16.10.2014 Views

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

served or rehabilitated as well as in other areas <strong>of</strong> the state.<br />

would be my motivation.<br />

And,that<br />

Q: Was there anyone particular in your district that called this to<br />

attention, or called any particular buildings to your attention?<br />

A: No, I don't think so. They wouldn't have had to, I would have just recognized<br />

it on my own.<br />

Q: In 1971, with Senator Cherry, you made a mernorlal to the U. S. Congress<br />

to continue the model cities program. What was your concern with the model<br />

cities program, sir?<br />

A: Well, the Congress had given the impression that they were going to<br />

eliminate it and we felt that it should still obtain. You see, model<br />

cities came into existence when there was a lot <strong>of</strong> strife and unrest in the<br />

inner-cities across the nation. There were riots and other kinds <strong>of</strong> things<br />

and we felt that the model cities prpgram would be a very stabilizing<br />

influence on helping people to rehabilitate themselves and to get themselves<br />

started toward the regular job market. We wanted the Congress to know that<br />

it was our view that it would be disasterous if that program went down.<br />

Q: Was the program active in your district?<br />

1<br />

A: Oh, yes, very active in my district.<br />

Q: In what way? What was being done?<br />

A: Well, the model cities program, they hired a large number <strong>of</strong> people and<br />

the focus was on neighborhoods, and getting people within a particular<br />

neighborhood, through various kinds <strong>of</strong> federal.programs, to upgrade themselves,<br />

prepare themselves for additional kinds <strong>of</strong> responsibilities in the<br />

work market. And it also <strong>of</strong>fered employyent to people during the period <strong>of</strong><br />

transition between poverty and--moving forward. There were programs that<br />

actually fed people who were in necessitest circumstances. There were<br />

programs that were geared toward freeing women to work, like day care<br />

centers and things <strong>of</strong> that sort where their children could be kept in the<br />

daytime to free them to work. A11 <strong>of</strong> those programs, we felt, had a<br />

salutary effect on government in that, if you can get people <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> welfare<br />

rolls and <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> necessitest circumstances, where they are not earning, into<br />

giving them a viable kind <strong>of</strong> an existence, it would mean a great deal more<br />

to the state, to the people themselves and to the revenue impact on the<br />

state. It would be upgraded.<br />

Q: And did it continue?<br />

A: The model cities program continued until probably--it was just phased out<br />

in 1978, as a matter <strong>of</strong> fact. There were some other programs which came<br />

into existence which helped to support the same concept. At the federal<br />

level, many <strong>of</strong> the programs that were a part <strong>of</strong> the Democratic administration<br />

previously were eliminated but then the new concept <strong>of</strong> revenue sharing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!