Publication 963 (Rev. October 1997) - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

Publication 963 (Rev. October 1997) - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board Publication 963 (Rev. October 1997) - Uncle Fed's Tax*Board

19.10.2014 Views

Determining Worker Status The government entity must meet the following consistency and reasonable basis requirements before the relief provisions of section 530 apply: NOTES A) Consistency Test The government entity must meet both aspects of the consistency test by: 1. filing all required Forms 1099 (reporting consistency), and 2. treating all workers in similar positions the same (substantive consistency). B) Reasonable Basis Test The government entity must satisfy one of the following: 1. prior audit safe haven 2. judicial precedent safe haven 3. industry practice safe haven 4. other reasonable basis Meeting the consistency and reasonable basis tests will give the government entity relief from employment taxes with respect to the workers whose status is in question. Historical Background Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978, as amended, is not part of the IRC. However, some publishers include its text after IRC section 3401(a). It was originally intended as an “interim” relief measure, but was extended indefinitely by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. Section 530 was amended by section 1706 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 1) 698). Section 530(d) denies relief for certain technically skilled workers who provide services under a three party situation. Section 530(e) was added by section 1122 of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996. Section 530(e), which is generally effective after December 31, 1996, contains a number of provisions that affect conditions under which a government entity will be eligible for section 530 relief. These will be addressed in turn. IRS Must Consider Section 530 It is not necessary for the government entity to claim section 530 relief for it to be applicable. IRS personnel must provide the taxpayer a plain language summary of section 530 at the beginning of an examination involving worker classification. Section 530 Limits Guidance Under section 530, the IRS is barred from issuing any regulations or revenue rulings pertaining to worker classification. As a result, the IRS cannot issue new revenue rulings or even modify existing revenue rulings to reflect new developments. Section 530 imposes no prohibition on private letter rulings or technical advice memoranda. Also, there is no prohibition on publishing guidance dealing with section 530 itself. Federal-State Reference Guide (1997 Edition) 3-5

Determining Worker Status NOTES Section 530 Considered First The IRS will consider section 530 (relief provision) as the first step in any case involving worker classification. A government entity will also want to consider this aspect. Additionally, the government entity need not concede or agree to the determination that the workers are employees in order for section 530 relief to be available. Other Tax Consequences For Workers A government entity may be entitled to relief under section 530 but workers may find, through a determination letter or by some other means, that they have been misclassified and are employees. However, section 530 relief does not extend to the worker. It does not convert a worker from the status of employee to the status of independent contractor. Misclassified employees are liable for the employee share of FICA rather than for tax under the Self Employment Tax Contributions Act (SECA). SECTION 530 TESTS A) Consistency Tests 1. Reporting Consistency Filing Information Returns The first requirement a government entity must meet to obtain relief under section 530 is timely filing of all required Forms 1099 with respect to the worker for the period, on a basis consistent with the government entity’s treatment of the worker as not being an employee. This provision applies only “for the period.” Revenue Procedure 85-18, section 3.03(B). That is, if a government entity in a subsequent year files all required returns on a basis consistent with the treatment of the worker as not being an employee, then the government entity may qualify for section 530 relief for the subsequent period. If a government entity is not “required to file,” relief will not be denied on the basis that the return was not filed. Revenue Ruling 81-224, 1981-2 C.B. 197, addresses specific questions about timely filing of Forms 1099. It provides that: ♦ ♦ taxpayers that do not file timely Forms 1099 consistent with their treatment of the worker as an independent contractor, may not obtain relief under the provisions of section 530 for that worker in that year taxpayers that mistakenly, in good faith, file the wrong type of Form 1099 do not lose section 530 eligibility. 2. Substantive Consistency Substantially similar position A substantially similar position exists if the job functions, duties, and responsibilities are substantially similar and the control and supervision of those duties and responsibilities are substantially similar. In addition, section 530(e)(6), added by the Small Business Job Protection Act, states that the determination of whether workers hold substantially similar positions requires consideration of the relationship between the taxpayers and those individuals. This includes, but is not limited to, the degree of supervision and control. It is also apparent that the contractual relationship and the provision of employee benefits are also to be considered. 3-6 Federal-State Reference Guide (1997 Edition)

Determining Worker Status<br />

NOTES<br />

Section 530 Considered First<br />

The IRS will consider section 530 (relief provision) as the first step in any case involving<br />

worker classification. A government entity will also want to consider this aspect. Additionally,<br />

the government entity need not concede or agree to the determination that the workers<br />

are employees in order for section 530 relief to be available.<br />

Other Tax Consequences For Workers<br />

A government entity may be entitled to relief under section 530 but workers may find,<br />

through a determination letter or by some other means, that they have been misclassified and<br />

are employees. However, section 530 relief does not extend to the worker. It does not<br />

convert a worker from the status of employee to the status of independent contractor.<br />

Misclassified employees are liable for the employee share of FICA rather than for tax under<br />

the Self Employment Tax Contributions Act (SECA).<br />

SECTION 530 TESTS<br />

A) Consistency Tests<br />

1. Reporting Consistency<br />

Filing Information Returns<br />

The first requirement a government entity must meet to obtain relief under section 530 is<br />

timely filing of all required Forms 1099 with respect to the worker for the period, on a<br />

basis consistent with the government entity’s treatment of the worker as not being an<br />

employee. This provision applies only “for the period.” <strong>Rev</strong>enue Procedure 85-18,<br />

section 3.03(B). That is, if a government entity in a subsequent year files all required<br />

returns on a basis consistent with the treatment of the worker as not being an employee,<br />

then the government entity may qualify for section 530 relief for the subsequent period.<br />

If a government entity is not “required to file,” relief will not be denied on the basis that<br />

the return was not filed.<br />

<strong>Rev</strong>enue Ruling 81-224, 1981-2 C.B. 197, addresses specific questions about timely filing<br />

of Forms 1099. It provides that:<br />

♦<br />

♦<br />

taxpayers that do not file timely Forms 1099 consistent with their treatment of the<br />

worker as an independent contractor, may not obtain relief under the provisions of<br />

section 530 for that worker in that year<br />

taxpayers that mistakenly, in good faith, file the wrong type of Form 1099 do not lose<br />

section 530 eligibility.<br />

2. Substantive Consistency<br />

Substantially similar position<br />

A substantially similar position exists if the job functions, duties, and responsibilities are<br />

substantially similar and the control and supervision of those duties and responsibilities<br />

are substantially similar. In addition, section 530(e)(6), added by the Small Business Job<br />

Protection Act, states that the determination of whether workers hold substantially similar<br />

positions requires consideration of the relationship between the taxpayers and those<br />

individuals. This includes, but is not limited to, the degree of supervision and control. It<br />

is also apparent that the contractual relationship and the provision of employee benefits<br />

are also to be considered.<br />

3-6 Federal-State Reference Guide (<strong>1997</strong> Edition)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!