Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
matter <strong>of</strong> fact--with the head <strong>of</strong> the real estate group in the state and he<br />
said, "No, <strong>Cecil</strong>," and he slammed his hand down on the table and developed<br />
just a torrential nosebleed. They rushed him to the hospital. We were<br />
really arguing the whole thing out at the dinner and next morning when he<br />
woke up in the hospital there were a dozen roses there from me. Although<br />
he was my adversary, I just felt that I wanted to do that. But in the<br />
housing, the real estate people were very much opposed.<br />
Q: Who was that individual?<br />
A: I was trying to think <strong>of</strong> his name when I was telling you that. I don't<br />
remember at the moment, I just don't remember his name. He was the man<br />
who preceded Bob Cook. Bob Cook is now the head <strong>of</strong> the real estate group.<br />
He was the man who preceded Bob Cook.<br />
I<br />
Q: There were some other relatively minor bills related to this. Senator<br />
Swanson, again in 1967, introduced a bill to prohibit discrimination against<br />
unwed mothers and their children in housing. Do you recall that bill?<br />
A: I recall it. I think it was kind <strong>of</strong> tongue-in-cheek because Senator<br />
Swanson was one <strong>of</strong> the ones who was a member <strong>of</strong> that famous Ozinga committee<br />
that was killing all the housing bills. So I sort <strong>of</strong> think that was kind <strong>of</strong><br />
tongue-in-cheek. What happened to the bill, you recall?<br />
Q: It failed, sir.<br />
A: Yes. I don't think it would have much chance.<br />
Q: Evidently it was voted on. There were a couple <strong>of</strong> others like that.<br />
Senator Smith had a bill which stated that no.housing projects under the<br />
housing authority could have discrimination in them in the management or<br />
the construction work and all that sort <strong>of</strong> thing. Another one was intro-<br />
duced by Senator Newhouse--all<br />
<strong>of</strong> these, <strong>of</strong> course, had your participation<br />
in it--which said that real estate broker's licenses could be rescinded<br />
if . . . So there were a number <strong>of</strong> others that were involved in that.<br />
A: Sure. We took as many approaches to the subject as we could think <strong>of</strong>.<br />
Q: You mentioned that Swanson was on the Ozinga committee. Now, I notice<br />
that, again in 1967, there were a tremendous number <strong>of</strong> bills, eighty or<br />
nfnety, in which you cosponsored with Senator Swanson in regard to the<br />
housing authority. Most <strong>of</strong> them--well, I shouldnlt say most <strong>of</strong> them, but<br />
about twertty let's say--had to do with substituting a regional housing<br />
authority far the local housing authority and for the land clearance commissions.<br />
Do you recall that situation?<br />
A: Yes, I think I do. Those I felt were reasonable. They had to do with<br />
making sure that there was more housing built. I think that's basically<br />
what it meant:. Yes.