Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
of a deduction (Treas. Reg. section 1.446-1(e)(2)(ii) and Rev. Proc. 91-31, 1991-1 C.B.<br />
566). Rev. Proc. 97-27 provides a definition of "method of accounting." It states: "* * * the<br />
relevant question is generally whether the practice permanently changes the amount of<br />
taxable income * * *." Consistent treatment is established by using an improper method for 2<br />
or more tax years (Rev. Proc. 97-27 and Rev. Rul. 90-38, 1990-1 C.B. 57) and a proper<br />
method for 1 year (Treas. Reg. section 1.446-1(e)(1)).<br />
Under the method of accounting employed by most dealerships, only a "net" amount of the<br />
retail sale price of a mechanical breakdown contract is reported in the taxable year of the sale<br />
of the contract. This "net" represents the amount by which the sales price exceeds the<br />
insurance and administrative expenses. This method results in the exclusion from income, or<br />
early deduction of, expense items that properly should either be amortized over the life of the<br />
mechanical breakdown contract, or be deducted as economic performance occurs.<br />
Requiring the dealer to change from expensing insurance premiums to amortizing them is a<br />
change in accounting method. This change affects the timing of the deduction of a material<br />
item.<br />
A new dealership filing its first return has not established an accounting method where it<br />
erroneously deducted in 1 year the entire premium for a multi-year period.<br />
Under IRC section 481(a), when computing taxable income for any taxable year, "* * * (1) if<br />
such computation is under a method of accounting different from the method under which the<br />
taxpayer’s taxable income for the preceding year was computed then (2) there shall be taken<br />
into account those adjustments which are determined to be necessary solely by reason of the<br />
change in order to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted * * *."<br />
Treas. Reg. section 1.481-1(a)(1), provides that a change in method of accounting to which<br />
IRC section 481 applies includes a change in the over-all method of accounting for gross<br />
income or deductions, or a change in the treatment of a material item.<br />
IRC section 481(b) provides for a limitation on tax where the change in method of<br />
accounting is substantial. This section allows for a computation of tax over 3 years if the<br />
method of accounting changed was used in 2 preceding tax years and the increase to taxable<br />
income for the year of change exceeds $3,000.<br />
When adjustments are made under IRC section 481(a), the statute of limitations is not an<br />
issue. IRC section 481 provides that taxable income for the year of change must be computed<br />
by taking into account all adjustments necessary to prevent items from being duplicated or<br />
omitted. This includes amounts that would otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations.<br />
Graff Chevrolet Company v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., 343 F.2d 568 (5th Cir. 1965).<br />
A second adjustment under IRC section 446(b) accounts for the difference in taxable income<br />
determined under the new method of accounting for the year of change as compared to the<br />
old method.<br />
11-7