances warrant. Regarding the initial interview, our objective is to acquire up-front information about the dealership’s normal operations and dealings with all other entities, shareholders and customers. Traditionally, the best way to do this was to require that the shareholder be present at the interview. However, the dealer may not be "available" during the time frame designated by the agent to begin the examination. It is not uncommon for a representative to recommend that the dealer stay visible to discourage compensation related issues, but out of direct access of the agent. Additionally, and to that end, a liaison will typically exist that will "aid" the examiner in securing answers and documents. Regardless of the availability of the principal shareholder, the agent should not delay the start of these examinations due to the unavailability of any party. The agent can begin the examination and interview the designated representative. If the agent feels the questioning is not productive, schedule an interview with the dealer as soon as possible, but continue with the examination. The designated representative can give the agent sufficient information and documents to begin, and in many cases get deep into, the examination. If it becomes apparent the shareholder’s unavailability is not in good faith or the designated representative is attempting to serve as a courier by responding to every question with, "I will get that for you," the agent needs to let them know this is not acceptable. Where appropriate, the agent should take affirmative steps to curtail such activity. The resolution of this matter will be determined on a case by case basis. Requests for information work best when a separate Information Document Request (IDR) is issued for each item requested. This is especially true if many items have been requested. When a specific request is not timely filled, reissue the original request. Some representatives wish to test the examiner early on in the audit process to determine not only the technical aptitude of a particular agent, but also his or her resolve to do the job. The representative will form his or her strategy in dealing with this agent and the audit accordingly. The sample initial interview questions are included in the appendix and may prove to be of benefit for some agents. The most crucial source of information the agent could garner at the onset of the examination regarding financial status concerns related entities. The financial status analysis, as previously discussed, cannot be made without full knowledge of all related entities. This point cannot be stressed enough. The agents’ IDR should ask the dealership to list all related entities. The IDR should go one step further and ask the dealership to prepare a flow chart laying out all related 2-2

entities and their purpose and relationship to the principal shareholder. Often the dealership will respond to this request as asked. Sometimes the dealership will make this particular information gathering difficult. The agent must be persistent and repeatedly ask for this information if they are not satisfied full disclosure has been made. Often the reconciliation will reveal related entities to the agent through intercompany loans or transfers. Relative to related entities, an agent should consider reviewing our IRS internal documentation in the context of related return analysis. Initially, prior and subsequent return information should be secured to determine if the taxpayer is: 1. Reporting losses every year, 2. Conforming to the market place (high profit in a recognized good year). Review the taxpayer’s Forms 941 to see at what level dealership activity responded to the general peaks and surges of the industry. In addition, check filing documentations on the dealer, a process crucial to the beginning of future pertinent questions. A search of IRS files for other businesses using a similar name or address of the taxpayer may also reveal related entities. Concurrent with the request for information regarding related entities, the agent should request photocopies of all related returns for all years of relevance. If a related return cannot be provided for a valid reason, e.g., nonmaterial participation in a limited partnership with a low percentage of ownership, receipt of a Form K-1 may be appropriate. The key is to obtain verifiable information regarding the shareholder’s equity interests in these related entities. When the agent has this information in hand, a determination of whether there is financial status can be made. Dealerships currently may avail themselves of specific revenue procedures. Rev. Proc. 97-36 relates to the election to use the Alternative LIFO Method. Rev. Procs. 92-97 and 97-38 relate to the amortization of related expense and deferral of mechanical breakdown service income. The agent should determine if such elections have been made and request a photocopy of the Form(s) 3115, Application for a Change in Accounting Method, or other statement or form used to make the election. The inner working of these Revenue procedures and their application to a particular dealership may take on significance as the examination proceeds. The effect of these Revenue procedures is addressed later in this Guide. The agent’s familiarity with Package Audit requirements and audit standards relative to these requirements would make a detailed discussion redundant. We, therefore, would like to stress certain points pertinent to auto dealerships. When sending out the initial IDR, the agent should request information sufficient to complete the Package Audit phase of the examination during the first few days at the audit site. As previously 2-3

entities and their purpose and relationship to the principal shareholder.<br />

Often the dealership will respond to this request as asked. Sometimes the dealership will make<br />

this particular information gathering difficult. The agent must be persistent and repeatedly ask for<br />

this information if they are not satisfied full disclosure has been made. Often the reconciliation<br />

will reveal related entities to the agent through intercompany loans or transfers.<br />

Relative to related entities, an agent should consider reviewing our IRS internal documentation in<br />

the context of related return analysis. Initially, prior and subsequent return information should be<br />

secured to determine if the taxpayer is:<br />

1. Reporting losses every year,<br />

2. Conforming to the market place (high profit in a recognized good year).<br />

Review the taxpayer’s Forms 941 to see at what level dealership activity responded to the general<br />

peaks and surges of the industry.<br />

In addition, check filing documentations on the dealer, a process crucial to the beginning of future<br />

pertinent questions. A search of IRS files for other businesses using a similar name or address of<br />

the taxpayer may also reveal related entities.<br />

Concurrent with the request for information regarding related entities, the agent should request<br />

photocopies of all related returns for all years of relevance. If a related return cannot be provided<br />

for a valid reason, e.g., nonmaterial participation in a limited partnership with a low percentage of<br />

ownership, receipt of a Form K-1 may be appropriate. The key is to obtain verifiable information<br />

regarding the shareholder’s equity interests in these related entities.<br />

When the agent has this information in hand, a determination of whether there is financial status<br />

can be made.<br />

<strong>Dealerships</strong> currently may avail themselves of specific revenue procedures. Rev. Proc. 97-36<br />

relates to the election to use the Alternative LIFO Method. Rev. Procs. 92-97 and 97-38 relate to<br />

the amortization of related expense and deferral of mechanical breakdown service income. The<br />

agent should determine if such elections have been made and request a photocopy of the<br />

Form(s) 3115, Application for a Change in Accounting Method, or other statement or form used<br />

to make the election. The inner working of these Revenue procedures and their application to a<br />

particular dealership may take on significance as the examination proceeds. The effect of these<br />

Revenue procedures is addressed later in this <strong>Guide</strong>.<br />

The agent’s familiarity with Package <strong>Audit</strong> requirements and audit standards relative to these<br />

requirements would make a detailed discussion redundant. We, therefore, would like to stress<br />

certain points pertinent to auto dealerships.<br />

When sending out the initial IDR, the agent should request information sufficient to complete the<br />

Package <strong>Audit</strong> phase of the examination during the first few days at the audit site. As previously<br />

2-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!