16.10.2014 Views

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

matter <strong>of</strong> fact--with the head <strong>of</strong> the real estate group in the state and he<br />

said, "No, <strong>Cecil</strong>," and he slammed his hand down on the table and developed<br />

just a torrential nosebleed. They rushed him to the hospital. We were<br />

really arguing the whole thing out at the dinner and next morning when he<br />

woke up in the hospital there were a dozen roses there from me. Although<br />

he was my adversary, I just felt that I wanted to do that. But in the<br />

housing, the real estate people were very much opposed.<br />

Q: Who was that individual?<br />

A: I was trying to think <strong>of</strong> his name when I was telling you that. I don't<br />

remember at the moment, I just don't remember his name. He was the man<br />

who preceded Bob Cook. Bob Cook is now the head <strong>of</strong> the real estate group.<br />

He was the man who preceded Bob Cook.<br />

I<br />

Q: There were some other relatively minor bills related to this. Senator<br />

Swanson, again in 1967, introduced a bill to prohibit discrimination against<br />

unwed mothers and their children in housing. Do you recall that bill?<br />

A: I recall it. I think it was kind <strong>of</strong> tongue-in-cheek because Senator<br />

Swanson was one <strong>of</strong> the ones who was a member <strong>of</strong> that famous Ozinga committee<br />

that was killing all the housing bills. So I sort <strong>of</strong> think that was kind <strong>of</strong><br />

tongue-in-cheek. What happened to the bill, you recall?<br />

Q: It failed, sir.<br />

A: Yes. I don't think it would have much chance.<br />

Q: Evidently it was voted on. There were a couple <strong>of</strong> others like that.<br />

Senator Smith had a bill which stated that no.housing projects under the<br />

housing authority could have discrimination in them in the management or<br />

the construction work and all that sort <strong>of</strong> thing. Another one was intro-<br />

duced by Senator Newhouse--all<br />

<strong>of</strong> these, <strong>of</strong> course, had your participation<br />

in it--which said that real estate broker's licenses could be rescinded<br />

if . . . So there were a number <strong>of</strong> others that were involved in that.<br />

A: Sure. We took as many approaches to the subject as we could think <strong>of</strong>.<br />

Q: You mentioned that Swanson was on the Ozinga committee. Now, I notice<br />

that, again in 1967, there were a tremendous number <strong>of</strong> bills, eighty or<br />

nfnety, in which you cosponsored with Senator Swanson in regard to the<br />

housing authority. Most <strong>of</strong> them--well, I shouldnlt say most <strong>of</strong> them, but<br />

about twertty let's say--had to do with substituting a regional housing<br />

authority far the local housing authority and for the land clearance commissions.<br />

Do you recall that situation?<br />

A: Yes, I think I do. Those I felt were reasonable. They had to do with<br />

making sure that there was more housing built. I think that's basically<br />

what it meant:. Yes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!