17.10.2014 Views

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ref. p. 134] <strong>2.1</strong> <strong>Ultrafast</strong> <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> 39<br />

and recover faster than <strong>the</strong> gain, while <strong>the</strong> recovery time of <strong>the</strong> saturable absorber can be much<br />

longer than <strong>the</strong> pulse duration. Dynamic gain saturation means that <strong>the</strong> gain experiences a fast,<br />

pulse-induced saturation that <strong>the</strong>n recovers again between consecutive pulses (Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.5a).<br />

For <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> we cannot apply slow saturable absorber mode-locking as shown in<br />

Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.5a, because no significant dynamic gain saturation is taking place due to <strong>the</strong> small gain<br />

cross-section of <strong>the</strong> laser. The upper <strong>state</strong> lifetime of <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> is typically in <strong>the</strong> μs toms<br />

regime, much longer than <strong>the</strong> pulse repetition period, which is typically in <strong>the</strong> nanosecond regime.<br />

In addition, <strong>the</strong> gain cross-section is 1000 or even more times smaller than for dye <strong>lasers</strong>. We<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore do not observe any significant dynamic gain saturation and <strong>the</strong> gain is only saturated to<br />

a constant level by <strong>the</strong> average intracavity intensity. This is not <strong>the</strong> case for dye, semiconductor<br />

and color-center <strong>lasers</strong> for which Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.5a describes most mode-locking processes. Therefore it<br />

was assumed that without o<strong>the</strong>r pulse-forming mechanisms (such as soliton pulse shaping) a fast<br />

saturable absorber is required for <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong>. Kerr-lens mode-locking is nearly an ideal example<br />

for fast saturable absorber mode-locking. However, SESAM mode-locking results revealed<br />

that even a slow saturable absorber can support significantly shorter pulses even though a net gain<br />

window remains open after <strong>the</strong> short pulse (Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.5c). At first this seems surprising, because<br />

on <strong>the</strong> trailing edge of <strong>the</strong> pulse <strong>the</strong>re is no shaping action of <strong>the</strong> absorber and even worse one<br />

would expect that <strong>the</strong> net gain after <strong>the</strong> pulse would destabilize <strong>the</strong> pulse. However, we have shown<br />

that in <strong>the</strong> picosecond regime without soliton formation, a more strongly saturated slow saturable<br />

absorber can stabilize a shorter pulse because <strong>the</strong> pulse is constantly delayed by <strong>the</strong> absorber and<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore swallows any noise growing behind himself [01Pas1]. This means that even with <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong><br />

<strong>lasers</strong> we can work with relatively slow saturable absorbers that have approximately a recovery<br />

time in <strong>the</strong> range of 10 to 30 times <strong>the</strong> absorber recovery time. In <strong>the</strong> femtosecond regime soliton<br />

formation is actually <strong>the</strong> dominant pulse-forming mechanism and <strong>the</strong> slow saturable absorber<br />

needs only to be fast enough to stabilize this soliton – which is referred to as soliton mode-locking<br />

[95Kae1, 95Jun2, 96Kae].<br />

<strong>2.1</strong>.3 Overview of ultrafast <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong><br />

<strong>2.1</strong>.3.1 Overview for different <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> laser materials<br />

Table <strong>2.1</strong>.1 to Table <strong>2.1</strong>.3 give a full overview of <strong>the</strong> different results that have been achieved using<br />

different <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong>. The long list as shown in Table <strong>2.1</strong>.2 demonstrates how active <strong>the</strong> field<br />

of cw mode-locked <strong>lasers</strong> has been. The shortest pulses in <strong>the</strong> two optical cycle regime are being<br />

generated by <strong>the</strong> Ti:sapphire laser using Kerr-Lens Mode-locking (KLM). O<strong>the</strong>rwise, more recent<br />

results clearly demonstrate that <strong>the</strong> emphasis has shifted towards SESAM mode-locking because<br />

more stable and self-starting mode-locking can be achieved and <strong>the</strong> saturable absorber can be<br />

optimized independently from <strong>the</strong> cavity design. This allowed us to push <strong>the</strong> frontier in terms of<br />

pulse repetition rate and pulse energy by several orders of magnitude. Today, we can obtain a<br />

pulse repetition rate of about 160 GHz as compared to around 1 GHz in 1990. In addition, we have<br />

increased <strong>the</strong> pulse energy from <strong>the</strong> nJ-regime to more than 10 μJ from a passively mode-locked<br />

diode-pumped <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> laser at 10–50 MHz pulse repetition rates during <strong>the</strong> last decade which is<br />

an increase of more than four orders of magnitude. More results are summarized in Table <strong>2.1</strong>.2 and<br />

discussed below in Sect. <strong>2.1</strong>.3.1.1 to Sect. <strong>2.1</strong>.3.1.3. Q-switching results are restricted to microchip<br />

<strong>lasers</strong> because <strong>the</strong> pulse duration scales with <strong>the</strong> photon cavity lifetime. Thus, <strong>the</strong> shorter <strong>the</strong> laser<br />

cavity, <strong>the</strong> shorter <strong>the</strong> pulses that can be generated as discussed in Sect. <strong>2.1</strong>.3.1.4.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> past few years, a novel type of laser has bridged <strong>the</strong> gap between semiconductor <strong>lasers</strong><br />

and <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong>. The Vertical-External-Cavity Surface-Emitting Laser (VECSEL) [99Kuz]<br />

Landolt-Börnstein<br />

New Series VIII/1B1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!