Download the entire Volume 3 Criteria Manual - Urban Drainage ...

Download the entire Volume 3 Criteria Manual - Urban Drainage ... Download the entire Volume 3 Criteria Manual - Urban Drainage ...

14.10.2014 Views

Treatment BMPs Chapter 4 3.0 References Wright Water Engineers and Geosyntec Consultants. 2010. International Stormwater Best Management Practices Database Pollutant Category Summary: Fecal Indicator Bacteria. Prepared for WERF, FHWA and EWRI-ASCE. 4-4 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District November 2010 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 3

Grass Buffer T-1 Description Grass buffers are densely vegetated strips of grass designed to accept sheet flow from upgradient development. Properly designed grass buffers play a key role in LID, enabling infiltration and slowing runoff. Grass buffers provide filtration (straining) of sediment. Buffers differ from swales in that they are designed to accommodate overland sheet flow rather than concentrated or channelized flow. Site Selection Grass buffers can be incorporated into a wide range of development settings. Runoff can be directly accepted from a parking lot, roadway, or the roof of a Photograph GB-1. A flush curb allows roadway runoff to sheet flow through the grass buffer. Flows are then further treated by the grass swale. Photo courtesy of Muller Engineering. structure, provided the flow is distributed in a uniform manner over the width of the buffer. This can be achieved through the use of flush curbs, slotted curbs, or level spreaders where needed. Grass buffers are often used in conjunction with grass swales. They are well suited for use in riparian zones to assist in stabilizing channel banks adjacent to major drainageways and receiving waters. These areas can also sometimes serve multiple functions such as recreation. Hydrologic Soil Groups A and B provide the best infiltration capacity for grass buffers. For Type C and D soils, buffers still serve to provide filtration (straining) although infiltration rates are lower. Designing for Maintenance Recommended ongoing maintenance practices for all BMPs are provided in Chapter 6 of this manual. During design the following should be considered to ensure ease of maintenance over the long-term: • Where appropriate (where vehicle safety would not be impacted), install the top of the buffer 1 to 3 inches below the adjacent pavement so that growth of vegetation and accumulation of sediment at the edge of the strip does not prevent runoff from entering the buffer. Alternatively, a sloped edge can be used adjacent to vehicular traffic areas. • Amend soils to encourage deep roots and reduce irrigation requirements, as well as promote infiltration. Grass Buffer Functions LID/Volume Red. Yes WQCV Capture No WQCV+Flood Control No Fact Sheet Includes EURV Guidance No Typical Effectiveness for Targeted Pollutants 3 Sediment/Solids Good Nutrients Moderate Total Metals Good Bacteria Poor Other Considerations Life-cycle Costs Low 3 Based primarily on data from the International Stormwater BMP Database (www.bmpdatabase.org). November 2010 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District GB-1 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 3

Grass Buffer T-1<br />

Description<br />

Grass buffers are densely vegetated<br />

strips of grass designed to accept sheet<br />

flow from upgradient development.<br />

Properly designed grass buffers play a<br />

key role in LID, enabling infiltration and<br />

slowing runoff. Grass buffers provide<br />

filtration (straining) of sediment.<br />

Buffers differ from swales in that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are designed to accommodate overland<br />

sheet flow ra<strong>the</strong>r than concentrated or<br />

channelized flow.<br />

Site Selection<br />

Grass buffers can be incorporated into a<br />

wide range of development settings.<br />

Runoff can be directly accepted from a<br />

parking lot, roadway, or <strong>the</strong> roof of a<br />

Photograph GB-1. A flush curb allows roadway runoff to sheet flow<br />

through <strong>the</strong> grass buffer. Flows are <strong>the</strong>n fur<strong>the</strong>r treated by <strong>the</strong> grass<br />

swale. Photo courtesy of Muller Engineering.<br />

structure, provided <strong>the</strong> flow is distributed in a uniform manner over <strong>the</strong> width of <strong>the</strong> buffer. This can be<br />

achieved through <strong>the</strong> use of flush curbs, slotted curbs, or level spreaders where needed. Grass buffers are<br />

often used in conjunction with grass swales. They are well suited for use in riparian zones to assist in<br />

stabilizing channel banks adjacent to major drainageways and receiving waters. These areas can also<br />

sometimes serve multiple functions such as recreation.<br />

Hydrologic Soil Groups A and B provide <strong>the</strong> best infiltration<br />

capacity for grass buffers. For Type C and D soils, buffers still<br />

serve to provide filtration (straining) although infiltration rates are<br />

lower.<br />

Designing for Maintenance<br />

Recommended ongoing maintenance practices for all BMPs are<br />

provided in Chapter 6 of this manual. During design <strong>the</strong><br />

following should be considered to ensure ease of maintenance<br />

over <strong>the</strong> long-term:<br />

• Where appropriate (where vehicle safety would not be<br />

impacted), install <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> buffer 1 to 3 inches below <strong>the</strong><br />

adjacent pavement so that growth of vegetation and<br />

accumulation of sediment at <strong>the</strong> edge of <strong>the</strong> strip does not<br />

prevent runoff from entering <strong>the</strong> buffer. Alternatively, a<br />

sloped edge can be used adjacent to vehicular traffic areas.<br />

• Amend soils to encourage deep roots and reduce irrigation<br />

requirements, as well as promote infiltration.<br />

Grass Buffer<br />

Functions<br />

LID/<strong>Volume</strong> Red.<br />

Yes<br />

WQCV Capture<br />

No<br />

WQCV+Flood Control No<br />

Fact Sheet Includes<br />

EURV Guidance<br />

No<br />

Typical Effectiveness for Targeted<br />

Pollutants 3<br />

Sediment/Solids<br />

Good<br />

Nutrients<br />

Moderate<br />

Total Metals<br />

Good<br />

Bacteria<br />

Poor<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Considerations<br />

Life-cycle Costs<br />

Low<br />

3<br />

Based primarily on data from <strong>the</strong><br />

International Stormwater BMP Database<br />

(www.bmpdatabase.org).<br />

November 2010 <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>Drainage</strong> and Flood Control District GB-1<br />

<strong>Urban</strong> Storm <strong>Drainage</strong> <strong>Criteria</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!