19.10.2014 Views

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cash 300<br />

Accounts Receivable 300<br />

2. <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>Technique</strong><br />

The agent needs to compare the dealer’s invoice with the purchases Journal and the General<br />

Ledger to determined whether dealer is correctly reporting the "Holdback" amounts. If the<br />

dealer properly books the "Holdback" amount at the time the vehicle is purchased, there<br />

should not be any reference made to the "Holdback," in the sales journal, at the time the<br />

vehicle is sold to the customer.<br />

The Holdback identified as a separately stated charge on the dealer invoice as part of the<br />

dealer cost is for example purpose. The amount may show somewhere on the invoice but as<br />

information for accounting purposes and not as an element of dealer cost.<br />

3. Law<br />

Rev. Rul. 72-326, provides that the dealer cannot include the $300 "Holdback" as an<br />

inventory cost. Thus, the car should be included in inventory at $9,500 and the $300 carried<br />

in a receivable account from the factory/manufacturer. The manufacturer, on the other hand,<br />

is not required to include the "$300 Holdback" in income.<br />

Brooks-Massey Dodge Inc. v. Commissioner 60 T.C. 884 (1973). The amounts of an accrual<br />

basis dealer discount held back by the manufacturer under a plan agreed to by the dealer was<br />

taxable to the dealer in years the amount was credited to the dealership’s account rather than<br />

in years received.<br />

Warranty Advances<br />

Dealers perform work on vehicles, as a result of defective materials or workmanship at the time of<br />

manufacture, for which the dealer is reimbursed by the manufacturer. Because of the time delay<br />

from when the work is completed and the date the manufacturer pays the claim, the manufacturer<br />

issues credit memoranda or advances to the dealerships based on an averaging calculation<br />

(average of warranty claims submitted in a month) thereby reducing the accounts payable of the<br />

dealer for parts purchased from the manufacturer. The purpose of the arrangement is to allow the<br />

dealer a credit against amounts owed to the manufacturer before the warranty bill is processed by<br />

the manufacturer.<br />

The amount of the credit is adjusted at the beginning of each year based on the average of the<br />

previous 12 months warranty claims filed and approved. Since dealers use an accrual method of<br />

accounting, all amounts due it from the manufacturer for warranty work performed through the<br />

end of the taxable year are includable in gross income. Accordingly, the amounts represented by<br />

the credit memorandum issued by the manufacturer, pursuant to the credit arrangement, are not<br />

19-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!