2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group
2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group
2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ref. p. 134] <strong>2.1</strong> <strong>Ultrafast</strong> <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> 107<br />
where we used <strong>the</strong> slowly-varying-envelope approximation (which is applicable for pulse durations<br />
of more than 10 fs in <strong>the</strong> near infrared wavelength regime). Taking into account only <strong>the</strong> first-order<br />
and second-order dispersion terms we <strong>the</strong>n obtain:<br />
[<br />
à (z,ω) ≈ 1 − ik nΔ ′ ωz − i 1 ]<br />
2 k′′ nΔ ω 2 z à (0,ω) . (<strong>2.1</strong>.39)<br />
The linear term in Δ ω determines <strong>the</strong> propagation velocity of <strong>the</strong> pulse envelope (i.e. <strong>the</strong> group<br />
velocity υ g ) and <strong>the</strong> quadratic term in Δ ω determines how <strong>the</strong> pulse envelope gets deformed due to<br />
second-order dispersion. The influence of higher-order dispersion can be considered with more terms<br />
in <strong>the</strong> expansion of k n (ω) (<strong>2.1</strong>.37). However, higher-order dispersion only becomes important for<br />
ultrashort pulse generation with pulse durations below approximately 30 fs depending how much<br />
material is inside <strong>the</strong> cavity. Normally we are only interested in <strong>the</strong> changes of <strong>the</strong> pulse envelope<br />
and <strong>the</strong>refore it is useful to restrict our observation to a reference system that is moving with<br />
<strong>the</strong> pulse envelope. In this reference system we only need to consider second- and higher-order<br />
dispersion. In <strong>the</strong> time domain we <strong>the</strong>n obtain for second-order dispersion:<br />
]<br />
A (z,t) ≈<br />
[1+iD ∂2<br />
∂t 2 A (0,t) , D ≡ 1 2 k′′ nz = 1 d 2 φ<br />
2 d ω 2 , (<strong>2.1</strong>.40)<br />
where D is <strong>the</strong> dispersion parameter which is half of <strong>the</strong> total group delay dispersion per cavity<br />
round trip. Therefore we obtain for <strong>the</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> pulse envelope:<br />
ΔA ≈ iD ∂2<br />
A. (<strong>2.1</strong>.41)<br />
∂t2 <strong>2.1</strong>.6.2.5 Self-phase modulation (SPM)<br />
The Kerr effect introduces a space- and time-dependent refractive index:<br />
n (r, t) =n + n 2 I (r, t) , (<strong>2.1</strong>.42)<br />
where n is <strong>the</strong> linear refractive index, n 2 <strong>the</strong> nonlinear refractive index and I (r, t) <strong>the</strong> intensity<br />
of <strong>the</strong> laser beam, typically a Gaussian beam profile. For laser host materials, n 2 is typically of<br />
<strong>the</strong> order of 10 −16 cm 2 /W and does not change very much for different materials. For example,<br />
for sapphire n 2 =3× 10 −16 cm 2 /W, fused quartz n 2 =2.46 × 10 −16 cm 2 /W, Schott glass LG-760<br />
n 2 =2.9 × 10 −16 cm 2 /W, YAG n 2 =6.2 × 10 −16 cm 2 /W, and YLF n 2 =1.72 × 10 −16 cm 2 /W.<br />
The nonlinear refractive index produces a nonlinear phase shift during pulse propagation:<br />
φ (z,r,t) =−kn(r, t) z = −k [n + n 2 I (r, t)] z = −knz − δ L |A (r, t)| 2 , (<strong>2.1</strong>.43)<br />
where δ L is <strong>the</strong> Self-Phase Modulation coefficient (SPM coefficient):<br />
δ L ≡ kn 2 z/A L , (<strong>2.1</strong>.44)<br />
where A L is <strong>the</strong> laser mode area inside <strong>the</strong> laser medium. Here we assume that <strong>the</strong> dominant SPM<br />
inside <strong>the</strong> laser occurs in <strong>the</strong> gain medium. In this case, z is equal to twice <strong>the</strong> laser material<br />
length. Of course <strong>the</strong> mode area can be also very small in o<strong>the</strong>r materials. In this case, we will<br />
have to add up all <strong>the</strong> SPM contributions inside <strong>the</strong> laser resonator. The laser mode area A L is an<br />
“averaged value” in case <strong>the</strong> mode is changing within <strong>the</strong> gain medium.<br />
The electric field during propagation is changing due to SPM:<br />
E (z,t) =e iφ E (0,t) ∝ e −iδL|A(t)|2 A (0,t)e iω0t−ikn(ω0)z . (<strong>2.1</strong>.45)<br />
For δ L |A| 2 ≪ 1 we obtain:<br />
Landolt-Börnstein<br />
New Series VIII/1B1