16.10.2014 Views

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the form <strong>of</strong> a bill--gave thought to trying to combine the functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Human Relations Commission and the fair housing and put them into one<br />

commission, I noted that that had been done rather successfully in the<br />

state <strong>of</strong> Minnesota. Whether I ever did that by way <strong>of</strong> a bill, I don't<br />

remember, but I do remember giving it some thought. We may have tried to<br />

amend the Human Relations Act to give it the power to deal with the subject<br />

<strong>of</strong> fair housing, and I think we did take that approach on some occasions.<br />

Q: Yes. There were several bills which you introduced, rather specific<br />

bills such as making a real estate <strong>of</strong>fice a place <strong>of</strong> public accommodation<br />

subject to . . .<br />

A: That's correct. There was one to make a real estate <strong>of</strong>fice a place <strong>of</strong><br />

public accommodation. There was another to make banks and savings and<br />

loan associations a place <strong>of</strong> accomodation. I can remember that was in 1965,<br />

if I recall, because I asked Adlai Stevenson, who was a freshman legislator,<br />

to handle those bills. They were simply different approaches to the same<br />

subject matter <strong>of</strong> open housing.<br />

For instance, for the reason if you could make certain that a bank or a<br />

savings and loan could not be involved in a discriminatory action as<br />

respects housing, it would have the overall effect <strong>of</strong> opening up the<br />

housing market to minorities. The same thing with savings and loans and<br />

banks and real estate <strong>of</strong>fices. It was an attempt to put the onus on the<br />

industry that dealt with housing in contradistinction to individual cases.<br />

So that was just simply another approach that we toak. Those bills passed<br />

the House, as I remember, and they got killed in the Senate.<br />

Q: One <strong>of</strong> the things that developed through the years--in 1966, it came to<br />

a head here in Chicago--was the local municipal ordinance which apparently<br />

did the same thing that you were attempting to do at the state legislature.<br />

Of course, the Chicago ordinance was tested first in the circuit court and<br />

then in the <strong>Illinois</strong> Supreme Court and was upheld. Do you recall the<br />

circumstances around that ordinance?<br />

A: No, not in detail. I do know that there was a great deal <strong>of</strong> hue and<br />

cry concerning it because the same forces had opposed it. But Mayor<br />

Richard Daley decided he wanted to do it and it got passed in the city<br />

council on the open housing situation. And I think the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

it was with the human relations commission <strong>of</strong> the city, I think. Yes.<br />

Q: And this occurred in several other municipalities, apparently throughout<br />

the state.<br />

A: Yes.<br />

Q: Then, in 1968, the legislature validated these types <strong>of</strong> municipal<br />

ordinances.<br />

A: That's correct. Now, you've got to remember that all <strong>of</strong> that came after

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!