download the PDF version - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
download the PDF version - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
download the PDF version - Ultra High Fidelity Magazine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Free Advice<br />
<strong>the</strong> audio editors are faulty. If <strong>the</strong> music<br />
coming out isn’t peeling <strong>the</strong> paint off<br />
passing cars, <strong>the</strong>n that’s probably <strong>the</strong><br />
case.<br />
My husband and I had <strong>the</strong> distinct pleasure<br />
of meeting you at <strong>the</strong> 1993 Toronto hi-fi<br />
show. At <strong>the</strong> time we, were in <strong>the</strong> search for<br />
a musical system for our home. When we<br />
had asked you about <strong>the</strong> Totem One speaker<br />
playing in a different room, you had waxed<br />
enthusiastically about <strong>the</strong>m. A short while<br />
later, we purchased a pair and have enjoyed<br />
<strong>the</strong>m ever since. Thank you also for <strong>the</strong><br />
recommendation of Linn Intek integrated<br />
amplifier — it works well with <strong>the</strong> Totem<br />
speakers, and fit nicely into our budget.<br />
Now, after 10 years, we are plunging<br />
into <strong>the</strong> realm of home <strong>the</strong>atre, and are<br />
again seeking your advice. I notice that<br />
you will be reviewing <strong>the</strong> Totem Signature<br />
One Center speaker in <strong>the</strong> upcoming issue<br />
of UHF. Although I certainly plan to read<br />
<strong>the</strong> full review, I have <strong>the</strong> opportunity right<br />
now to buy this speaker, and ask if it would<br />
be as pleasing, musically, as <strong>the</strong> Totem Ones<br />
have been.<br />
Tina Morgan<br />
WINDSOR, ON<br />
8 ULTRA HIGH FIDELITY <strong>Magazine</strong><br />
As we write this, Tina, we have completed<br />
<strong>the</strong> preliminary listening tests on<br />
<strong>the</strong> Model One Center, though we have<br />
yet to do <strong>the</strong> group evaluation and <strong>the</strong><br />
instrument tests. Preliminary conclusion:<br />
it doesn’t actually sound identical<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Model One, for reasons that are<br />
clearly visible: it has a second woofer, it<br />
has a different size cabinet, and it lies on<br />
its side instead of being upright.<br />
The same can of course be said<br />
of o<strong>the</strong>r central speakers. The badge<br />
doesn’t guarantee that it will sound like<br />
<strong>the</strong> main speakers sharing that badge.<br />
That said, our preliminary listening<br />
session, which was quite long, indicates<br />
that <strong>the</strong> speaker works very well, and<br />
it is certainly <strong>the</strong> one that is likely to<br />
blend best with your Model Ones. We’d<br />
recommend getting it.<br />
This may be a dumb question, but here it<br />
is. I currently use a Panamax bar to protect<br />
against power interruptions. I live in <strong>the</strong><br />
country and we lose our power during <strong>the</strong><br />
thunderstorm season, plus severe winter<br />
conditions. Does this Gutwire Stingray<br />
power bar do <strong>the</strong> same thing, or will I still<br />
require <strong>the</strong> Panamax?<br />
David J. Gilchrist<br />
ROCKWOOD, ON<br />
Who was it who once said that that a<br />
dumb question is <strong>the</strong> one you don’t ask?<br />
No, <strong>the</strong> Gutwire Stingray does not provide<br />
surge protection, and we don’t know<br />
of any way to provide it without taking a<br />
major performance hit. Living where we<br />
do, where century-old trees tower over<br />
<strong>the</strong> building like large natural lightning<br />
rods, we don’t worry much about surges.<br />
Makers of protection devices such as<br />
<strong>the</strong> Panamax have an obvious reason to<br />
overstate <strong>the</strong> importance of protection.<br />
But <strong>the</strong>n again you don’t live where<br />
we do, so you’ll need to evaluate <strong>the</strong><br />
odds of having Mo<strong>the</strong>r Nature take<br />
a fatal swipe at your investment. Two<br />
questions, <strong>the</strong>n. First, since we presume<br />
you don’t use a protected power bar on<br />
everything in <strong>the</strong> house, when was <strong>the</strong><br />
last time you lost an electrical product<br />
to a lightning storm? Second question:<br />
does your householder policy cover this<br />
sort of damage?<br />
I am looking for a good amp for upgrading<br />
my system. I browsed through most of<br />
your past issues. I became a subscriber in<br />
<strong>the</strong> early 90’s. I found your review of <strong>the</strong><br />
McIntosh MC7150 (issue No. 37) and I<br />
admire your candid comments. It’s 10 years<br />
now and <strong>the</strong> Mac MA6900 has received good<br />
reviews in <strong>the</strong> US and o<strong>the</strong>r places. Will you<br />
be doing a review of this model in <strong>the</strong> near<br />
future? If not, have you heard of it and what<br />
is your general opinion.<br />
I almost bought <strong>the</strong> Jadis Orchestra<br />
Reference but <strong>the</strong>n I read your review about<br />
<strong>the</strong> short supply of <strong>the</strong> KT90 and I had second<br />
thought. According to an ad in Stereophile,<br />
<strong>the</strong> 2003 model of this amp in <strong>the</strong> US market<br />
uses EL34’s. Again, will you do a review of<br />
it in <strong>the</strong> near future and if not, can I have<br />
some general comments?<br />
I am a retiree of 66 years old, so <strong>the</strong> amp<br />
I am looking for may be <strong>the</strong> last one in my<br />
life and I have to be careful. My present amp<br />
is a tiny Italian integrated with two EL34’s,<br />
and is quite musical. Its latest model, Unison<br />
Research S2K (KT88 instead of EL34) got<br />
a class B grading by Stereophile.<br />
Anthony Tang<br />
HONG KONG<br />
Not many years after this magazine<br />
was founded, some 21 years ago, we commented<br />
on a letter by saying that if we<br />
agreed with what <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r magazines<br />
write, we wouldn’t bo<strong>the</strong>r producing<br />
this one. To that we would add a second<br />
observation: <strong>the</strong>re is no audio product<br />
so awful that it hasn’t received a good<br />
review from someone, somewhere.<br />
Our comments on <strong>the</strong> MC7150 don’t<br />
necessarily carry over to all o<strong>the</strong>r models<br />
of <strong>the</strong> marque, of course, though <strong>the</strong>