17.10.2014 Views

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

2.1 Ultrafast solid-state lasers - ETH - the Keller Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ref. p. 134] <strong>2.1</strong> <strong>Ultrafast</strong> <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> 81<br />

100<br />

Reflectivity R [%]<br />

R ns<br />

95<br />

F sat,A<br />

= 18 J/cm 2<br />

Rns= 3.7%<br />

R<br />

= 4.9%<br />

R 0<br />

R ns<br />

90<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Incident pulse fluence F p,A [ J/cm 2 ]<br />

Fig. <strong>2.1</strong>.9. Measured nonlinear reflectivity as a<br />

function of incident pulse fluence on a typical<br />

SESAM. Theoretical fit determines <strong>the</strong> macroscopic<br />

saturable absorber parameters: saturation fluence<br />

F sat,A, modulation depth ΔR and nonsaturable loss<br />

ΔR ns.<br />

good fit and determine <strong>the</strong> saturation fluence F sat,A , modulation depth ΔR and nonsaturable<br />

losses ΔR ns of <strong>the</strong> absorber [95Bro1, 04Hai].<br />

The modulation depth is typically small (i.e. a few percent to a fraction of a percent!) to prevent<br />

Q-switching instabilities in passively mode-locked <strong>solid</strong>-<strong>state</strong> <strong>lasers</strong> [99Hoe1]. Thus it is reasonable<br />

to make <strong>the</strong> following approximation:<br />

ΔR =1− e −2q0 ≈ 2q 0 , q 0 ≪ 1 , (<strong>2.1</strong>.6)<br />

where q 0 is <strong>the</strong> unsaturated amplitude loss coefficient.<br />

The saturation of an absorber can be described with <strong>the</strong> following differential equation [89Agr]:<br />

dq (t)<br />

dt<br />

= − q (t) − q 0<br />

τ A<br />

−<br />

q (t) P (t)<br />

E sat,A<br />

, (<strong>2.1</strong>.7)<br />

where q (t) is <strong>the</strong> saturable amplitude loss coefficient that does not include any nonsaturable losses<br />

and P (t) is <strong>the</strong> time-dependent power incident on <strong>the</strong> absorber. Note that (<strong>2.1</strong>.7) may not be<br />

precise for high excitations where inverse saturable absorption can start to become important: For<br />

example, high excitation many times above <strong>the</strong> saturation fluence can result in additional effects<br />

such as two-photon absorptions, free carrier absorption, <strong>the</strong>rmal and even various damage effects<br />

[99Tho], [05Gra2]. Two-photon absorption only starts to become significant in <strong>the</strong> femtosecond<br />

pulse width regime and results in an earlier roll-off of <strong>the</strong> nonlinear reflectivity at high incident<br />

pulse fluences. This is a well-known effect and has been used in power-limiting devices before<br />

[86Wal]. In this regime, however, <strong>the</strong> absorber is operated more closely to <strong>the</strong> damage threshold<br />

which needs to be evaluated separately. Our experience is that damage in semiconductor saturable<br />

absorbers typically occurs at around 100 times <strong>the</strong> saturation fluence of <strong>the</strong> absorber with longterm<br />

degradation observed close to below this damage threshold. Therefore, we normally operate<br />

<strong>the</strong> device a least an order of magnitude below this damage threshold, ideally at an incident pulse<br />

fluence of 3 to 5 times <strong>the</strong> saturation fluence of <strong>the</strong> absorber. We <strong>the</strong>refore neglect <strong>the</strong>se very<br />

high-fluence effects in <strong>the</strong> following discussion. They, however, will become important again for<br />

suppressing Q-switching instabilities and will be discussed in more detail in Sect. <strong>2.1</strong>.6.8.<br />

At any time t <strong>the</strong> reflected (or transmitted) intensity I out (t) from <strong>the</strong> saturable absorber is<br />

given by<br />

I out (t) =R (t) I in (t) =e −2q(t) I in (t) (<strong>2.1</strong>.8)<br />

for a given input pulse I in (t). Then <strong>the</strong> total net reflectivity is given by<br />

Landolt-Börnstein<br />

New Series VIII/1B1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!