Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Cecil A. Partee Memoir - University of Illinois Springfield
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A: No, I do not.<br />
Q: Why were yau concerned with it?<br />
A: Because I thought it was the best thing for the women in my area and<br />
for the rest <strong>of</strong> the state.<br />
Q: Did they call this to your attention in your area or your district?<br />
A: I couldn't tell you whether they did or didn't. I could probably tell<br />
you that after the bill was introduced, there were a lot <strong>of</strong> people in<br />
my area, one in particular, who were very supportive <strong>of</strong> the concept.<br />
Q: Yes. Which brings up the subject, how did you manage your mail in<br />
the House, let's say in those days?<br />
A: Well, in those days, we did not have any <strong>of</strong>fices and we had nowhere to<br />
work from. We dictated at our desk. We had a pool <strong>of</strong> stenographers and<br />
you would get your mail and weed it out as to those letters that you felt<br />
obliged to answer. I usually tried to answer all <strong>of</strong> my mail, every single<br />
person who wrote me got some kind <strong>of</strong> an answer. If it were something that<br />
I felt obliged to dictate on, to explain either a positive or a negative<br />
position on a bill, I would do so, There were instances where you got<br />
just tons <strong>of</strong> mail on a subject that would be on postcards or something<br />
saying, "I favor House bill so and so and so and so." In that instance,<br />
so that the person would know that you had received the mail, we had some<br />
cards printed so that all your secretary had to do was to address it in<br />
the name <strong>of</strong> the person to whom it was to be sent, in which you would say<br />
either that you were opposed to the bill, and you let the people know that,<br />
or you would say you were for it. We had some stock answers that we gave<br />
in those instances. So at least their mail would be answered and it would<br />
be communicated to them first that you had received it and secondly what<br />
your position would be. There might be a bill on which you might say on a<br />
card that you have it under study and you are going to wake a decisidn soon<br />
before you voted on it, but that you would bear in mind the position that<br />
they took at the time you voted.<br />
Q: Did you receive many petitions for action?<br />
A: Very few petitions for action.<br />
Q: In 1965, Mrs. Saperstein and you plus 94 others introduced a bill on the<br />
wages. Do you recall that one?<br />
A: No. It may well have been the same bill that Kaplan had presented<br />
before, I don't know.<br />
Q: Yes, in 1959, 1965, 1967 and 1969, in all those years, it was introduced<br />
and in most cases tabled. It didn't come to a vote, evidently. When a<br />
bill . "