Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the form <strong>of</strong> a bill--gave thought to trying to combine the functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Human Relations Commission and the fair housing and put them into one<br />
commission, I noted that that had been done rather successfully in the<br />
state <strong>of</strong> Minnesota. Whether I ever did that by way <strong>of</strong> a bill, I don't<br />
remember, but I do remember giving it some thought. We may have tried to<br />
amend the Human Relations Act to give it the power to deal with the subject<br />
<strong>of</strong> fair housing, and I think we did take that approach on some occasions.<br />
Q: Yes. There were several bills which you introduced, rather specific<br />
bills such as making a real estate <strong>of</strong>fice a place <strong>of</strong> public accommodation<br />
subject to . . .<br />
A: That's correct. There was one to make a real estate <strong>of</strong>fice a place <strong>of</strong><br />
public accommodation. There was another to make banks and savings and<br />
loan associations a place <strong>of</strong> accomodation. I can remember that was in 1965,<br />
if I recall, because I asked Adlai Stevenson, who was a freshman legislator,<br />
to handle those bills. They were simply different approaches to the same<br />
subject matter <strong>of</strong> open housing.<br />
For instance, for the reason if you could make certain that a bank or a<br />
savings and loan could not be involved in a discriminatory action as<br />
respects housing, it would have the overall effect <strong>of</strong> opening up the<br />
housing market to minorities. The same thing with savings and loans and<br />
banks and real estate <strong>of</strong>fices. It was an attempt to put the onus on the<br />
industry that dealt with housing in contradistinction to individual cases.<br />
So that was just simply another approach that we toak. Those bills passed<br />
the House, as I remember, and they got killed in the Senate.<br />
Q: One <strong>of</strong> the things that developed through the years--in 1966, it came to<br />
a head here in Chicago--was the local municipal ordinance which apparently<br />
did the same thing that you were attempting to do at the state legislature.<br />
Of course, the Chicago ordinance was tested first in the circuit court and<br />
then in the <strong>Illinois</strong> Supreme Court and was upheld. Do you recall the<br />
circumstances around that ordinance?<br />
A: No, not in detail. I do know that there was a great deal <strong>of</strong> hue and<br />
cry concerning it because the same forces had opposed it. But Mayor<br />
Richard Daley decided he wanted to do it and it got passed in the city<br />
council on the open housing situation. And I think the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
it was with the human relations commission <strong>of</strong> the city, I think. Yes.<br />
Q: And this occurred in several other municipalities, apparently throughout<br />
the state.<br />
A: Yes.<br />
Q: Then, in 1968, the legislature validated these types <strong>of</strong> municipal<br />
ordinances.<br />
A: That's correct. Now, you've got to remember that all <strong>of</strong> that came after