DFHADprototype071409.. - Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
DFHADprototype071409.. - Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
DFHADprototype071409.. - Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTION 3 – HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS<br />
HOFFMAN MAJOR DRAINAGEWAY PLANNING<br />
FLOOD HAZARD AREA DELINEATION<br />
3.1 OVERVIEW<br />
The storm runoff hydrographs <strong>and</strong> routing for the study were generated using the Environm ental Protection<br />
Agency’s 2006 version of Stormwater Manage ment Model (SW MM) Version 5.0. The physical<br />
characteristics for each subwatershed in the SWMM analysis include:<br />
• <strong>Drainage</strong> area<br />
• Width of the subwatershed<br />
• Subwatershed slope<br />
• Percent imperviousness<br />
• Subarea routing<br />
• Percent routed<br />
• Soil infiltration rates<br />
• Surface retention storage values<br />
The peak flow results from the SWMM m odel were com pared to the re sults in the FEMA FIS at various<br />
locations. The comparison process is discussed in more detail in Section 3.6<br />
In acco rdance with Dis trict policy, existing privatel y-owned detention basins we re not inclu ded in th e<br />
hydrologic models because of the uncertainty associated with their continued ex istence. There are no<br />
known publicly-owned <strong>and</strong> maintained detention basins in the watershed area.<br />
The drainage network is generally comprised of subwatersheds, design points, <strong>and</strong> open channels.<br />
TABLE 3-1<br />
Incremental Rainfall Depths (inches)<br />
Time<br />
Return Period (Year)<br />
(min)<br />
2 5 10 25 50 100 500<br />
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
5 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03<br />
10 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.10<br />
15 0.08 0.12 0.14 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.15<br />
20 0.16 0.22 0.25 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.26<br />
25 0.25 0.36 0.42 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.46<br />
30 0.14 0.18 0.20 0.50 0.59 0.68 0.82<br />
35 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.24 0.28 0.38 0.46<br />
40 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.26<br />
45 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.12 0.17 0.20<br />
50 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16<br />
55 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.13<br />
60 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.13<br />
65 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.13<br />
70 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.07<br />
75 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.07<br />
80 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04<br />
85 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04<br />
90 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />
95 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />
100 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />
105 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />
110 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />
115 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />
120 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />
1-Hour Point<br />
Rainfall (inches)<br />
1.00 1.42 1.68 2.01 2.35 2.71 3.35<br />
The “Hoffman <strong>Drainage</strong>way Baseline Hydrology Repor t” was published in September of 2006 <strong>and</strong> the<br />
hydrologic calculations were accep ted by the <strong>Urban</strong> Drai nage <strong>and</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>District</strong> on October 11,<br />
2006.<br />
3.2 DESIGN RAINFALL<br />
The 5-m inute increm ental rainfall depths for the 2- , 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, <strong>and</strong> 100-year storm events were<br />
gathered from table 9.5 in the Ad ams County Development St<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> Regulations. The EPA SW MM<br />
model then distributed the rainfall depths over a 2- hour storm duration. The increm ental rainfall depths<br />
used are shown in Table 3-1.<br />
3-1<br />
DFHAD Prototype