Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

16.10.2014 Views

gossip column. They wanted a gossip column and I didn't think that it was appropriate. I made the statement that there was enough gossip, and small talk, you know, there already and we didn't need to formalize it with a column and the gentleman, who was my dean and who was the person I reported to under this project, said, "Well, I want to tell you something." He said, "Gossip is a part of America." He said, "The highest paid journalist in America is a man named Walter Winchell and that's what his column is. Really, if we get right down to it, it's gossip. So," he said, "give them a gossip column." And I relented on that basis. I decided I would do it thoroughly, so I picked out about eight or ten people, men and women, mostly women, who were persons who had had some disappointments on that campus, like girls who had pledged a sorority and did not make it or girls who were less attractive than others who had been pushed aside for one reason or the other. I asked them, individually, and privately, to submit to me gossip and to submit it to me at my post office box, anonymously. And I got some real, juicy gossip. And I started to print it. And then I got burned in effigy because they were mad at this column,it was so introspective and devastating--but they asked for it. Q: Was this the same people who had picketed in the first place? A: I'm sure. I'm sure. The ones who insisted on its inclusion. Q: How large a paper was it? A: Eight pages and we had a circulation that would cover the campus. We had about, I guess, about forty-five hundred kids on the campus. It was an eight page paper. Q: How did you have it published? Privately or was it . . . A: No, it was published by the school, by the printing press there at the school, yes. Q: What was the name of the paper? A: Tennessee State Collegian. Q: So that was your second experience with writing up . . . A: Yes, it really was, yes. I remember one of the editorials that I wrote that the Dean was just really enamored of and it was "Are You in College or Is College in You?" Q: Oh? What was the tenor of the thing? A: Well, the thrust of it was: "Were you just in college physically or was the concept of college imbedded in your personality and in your thought process?" If you were just in college physically, you really didn't care much about what went on or how things went, you weren't really concerned about improving

yourself and so forth. Whereas, in contradistinction, if you had college in you, then the school itself became a method by which you enlarged your own perceptions, in which you elasticized your own mind and where you prepared yourself to make a contribution to society. That was the concept of the differential. Q: And he really liked that? A: Oh, he really liked that, yes. He said that was "deep." He said, "NOW that's deep. I like that .I1 (laughter) Q: How large a staff did you have for the newspaper? A: We had about eight or ten people. Q: Are you still in contact with any of those eight or ten? A: No, I don't think so. As a matter of fact, I can't even remember who they were, to tell you the truth. (pause) Got it out once a month, I suppose, 1 don't really remember. Q: How did you get to be editor of this? Did you actively go after it? A: Well, I think the paper was commissioned through the student council and I was president of the student council. The student council had to make a judgement as to who should be the editor and I suppose I just kind of got it shoved at me, really. I had taken a couple of journalism courses and I had done fairly well, so . . . Q: What were your functions that you performed in the student council? A: The student council was divided into four components. We had two freshman representatives, two sophomore representatives, two juniors and two seniors. I had been a member of the student council since my freshman year. Mostly, we were a liaison between students and the faculty and the administration; you know, to articulate the needs, the requests and so forth, of the student body. From time to time, disciplinary problems that arose would be given to us by the administration to make recommendations as to what should be done in a particular instance. As I look back on it, I think that the disciplinary prablems that they gave us were ones that they found it difficult to deal with and they felt that if we gave our version, our impact on it, then it sort of covered their behinds a little bit, you know; so it could be a student decision rather than an administrative one. Q: Do you remember any instances of . . . A: I remember one that I thought that we got shafted on. I suppose that's why it sticks in my mind. There was an extremely, I mean extremely, attractive young lady who came from St. Louis who said that one of her parents was baack and the other was Chinese. She was a beautiful person physically and notitoo bad mentally. She was absolutely exquisite. She could have been a movielstar.

gossip column. They wanted a gossip column and I didn't think that it was<br />

appropriate. I made the statement that there was enough gossip, and small<br />

talk, you know, there already and we didn't need to formalize it with a column<br />

and the gentleman, who was my dean and who was the person I reported to under<br />

this project, said, "Well, I want to tell you something." He said, "Gossip<br />

is a part <strong>of</strong> America." He said, "The highest paid journalist in America is<br />

a man named Walter Winchell and that's what his column is. Really, if we get<br />

right down to it, it's gossip. So," he said, "give them a gossip column."<br />

And I relented on that basis.<br />

I decided I would do it thoroughly, so I picked out about eight or ten people,<br />

men and women, mostly women, who were persons who had had some disappointments<br />

on that campus, like girls who had pledged a sorority and did not make it or<br />

girls who were less attractive than others who had been pushed aside for one<br />

reason or the other. I asked them, individually, and privately, to submit to<br />

me gossip and to submit it to me at my post <strong>of</strong>fice box, anonymously. And I<br />

got some real, juicy gossip. And I started to print it. And then I got<br />

burned in effigy because they were mad at this column,it was so introspective<br />

and devastating--but they asked for it.<br />

Q: Was this the same people who had picketed in the first place?<br />

A: I'm sure. I'm sure. The ones who insisted on its inclusion.<br />

Q: How large a paper was it?<br />

A: Eight pages and we had a circulation that would cover the campus. We<br />

had about, I guess, about forty-five hundred kids on the campus. It was an<br />

eight page paper.<br />

Q: How did you have it published? Privately or was it . . .<br />

A: No, it was published by the school, by the printing press there at the<br />

school, yes.<br />

Q: What was the name <strong>of</strong> the paper?<br />

A: Tennessee State Collegian.<br />

Q: So that was your second experience with writing up . . .<br />

A: Yes, it really was, yes. I remember one <strong>of</strong> the editorials that I wrote<br />

that the Dean was just really enamored <strong>of</strong> and it was "Are You in College or Is<br />

College in You?"<br />

Q: Oh? What was the tenor <strong>of</strong> the thing?<br />

A: Well, the thrust <strong>of</strong> it was: "Were you just in college physically or was the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> college imbedded in your personality and in your thought process?"<br />

If you were just in college physically, you really didn't care much about what<br />

went on or how things went, you weren't really concerned about improving

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!