Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

16.10.2014 Views

Q: Do you remember what type of emotionality was involved when he was speaking? A: Well . . . spirited and strident debate. Be may have said damn or hell. He just got really carried away in terms of frustration with the resistance that was coming to the bill under those circumstances and probably made a very spirited speech on the subject. Q: 1 understand that this Licensing and Miscellany Committee was headed by Frank Ozinga and I understand that you were fairly strident in some comments about Ozinga and his killing of open housing. A: Yes, I might have been strident about the entire committee and Ozinga as chairman, yes, because I never felt that they ever gave me a fair hearing on it. I thought that when they came in there their minds were made up and they weren't prepared to listen to what the true facts were. In those days, it's to be remembered, I couldn't even get any newspapers, any editorial comments in favor of fair housing. I went once to Peoria and talked to the editor there who was a man that I considered a very fine man and asked for an editorial in favor of the concept and he told me that he didn't think that people who worked for him and his newspaper would do it on the basis that they didn't believe in the concept. Be said they didn't believe in the concept and hence they wouldn't write favorable articles. I said, "Well, I'm not asking that they believe in the concept, but what I'm asking is, 'Do your peaple have journalistic integrity?"' He says, "You are doggone right they do. They certainly do have journalistic integrity." I said, "Then, if they have journalistic integrity, let them make a survey, since you say they don't need it in Peoria. Let them make a survey of the city of Peoria and I'll abide those results,," He said, "You got it." So the newspaper people in the Peoria Journal-Star made a survey and they didn't write one editorial in favor of open housing, they wrote twelve editorials in favor of open housing and put them in a little booklet called A House Divided. I was just more than gratified that they did it. Although they may not have believed in it, they had the journalistic integrity to write what the survey revealed and the survey revealed a real need for open housing in Peoria which they had initially felt that they didn't need. Q: What were some of the other things that you did in order to promote this? A: Well, I talked to various kinds of people, people from religious groups, people from the real estate industry. We had some rather large people from the real estate industry. I mean well-heeled, substantial and progressive real estate people who would come in to testify against it. The real estate industry itself, the broker's industry, they were very much opposed to it. I can remember one day I was discussing it off the floor--at dinner as a

matter of fact--with the head of the real estate group in the state and he said, "No, Cecil," and he slammed his hand down on the table and developed just a torrential nosebleed. They rushed him to the hospital. We were really arguing the whole thing out at the dinner and next morning when he woke up in the hospital there were a dozen roses there from me. Although he was my adversary, I just felt that I wanted to do that. But in the housing, the real estate people were very much opposed. Q: Who was that individual? A: I was trying to think of his name when I was telling you that. I don't remember at the moment, I just don't remember his name. He was the man who preceded Bob Cook. Bob Cook is now the head of the real estate group. He was the man who preceded Bob Cook. I Q: There were some other relatively minor bills related to this. Senator Swanson, again in 1967, introduced a bill to prohibit discrimination against unwed mothers and their children in housing. Do you recall that bill? A: I recall it. I think it was kind of tongue-in-cheek because Senator Swanson was one of the ones who was a member of that famous Ozinga committee that was killing all the housing bills. So I sort of think that was kind of tongue-in-cheek. What happened to the bill, you recall? Q: It failed, sir. A: Yes. I don't think it would have much chance. Q: Evidently it was voted on. There were a couple of others like that. Senator Smith had a bill which stated that no.housing projects under the housing authority could have discrimination in them in the management or the construction work and all that sort of thing. Another one was intro- duced by Senator Newhouse--all of these, of course, had your participation in it--which said that real estate broker's licenses could be rescinded if . . . So there were a number of others that were involved in that. A: Sure. We took as many approaches to the subject as we could think of. Q: You mentioned that Swanson was on the Ozinga committee. Now, I notice that, again in 1967, there were a tremendous number of bills, eighty or nfnety, in which you cosponsored with Senator Swanson in regard to the housing authority. Most of them--well, I shouldnlt say most of them, but about twertty let's say--had to do with substituting a regional housing authority far the local housing authority and for the land clearance commissions. Do you recall that situation? A: Yes, I think I do. Those I felt were reasonable. They had to do with making sure that there was more housing built. I think that's basically what it meant:. Yes.

Q: Do you remember what type <strong>of</strong> emotionality was involved when he was<br />

speaking?<br />

A: Well . . . spirited and strident debate. Be may have said damn or hell.<br />

He just got really carried away in terms <strong>of</strong> frustration with the resistance<br />

that was coming to the bill under those circumstances and probably made a<br />

very spirited speech on the subject.<br />

Q: 1 understand that this Licensing and Miscellany Committee was headed by<br />

Frank Ozinga and I understand that you were fairly strident in some comments<br />

about Ozinga and his killing <strong>of</strong> open housing.<br />

A: Yes, I might have been strident about the entire committee and Ozinga<br />

as chairman, yes, because I never felt that they ever gave me a fair hearing<br />

on it. I thought that when they came in there their minds were made up and<br />

they weren't prepared to listen to what the true facts were.<br />

In those days, it's to be remembered, I couldn't even get any newspapers,<br />

any editorial comments in favor <strong>of</strong> fair housing. I went once to Peoria<br />

and talked to the editor there who was a man that I considered a very fine<br />

man and asked for an editorial in favor <strong>of</strong> the concept and he told me that<br />

he didn't think that people who worked for him and his newspaper would do<br />

it on the basis that they didn't believe in the concept. Be said they<br />

didn't believe in the concept and hence they wouldn't write favorable<br />

articles. I said, "Well, I'm not asking that they believe in the concept,<br />

but what I'm asking is, 'Do your peaple have journalistic integrity?"' He<br />

says, "You are doggone right they do. They certainly do have journalistic<br />

integrity." I said, "Then, if they have journalistic integrity, let them<br />

make a survey, since you say they don't need it in Peoria. Let them make a<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Peoria and I'll abide those results,," He said, "You<br />

got it."<br />

So the newspaper people in the Peoria Journal-Star made a survey and they<br />

didn't write one editorial in favor <strong>of</strong> open housing, they wrote twelve<br />

editorials in favor <strong>of</strong> open housing and put them in a little booklet called<br />

A House Divided. I was just more than gratified that they did it. Although<br />

they may not have believed in it, they had the journalistic integrity to<br />

write what the survey revealed and the survey revealed a real need for open<br />

housing in Peoria which they had initially felt that they didn't need.<br />

Q: What were some <strong>of</strong> the other things that you did in order to promote<br />

this?<br />

A: Well, I talked to various kinds <strong>of</strong> people, people from religious groups,<br />

people from the real estate industry. We had some rather large people from<br />

the real estate industry. I mean well-heeled, substantial and progressive<br />

real estate people who would come in to testify against it. The real estate<br />

industry itself, the broker's industry, they were very much opposed to it.<br />

I can remember one day I was discussing it <strong>of</strong>f the floor--at<br />

dinner as a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!