17.10.2014 Views

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ref. p. 134] <strong>2.1</strong> <strong>Ultrafast</strong> <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> 117<br />

Loss<br />

<strong>Group</strong> delay<br />

dispersion (GDD)<br />

Continuum<br />

<strong>Group</strong> delay<br />

dispersion (GDD)<br />

Continuum<br />

Gain<br />

Gain<br />

Pulse<br />

Pulse<br />

a<br />

Time t<br />

b<br />

Frequency <br />

Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.17. Soliton mode-locking in (a) time and (b) frequency domain. The continuum pulse spreads in<br />

time due to group velocity dispersion and thus undergoes more loss in <strong>the</strong> relatively slow absorber, which<br />

is saturated by <strong>the</strong> shorter soliton pulse. However, <strong>the</strong> longer continuum pulse has a narrower spectrum<br />

and thus undergoes more gain than <strong>the</strong> spectrally broader soliton pulse.<br />

soliton pulse is formed for all group delay dispersion values as long as <strong>the</strong> continuum loss is<br />

larger than <strong>the</strong> soliton loss [96Kae] or <strong>the</strong> pulses break up in two or more pulses [97Aus]. Thus,<br />

for smaller negative dispersion <strong>the</strong> pulse duration becomes shorter (<strong>2.1</strong>.74) until minimal pulse<br />

duration is reached. With no pulse-break-up, <strong>the</strong> minimal pulse duration is given when <strong>the</strong> loss<br />

for <strong>the</strong> continuum pulse becomes equal to <strong>the</strong> loss of <strong>the</strong> soliton pulse. When <strong>the</strong> soliton pulse is<br />

stable, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> saturated gain is equal to <strong>the</strong> loss:<br />

g = l + l s with l s = D [ (<br />

g<br />

3τ 2 + q E sat,A<br />

0 1 − exp −<br />

E )]<br />

p<br />

, (<strong>2.1</strong>.75)<br />

E p E sat,A<br />

where l is <strong>the</strong> total saturated amplitude loss coefficient per cavity round trip (i.e. output coupler,<br />

residual cavity losses and nonsaturable absorber loss of <strong>the</strong> saturable absorber) and l s <strong>the</strong> additional<br />

loss experienced by <strong>the</strong> soliton as a result of gain filtering (<strong>2.1</strong>.68) and <strong>the</strong> amplitude loss coefficient<br />

for saturation of <strong>the</strong> slow absorber (<strong>2.1</strong>.15). Soliton perturbation <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>the</strong>n determines <strong>the</strong> roundtrip<br />

loss of <strong>the</strong> continuum pulse [96Kae]. The continuum is spread in time because of dispersion<br />

and <strong>the</strong>refore experiences enhanced loss in <strong>the</strong> recovering absorber that has been saturated by <strong>the</strong><br />

much shorter soliton pulse.<br />

We <strong>the</strong>n predict a minimum pulse duration for a soliton pulse [95Kae1, 96Kae]:<br />

( ) 3/4 (<br />

1<br />

τ p,min =1.7627 √ φ −1/8 τA g 3/2 ) 1/4 ( ) 3/4 1 ( τA<br />

) 1/4 g<br />

3/8<br />

s<br />

≈ 0.45<br />

, (<strong>2.1</strong>.76)<br />

6 Ωg q 0 Δ ν g ΔR φ 1/8<br />

s<br />

where φ s is <strong>the</strong> phase shift of <strong>the</strong> soliton per cavity round trip (assuming that <strong>the</strong> dominant SPM<br />

occurs in <strong>the</strong> laser gain medium), Δ ν g <strong>the</strong> FWHM gain bandwidth and ΔR ≈ 2q 0 (<strong>2.1</strong>.6). With<br />

(<strong>2.1</strong>.73) <strong>the</strong>n follows φ s = φ s (z =2L g )=kn 2 L g I 0,L = 1 2 δ LP 0 ,whereδ L is <strong>the</strong> SPM coefficient<br />

(<strong>2.1</strong>.47) and P 0 <strong>the</strong> peak power inside <strong>the</strong> laser cavity. In (<strong>2.1</strong>.76) we assume a fully saturated slow<br />

saturable absorber and a linear approximation for <strong>the</strong> exponential decay of <strong>the</strong> slow saturable absorber.<br />

The analytical solution for soliton mode-locking (<strong>2.1</strong>.76) has been experimentally confirmed<br />

with a Ti:sapphire laser where a Fabry–Perot filter has been inserted to give a well-defined gain<br />

bandwidth [95Jun2]. However, this equation still does not tell us what soliton phase shift would<br />

be ideal. Equation (<strong>2.1</strong>.76) would suggest that very high values are preferred, which actually leads<br />

to instabilities. Also this equation is not taking into account that <strong>the</strong> soliton pulse may break up<br />

into two solitons which occurs more easily if <strong>the</strong> absorber is too strongly saturated. Numerical<br />

simulations can give better estimates for <strong>the</strong>se open questions [01Pas1].<br />

Landolt-Börnstein<br />

New Series VIII/1B1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!