2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group
2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group
2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ref. p. 134] <strong>2.1</strong> <strong>Ultrafast</strong> <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> 39<br />
and recover faster than <strong>the</strong> gain, while <strong>the</strong> recovery time of <strong>the</strong> saturable absorber can be much<br />
longer than <strong>the</strong> pulse duration. Dynamic gain saturation means that <strong>the</strong> gain experiences a fast,<br />
pulse-induced saturation that <strong>the</strong>n recovers again between consecutive pulses (Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.5a).<br />
For <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> we cannot apply slow saturable absorber mode-locking as shown in<br />
Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.5a, because no significant dynamic gain saturation is taking place due to <strong>the</strong> small gain<br />
cross-section of <strong>the</strong> laser. The upper <strong>state</strong> lifetime of <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> is typically in <strong>the</strong> μs toms<br />
regime, much longer than <strong>the</strong> pulse repetition period, which is typically in <strong>the</strong> nanosecond regime.<br />
In addition, <strong>the</strong> gain cross-section is 1000 or even more times smaller than for dye <strong>lasers</strong>. We<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore do not observe any significant dynamic gain saturation and <strong>the</strong> gain is only saturated to<br />
a constant level by <strong>the</strong> average intracavity intensity. This is not <strong>the</strong> case for dye, semiconductor<br />
and color-center <strong>lasers</strong> for which Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.5a describes most mode-locking processes. Therefore it<br />
was assumed that without o<strong>the</strong>r pulse-forming mechanisms (such as soliton pulse shaping) a fast<br />
saturable absorber is required for <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong>. Kerr-lens mode-locking is nearly an ideal example<br />
for fast saturable absorber mode-locking. However, SESAM mode-locking results revealed<br />
that even a slow saturable absorber can support significantly shorter pulses even though a net gain<br />
window remains open after <strong>the</strong> short pulse (Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.5c). At first this seems surprising, because<br />
on <strong>the</strong> trailing edge of <strong>the</strong> pulse <strong>the</strong>re is no shaping action of <strong>the</strong> absorber and even worse one<br />
would expect that <strong>the</strong> net gain after <strong>the</strong> pulse would destabilize <strong>the</strong> pulse. However, we have shown<br />
that in <strong>the</strong> picosecond regime without soliton formation, a more strongly saturated slow saturable<br />
absorber can stabilize a shorter pulse because <strong>the</strong> pulse is constantly delayed by <strong>the</strong> absorber and<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore swallows any noise growing behind himself [01Pas1]. This means that even with <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong><br />
<strong>lasers</strong> we can work with relatively slow saturable absorbers that have approximately a recovery<br />
time in <strong>the</strong> range of 10 to 30 times <strong>the</strong> absorber recovery time. In <strong>the</strong> femtosecond regime soliton<br />
formation is actually <strong>the</strong> dominant pulse-forming mechanism and <strong>the</strong> slow saturable absorber<br />
needs only to be fast enough to stabilize this soliton – which is referred to as soliton mode-locking<br />
[95Kae1, 95Jun2, 96Kae].<br />
<strong>2.1</strong>.3 Overview of ultrafast <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong><br />
<strong>2.1</strong>.3.1 Overview for different <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> laser materials<br />
Table <strong>2.1</strong>.1 to Table <strong>2.1</strong>.3 give a full overview of <strong>the</strong> different results that have been achieved using<br />
different <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong>. The long list as shown in Table <strong>2.1</strong>.2 demonstrates how active <strong>the</strong> field<br />
of cw mode-locked <strong>lasers</strong> has been. The shortest pulses in <strong>the</strong> two optical cycle regime are being<br />
generated by <strong>the</strong> Ti:sapphire laser using Kerr-Lens Mode-locking (KLM). O<strong>the</strong>rwise, more recent<br />
results clearly demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> emphasis has shifted towards SESAM mode-locking because<br />
more stable and self-starting mode-locking can be achieved and <strong>the</strong> saturable absorber can be<br />
optimized independently from <strong>the</strong> cavity design. This allowed us to push <strong>the</strong> frontier in terms of<br />
pulse repetition rate and pulse energy by several orders of magnitude. Today, we can obtain a<br />
pulse repetition rate of about 160 GHz as compared to around 1 GHz in 1990. In addition, we have<br />
increased <strong>the</strong> pulse energy from <strong>the</strong> nJ-regime to more than 10 μJ from a passively mode-locked<br />
diode-pumped <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> laser at 10–50 MHz pulse repetition rates during <strong>the</strong> last decade which is<br />
an increase of more than four orders of magnitude. More results are summarized in Table <strong>2.1</strong>.2 and<br />
discussed below in Sect. <strong>2.1</strong>.3.1.1 to Sect. <strong>2.1</strong>.3.1.3. Q-switching results are restricted to microchip<br />
<strong>lasers</strong> because <strong>the</strong> pulse duration scales with <strong>the</strong> photon cavity lifetime. Thus, <strong>the</strong> shorter <strong>the</strong> laser<br />
cavity, <strong>the</strong> shorter <strong>the</strong> pulses that can be generated as discussed in Sect. <strong>2.1</strong>.3.1.4.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> past few years, a novel type of laser has bridged <strong>the</strong> gap between semiconductor <strong>lasers</strong><br />
and <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong>. The Vertical-External-Cavity Surface-Emitting Laser (VECSEL) [99Kuz]<br />
Landolt-Börnstein<br />
New Series VIII/1B1