14.10.2014 Views

DFHADprototype071409.. - Urban Drainage and Flood Control District

DFHADprototype071409.. - Urban Drainage and Flood Control District

DFHADprototype071409.. - Urban Drainage and Flood Control District

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION 3 – HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS<br />

HOFFMAN MAJOR DRAINAGEWAY PLANNING<br />

FLOOD HAZARD AREA DELINEATION<br />

3.1 OVERVIEW<br />

The storm runoff hydrographs <strong>and</strong> routing for the study were generated using the Environm ental Protection<br />

Agency’s 2006 version of Stormwater Manage ment Model (SW MM) Version 5.0. The physical<br />

characteristics for each subwatershed in the SWMM analysis include:<br />

• <strong>Drainage</strong> area<br />

• Width of the subwatershed<br />

• Subwatershed slope<br />

• Percent imperviousness<br />

• Subarea routing<br />

• Percent routed<br />

• Soil infiltration rates<br />

• Surface retention storage values<br />

The peak flow results from the SWMM m odel were com pared to the re sults in the FEMA FIS at various<br />

locations. The comparison process is discussed in more detail in Section 3.6<br />

In acco rdance with Dis trict policy, existing privatel y-owned detention basins we re not inclu ded in th e<br />

hydrologic models because of the uncertainty associated with their continued ex istence. There are no<br />

known publicly-owned <strong>and</strong> maintained detention basins in the watershed area.<br />

The drainage network is generally comprised of subwatersheds, design points, <strong>and</strong> open channels.<br />

TABLE 3-1<br />

Incremental Rainfall Depths (inches)<br />

Time<br />

Return Period (Year)<br />

(min)<br />

2 5 10 25 50 100 500<br />

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

5 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03<br />

10 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.10<br />

15 0.08 0.12 0.14 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.15<br />

20 0.16 0.22 0.25 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.26<br />

25 0.25 0.36 0.42 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.46<br />

30 0.14 0.18 0.20 0.50 0.59 0.68 0.82<br />

35 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.24 0.28 0.38 0.46<br />

40 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.26<br />

45 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.12 0.17 0.20<br />

50 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16<br />

55 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.13<br />

60 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.13<br />

65 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.13<br />

70 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.07<br />

75 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.07<br />

80 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04<br />

85 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04<br />

90 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

95 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

100 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

105 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

110 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

115 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

120 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04<br />

1-Hour Point<br />

Rainfall (inches)<br />

1.00 1.42 1.68 2.01 2.35 2.71 3.35<br />

The “Hoffman <strong>Drainage</strong>way Baseline Hydrology Repor t” was published in September of 2006 <strong>and</strong> the<br />

hydrologic calculations were accep ted by the <strong>Urban</strong> Drai nage <strong>and</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>District</strong> on October 11,<br />

2006.<br />

3.2 DESIGN RAINFALL<br />

The 5-m inute increm ental rainfall depths for the 2- , 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, <strong>and</strong> 100-year storm events were<br />

gathered from table 9.5 in the Ad ams County Development St<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> Regulations. The EPA SW MM<br />

model then distributed the rainfall depths over a 2- hour storm duration. The increm ental rainfall depths<br />

used are shown in Table 3-1.<br />

3-1<br />

DFHAD Prototype

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!