19.10.2014 Views

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

Auto Dealerships - Audit Technique Guide - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

When a dealership is the principal on an extended service contract, the sales price of the<br />

service contract constitutes an advance payment and the dealership must include the full sales<br />

price in income when the contract is sold. The exception provided by Rev. Proc. 71-21 does<br />

not apply since the terms of the contracts are 2 years or more, and the services will not be<br />

performed by the end of the taxable year after the year of sale.<br />

The Tax Court specifically addressed this issue in the dealership context in two cases. In<br />

Hinshaw’s, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-327, the Tax Court ruled that all<br />

amounts collected for extended service contracts were includable in income in the year<br />

received.<br />

When dealers pay a premium to insure their liability under the service plan that they sell, the<br />

term of the insurance is the same as the term of the contracts of 2 to 6 years. Insurance<br />

premiums for policies covering more than 1 year must be amortized ratably over the term of<br />

the policy. Taxpayers using the accrual method of accounting must prorate and deduct<br />

ratably over the term of the policy prepaid insurance premiums. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan<br />

Co. v. Commissioner, 8 B.T.A. 566 (1927).<br />

In Hinshaw’s, Inc. above, the Tax Court specifically addressed amortization of insurance<br />

purchased to cover the dealer’s risk under the extended service contract. The Court ruled<br />

that the dealership "* * *entered into contracts with its customers that required [it] to protect<br />

the customers from vehicle service costs for up to 7 years. [The dealership] then purchased<br />

insurance to protect itself from having to pay those costs; instead, the costs would be paid by<br />

an insurance company. Since [the dealership] will benefit from this coverage for more than 1<br />

tax year, petitioner must capitalize the cost of the insurance."<br />

In summary, the dealer obligor extended service contracts and insurance is purchased<br />

When a dealership acts as the obligor on an extended service contract and purchase insurance<br />

to cover its risk, it must include in income the full sales price of an extended service plan at<br />

the time of sale, and is allowed to deduct the insurance premium ratably over the term of the<br />

plan.<br />

Service Warranty Income Method (SWIM)<br />

In general, payments received by an accrual method taxpayer for services to be performed in<br />

the future must be included in gross income in the taxable year of receipt. The Service<br />

recognized that this treatment resulted in a significant and unique cash flow problem for<br />

dealerships that sell extended service contracts to customers in connection with the sale of<br />

motor vehicles and immediately pay a third-party to insure their risks under the contracts.<br />

To remedy this situation, the Service made an administrative decision to permit these<br />

dealerships to adopt or change to a special method of accounting for advance payments that<br />

would alleviate the cash flow problem but would generally conform economically to the tax<br />

treatment of advance payments under current law.<br />

11-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!